Comments on: In Eighth, Go With Romero

By: the truth hurts

the truth hurts — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:27:03 +0000

World Series, here come the Phillies!

By: Eb

Eb — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:21:48 +0000

TADITHITO IGUCHI JUST SIGNED WITH THE PHILS

By: the truth hurts

the truth hurts — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:04:52 +0000

Buffalo: matchups should always be dictated by proper discretion. I’m sure at the time when Durbin came in to face Zimmerman there wasn’t 1 Phillie fan who thought Eyre gave them a better chance to record the out over Durbin. But there are always more factors at work, and just because Durbin gave the Phils’ a righty-on-righty matchup doesn’t mean it’s an automatic advantage for the Phils. If Zimmerman had awesome career numbers against Durbin, or if Durbin had been working for a 4th straight day, or if Eyre had gotten Zimmerman and a whole bunch of other righties out prior to the switch, then obviously it’s a horrible move. But more times than not righty-on-righty and lefty-on-lefty matchups will favor the pitcher. There’s a reason why ROOGY’s and LOOGY’s were invented. But managers have to do it in the right situation with the right personnel, and that’s not always a black and white issue.

By: Buffalophilsfan

Buffalophilsfan — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:55:30 +0000

Truth, I am not so sure always going with righty vs righty or lefty vs lefty match-up is always the best way to go. The other night in Washington is a perfect example. In the 7th, Eyre comes in and gets the first two switch hitters easily. Then Zimmerman comes up and Cholly waddles out to bring in Durbin for the R vs. R. Next thing you know the ball is deposited into deep centerfield where the grounds crew keep the tractors. Why not stick with Eyre?? He was in a groove. His stuff looks pretty nasty right now to me against right or left. Stay with the hot hand instead of always playing the percentages.

By: KM

KM — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:53:56 +0000

Romero is a nice choice, as long as he can find the strike zone. Romero should have been the setup guy since last year, but for some reason, Chalie has always decided to go with the likes of Gordon, Madson and so on.

By: Tim Malcolm

Tim Malcolm — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:53:00 +0000

I can agree on Eyre, but Romero has proven himself worthy. He’s really the best setup man this team has had in some time.

Thanks nick, that’s a typo.

By: the truth hurts

the truth hurts — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:52:23 +0000

I agree, Tim. I pretty much thought the reason the Phils got Scott Eyre was to use him vs. tough lefties prior to the 8th inning, allowing them to hold on to Romero until the game is more on the line. Still, I think Madson’s poor 8th innings are more a testament to force-feeding him to bad matchups then some cosmic force that isn’t allowing him to succeed as a set-up man. If a bunch of righties are stacked up in the 8th inning, there should be no hesitation to bring in Madson.

By: Buffalophilsfan

Buffalophilsfan — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:51:26 +0000

Tim, I agree with Durbin in multiple innings and Madson for the 7th, but I think Eyre has to be the set-up guy. His splits are much better against righties and he is basically the same as Romero vs. Lefties. Make Romero the LOOGY.

This is a huge weekend. Take at least 2 and we are feeling pretty good on Monday AM. Sweep and things get real interesting. Either way, don’t forget about the Brewers series next weekend (I think we miss Sabathia too). They are reeling and the wild card is very much a possibility too.

By: nick

nick — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:45:30 +0000

That’s why the Phillies paid him $12MM. Give him the damn ball.*

By: Tim Malcolm

Tim Malcolm — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:45:11 +0000

truth: You’re right in that situations present different options. But more often we’ve seen Charlie go with Romero for an out or two in the seventh, then wasting another righty, only to be backed in a hole in the eighth, starting the inning with a Madson or Durbin, when maybe the matchups might not be favorable.

And the splits show that the eighth inning has been a problem for certain pitchers. Really, doesn’t it strike you as weird that Madson has so much of a better 6th, 7th and 9th inning?

Sometimes a bullpen needs to be a little cut and dry. Sometimes guys need roles. When the bullpen was at its best, you knew Romero was getting lefties, Durbin was getting righties, then Gordon in the 8th, Lidge in the 9th. If you have three guys who are 1-for-10 against Madson lined up for the 8th, maybe you play that percentage, but more often, Romero needs to be in there. He’s proven worthy of the clutch situation.

By: the truth hurts

the truth hurts — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:37:19 +0000

Bullpen roles are not as cut and dry as you make them sound, Tim. For instance, just because Romero has the better opponents’ batting average in the 8th inning over Ryan Madson does not automatically make him the clear cut choice to start the 8th if the Phils are facing Easley, Wright, and Tatis in the Mets’ lineup, nor does it make him the right reliever to go to if Myers loads the bases with 2 out and Wright coming to the plate. I think instead of focusing on opponents’ batting averages broken down between innings, Charlie Manuel needs to look at lefty-on-lefty/righty-on-righty matchups and favorable historical matchups. For example, if Carlos Beltran (switch-hitter) is up in the 8th and he is (hypothetically) 8 for 10 in his career against Romero, but 1 for 9 against Madson, the correct reliever to bring it would be Madson. From an observer’s standpoint, nothing changes to make relievers better or worse from inning to inning. What changes is the batters they face and the matchups they’re presented.

By: philsphan

philsphan — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:30:39 +0000

I said earlier (Cubs series I think) that Romero should be the set-up man. I still think he should, but I wouldn’t mind having Eyre as the set-up man. He is doing amazing, let the hot hand pitch. Either way, Madson should be the 7th inning guy and Durbin should go back to his multiple inning role (5th-7th innings, depending on the situation).