Forget Week One, The Season Starts At Shea
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, April 08, 2008 12:26 AM | Comments: 10
Posts
I’ll say it — the first week of the 2008 season was the tune-up, the spring after the spring, the tim
e to dust off the cobwebs. The bullpen worked out their kinks; the rotation stretched a bit; the offense found their step. The season begins today at Shea Stadium.
The Phils begin their first series with their chief rivals, the Mets, today at the home opener at Shea Stadium. You all know the history — Mets won division over the Phils in 2006; Mets had the division won last year but choked, while the Phils made a tremendous run to take the crown on the last day; the offseason featured a few barbs; a lot of sportswriters think one of the 50 men between these two teams will be murdered at some point soon.
Let’s talk it up. First, Pat Burrell:
“It could be worse. It could be two teams that finish in last place every year and nobody cares. So it’s exciting. Personally I enjoy going to NY and playing, there’s a little extra excitement there and especially with what happened last year, I don’t think anybody would say otherwise.”
Manager Charlie Manuel:
“As long as we whip them, we don’t have to make a big deal out of it. They’ll talk, we’ll hit. That’s the only way I see it.”
“I am truly excited. People love to hate you, and they really do hate you. It’s something where the guys on the other team, I think they enjoy it. It’s not like we hate them. We don’t hate each other. But we just enjoy playing against each other because we have tremendous talent and it makes it very exciting for the fans.”
Willie Randolph deflected the talk about the Phillies and made it more about coming home:
“It will be good to be home. It’s good to make a statement early.”
The only Met quoted about the series at this point is one of the newest, Brian Schneider:
“I’m looking forward to it. It will be a blast. It will be kind of crazy against them.”
Juicy. Rollins did add this about the rivalry:
“You know about the Mets and the Phillies. We’ll never be [the Red Sox] and [Yankees] by any means, but the intensity is starting to pick up. The pressure is back on them, if you ask me. New York is always supposed to be better than any other city in baseball — the fans expect that and the media expects that, so the team is going to feel the same way. So they’re already under the microscope.”
Basically, a lot of words, but none of them volatile. Don’t expect volatile. While Jayson Stark said there’d be a brawl, I’m betting against it. These teams don’t loathe each other; the rivalry is too young, too fresh, really. Remember, the Phils and Mets have only been contenders together for the past three seasons, and before that, there were two seasons (1976, 1986) where both teams were good at the same time.
That doesn’t mean we should downplay the series; on the contrary, we should totally be revved up for the set. This is where the season really begins, where the Phils will be tested for the first time at all facets of their game. Injuries or not, the Mets are coming out to play, especially as they open Shea for the final time. There may not be a battle royal on the Shea grass, but there will be 100 percent effort, and the play will be fierce. It’s time for the Phils to load up their guns — this is where the marathon kicks in.

















Posts: 0 Fran
Here we go baby, the season starts now!!!
Posted: 12:34 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 chris.I
We have a Mets killer (Burrell), A loaded gun (Rollins), The sleeping monster about to awake (Howard), and The man who needs no introduction (Utley)..This Sh*t is about to get really ugly for the Mets. Everyone bring out the brooms cause were about to get our first sweep of the year. I hope we sink Perez early
Posted: 12:54 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 NateB
there will be no brawl on the field- the players are too mature for that. mets fans in the stands might start some fights tho when their team starts getting rocked, so be careful. anyway- this is gonna be a fun series!!!
Posted: 01:50 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 Doc's Sports Predictions Guy
I want to wait to see who the umps are, but I have a feeling this is going to be a high scoring series. No sweeps either way. Both of these bullpens are awful and that, along with both teams’ Never-Say-Die attitudes is going to make this the most back-and-forth, unpredictable, entertaining series of the week.
Burrell can talk all he wants about the Mets, since he owns them. But Rollins? One of the weakest N.L. MVP’s ever. I mean, if the Mets don’t completely and utterly collapse in the final month is that guy getting 10 votes? No way.
Posted: 03:07 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 mick
Collapse or no collapse Rollins gets plenty of votes–he had an unbelievable year. Utley, however, wins MVP had he not been hurt. The kid in Colorado probably was more deserving
Posted: 08:00 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 Fran
Prediction:
Phillies- 7
Mets- 4
Posted: 08:45 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 558 Brian Michael
You gotta love Charlie’s quote. He’s focused on winning and that’s it. Let’s hope he brings his A game along with the rest of the club.
Posted: 10:56 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
I cant believe they still have the audacity to have Moyer in the rotation this year. I respect him a lot, but I predict he will not finish the season as the 3rd starter, if hes even still in the roatation. He may pitch well against the mets today, but hes far too susceptible to the umpires strike zone. If those hitters on the Mets dont knock him out by the 4th inning they should be embarrassed, and i cant stand the mets.
Posted: 11:35 AM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 Mr Met
Charlie Manuel is a horses ass.
Posted: 12:36 PM on April 8, 2008
Posts: 0 Gnomicide
If the Mets don’t utterly collapse in the second half? Of course they utterly collapse and seven straight games of that collapse were at the hands of the Phillies, with whom Rollins happens to be a member of and played in 162 games last season.
I hate people downplaying Rollins achievement by blaming it all on the Mets and not giving credit where credit is deserved. Holliday had a great season too and probably was equally deserving of the award, but Rollins is far from being a poor choice or the wrong choice. Looking at statistics and leadership it was a tough decision for the writers and they chose one way this year. Who know how’ll they pick next year.
Posted: 12:43 PM on April 8, 2008