http://philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/ Your source for Phillies news, events, trade rumors, tickets, bars and other fun stuff. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:33:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-2053 benjamin franklin Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:38:38 +0000 http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/#comment-2053 p.s. they aren't good on the mets p.s. they aren’t good on the mets

]]> http://philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-2052 benjamin franklin Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:37:08 +0000 http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/#comment-2052 I just arrived here in philly after succesfully creing a time machine and I came all this way for this. These guys may have been good to great on the Devil rays or royals, the 2008 Phillies or even the 1776 Phillidaphia Federalists. Alexander Hamilton could bench press Jason Werth, and wiliam penn could throw a peice of parchment or a ball-point-pen faster then Durbin. I just arrived here in philly after succesfully creing a time machine and I came all this way for this. These guys may have been good to great on the Devil rays or royals, the 2008 Phillies or even the 1776 Phillidaphia Federalists. Alexander Hamilton could bench press Jason Werth, and wiliam penn could throw a peice of parchment or a ball-point-pen faster then Durbin.

]]> http://philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-2034 35 For 2008: 5 Who Are Great … Or Good Enough? — iRboto.com, not iRobot.com ;-) Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:48:35 +0000 http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2008/02/35-for-2008-5-who-are-great-or-good-enough/#comment-2034 [...] This week, I’m previewing the 2008 Phillies by presenting the 35 players — as of today — who will mean most for repeated success. I say “as of today” because this list will definitely change. Last year, a list like this wouldn’t have mentioned JC Romero or Kyle Kendrick, and would’ve mentioned Matt Smith and Rod Barajas. For the series, I divided the 35 players into seven groups, each one to be presented daily. The groups have a common thread, which each player seems to follow as his 2008 miss Read more… [...] [...] This week, I’m previewing the 2008 Phillies by presenting the 35 players — as of today — who will mean most for repeated success. I say “as of today” because this list will definitely change. Last year, a list like this wouldn’t have mentioned JC Romero or Kyle Kendrick, and would’ve mentioned Matt Smith and Rod Barajas. For the series, I divided the 35 players into seven groups, each one to be presented daily. The groups have a common thread, which each player seems to follow as his 2008 miss Read more… [...]

]]>