Quantcast


Hamels Cruises To 10th Victory

Posted by Tim Malcolm, Sun, August 17, 2008 11:28 PM | Comments: 116
Posts

Cole Hamels gave the Phillies just what they needed — a well-pitched, tight, economic win. The Phils took it 2-1 from the Padres, taking the series by that score. They head home with a 2-5 road trip at their backs.

Hamels’ line was the stuff of aces — 8 IP, 7 H, 1 ER, 3 K, 0 BB. He threw under 100 pitches, as Padre hitters teed up early in their at bats and gave Hamels the ammunition necessary to grab win No. 10. Brad Lidge tossed his 30th save in as many chances, getting some help from umpires, but mostly his fastball.

All this joy from strong pitching comes with the same old concerns. The offense was again lethargic, scoring just two runs off Cha Seung Baek. He threw a bunch of slop, and of course, the Phils can’t hit slop, and what’s worse, they try to hit slop. Baek recorded five strikeouts by throwing said slop against the fastball-happy Phils hitters.

Pat Burrell had two hits, including his solo home run (29), which proved to be the game-winner. The Phils also got an early run — Jimmy Rollins singled, stole second, advanced to third on a throwing error and scored on a Jayson Werth sacrifice fly (surprisingly not a ground out). Other than those two instances, the Phils collected four hits and left 12 men on base.

So celebrate another good pitching performance, but say goodbye to the expansive city air of Petco Park. Remember, that’s where JD Durbin threw a complete game-shutout.

(For tonight’s game pic, here’s a gem captured on national television. Everyone support Phillies Nation!)

 
Get cool Phillies t-shirts at Cheesesteak Tees
 
  • Posts: 0 Tyler

    Was that sign intended toward this site or just Phillies Nation in general?

     
  • Posts: 0 NEPA

    Even our wins feel like losses recently. I’m so pissed after every game anymore.

     
  • Posts: 0 Ryan

    not sure tyler..

     
  • Posts: 0 Whisky Priest

    Petco is the biggest collection of ineffectual fans that I’ve ever witnessed. Don’t get me wrong, they’re nice folk, but they couldn’t outcheer a St. Louis fan to save their kids’ lives. 2-1 is a bullshit score, and the Phils’ offense deserves a swift kick to their collective nuts.

     
  • Posts: 0 Bear Mike

    OK, because the Phillies are playing so poorly right now and are 2 games back behind the Mets, I reviewed our remaining schedule and estimated the result of the remainder of games (with rose-colored glasses?):

    VS. Games Wins

    Nats 9 7
    Dodgers 4 2 ?
    Mets 5 3 ?
    Cubs 4 2 ?
    Fish 6 4
    Braves 6 5
    Brewers 4 2 ?
    38 25

    I made alot of assumptions here. This big assumption here is that they split three 4 game series against the Dodgers, Cubs, & Brewers. Will really finish the last 38 games with 25 wins – 13 losses? This would mean we would finish the season 91W-71L. The way our team has been playing, that seems to be unrealistic. OK, how about 21W-17L in the remaining 38 games for a final record of of 87W-75L. Where would this leave us in the NL East? I still predict that the Phillies will win the division. In order to accomplish that, the Phillies have to get their offense firing on all cylinders. Any thoughts?

     
  • Posts: 0 Bear Mike

    I did the same thing for the Mets remaining schedule and estimated the results:

    VS – Games – Wins
    Pit 1 – 1
    Braves 9 – 6
    Astros 4 – 2
    Phills 5 – 2
    Fish 6 – 4
    Brewers 4 – 2
    Nats 6 – 5
    Cubs 4 – 2
    38 games: estimate 23 wins for a final record of 91W – 71L.
    I don’t know how realistic my estimates are, but it looks like it will be close down to the wire. Who knows in the end?????

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    They have to do better than 9-7 against the nats. it needs to be more like 12-4.

    anyways, this offense sucks. cha seung baek is total garbage and they could barely muster 2 runs off of him. terrible. they cant even hit garbage pitching anymore! its gotten WORSE as the year progresses here.

     
  • Posts: 0 Paul

    Hopefully the Nats pitching is the tonic that the Phils hitting needs.

     
  • Posts: 0 Josh

    Uh, Geoff, you may want to read that again. He was guessing we’d go 7-2 against the Nats in 9 remaining games. Those estimates look a little high for the Phils to me, and a lot closer for the Mets, so that sucks. We’re only fighting the for division at this point, I don’t see us catching Milwaukee for the wildcard. Hopefully things turn around quickly, and the offense remembers how to hit in September magically.

     
  • Posts: 0 Phil

    I just can’t see the Phillies winning this division. It has been a nice season. We got off to a great start…I don’t know what happened to this team, but they deserved to lose playing the way they are.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    The wild card will come from the central, no east team has a shot at it. The front office so inadequately handled the hittting situation that the only thing left to do is indeed “hope they somehow magically remember how to hit in september.”Unbelievable. just go and address the problem. If you dont have the prospects to get a casey blake type in here, then admit youre not good enough and go a little bit younger. the truth is, most GMs dont like to rebuild all the way anyway, but if they know theyre not good enough theyll sell off a player for some good prospects to help them get to the top next year. This years selloff candidate: Jimmy Rollins. See ya, jackass.

     
  • Posts: 558 Brian Michael

    I don’t know where the sign on tv came from, but I sure like its style.

     
  • Posts: 0 Gabriel

    deserve to lose? wow. we still have a pretty decent shot at the playoffs. look at the rockies of last year. if we could ride a wave like that (starting now) we could turn some heads. does anyone think any NL team has a shot at the angels anyways?

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    Dude, what the rockies did doesnt really happen too often. Aside from the cardinals, how often does a bad team like that actuallly get on a roll to THAT extreme?

    theres a reason that rarely happens. you have to be GOOD ENOUGH to win. they just arent. if they cant hit cha seung baek then something magical needs to happen to save them. Because thats how bad it is. It used to be “cant hit good pitching,” then it was “they cant hit decent pitching,” well now its “they cant hit any pitching.”

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I can’t see the Muts winning 90 games this year.. they have a TERRIBLE bullpen

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    and actually, if they do get into the playoffs next year will be worse because theyll all be filled up with false confidence again like they were this year. including the front office. they really dont deserve to be in the playoffs the way they have played up to this point. Who knows, it might actually be a good thing for them. Theyll realize that theyre a lot farther away than they and some of you think. You want to play with the big boys? well you gotta retool your whole organization so that its a precision machine that churns out quality players ready to contribute or valuable enough to be moved as assets. you think theyre ready for that? pffh

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    all im saying is, if were now reduced to relying on some “magical run.” tahts embarrassing and pathetic. they had their magical run last year and it got them just as far as they deserved to go.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    What do you guys all think about the Marlins? Is it worth one World Series if you have to continually trade everyone off and save salary.. This fron FanNation Truth & Rumors:

    Unless Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria doubles the $22 million payroll (which nobody expects), several players likely will be dealt this winter for cheaper talent. ”Payroll will always match revenue,” team president David Samson stressed. One National League general manager said Florida’s predicament is tricky because ”it’s hard to find alternatives if you move some of their best arbitration-eligibles, like Dan Uggla. Mike Jacobs is probably the most expendable.”

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    Theyre allowed to do that. Theyve won with it twice. When they think theyre ready again theyll boost the payroll to liek 40-something and win another world series. its better than the phillies approach because the phillies have yet to win anything with this approach.

     
  • Posts: 0 That Guy

    The muts were able to benefit from a soft spot in the schedule. They have been able to sweep the shitboxes while we can only take 2 of 3. This is the difference in the standings.

     
  • Posts: 0 Gabriel

    i don’t think a ‘magical run’ is necessary for us to make it into the playoffs. everyone knows our bats are fully capable of coming alive at any point. we are also a very streaky team. i guess i’m sayin that i dont wanna start thinkin about next year already when we are only 2 games out of first in the east… i know that we have been playin like six day old garbage recently but i dont want to give up hope yet

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    but thats what were saying/ the “bats coming alive” thing is being overly reliant on something we havent seem for months. how about lets try scoring 3 runs per game. lets see them do that before we start “assuming the bats are going to come a live again.” i havent seen anything that leads me to believe this lineup is going to score 5 runs a game, on average, for the rest of the season. i just dont see it given their current pace.

     
  • Posts: 0 TJ

    Hamels pitched well last night and didnt give up a home run again making it 3 consectuive starts. Hamels has allowed two or less runs in seven of his last nine starts and 10 of 14.

    The Phillies will make the playoffs but it wont come easy and we all know that. What we need to do is get J.A. Happ back in the rotation at the expense of Kendrick. It’s only a matter of time before we score more runs right, right? Lets hope so, because our pitching has been good enough to win us close games. Hamels isnt hurt which is a sigh of relief, what happened to all that speculation? Lidge, perfect still. Knock on wood. I’m still optimistic that the Mets will falter, but they are extremely hot right now. . . . against pretty bad teams so we can do nothing but wait and see. Go Phils.

    Some foot notes from ESPN..
    “The Phillies are 55-0 when leading after the eighth inning. Philadelphia is one of five big league teams who are undefeated with a lead heading into the ninth inning. … Padres’ first-round draft pick Allan Dykstra took batting practice. Dykstra, who signed his contract on Friday, was a freshman when Hamels was a senior at the same San Diego area high school, although they were not teammates on the varsity team.”

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    or how about we keep it really simple? win baseball games.

     
  • Posts: 0 Todd

    cha seung baek isn’t as bad as you think actually… he’s faced the mets twice and shut them down twice.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    (outside of the Marlins’ approach, since no other team can copy that for some reason..) Would you take one World Series if it meant the team would suck for the next 5-10 years?

     
  • Posts: 0 bobby

    The lack of offense has become more than just a concern. It’s downright shocking. The only positive spin I can think of is that they can’t possibly be this bad, right? So assuming they break out offensively, they suddenly become a strong team, with the pitching they’ve been getting. (Hey, I’m reaching at straws, I know.)

    Off Topic: I have 2 tickets (Sec. 136) for the Phillies/Mets on Weds, August 27th, 7:05pm. Unfortunately, I have a conflict that night and would love to swap with someone for the night before, Tues, 8/26. Anyone interested e-mail me at robert_tee@yahoo.com. Thx.

     
  • Posts: 0 Rob

    Well considering we’ve taken one world series for a team that has sucked for approximately 100 years… I’d say yes.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    But in 15 years the marlins have one twice. the phililes havent won a world series with this “just good enough to sell tickets” approach. the approach of pretenders. so what is there to reassure me that this way of doing things is going to win a championship? theyve been like this for YEARS. always a lot of 30-somethings on the team. hardly ever rebuilding or even “going younger.” always wasting money on veterans, going back to the mid-80s, instead of building around a young core. do they have one now? yeah sorta, the problem is that their young core is pushing 30 and half the rest of the spots are filled by 30 somethings.

    so theres never a trend or a theme here other than having an improperly constructed team. they had their magical run and it FAILED in 1993, they had it again last year and it FAILED. and tahts all youre going to get unless the approach changes here.

    what the hell have the phillies done thats so great? theyre the worst franchise in baseball. they always have been and they still are. yet we still support it, which makes rollins comments all the more disgraceful.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I just mean, as a Phillies fan…. forget about their past… Would you take a Phillies World Series championship this year if it meant that they would be a sub .500 team for the next 10 years?

    Im a fan of watching them and cheering for them to win and holding out that hope that one day they’ll win it and it will be the sweetest thing ever..

    Maybe thats why im not so bitter that they’re 2 games behind the Muts right now

     
  • Posts: 0 TJ

    Geoff I dont know what to tell you but to pick a different team to follow, you obviously not satisfied with the current state of the franchise nor with its past. What do you like about this team? I dont get why you post on here to point out negatives. Are you trying to pry fans away from the Phillies? What are you trying to do? I think we’ve all come to accept that this team is hurting.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    id take one championship in 10 years yes.

    especially considering theyve had one championship in 100 years. and whoever engineered that title would be good enough to repeat it before another 100 years passed, youd think.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    i grew up rooting for this team, going to the games, when they were HORRIBLE. 1993 was a faint memory even though i was at some of the playoff games.

    thats what being a fan is. you root for the team and support them even if they are the worst franchise in baseball over time. its also why its so frustrating because the ownership/management is so duplicitious and/or incompetent that you actually can legitimately wonder whether or not theyre not failing on purpose to keep people coming enough to milk us out of our money.

     
  • Posts: 0 Phil

    The Cubs are a pretty bad franchise too, which is odd because they’re a big market club.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    See, I think being a fan is trying to point out the positives.. and continually giving yourself reason to hope.. look at the RedSox (before ’04) and the Cubs haven’t won in 100 years..

    I brought up the 10-years scenario, cause I’d rather see my team continually play good baseball instead of just be the Champion and then nothing… I enjoy watching the Phillies play, yes its frustrating when they go 2-5 on road trips and stuff… but really, they are getting better, and maybe they won’t win with this current group, but they sure have been exciting the past few seasons, and in my mind they’ll only get better over the next few

     
  • Posts: 0 Rob

    I’m a much younger Phillies fan, but I’m old enough to realize why my dad, who has been a conscious fan for more than 40 years, says “They’re gonna lose” every time the 7th inning stench rolls around.

    I like rooting for them, they’re by far my favorite team of any sport, so I’d definitely choose 1 championship for 10 years of sub .500. Imagine what that world series would feel like! Seriously!

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    ” brought up the 10-years scenario, cause I’d rather see my team continually play good baseball instead of just be the Champion and then nothing”

    thats the eagles-phillies media spin that youve bought into. thats an absurd statement. what fan doesnt want to see their team win a championship? youre nuts.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    also, with a big market team like the phillies, a championship would actually breed more success because the revenue would increase enough that even those crooks would put it back into the team because they wouldnt know what to do with a good chunk of it.

     
  • Posts: 0 Rob

    Ya, what your basically saying is you’d rather take 10 years with no championship than 10 years with one championship. Whats the difference between the other 9? Meaningless in my point of view. 2001-2006 has just faded into a blur for me anyway. 86-76. I couldn’t tell you the difference between any of the seasons. They aren’t memorable. A championship is memorable.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I’m nuts… you’re completely normal…

    Read the rest of what I said…. you keep coming up with these do-or-die comments and stuff… meanwhile, they have the best group of talent they’ve had since 1980.. and they have lots of those players locked up for a few years, meaning that they should be able to contend for the next 3 years or so… maybe more if they sign some players… and maybe less if they trade their starters like you want them to.

    I’d like to be able to keep going to the ballpark and seeing teams play the game on the field instead of on paper… you just never know what is going to happen, and that unknown is what makes sports so great… the optimism that every fan has going into every season… it would be GREAT to win a championship, but it would suck to watch a team win one and then not be competitive..

    I know its an off-topic, unrealistic conversation… but once in a while you should take a deep breath and realize they have a pretty good team.. and the Cubs, Brewers, Cards, Mets, etc aren’t any more of a sure thing to win a World Series this year than we are…

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Maybe they won’t go down in the record books as the greatest teams or seasons in history… but the past few years watching Phillies baseball has been AWESOME..

    even the last year at the VET… Thome carrying them and smacking home runs… the late season runs in each of the last 3 years…. its been pretty damn good being a Phillies fan lately (unless you only measure things by the number of Championships)

     
  • Posts: 0 Rob

    Your question was 1 WS, and 9 years sub .500 vs. 10 years of “competitive” baseball. Not 7 years of competitive baseball with hope for the next 3. What if the NL east turns into the NL West and Competitive is 5 games under .500? If you’d rather trade a championship and 9 meaningless seasons for 10 meaningless seasons, I’d like to know what type of antidepressants you are on because I’d love to be that positive about 10,000 losses.

     
  • Posts: 0 Richie

    The one thing I really want them to do is have management before the year say we are “going for it” this year. Whatever it takes, like the cubs have done recently, the yankees and sox do every year. Go an extra 10 million on top of the cap and bring in a stud rental for a year and go for it. Instead of (jenkins, taguchi) signings that simply keep the fan base at bay.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I didn’t do a good job of explaining that.. but if it meant the Phillies would be “unwatchable” for the next 10 years if gauranteed a Championship this year.. would you take it? …why? just to say that you were the Champ?

    Or would you rather take your chances over the next 10 years, not having anything for certain, but going with the flow and enjoying the excitement and the disappointment?

    I’d rather go with the later, because although it would be great to win a World Series… its even better to just enjoy the fact that the Phillies have a good, young team that wins a good amount of games every year.. and maybe some time soon has a chance to steal a World Series from the AL

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    This team hasn’t commited to a time-frame for being a legitmate contendor, they’ve half heartedly made a window through 2011 but not with any authority.

    Those teams are better this year because they have a direction and that’s what makes them desperate, their hungry to win and the Phils aren’t

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    but it would be nice to have something to show for all that. it was enjoyable, yes, but it all ended with nothing to show for it. you need to win ultimately because as you saw with the 1993 team. after they failed to win the next year the ballpark was barren for almost a decade because the organization was horrible. now with a money-maker ballpark thye have a chance to invest in a deep, well-scouted, well-thought out farm system that will continually produce. they havent poured NEARLY enough money into that. then you need to keep fans coming back by signing a few players with big names and big media attention until your all new farm system is reayd to produce prospects for you.

    you start by drafting college players who will be reayd soon and then you go for reaches later on in the draft with big upside. eventually it will all cycle around and within a few years youll be reayd to take a run at the world series. if you can keep that group together for a few years then you take take two or three runs at it until you have to rebuild and cycle around again.

    its really not that complex, but the phillies arent trying to win with that proven method. theyre either not trying to win at all or theyre retards.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Forget the stud rental the Phils need to get active in international recruitment and the draft. Our needs need to be addressed internally with prospects capable of making the major leagues, hit or miss is not how you draft in the high rounds.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    agreed. in the high rounds, college players are the safest bet. college pitching has developed past the phase where they have arm trouble, usually, and you can rely on them to be up in 2 years tops.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I was born in 1983.. so the fact that they have 10,000 losses doesn’t bother me that much because I didn’t see 90% of them..

    in 2006.. the Chicago Cubs has the 7th highest payroll in baseball.. they finished 6th in the NL CENTRAL with a 66-96 record… so there are always exceptions to the rule… and the Yankees have been 1st or 2nd in payroll in each of the last 7 season or so since they last won a World Series..

     
  • Posts: 0 Rob

    I mean but still, Don, those seasons were exciting but they didn’t even make the playoffs. I would say if competitive means playoff team for a bunch of those years vs. unwatchable + 1 WS, I might take the competitive scenario… but again, we’ve all watched the Phils when they’ve been unwatchable… I know what that’s like and i lived to tell about it.

     
 
Leave a Comment

>> Create a new Phillies Nation account.
>> Already registered with Phillies Nation? Log in here.
>> Comment without logging in:






Please ensure your comments comply with our Comment Policy.