Carrasco Impresses In First AAA Start
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Mon, August 04, 2008 12:15 PM | Comments: 149
Posts
Carlos Carrasco pitched 6.2 innings, giving up two runs (none earned) on six hits in his first AAA start with the Lehigh Valley IronPigs.
The No. 1 prospect threw 102 pitches, 67 for strikes. According to Joseph Santoliquito of the Inquirer, he had “great command of his fastball, changeup and curveball.” He was throwing in the mid-90s with a changeup in the mid-80s.
Asst. GM Ruben Amaro agreed that he looked good:
“He threw strikes, was very aggressive, going after hitters, and looked very poised and under control to me. But whether or not we’ll call him up is something we can’t discuss publicly. We would need a reason to bring him … But there is no question he has major league stuff.”
Whether it bodes well for his Major League prospects or not, it’s a promising start for Carrasco against close to MLB-quality talent. They should take it one start at a time with him.
















Posts: 0 Geoff
how is all that wonderful talent so inexpendable IN THE 6-HOLE ?
Posted: 02:14 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
If your mission was to get people to acknowledge that he is untouchable, then say that…and say why… I was thinking this whole time that your mission was to prove that Jimmy Rollins is the worst player in major league baseball.. is never on base…and should be traded for garbage, as we try to to win a world series..
my problem with you is steadily say the most outlandish things possible..and then try to defend that with contradictions, and “I don’t need to explain myself again if you can’t understand”… “try to keep up”…. and “actually, you brought up trading him this time”.
Posted: 02:15 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Do you want the Phillies to trade him, or are we just going to keep going in a circle?
Do you actually want them to trade the MVP, Gold Glove winner Jimmy Rollins???
If not…shut up about it and talk about something realistic
Posted: 02:17 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
there are some sensible reasons to trade jimmy rollins, and sensible reasons why it shouldn’t even cross our minds. however, to argue over the reasoning doesn’t make any sense because it will never happen.
Posted: 02:17 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
jeez..if only you people treated our politicians with such scrutiny….
are those things really that outlandish though? isnt trading ryan howard more outlandish? isnt he more valuable year in and year out than jimmy rollins?
Posted: 02:19 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
geoff, you know how i feel about the phillies’ “core”
Posted: 02:21 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
I do want them to trade him but it wont happen, ever, so im just going to drop it.
It wont happen because the phillies are not that smart. theyll wait until he declines into a shell of his former self. and maybe then theyll trade him for a piece of trash, terrible prospect package that wont contribute to anything. why will thye mayb possibly do that years down the road? because ruben amaro is in there and he doesnt recognize value if it hit him over the head.
Posted: 02:21 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
yes, i do mike.
there are 4 or 5 guys. weve argued whether or not j-roll should be in there more than enough already. but theres only a few really valuable guys. the rest of them are overpaid trash or mediority at face value.
Posted: 02:23 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
im serious, watch them jump all over this piece of junk reliever scott eyre. 36 years old, 7.11 era.
Posted: 02:23 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Because if you really, seriously want this team to win a World Series.. like I’m sure you do…. trading Jimmy Rollins is going to weaken this team, not make it better.
My whole point is that the NL might be terrible, and all the teams are junk.. but that ain’t our fault.. the Phillies are going out there and beating the opposing team more often than not. Maybe Rollins value is as high as it will be for the rest of his career.. but for the next 2 or 3 seasons I still think it makes sense to have one of the best shortstops in baseball on your team, instead of trading him for prospects.
If they could have received a STUD with a welcoming contract, like Halladay.. of course you would make the trade.. but you don’t trade someone as explosive and important to your team’s success as Jimmy Rollins because it wouldn’t do anything towards the goal of winning a World Series anytime in the near future
Posted: 02:31 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
remember the abreu trade? we got a handful of great garbage in return: cj henry, matt smith, jesus sanchez and carlos monasterios. well, henry is only 21, but other than that…
Posted: 02:32 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
theyre not going to make the trade so its not even worth discussing anymore. i told you why id do it and what id expect in return. but it doesnt matter, who am i kidding? theyll wait until hes 36, washed up, and in the middle of the next contract, which will be a bad contract, and trade him for 4 of 5 pieces of scrap.
Posted: 02:34 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
the abreu trade was a doozy, i like how NONE of those guys ever contributed to our team at all. NONE!!!! was that a gillick trade?
Posted: 02:35 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
That was a salary dump.. and at least we got Jesus in that trade… he has yet to become our savior, but its too soon to judge
Posted: 02:37 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
but, why is it that other GM’s salary dumps produce guys that actually like are good big league ballplayers. remember all of wade/gillicks salary dumps overt the past decade? ho wman yof those prospects/players did anything of note?
Posted: 02:40 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
what other GMs salary dumps produce guys that are good big league ballplayers?? Do you mean “trades”?
Posted: 02:42 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
right..dont even try to defend gillicks and wades trades of “stars” for “prospects.” just dont even try it. i cant think of one prospect in any of those trades that contributed to SUCCESS FOR THIS TEAM.
bruce is better at sucking up to management than you are, you better let him try and defend those trades.
Posted: 02:46 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
wtf are you talking about… seriously, when all these other GMs dump salary.. who are the superstars they landed in return? I’m so dumb that I can’t think of any….
The Phillies got rid of Abreu so they didn’t have to pay him $15 M last year, and wouldn’t have to worry about his $16 M option this year.. how was that not a smart move? They obviously weren’t going to win anything with him as the leader of this team
Posted: 02:48 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
im not asking for a superstar, just give me SOMEONE WHOS NAME ILL REMEMBER IN 5 years.
Posted: 02:55 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
if yorue going to depend those deals, and the prospects they got in return, then please allow me to borrow another brett myers phrase:
“youre a fucking retard. you dont know shit about fucking baseball.”
Posted: 02:56 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
How come everytime I ask a question.. such as “what other GMs salary dumps produce guys that are good big league ballplayers” …. which was in response to your complain that other GMs dump salary and get guys that are good big league ballplayers….. you come back with something like that.
If you trade your top guys and expect something in return… its called a “trade”
If you trade your top guys so that you don’t have to pay them $15M and then $16M… its called a “salary dump”…and you don’t expect anything in reuturn when you do that.
Again, I already said how dumb I was since I couldn’t remember any “salary dumps” that resulted in big returns.. And I asked you kindly to name me a few to jog my memory… I obviously know nothing about baseball and its workings, but would love to learn as much as you
Posted: 03:03 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
well said. i coudlnt agree more. you corrected yourself without me having to say or do anything. nice work.
i was gearing up for an argument in case you were going to try and defend of those moves. then you would be making the extreme statement that would require backing up. i dont have to back up that statement.
its commonly accepted that those were bad trades, just as it is commonly accepted that rollins is untouchable. i went against that, so i had to prove that with statistics and logical arguments. so if youre going to go against the commonly accepted opinion here, then you need to provide some support.
Posted: 03:06 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
huh? Cause I asked you which GMs made salary dumps that resulted in good baseball player in return? (still waiting on your answer there)… and then you said that all you wanted was a player that you would remember in 5 years… well usually you can’t “dump” a player and get a big catch in return… that started as your response to the Phillies dumping Abreu.. to ditch his salary because no team was going to take on his salary AND give you their prospects.
Somehow.. you can’t understand my easy-to-understand concept that if you are trying to rid a guys salary, simpy to get rid of his salary…that is what you do… if you are trying to trade a top player, and get get top prospects in return..its a different thing.. But my all means, keep answering my questions with non-related statements.. that works well
Posted: 03:13 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
tahts right. it does work well. dont try to change the subject. if youre not going to answer my question then im not going to answer yours.
Posted: 03:14 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
What is your question?
Posted: 03:16 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
im not going to repeat myself. you know what? just, nevermind. next youre going to try and tell me that steve carlton wasnt the greatest left-handed pitcher of all time.
Posted: 03:17 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
this is becoming confusing and absurd.
Posted: 03:18 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Last time you asked a question was 40 minutes ago… when you asked why is it that other GMs dump salary and get good baseball players in return.. I was trying to find out from you.. which ones you were talking about… and you still haven’t come up with any..
is that the question you’re talking about?
Posted: 03:20 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
allright. i will agree to not discuss baseball with him the rest of the day.
Posted: 03:20 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
im not going to come up with any because its pointless. they signed them to back contracts and the only recourse was to dump them gor garbage. total garbage. this, ed wade still sucks and pat gillick couldnt even con a decent prospect out of anybody because they waited too long.
why do i have to provide examples of that? thats the argument. the pirates got some decent prospects in BOTH of their big salary dumps over last week. the consensus is that a few of those guys will be good players. name one good player the phillies got that came out of those deals.
is that such a hard thing to grasp?
Posted: 03:25 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
No the hard thing to grasp seems to be you understanding that the Phillies didn’t have a market for Abreu, and wanted to get rid of his salary..
The Pirates wanted to get rid of Nady, and Bay because they have good young outfield prospects in waiting, and though they could get high prices for their players..
I really don’t expecially like arguing with you over pointless things on here, believe it or not, BUT I really feel like you just type things, just to excercise your fingers, and not because they make any sense… your constant back-tracking over what you think and say makes it hard to give you any credability.
Posted: 03:29 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
ok there, chief. the pirates got rid of nady and bay and marte to DUMP salary. i know the pirates better than you do. they are all about shedding payroll. they got good prospects in return.
its not my fault if people cant follow my arguments. i say something thats obvious. then you cant understand it because its beyond your capabilities, so you ask me to document it, and i do. and sometimes you still dont get it.
Posted: 03:31 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
don, you mean, “the Phillies didn’t CHOOSE/WANT to have a market for Abreu”?
Posted: 03:31 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
I guess so.. if you guys really believe that they chose to hang onto him long enough not to have any value.. and then dump him instead of trade him…
If I remember correctly.. the Yankees were the only team that were interested in Abreu because he made $15.5 million, and the Phillies had to pay Abreu $1.5M to agree to be traded without demanding the Yankees picked up his 2008-option for $16-M ..which the Yankees did anyway, cause why wouldn’t they pay him too much.
If no other teams are interested, your options are keep him..or dump him… they chose to dump him, and have since won the NL East and improved over the time he was here.
Posted: 03:37 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
as well, as well.
Posted: 03:38 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
this whole thing started over pat gillick.
Posted: 03:40 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Geoff,
I think I speak for everyone when I say that your thoughts and comments are by far the easiest to understand..and never contradict something you said before. If any one person could be nominated as the Phillies next GM, I would vote for you, hands down. (The other day when you said the Yankees gave up overrated prospects for Nady, and now you call them good prospects) I’m willing to overlook that, because you know the Pirates better than me.
I apologize for myself, and for the rest of PhilliesNation that for whatever reasons, don’t always see exactly what you want us to see with your intelligent, and often brilliant trade proposals. You have clearly demonstrated that your knowledge of what makes a “winning team” is far superior to mine.
Sincerely,
Don M
Posted: 03:43 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
thats mighty thoughful of you, i appreciate that.
Posted: 03:45 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
they can be overrated without being bad. are the phillies overrated? yes, are they bad? no
Posted: 03:48 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
the phils aren’t bad, they’re TERRIBLE.
Posted: 03:50 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
The Phillies blow…
Posted: 03:51 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Listen I understand what you are saying.. I acutally brought that point up the other day how we got nothing from Schilling, Rolen, Abreu etc.. because they always think they can resign the guy, or that winning is right around the corner..
But you have to understand my point that trades and salary dumps are much, much different… the only things the Phillies could have done with Abreu was ship him to the Yankees..or keep him.. so they shipped him off… Then they signed Utley to a long-term deal… you gotta take the good with the bad.
Posted: 03:54 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
myers phrase:
“youre a fucking retard. you dont know shit about fucking baseball.â€
The BEST part about that is the reporter didn’t miss a beat.. and responded with something like, “…and how do you spell retard?” …priceless.
Posted: 04:08 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
that was one of the funnist baseball things iver ever seen, that exchenge? i forgot what heasked him, it was something like: did he crush it?
Posted: 04:11 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
brett myers is a great interview when hes pissed
Posted: 04:14 PM on August 5, 2008
Posts: 0 grandbaypoker
grandbaypoker…
Minneapolis beggars dynamiting initializing rifled balcony …
Posted: 10:13 PM on October 4, 2008
Posts: 0 canada yukon grand lisboa hotel and casino
canada yukon grand lisboa hotel and casino…
bathe?Scarsdale:Budweisers bitmap …
Posted: 03:20 AM on November 11, 2008
Posts: 0 betus pokr bonus code
betus pokr bonus code…
Jacobson monuments?bribers!bedazzlement:sabbatical …
Posted: 08:11 PM on January 24, 2009
Posts: 0 completely free payday counseling
completely free payday counseling…
Hun facilitating flesh francs particles bronchial …
Posted: 04:51 PM on March 11, 2009