Comments on: Gamenight: Marlins (72-72) At Phillies (79-65)

By: Bernardine Perlas

Bernardine Perlas — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 19:33:01 +0000

Aloha.As i ‘m genuinely excited about this.Where might I get added blogs regarding the subject? Some ideas?

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:46:37 +0000

No harm intended… and I apologize for the silly name calling. That’s something I don’t do.

A few laughs (granted, at someone’s expense), some juices flowing and some emotion for our teams is all I’m ever after.

Again… here’s to October!

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:43:08 +0000

Mets Troll – you crack me up.

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:40:43 +0000

How many WS wins do the Phillies have? If its 1 then… guess what? That is the DEFINITION of “isolated”. Even if its one, at what point does that make it not legit? See? I didn’t say it wasn’t legit. That’s you putting more words in my mouth.

I’ll crank up the music box some other time and see who comes dancing. :)

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:39:21 +0000

Take care SJ Mike – you make better arguments. I enjoy your posts.

By: SJ Mike

SJ Mike — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:34:56 +0000

As I don’t have a crystal ball to see what would have happened had the Mets won last year or what will happen this year.

But you like to make a claim like the Phillies winning the World Series is an isolated incident, yet when the Mets do it, it is legit, nevermind the fact that it took, without a doubt, a blatant mental error and miscue on a routine play for the Mets to win it.

But anyway, I must be off. Enjoy the rest of your playground mud slinging, seeing as you get an admittingly sick amount of pleasure from doing so.

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:30:58 +0000

Mets Troll – got to hand it to you man, you do string together a good argument. Are you an attorney? Entrepreneur? Investment advisor? Engineer?

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:28:41 +0000

SJ – You’re saying the runner on 2nd wouldn’t have scored. I’m saying we’ll never know (I don’t have a crystal ball to see what would have happened next). If you’re basing any conclusions on the statement that the runner on 2nd would not have scored, then it is YOUR logic. THAT is putting words in my mouth. I only look like a hypocrite when you do that… so its weak… at best.

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:28:31 +0000

Thank you Reds! Go Reds tomorrow, and Go Phils. If the Phils can be 2 games back going into the Brewers series, maybe Charlie can go with a spot starter for Thursday (carrasco?) and let Moyer pitch on normal rest on Friday.

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:26:32 +0000

ok trolling met – i hope they meet in the NLCS too, and peace to you sir.

however, while certainly opinions, i wouldn’t call my previous comments that you cite ad hominem attacks on mets fans. (if that’s what you were getting at).

By: Runshouse

Runshouse — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:26:05 +0000

07 whoops.

By: Runshouse

Runshouse — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:25:21 +0000

the 06 Phils are just like the 86 mets… except they didn’t dominate the entire season… win a playoff game, an NL championship or a world series.

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:25:10 +0000

Yeah.. honestly… I’m stirring the pot just for fun. You gotta admit, it got some juices flowing.

Here’s to October!

By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:25:01 +0000

Well good news for both Mets and Phils fans….the Brewers lost

By: SJ Mike

SJ Mike — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:24:21 +0000

But Mets Troll, the winning run was at 2nd base and would not have scored. So by your logic, it took a Red Sox collapse for the Mets to win, who were leading the series at that time.

Favored on paper doesn’t mean win. You of all people should know that with 7 up and 17 to go. That’s the beauty of baseball.

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:23:30 +0000

Crisis Team Management… and there is currently no crisis to manage… other than on this blog site… but I think I stirred the pot to cause that!

By: Trolling met

Trolling met — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:23:09 +0000

AC in NJ : f*ck you Mutts fan. it’s been 22 years and counting for you too, and it will be 23 after the flushing faggots flame out in round 1.

even with the Yankees 10 gb, mutts are still the number 2 team in NYC – always will be!!

Mets Troll – learn to spell. the word is “past”, not “passed”. Clearly, you haven’t completed 5th grade yourself. Why don’t you go to sleep?

I didn’t know this was talking baseball.. im out of here, i really hope both the philths and mets make the playoffs and meet in the nlcs.. peace ;)

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:22:00 +0000

Mets Troll – are you at work now? what do you do man?

By: Mets Troll

Mets Troll — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:21:17 +0000

We’ll never know… but with Mookie barreling his way up to 1st base and Buckner as deep as he was, it was no sure out. In any case, that blunder only corrected the situation. The Mets were favored to win that WS.

By: AC in NJ

AC in NJ — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:19:28 +0000

Trolling Met: “this isn’t a f*cking english class so how about we put the spell check aside and get over yourself”

Mets Troll: “AC, its passed your bed time. Adults are speaking here… go to sleep” and “I love it when the only thing someone can come back at you with is a comment on your grammar… I accept your capitulation”

See, I’m just trying to talk some baseball here. It’s the Mets fans who are busy with the ad hominem attacks.