Hamels Ineffective In Loss To Cardinals
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Sat, August 02, 2008 10:27 AM | Comments: 38
Posts
Cole Hamels gave up four runs in the third inning, which happened to be the difference in a 6-3 loss to the Cardinals.
Joe Mather hit a home run to give the Cards a 3-0 lead, then Hamels let up two consecutive singles — aided by an Eric Bruntlett throwing error — before a sacrifice fly made it 4-0. The ace went six innings, giving up four earned runs (five in all) on eight hits. It marks his second bad start in a row, after the debacle against Atlanta.
The Phils made it close in the sixth when Shane Victorino and Chase Utley hit back-to-back doubles, then Pat Burrell homered to make it 5-3. But the Phils got nothing else off the Saint Louis bullpen, and came up short with the tying run (Victorino) at the plate with two outs in the ninth. How Kyle Lohse outpitched Cole Hamels baffles me. This whole Lohse phenomenon (13-3) baffles me.
Hamels has to pitch better. He’s the ace for a reason. Suddenly that home run ball that he seems to give up once in a while is becoming much more dangerous. Last week it was a nail-in-the-coffin for the 24-year-old. Today it was an unfortunate turn of events. Both were three-run shots.
It’s easy to say the offense came up short in this one, especially against a guy who is winning by basically spotting his fastball. But this time it’s all about Cole. No excuse for a lackluster effort this time out (unless, and I didn’t want to bring it up, but unless he’s really injured).
Hamels: “I’m not hurt. I’m perfectly fine.”
We’ll take your word, Cole.
Associated Press photo
















Posts: 0 Greg V.
Yeah it was hardly a plausible effort from the man . But I’m not worried just yet. However, another start like the last two may change all that.
Posted: 10:32 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
You guys remember when he had 2 bad outings in a row against the Marlins and the Astros and then bounced back from them and pitched like 10 solid outings in a row? Maybe that’ll happen again.
Posted: 10:35 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Fred
Maybe we are again over-valuing our players. Perhaps the true Cole Hamels is coming through – maybe he is only a 3-4 starter. What is his best pitch? The changeup? Could be the rest of the league is catching on to him? But then again, perhaps Eskin is correct – he’s injured.
Whatever the issue(s) is/are with Hamels, this just brings to light the fact the Phils are without a true #1 starter.
Posted: 11:06 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 EastFallowfield
Lohse pitched 5 and 1/3 with 3 ER. The only way difference between his ‘good’ start and Hamels’ bad one is he got lifted before he could give up more.
Posted: 11:17 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Fred
True but Lohse is not their #1 starter. Hamels is our #1.
Posted: 11:21 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Fred, that’s a little absurd. Hamels is just a kid. He’s going to go through rough patches. His stuff was not on at all last night. He’ll bounce back. I don’t think he’s injured though. He wouldn’t pitch injured.
Posted: 11:28 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Fred
Phil, the proof is in the pudding. What does age have to do with anything? Opposing teams don’t cut you break because you’re a ‘kid’. He’s in the bigs and the only thing that matters is performance.
Posted: 11:35 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 EastFallowfield
So pitching to an ERA of 5 or 6 is pitching well as long as you’re not a #1? If so, Eaton’s looking good.
Posted: 11:45 AM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Hamels is the Phillies biggest disappointment this season. Period.
At some point he needs to keep the ball and/or limit runs in the yard in a big game, and it just hasn’t happened yet.
Posted: 12:17 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
scot – Myers?
Phil – I thought some about your comment that Cole wouldn’t pitch hurt. You know, you’re probably right. It seems like anytime Cole has been hurt in the past, he’s been honest with Charlie about it.
I believe Eskin said that his source was scouts? That could mean nothing. I mean scouts could pick up a mechanics change issue that might lead them to think that. This change could also be the problem in the last two starts.
I don’t understand why the Phillies pitchers have so many mechanics issues. I mean hasn’t Dubee been doing this for a long time? I would think he’d pick up on these things immediately. Especially since he’s around these guys day-in and day-out.
I think if the Phils don’t make the playoffs this year, Dubee and Milt could be the ones who take the fall for it.
Posted: 12:33 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
BTW – Does anyone know when teams put players on waivers?
Posted: 12:35 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Rick, I just have much higher expectations of Cole than Myers. He’s the guy who before the season was telling everyone who’d listen how he wants to win the Cy Young, throw a no hitter, win twenty games, and he’s nowhere near that level right now. Dude has given up more than 5 runs in 5 starts if I remember correctly. He just hasn’t been ace material.
Myers is a headcase, but eveyone knew that coming into the season. Hamels is awful.
Posted: 12:38 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 EastFallowfield
Biggest disappointments:
Jenkins
Myers
Taguchi
Madson
Posted: 12:48 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 EastFallowfield
Hamels has lost games 1-0, 3-2, and 2-0. Win those games and he’s 12-4. That doesn’t include 4 NDs where he went 7 IP 0 ER, 8 IP 2 ER, 7 IP 2 ER, 8 IP 2 ER.
Posted: 12:55 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Hamels is awful. Let’s trade him…Scot you are the biggest homer Phillies fan of all time.
Posted: 01:01 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Jack
scot you’re awful. Myers was the opening day starter and he may be one bad start away from the bullpen. Hamels has looked shaky in a few starts but dominant in others.
Posted: 01:07 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Did I interrupt the Hamels family reunion in here? Sorry, ladies. I’ll just get some punch and leave you to your knitting.
The ace of a staff is the guy in the staff who is supposed to get the wins under the toughest situations, including when you don’t get the run support. That’s what he’s supposed to do. Hamels hasn’t. Especially against the best teams he’s faced.
Phil, I’ve never said trade Hamels at every point. Never. Ever. Never. But I will take your biggest homer comment as a compliment. It’s not every day that someone whose put 6k miles on his car to watch this team from Connecticut gets such an award. Cheers!!!
Posted: 01:14 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
I find the blind defense of Hamels in here so interesting, for real. I mean when Howard was leading the league in RBI’s people were still jumping all over him. But he’s batting .230. He’ll have 200 k’s!!! He’s an albatross.
Meanwhile, Hamels can consistently give up homeruns in big games against good teams to give up the lead, or tie a game, and he’s never to blame. It can’t possibly be Hamels fault the ball left his hand, hit the bat and went over the fence. It’s the fault of our offense!!!
It’s a really intersting juxtaposition.
Posted: 01:17 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
The past 2 outings was his fault, but almost everyone of his losses and no decisions was not his fault.
Posted: 01:35 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
15 of Carlos Ruiz’s GIDP’s weren’t his fault, either. It’s just really good pitching. Chooch is blameless.
86 of Howard’s K’s. Spotty umpiring. The umpiring union doesn’t pay for Lasik.
The double standard here is hilarious to me.
Posted: 01:46 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Okay, well I’m with you then. Hamels sucks. Bring me in a guy that will post a 0.00 ERA and pitch 9 innings. I want a guy that can throw a perfect game every time. A super perfect game. 81 pitches all them for strikes striking out 27 batters. Hamels is a #5 at best.
Quick question does Santana suck?
Posted: 01:59 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Man, there is no middle ground for you is there Phil. You live in an all or nothing world. Never said anything about him being a #5 either.
Being as though I never said Hamels sucks, I wouldn’t say that Santana sucks either. Like the case with Hamels, if I were a Met fan I’d say he’s been a bit of a dissappointment, and I know several Mets fans up here who agree with me. Bunch of homers, those guys!!!!!
Posted: 02:08 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
“Hamels is awful.”
You said that. Awful and sucks are pretty synonymous.
Posted: 02:10 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
thats why they needed cc sabathia, rich harden, aj burnett, roy halladay, etc and when they failed to get one they assed out and went with joe. well, joe better discover a whole new level for them today and in the weeks to come, because if myers falters then you plug happ in, but what happens if hamels is injured and needs 2 weeks off? waiver-trade slop, get ready for it. jarrod washburn, bronson arroyo, ugh.
Posted: 02:11 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Well, I’m glad I at least got you over to the side of truth and reality Phil. Welcome! Jump in, the waters fine.
Posted: 02:14 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
No, yo uhaven’t. I don’t think Hamels is awful.
Posted: 02:16 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
You said, “I’m with you then.”
I’ll take that as meaning, “I’m with you then.”
I still don’t see where I said overall Hamels is awful, though his past two starts have surely been. And in some big games he has not been ace quality. But I’ll take the I’m with you then as seeing the facts and sharing in my disappointment.
Posted: 02:20 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Scroll up. You said Hamels is awful.
Posted: 02:25 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
And when I said I’m with you I was being sarcastic.
Posted: 02:26 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Well look at that, I did. My mistake. I’ll rephrase that as a collassal disappointment, as I have been saying for the past 2 weeks in games that matter. And then he just keeps going out and proving me right like he did last night.
Posted: 02:33 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Last night you were right, a few weeks ago when he allowed 2 earned runs in 8 innings you weren’t right.
Posted: 02:37 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
You may think I wasn’t right, but I did predict the outcome and Hamels giving up the home runs. That’s just part of the expertise that I bring.
Posted: 02:43 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Santana gives up a ton of homers too. Even when he won cy young awards. A lot of lefty change up pitchers do.
Posted: 02:46 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
i personally feel that hamels will be complete when he throws more curves and develops another pitch. he is a little predictable and good hitters, if theyre not behind in the counts, wont swing at the changeup. theyll force him to spot the fastball on the corners. his fastball is the pitch that gets jacked the most. i wonder what his slider looks like and if he has ever tried to throw one. santana has a really good slider and i think that hamels would benefit form learning one in the offseason just as kendrick would complete himself with an improved changeup.
i still think they need to replace rich dubee or the strength coach. i think ive found enough recent evidence that when starters come here under their guidance their velocity drops. you can tell lidge doesnt listen to dubee at all because he doesnt need to be coached. closers get annoyed when coaches try to do that anyway. you think anyone EVER talks to papelbon out there? that guy is a wild-eyes flamethrowing lunatic. his splitter is as good or better than rich hardens.
Posted: 02:57 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Yeah, Geoff, Santana does have a nasty slider, but it can only be effective to lefties. Hamels actually struggles more against lefties than righties.
Posted: 03:07 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
Phil, it isn’t about the number of home runs you give up as much as it is when you give them up. Game tying and lead giving home runs are a whole different story than giving up a solo blast when having a 3 or 4-1 lead.
Posted: 03:12 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Well Scot, Sabathia and Sheets lost to the Cubs last week in huge games. Are they awful pitchers too?
Posted: 04:46 PM on August 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
I’m on Phil’s side here. Hamels is our No. 1, and he is and will continue to be a No. 1. Phil’s analysis of his losses/no decisions is, imho, accurate (i.e. not his fault).
The problem right now with Hamels is that he is not following through on his pitches. Watch (if you have a DVR or something) Friday night’s game. His left hand at the end of his delivery is at his hip. It SHOULD be down around his knee (or even ankle). When he finishes at his hip, he’s also releasing higher in the delivery, and his pitches are coming in high. And we all know that high, hanging pitches will get salamied by good hitters.
He’s prone to this even in his good starts (that’s why Chooch adopted the Tony Pena-style squat, to get him to try to keep it down).
He’s not hurt, and he is a Hall-of-Fame-potential pitcher. I’m not a pitching coach, but if he concentrates on his follow-through in his delivery, he should be able to keep the ball down more. This will eliminate the dingers and make any slider/change-up pitches far more effective.
Just my couple of cents.
Posted: 09:36 AM on August 3, 2008