Mets Overcome Phils In 12
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Mon, July 07, 2008 12:56 AM | Comments: 153
Posts
Before we place blame on everyone under the sun, the Phils didn’t deserve to be tied in the first place.
The Phillies were down 2-0 with two outs and two strikes in the bottom of the ninth. Billy Wagner was ready to put away his former team, but in true trademark Phillie fashion, Jayson Werth buried a ball deep into the left-center field seats to tie the game. It was awesome, eye-opening, shocking stuff, but it meant not much. The Mets won anyway, as Fernando Tatis (of all people) homered to win it in the twelfth. The final: 4-2.
That the homer was off Chad Durbin isn’t the matter. The Mets deserved to win this one. The Phils’ offense was truly sickening — they “scattered” four hits off a wild Oliver Perez. They couldn’t score off him early and it doomed them. The Mets bullpen — before and after a rain delay — held the Phils easily. The Phils should’ve knocked the cover off the ball, but usual things happened (Howard struck out on bad pitches; Ruiz grounded out weakly; Feliz made a bad out).
Kyle Kendrick found a way to escape problems all game, going six innings and giving up just one run. But the offense couldn’t find a way to score despite the opportunities. They left a horrible 30 men on base. Not good at all. Sure everyone got a hit, but barely anybody got a hit at the right time.
Associated Press photo

















Posts: 0 Vernon Dozier
The Phillies obviously have some serious problems, and surprisingly it’s with the offense. Here’s a fun fact: Our beloved Phillies are 13-1 against the Braves and Rockies, but 35-40 against everyone else. I’m worried.
Posted: 06:57 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Thats very troubling. This team is way, way, way overrated. They need more than I previously thought to be a threat to anybody if they make the playoffs. They need an awesome starter, an awesome setup man because im not relying on Gordon when he comes back, AND ANOTHER EVERYDAY HITTER in this lineup. Yes, thats right. Ive seen enough to come to those conclusions.
Posted: 09:02 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
I’m starting to get extremely worried about this offense. Twenty runs a game against Houston means jack shit because Houston isn’t a contender.
We certainly need a front-line starter, but I’m beginning to think that such an acquisition will ultimately be futile. The problem is the offense. Even if we get Bedard, so what? In the first round, against Milwaukee, we’ll toss out Hamels and Bedard. Both will go seven innings and give up one or two runs.
But we’ll face Sheets and CC, and we’ll be shut out. And frankly, at this point, it ain’t even the elite pitchers I’m worried about. Anyone who knows how to pitch — i.e. anyone who has a sense of how to set up a hitter with fastballs for the out pitch, any pitcher who knows how to throw a situational breaking ball — can EASILY beat the Phillies.
It’s painfully obvious that Rowand was a huge loss. It’s not just his BA, either. He’s a smart player (can hit a fly ball with a guy on third, can move runners over, can refrain from popping up to the catcher when the runner on first is going to steal).
Way too many of the offensive players on this team take the Brett Myers mental approach: “As a closer, I don’t have to study hitters; I just go out there and throw.” Rollins, K-How, GIDP, Feliz and Junkins don’t have any concept of situational hitting or situational baseball. They just cruise out there and hack away at anything that looks like a meatball to them, and ANY pitcher with an ounce of brains can outsmart them.
Am I way off base here?
Does Charlie see this? Milt?
Posted: 09:04 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
Geoff, I don’t know that they need an everyday hitter. Their problem isn’t talent, it’s intelligence. They need to wise up, or to be taught how to hit situationally, or be taught how to be patient at the plate. These things can be taught.
Charlie uses the carrot. Maybe it’s time to try the stick. Maybe some guys have to ride the bench and get bitched at before they learn how to play Major League-level baseball.
Either way, it’s scary. And it needs to be openly addressed by the manager.
If he’s bright enough to see it.
Posted: 09:06 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
I wouldn’t put K-How on the list of people who don’t situationally hit. I’ve been shocked about how many RBI’s he’s been having with singles the he tries to drive up the middle to beat the shift. He does that even though he’s a power hitter and can hit home runs. He just wants to make sure the run scores sometimes. I would, however, put Utley on that list. He always k’s when there’s a man on 3rd with less than 2 outs.
Posted: 09:11 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
They need Rich Harden and they need him to be healthy.
They need Aaron Rowand too…thank you. That was a terrible mistake by Gillick. Thats why he dispensed with that policy because it was so stupid that it cost us.
Milt has gotta be sacrificed if he cant see it. Charlie better see it. Thats on point though. Half of these guys just take huge-holed hacks at it instead of swinging to make contact. No plate vision. No plate discipline.
They need to fix that or theyre not going anywhere this season.
Posted: 09:12 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Geoff,
Didn’t you see enough to come to those conclusions 2-3 weeks ago… and then after the swept the Braves, you changed your mind… but now that they lost 2 of 3 to the Muts, you came to the conclusion again… but if they win their next game, they’ll be World Series bound again???
Why is it always so extreme with you?
They are a better than average team, in a weak National League… there current team is good enough to win the NL East… if they add a pitcher or two at the deadline.. they could make it to the World Series. Nothing they can add right now will guarantee anything, but if they get that far, you just take your chances
Posted: 09:14 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Greg V
At the start of this season, I saw us as far superior to the Mets. Today, I see we are pretty much even with the bets. The starting pitching ranges from great to mediocre. The bats are streaky and nobody seemed clutch until Werth cracked a two run dinger and the Tati homer. All in all, it was a horrible game and I very much regret spending nearly 8 hours of my time watching it.
Posted: 09:17 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Greg V
excuse my spelling error, we are even with the METS. Bad typing on my part.
Posted: 09:19 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Mark
Offensive no-shows!
Posted: 09:20 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
No I saw enough. I just didnt want to break it out beacuse it seemed obvious but I cant take it anymore, I had to say it.
Oh I stopped thinking theyre a world series team after they failed in interleague play. That became obvious. What I did say is that there is no excuse for failing to get that far. Nothing less than that will be tolerated.
Theyre a decent team in a weak division and a weak NL, thats right. They need more than they cant get at the deadline so after the deadline you just have to kind of hope they can put it all together. I mean, they dont have the annumition to get all 3 components. Youre talking about hitters like Nady, Bay being out there, and we already know the pitchers out there. Those guys wont be cheap.
Posted: 09:23 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Also, im not the person out there crushing people for ripping them when they swept the braves. I was still ripping them. When this team wins one game, all these people come in and start talking abou thow great they are. Not that youre on eof them or anything but its noticeable. World Series went out the window a month ago. They need to focus on their own business now. failure is intolerable and unacceptable for this team, even when you take all factors into account.
Posted: 09:25 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
I just don’t understand how a team with 4 super stars and a bunch of other star players can’t get things done?
Posted: 09:27 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Then you’re a fake-fan dude… “nothing less than that will be tolerated” …. they SUCKED for the better part of the past decade, and the past few years, they keep getting closer and closer… last year they made the playoffs…. this year, they have a better team then they did last year… and they WILL be adding at the trade deadline.
I’m 99.9% sure they won’t win a World Series this year… but I think they are a pretty good team, so i’ll keep watching, and once all their pieces click, you’re looking at one of the best teams in the NL (weak or not, who cares?)
Add a pitcher like Bedard, and you can go heads-up with Arizona or the Brewers (neither of which have an offense like the Phillies.. and if the CUBS are the most overrated team in history, like Phil keeps saying… we should have no problem in the playoffs
Posted: 09:29 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
Phil, I’d agree. It wasn’t always this way, but since the start of June, Utley has somehow been a poor/dumb hitter as well. And I’m on the fence (as usual) with K-How. He consistently LOOKS awful. But he consistently gets guys home with singles and doubles.
The loss of Aaron Rowand dropped the hitters’ I.Q. by like 20 collective points.
Posted: 09:34 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Fake fan? how dare you. tahts way out of line.
When i say not tolerated I mean if they lose in the first round of the playoffs ill be more pissed than i was last year. Half the people on this site will say, oh well they made it to the playoffs so it was exciting again. No, No, No, thats not enough. I dont want to be stuck in purgatory. Either go all out or blow up the team, not in between. Last year they went in between, lohse, who was ok but not nearly enough. This year you have to go for it and turn over every stone. If theyre not prepared to do that then just blow the team up and rebuild on top of the core thats alreayd here. No more middle ground like theyve been in for years now. The flyers were like that for years with bob clarke at the helm and it drove the city nuts until they tanked out and had to be rebuilt (rather quickly, i must note) by holmgren.
Not tolerated doesnt mean abandon the team dude. It means what I just entailed.
Posted: 09:34 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
The Cubs won’t even make the playoffs. The Brewers will win that division. The Cards, Mets, or Marlins will take the WC. The Phillies are a better team than last year simply because the bullpen and slightly improved rotation. If Myers could actually pitch well, we woulda been leaps and bounds better and would probably have the best record in baseball. The offense is not better than it was last year. Certain guys got figured out. Rollins went on the DL and isn’t back to form. We’re really missing Rowand. Burrell is doing a great job in Rowand’s spot though. Rowand would be a good 2 hole hitter in this line-up. Regardless, I agree with Geoff. We need another bat in this line up, but where do you put it?
1B- Ryan Howard
2B- Chase Utley
3B- Pedro Feliz
SS- Jimmy Rollins
RF- Jayson Werth should play everyday, he is the bat we need but we could use another.
CF- Shane Victorino
LF- Pat Burrell
C- Carlos Ruiz…he’s the obvious one, but who do you get for that?
They need to stop relying on the long ball.
Posted: 09:34 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Yeah, I agree Geoff. We made it to the playoffs last year, that was as good as winning the WS with how much they’ve been through. Now this year they’re the division defending champs and have more to prove. They need to win the WS or at the very least get there.
Posted: 09:37 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Thats a good question Phil. A very tough one. I think what they needed was jenkins (not everyday but was considered borderline everyday) to be useful. Thats killing them now. Victorino needs to be a better and more disciplined hitter but you cant get rid of him because of his defensive and baserunning speed.
Its so frustrating The talent on offense is there but theyre all like, freakin retards.
Posted: 09:37 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
you always see a progression: make the playoffs, fail, then get farther and lose, then win. Thats a common, but not universal, trend with championship winning teams. so unless theyre special and do it all then you want to see the progression. if they regress or do the same then thats not cool.
Posted: 09:39 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Top to bottom the Phillies do have the potential to have one of the best offenses of all time, but they can’t situationally hit. Last year they didn’t even have the pitching they do this year. Our pitching averages 3.5 runs a game or so, our offense is averaging 5 runs a game. Take into account how many blow outs we had and our offense is averaging 4 runs a game. That’s not good enough. I’m not happy with .5 difference. Last year our pitching was averaging 4.5 runs a game and our offense was averaging 6 runs a game. We were completely able to manhandle other teams pitchers, good pitching or not. What happened to these guys? All we’re missing is Rowand.
Posted: 09:41 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
You guys need to understand that baseball is the toughest sport to even make the playoffs in, since only 4 teams get there in each league. And if we all agree that the way to stay competative is to build your team through young-talent, then how will “blowing the team up and rebuilding around the core” do anything.
The only players on their team with any trade value are the ones that you want to keep on the roster…and nobody else will get you anything in return..
If they go all-out this year..and don’t win the World Series, then what??
Wouldn’t you rather see them progress… maybe make the NLCS or WS.. still keep their team together, and maybe next year add another piece… If the NL is as bad as everyone says it is, and if we have no chance to beat any AL teams…shouldn’t we try to keep building, instead of trying to re-build ??
Posted: 09:43 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Building on what? Guys that are getting old? We have a 3 year window including this year. If we don’t win in the 2010 season it’s over, and these guys we speak of have no trade value, Rollins, Howard, etc.
Posted: 09:47 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Oh, on a more laughable note, up in Toronto they’re suggesting the Blue Jays make a trade to the Phillies that would be Burnett for Jimmy Rollins straight up. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Maybe Rollins for Halladay straight up…maybe, but probably not because we’re in the race and we need our reigning MVP short stop.
Posted: 09:49 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Yeah, sure. thats a valid point. But when you get a guy at the deadline KEEP HIM. thats building, sure. but wahts building when you let aaron rowand and kyle loshe get away for various reasons? now that set you back a year basically. so if you get a pitcher at the deadline, keep him around. keep burrell around. otherwise, youre always going to be struggling to rebuild everyyear while gaining no ground on the championship teams.
going for it doesnt have to mean this year alone. just have progression, the kind that you just mentioned. but then dont turn around in the offseason and let pat burrell go away without replacing him with someone just as good.
im in favor of that, but they dont do that. theyll let burrel walk and replace him with a rookie or someone not nearly as good.
they replaced rowand, who they didnt want to pay, with jenkins, who is totally worthless and is way overpaid.
now, the resigning of lidge, tahts good. that shows committment to winning. that says maybe, just maybe, they are changing their philosophy and going to try and hold the team together liek you said.
to this point they havebt done much of that but im encouraged by the lidge extension. thats certaintly what i want to see.
Posted: 09:51 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
yea..we have a window… where Utley, Hamels, Rollins, Lidge, Howard, etc are all here. Geoff suggested that, “This year you have to go for it and turn over every stone. If theyre not prepared to do that then just blow the team up and rebuild on top of the core thats alreayd here. ”
which is wrong, because we have a few years to get it done… if 2 years from now, we haven’t gotten past the first round of the playoffs, then yea you think about rebuilding… but for now, adding little pieces is the way to go
I think Burnett sucks.. I would do Rollins for Halladay in a heartbeat former CY Young winner for a former MVP… because pitching is so much harder to find
Posted: 09:54 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Geoff, they resigned Lidge to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. A. It secures Lidge’s future here, which doesn’t even compare to how important it makes the latter B. It gets it out of Myers head that he will be a closer for the Phillies some day. This will either make him get his shit together if he wants to stay a part of the organization.
Posted: 09:55 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Yeah, well the Jays would never do that. If you trade Rollins for Halladay who replaces Rollins at SS? Maybe you can do Rollins, Jenkins, and a prospect for Halladay and Eckstein who is ridiculously clutch in the post season.
Posted: 09:56 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
rollins for burnett, haha. who does toronto think they are? i actually would trade jimmy rollins for roy halladay straight up if they had a prospect ready to come up behind him.
Posted: 09:57 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Aaron Rowand got away because the Giants paid him something like $55 million over 5 years… which Im very glad the Phillies didn’t do.
And Geoff, I swear to god you change your stance everyday…. weren’t you one of the guys saying how our prospects are all awesome, and if we don’t win it all this year, we should trade them and bring the young guys up ..??
Or Phil’s offer to the Giants of Ryan Howard for Tim Lincecum (which he still for some reason thinks the Giants would actually do)
Posted: 10:01 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Don, what im basically saying is, when i say turning over every stone I mean not only this season but in the offseason. keep our best guys and if they cant then bring in someone as good or better.
if you dont hold onto the key components together, especially those pieces which they turned over every stone for at the deadline, then whats the point?
i HATE rentals. i think thats such a waste. the sabathia situation with the brewers, well ok if they want the picks then take the picks but normally you dont do that.
i shouldve qualified that aforementioned rant by saying that going all out doesnt mean getting a rental and then letting them go. thats almost counterproductive to a point. add to the talent pool. the phillies problem is a lack of organizational depth from majors to minors. the more talent you add and lock up the better.
look at the rays. theyre all of a sudden going to be good for a few years to come now because they kept gathering and building and resigning and locking up the right players.
Posted: 10:02 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
you could get away with Joe Schmoe playing shortstop behind Halladay and Hamels… as long as the dude played good defense, he could put up Carlos Ruiz numbers at the plate.
Posted: 10:03 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 558 Brian Michael
Did any one else see that Chase Utley is confirmed for the home run derby?
Posted: 10:03 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 NYC PIMP DaDDy
soookers
mets win
victrious
Posted: 10:05 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Good, he should be Brian Michael. Is there a list of who’s in it?
Posted: 10:06 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
What is a soooker? Learn to form complete sentences. Are all Mets fans dumb or is it just me?
Posted: 10:07 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
actually my stance is the same. Ill come up with a new idea that either is agreed upon or validated. but the fundamental desire to see them win is my stance. either win now (now = within 3 years, which is a good approach obviously) or tear it up and build for the future. obviously, some of our prospects are and will be awesome. some will be ok, and some will not pan out. my point is theres a fine line to walk when you do “go for it”. by the time howard is up for free agency they better have won, otherwise thats kind of the end of the road there given what we know now.
if someone comes up with an idea and i say, yes thats a good idea id liek that, you classify that as a flip flop. and tahts not what it is at all. thats way off base. its just acknowledging a good idea.
you sound like someone who relies on fox news for their information, lol.
Posted: 10:10 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Right but if they Rays fall short of the playoffs this year, and then make it next year but lose 1st round… in the third year they are going to have fans saying “go all out, or blow it all up”.
I know what you mean, but you seem to rant, rant, rant…..and then you calm down and try to make sense out of what you just said.
If the Phillies make the postseason this year but don’t do anything… next year they still have most of their team together… Nobody thought Jenkins would struggle this bad, or Myers would suck…. but nobody thought Durbin, Dobbs, Werth, Lidge, etc would be this good either.
I really, really like the direction this team is going.. they have flaws (RYAN HOWARD).. but they also have great upside in Utley and Hamels… I don’t think they should or will sign Howard long-term because he’s not that good.. If he ends the year with .230 avg, 45 HR, 140 RBI is that worth $10 million? …..
Another reason the Rays are good is because they do a very good job of manufacturing runs using speed and baserunning… which Rollins and Victorino are for, but they’ve had trouble being on base on a regular basis
Posted: 10:10 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Don M, yes that’s worth 10 million. Are you serious? The guy who is going to lead the NL in RBI’s and homers every year isn’t worth $10 million? What is worth in your opinion?
Posted: 10:13 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Oh, not to mention he did win an MVP, and you never know if he might win another one. He’s not even in his prime yet. Players usually reach there prime between the ages of 30 and 32.
Posted: 10:14 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
I’m a CNN guy..if anything.
I don’t mean to bust your balls, but literally last week, you said something along the lines of if they didn’t win it THIS YEAR… they should blow it all up, rebuild, trade everyone, bring up young guys etc…
TODAY… I agree 100% with what you just said… they have a window where they have some guys under contract Utley, Rollins, Lidge…and some guys under their control… K-How, Hamels.. if they can’t find the right out-side help to go with what they have now.. then they’ll need to start all over.
But the Phillies making the playoffs again this year, but not winning the World Series, is still a successful year.. the more experience they gain the better because a real World Series contender is not far away in Philadelphia…maybe not this season, but sometime soon
Posted: 10:16 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im not denying that I go overboard when Im pissed at them for losing, like yesterday. so we give them 3 years lets say. lets go all out in those 3 years, keeping the core together, and getting new and quality pieces, and move onto a championship. thats going all out. get talent, keep it, and add to it.
if theyre not going to do that, a very basic thing that you and i and everyone else expects, then whats the point? then you wonder if th eowners even care about winning and are happy to take our money and not try to increase the value or their investment.
The rays can single you to death, the phillies cant and yes rollins and victorino are coming up woefully short in that aspect of their games.
Posted: 10:17 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Geoff and I both said blow this team up. I would blow this team up if they don’t make the playoffs, but they more than likely will. If they don’t then they are a fraud and should be blown up.
Posted: 10:18 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Oh yeah theres no doubt I flew off the handle last week. I wont deny that. sabathias off the market so theres really not anyone else available, easily, that youd blow up the farm for.
im pretty sure it was also an angry response to the 3 people on here that still think they done need any help with pitching.
yeah i dont really watch tv news, i dont think anyone does. cnn or msnbc dont annoy me when its on though. fox just is garbage. there specifically to piss people off.
Posted: 10:20 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im sure if they miss the playoffs, liek Phil said, I would be pissed off enough to call for something like that. lol.
Posted: 10:21 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Don M, when will you answer my question to the worth of Ryan Howard?
Posted: 10:21 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Phil, Did I say he wasn’t worth that, or did I ask so other people could share their opinion?? I forget…
I think that if he sets a new major league record for strikeouts in a season, and hits closer to .200 then he does to .300 ….then maybe its worth taking a look at. Teams aren’t afraid of him anymore, because they know they can get him out without him putting the ball in play.
There was a stat the other day, that the Phillies have something like +78 more runs scored then their opponents.. the Marlins have like -20 less runs scored then their opponents.
If Howard leads the league in RBIs but can’t ever advance runners, or hit sac-flys.. he doesn’t help in the “manufacturing runs” department.. then is he still all that valuable?
Posted: 10:23 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Don M, that’s retarded. If Burrell is worth 14 million right now then Howard is worth $10 million easy. Howard strikes out and all of that, but he is leading the team BA with RISP…
Posted: 10:27 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Basically, I really don’t think the guy is worth a long-term deal… The prime of a guy’s career, I always thought was supposed to be 28-30… but so lets split the difference and say 28-32.
He is starting to take the ball the other way again, which make him dangerous at the plate. He has power to all-fields… but he said twice last week, that a strikeout is the same as any other type of out. When your team is struggling to score runs, and the guy you count on to drive them in has that opinion, that ain’t a good thing.
I think they should keep re-upping him through arbitration, because there is no reason to pay him $15 million per year, if you can get away with paying him $10 M. Hamels is going to get either a monster contract, or a monster arbitration figure… Victorino is going to need a raise… Werth is going to need a raise… Rollins is def under market value… Durbin and Madson are under paid..
I’m in favor of keeping Howard around for a few years, but the fact that he laughed when they offered him the same figures they gave Utley shows you that he thinks he’s better than he really is. He is terrible in the field….
They did screw him by keeping him in the minors too long.. lets see what kind of 2nd-half he has
Posted: 10:31 AM on July 7, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Burrell ISN’t worth that $14 million, which is why the Phillies will only keep him around if he offers them a home-town discount.
Posted: 10:34 AM on July 7, 2008