Sexson Could Land With Phillies
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Fri, July 11, 2008 08:43 AM | Comments: 80
Posts
Richie Sexson, hitting .218 with 11 HR and 30 RBI this season, was released Thursday by the Seattle Mariners. The 33-year-old first baseman/outfielder has had many issues this season, and beyond his offensive performance. He has brawled, been outspoken and generally a nuisance in the Seattle clubhouse.
But could he fit with the Phillies?
I harken back to Charlie Manuel’s quote about a bat:
“Yeah, I think we could use a bat. We could use a good bat. You’ve got to remember, good bats are competition. That can’t do anything but make you better.”
And I also remember Manuel told Comcast SportsNet he wants a “professional hitter,” a guy with some pop who can hit singles, too. Well, Sexson may not represent that kind of hitter, but he could be the right-handed bat the Phils are looking for off the bench. He’s worth $14M this season, but the Phils wouldn’t have to pay all that (just a portion, likely).
















Posts: 0 Lewisauce
I’m with Phil, Geoff et.al. on this one. It pains me to advocate it, but on the field he is exactly the bat we need.
We’re talking about renting him for the league minimum for less than half a season. I can’t help but say “OK” to that idea.
Posted: 11:36 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Milton Bradley is on the trade block. I know he’s made of glass, but that guy can rake.
Posted: 11:36 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 dan
Agreed Fran. Sign Bonds, and CBP automatically becomes a huge circus. There’s no way I’d take him on my team, and I don’t think there’s any need to discuss it because there’s no way it’s going to happen. Bonds is only marketable in San Fran and you know that’s all our owners care about..$$$
Posted: 11:40 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 chrism
why do we need jenkins in a worse form?…I’m surprised so many peeps like this…doesn’t make all that much sense to me…we don’t need another feast or famine guy that won’t help out defensively in the outfield…aren’t we looking for a replacement of taguchi? he doesn’t hit really, he runs and plays d
Posted: 11:44 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 chrism
don m I totally agree with u from earlier.weird huh but no burnett either
Posted: 11:47 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 chrism
btw every1 I’m one of those crazy guys waiting in line for the iphone…my internets been down so I havnt posted a lot lately but we should be back to notmal once I get the phone….if were going to do a trade ill take bedard over burnett..more upside I think
Posted: 11:49 AM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Theyll make an assload of money off of bonds being here for just a few months. tahts all you want from him. rest of the season, then adress the problem long-term in the offseason.
though id be ok with sexon, if you give me a choice between bonds or sexson you have to choose bonds
Posted: 12:01 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Agreed Geoff. Bonds would be A LOT cheaper.
Posted: 12:07 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Scott
I always liked Sexson, but where the hell would he play? He’d barely play 1st and do you want that giraffe in the outfield? I just don’t see paying x millions for a guy sitting the bench. We have a potent offense already. Let’s concentrate on pitching. Bedard would be best, but he is hurting right now. Anyone who can pitch in the Baltimore shoe box in the American League and still keep his ERA in the low to mid 3′s is how I want. Burnett sucks…
Posted: 12:32 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
I DON”T want Sexson here… I’d be fine with any player that makes the team better.
Burnett makes the rotation better, but it depends on what you have to give up… Doanld makes sense in a group because they need a SS.. If Burrell really turned down 2 years and $20M to stay with the Phillies, then we can’t trade Golson either.
I’d love to get Bedard, because he’s nasty…clubhouse cancer or not…he’s filthy when he’s on… 5 inning/100pitches…whatever… he’s better than what we have, and he’s better than what is on our farm currently.
EVERY Phillies fan should be down with the thought of Barry Bonds coming here because he would crush the ball in this park.. make other teams walk him intentionally and then pinch-run for him, i dont care… he’s nasty… he is a worthless human being, but one hell of a baseball player.
Posted: 12:45 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im down. Im not even going to think about sexson anymore, i just want them to get something done here with the pitching and if you cant find a hitter elsewhere…bonds is there.
Posted: 12:56 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
here the issue with sexson. is he legitimately a douche?
is he is then ill retract my initial desire to have him here.
if were going to get a douche, then its gotta be bonds
Posted: 12:57 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Pete
A couple of things. Signing Sexson is a ridiculous idea. The guy’s OBP is .315. For a supposed “power hitter” his SLG is .381!! Howard, by contrast is slugging .510. It makes no sense to pay a guy $8mm to be an out machine off the bench, and who won’t provide any defensive help. Sexson’s been circling the drain for some time now…I think he hit .205 last year.
The better idea is Bonds, for a lot of reasons. The guy will get on base and hit for power, no juice needed. Off the juice last year he OPS’ed 1.040. His defense is below average, but he’ll win more games with his bat than he loses with defense. You could platoon him with Werth and use him as a PH when he’s not starting. He’ll cost the league minimum. He’d probably love to play in CBP to pad his HR record. He’s a dick in the clubhouse – who cares? Give him a locker away from everyone else and just tell him to show up and get on base.
Posted: 01:00 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 ryan
wouldn’t take him. this is not the type of bat the phillies need off of the bench. plus, where do ya play him. doesn’t he only play first base? no thanks. i want a tad iguchi type for our bench.
Posted: 01:09 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
the more i think about bonds, the more it seems like an awesome idea. all your asking for is to squeeze a few months out of him. you dont need or want him here next year when he goes to trial (thats when i think it will happen if he plays this year)
you can resolve this problem next year.
who WOULDNT want to see howard – bonds – burrell at the heart of your order regardless of who hits in which slot?
itd be AWESOME
Posted: 01:09 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Pete
As for the pitching – I’d much rather have Burnett than Bedard at this point (though I’d much rather they follow Phil’s advice from a few days ago and go after Greinke…give up the store for him – he’s a potential ace who’s only 3 yrs older than Carrasco and who’s already proven himself in the majors).
Bedard has had ONE excellent year. Other than that he’s been average. ERA+ just above 100 every year and a WHIP of 1.33. That’s not worth top prospects. We all knew he was an injury risk and now he’s on the DL. Yeah, the M’s say he’ll be fine, but what the heck else are they going to say? He’s got Garcia written all over him. One other issue with Bedard is that, if he’s the guy we get, our top 3 pitchers are all lefties. I’d rather have a righty in there to at least force the opposing manager to think about matchups in a best of 5 playoff series.
Burnett’s having a down year, but as someone noted above, he’s stuck pitching in the AL East. His career splits are better than Bedard’s, and he’s a strikeout machine (something like 9 per 9 IP). Whatever you want to say about the contract, $12mm is below market for him given the state of pitching in MLB these days. Unlike Bedard, he’s pitched in the postseason. And, he’s a righty. If the price for him is Golson and change, it’s worth a shot. Myers is not going to return and be effective; his issues are deeper than a month with the IronPigs will fix. Eaton should not be our #5. I’d deal for Burnett and go to war with
Hamels
Burnett
Moyer
Kendrick
Happ
Posted: 01:13 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Pete
@ ryan – how is Bonds not the “type of bat” we need off the bench. He gets on base 50% of the time he goes to the plate. There’s no one on the market who does better than that. I don’t see how speed is the issue – the Phils aren’t in a rut because Burrell and Howard et al. are slow. The problem is people making outs to kill rallies. Bonds will make fewer outs than anyone who’s out there. He hits for power and average.
Play him in right and take your chances. His defense won’t be any worse than the Abreu era.
Posted: 01:17 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 jeff
Sexson would be fantastic. I think a change of scenery would help him, and he’d be hitting in a much smaller park too. And he’s a definite asset if theres gonna be any brawls with the mets/marlins/cardinals later this year.
Posted: 01:56 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 558 Brian Michael
David Wright got selected to replace Soriano in the All-Star game.
Odd that they replaced an OF with a 3B (from NY)…
Posted: 02:01 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 bob k
Did someone say the Phils made an offer to Pat Burrell?…How did I miss that one?
Posted: 02:18 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
it was in mlbtr. he rejected a 2 yr/20mm offer.
Posted: 02:23 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
David Wright deserves to be in the game… But Burrell should be in it instead of Corey Hart…
Posted: 02:25 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Bruce
It’s fun to read about the latest “rumors” on a website like “mlbtr”. However, please keep in mind there is nothing factual on that site when mentioning about Burrell and a contract offer.
Posted: 03:43 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
Pete is on the money. Get Burnett. Release Eaton or trade him for a bag of pucks (yeah, I said “pucks” and meant it). DFA Myers or trade him for draft picks. Pick up some of his salary. Whatever. I think Myers is broken and isn’t getting fixed as a Phillie or an IronPig.
The rotation Pete outlined above is spot on. It will be good down the stretch and in the postseason.
As for jeff, who said Sexson would be “fantastic.” Dude, you’re flat-out wrong. Sexson is an ass AND a shitty baseball player. Bonds is an ass BUT he’s still a damn good hitter.
Bonds costs you NOTHING in players, and you can pay him the league minimum. Burnett will do better in the NL East on a first-place team with a good bullpen than he has on that crap-ass Toronto roster in the AL East cellar. Jumping to this division will lower his ERA half a point right off the bat. He has durability issues, but they’re not as severe as Bedard’s. His only issue is the contract and you deal with that after he’s here and helps you get to the World Series.
Posted: 03:53 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
And Geoff’s right. Bonds won’t go to trial until after the season. We would not be signing Barry Bonds to be the heart or face of the Phillies. He’s a rent-a-bat for three months. Period.
Posted: 03:55 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
well, i do thikn myers has more value than that which would require him to be DFA’d. you dont DFA someone with that stuff. he has value.
Posted: 03:59 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Bruce
And how much would it cost the Phillies to have Bond’s “rent-a-bat” service for three months? And how do you pin a cost on team distractions from the media circus? ;-)
Posted: 04:03 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Bruce…the original post I wrote about said “the Phillies were thought to have offered Pat B….”
Its from Jayson Stark though, who I trust a lot of what he says.. and honestly, with probably 4-5 year deals worth $40+ Million from teams that want to add a Right-handed power bat.. you know Pat is going to draw a ton of intrest this off-season!
Posted: 04:16 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 Pete
The Phillies should explore a trade of Eaton to the Yankees. They need pitching and his bloated salary and mediocre production should fit well with NYY. As I said in the other thread, they should see what the cost is for Duchscherer before going hard after Burnett, but if Duch is unavailable/too pricey, Burnett would fit well.
Posted: 04:38 PM on July 11, 2008
Posts: 0 philsphan
If you can get Sexson for the ML minimum do it and DFA Taguchi. Otherwise I’d pass on Sexson.
Posted: 05:51 PM on July 11, 2008