Offseason Rundown
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, November 04, 2008 02:34 PM | Comments: 43
Posts
Just to lay it out simply, here are the issues the Phils face this offseason:
Outfield
- Pat Burrell could re-sign for two or three years. If not, the Phils will look to replace him with a right-handed bat on a two-year deal.
- Shane Victorino faces arbitration, and is a longterm deal candidate.
- Jayson Werth faces arbitration.
Starting Pitchers
- Jamie Moyer might re-sign for a year or two. Still, the Phils might choose to add another back-end starter for cheap.
- Cole Hamels faces an arbitration year. He could be offered a longterm contract.
- Joe Blanton faces arbitration.
Infield
- A right-handed bench bat may be sought for cheap.
- Ryan Howard is arbitration-eligble again, and should receive a raise from the $10M he collected in 2008.
- Greg Dobbs is arbitration-eligble.
- Eric Bruntlett is also arbitration-eligible.
Relief Pitchers
- The Phils could and should grab a player or two for insurance.
- Scott Eyre is a potential free agent, but expressed interest to stay for another year.
- Rudy Seanez has filed for free agency.
- Chad Durbin faces arbitration.
- Ryan Madson is arbitration-eligible. He could expect a contract.
- Clay Condrey is arbitration-eligible.
Catchers
- Neither Carlos Ruiz nor Chris Coste are facing arbitration.

















Posts: 0 Fran
I heard a rumor today that the rockies are interested in Holliday for eaton and either myers or victorino
anyone else know of anything like this?
Posted: 02:48 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jeffrey
With so many key players due arbitration raises — or better yet, multi-year deals — I just don’t see how the team has enough money left over to re-sign Burrell or bring in an equivalent bat.
Still, I think it’d be a bad idea to try to get cheap with guys like Howard, Hamels, Victorino, Madson, and Werth.
Of course, all of this is predicated on accepting that the ownership group’s budget is the right size. We all know it could be bigger.
Posted: 02:49 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
Fran if that’s the case, Tell the Rockies we’ll trade eaton for their bat boy, and a couple soft drinks.
Posted: 03:07 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jamie
Fran, this has been addressed ad nauseum. Holliday to Philly will require Victorino, Lou Marson, and a boatload of other prospects. Adam Eaton is not a prospect, nor is he a major league pitcher. Colorado wants to dump Holliday for salary purposes, the last thing they want to do is take on Eaton’s salary when the guy can’t stay in the big leagues. Will not happen.
Posted: 03:07 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Oh the Phils are raising payroll. They were raising it even before the WS, and now that they won, they get even more money.
I still wouldn’t get Holliday, no matter what. It’s one year. And he’s getting a big deal next year. And I’m not even confident the guy will be a big hitter outside of Coors all the time.
Posted: 03:09 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Durbinator
Why would the Rockies want Eaton?
Posted: 03:11 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
Out of all the LF on the market right now, I’d personally love to see Manny before anyone else. I know alot of people will disagree, and say he’s too much money, and he’s a head case, but I think Charlie can control him over here in Philly. If we can’t get either Manny, or Holliday (Sorry tim, I think Holliday is a future HOF type of player) than we should just stay with Burrell. Give the cry baby an extra year for the simple fact we love him here, and go after better quality pitching.
Posted: 03:16 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jim
Stay away from Holliday unless he comes with a new contract (a la Santana to the Mets). I think they should keep Burrell for 2-3 more years and hope someone comes along in the farm system. Its obvious they have Marson penciled in at some point in 2009 (Sorry ruiz or coste) and it looks like they are going to have Jason Donald be Feliz’s replacement at 3rd base as thats what they are doing with him in the AFL. He’s doing well too. Then there is Carlos Carrasco who is apparently going to compete for a spot in the rotation. Is that Kendrick’s spot or does Happ have that. If Happ is Kendrick’s spot then you would think Carrasco will take Moyer’s at the back end of the rotation, assuming he is ready.
Somewhere along the line you have to find the 3rd outfielder. But Burrell is one of the main offseason topics. Alogn with Ryno, do you trade him or do you pay him. Hamels deserves a deal. Madson deserves a deal (if he likes setting up) because he and Lidge were LIGHTS OUT. I also think that Victorino has deserved a long-term deal. He proved he can be an every day centerfielder and had 2 of the biggest hits in the post season. His energy is needed in this lineup. Werth should also stay, but pay him arbitration and have him show that he can play everyday again and put up around the same numbers.
This ownership has to spend money. Also, if you lose Burrell, do you get into the Manny sweepstakes or the CC sweepstakes, both of which like playing for Charlie. I guess we shall see. Let me know what you guys think or if you ever wanna talk baseball, phuckingchamps2008 @ gmail.com
Posted: 03:25 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
One overlooked point, Chris, and a good one, is that Manuel and Manny (eh, ironic I know) are like best friends. If anyone can mold Manny into a calm, winning spirit for a season, it’s Chollie.
But I still don’t see Manny here. Because of money, because of age, mainly because of the atmosphere. He wants laid back.
Posted: 03:25 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
I think he’d be laid back in Philly. I think the fans would embrace him quite well here. Think about the bond he had with Ortiz in Boston. I could see him, and Howard clicking like that. Besides that I think Manny wants to go to a winning team, and who better than the Phils coming off a world series division?
Posted: 03:46 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of picking up Milton Bradley. He had great production last year. The only thing that would worry me is having him in the field considering he was DH’ing for Texas mostly, correct? But, Pat has scared me in the field for years and Bradley was solid defensively in the past. I’m really liking this idea, I think he would look good in that 5 hole considering that he may not rack up as many HR’s at Pat, but he get’s a lot more hits overall and is really clutch close and late (.380 BA).
Posted: 03:47 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
I’m sorry to say this but Bradley is nothing but a broke down Jenkins. You want this guy filling Burrells spot? Were going to be losing ALOT of production putting this guy in the #5 spot. Trust me!
Posted: 04:02 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 timb
Don’t get rid of Victorino. His spark can’t be reproduced imho. i was all about trading him for Holliday earlier in the year, but after watching him for this year, I don’t know if his tangibles (speed, fielding) and intangibles (clutch, character) can be reproduced. Utley, Howard, Victorino, Rollins, and Hamels must stay. Madson, Lidge, and Ruiz too. The rest are replaceable in my opinion and we could still win lots of games as long as we have that core.
Posted: 04:04 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 timb
chris.i – i’m gonna have to disagree with you on that one… he was close to leading the AL in BA last year. How that is anything like Jenkins, I don’t know.
Posted: 04:09 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 timb
Manny would hate it in Philly. He wants everything handed to him. He wants to be respected and loved just for ‘being Manny’. You gotta earn it here.
Posted: 04:12 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Chris I – what the hell are you talking about?
Geoff Jenkins’ last year in MIL:
.255 BA w/ 21 HR 64 RBI’s and a .790 OPS
Milton Bradley last year in TEX:
.321 BA w/ 22 HR and 77 RBI’s and a .999 OPS
Oh, and he’s 3 or 4 years younger.
Posted: 04:13 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Manny
My first choice for LF would be Pat the Bat. If he leaves, then Bradley…
For starting pitchers, get Lowe if possible.
Finally, give long-term contracts to Victorino, Hamels and Madson.
Posted: 04:30 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
But NEPA, how do those numbers compare to Burrell’s? That’s what Chris.I was getting at I believe.
Posted: 04:32 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
Listen, I’m not knocking Bradley at all. I’m just saying were losing alot of production and power with ”rumors” of him being in the 5 spot. And Nepa…Your comparing Bradleys best season to one of Jenkins worst. All I’m saying is Jenkins would fit the #5 hole better than Bradley. He puts up better numbers in that category. If were going to sign someone to fill in for Burrell, we need to go out with a splash.
Posted: 04:34 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
Exactly..Thanks Rick
Posted: 04:35 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
I agree with the contracts completely! Especially Madson! By long-term are you thinking 3, 5, & 3 years; respectively; for those three guys?
I think Rocco Baldelli seems like he could be a good fill-in and would platoon well with either Jenkins or Stairs since he can’t really play everyday. But I would still rather have Pat back for another 2 years.
Posted: 04:35 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
What do you think is a fair offer for Cole Hamels at this point? 5/75mil
Posted: 04:37 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Well I was addressing the comparison to a broken down Jenkins which is just ridiculous.
AVG OBP SLG OPS
Bradley. 321 .436 .563 .999
Burrell . 250 .367 .507 .874
Posted: 04:37 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Burrell had 11 more HR’s and 9 more RBI’s but with 122 more AB’s.
Oh, and close and late isn’t even close. Burrell hit .295 while Bradley hit .380.
Posted: 04:39 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 J-Man
If we can’t get Burrell back,i say go after Bradley…He hits for average every year and he had a high OBP…He might not replace Pat the Bats power,but he would be better then Jenkins trust me…We also need to get Hamels,Victorino,and Madson contracts.
Posted: 04:41 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Chris I – you must have not watched this team the entire season. Because anyone that did would know that Jenkins is not the right fit for this team in the 5 HOLE. Are you kidding me? He was just terrible this year. And what year of Jenkins’ do you want me to compare Bradley to? A few years back when he was in his prime? Sorry, he’s not the same player.
Posted: 04:43 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Rick
Oh BTW the reason I was commenting on Baldelli is just because he would figure in as a much cheaper alternative. I mean obviously Milton Bradley would be preferred if money’s not an issue.
Posted: 04:44 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 J-Man
Yea Jenkins is past his prime…He was horrible this year and thats why he hardly played the rest of the season.
Posted: 04:47 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
Nepa-This is the last time I’m going to say this, and yes I watched the entire season. I have been for the past 20 years. We need to match Burrells production. Your telling me you’d rather have Bradley over Burrell? That sh*t just doesn’t make any sense. Bradley had a Rowand type of season last year. What’s the odd’s of him bringing that production here, and repeating it? Has he had consistant years? The guy was a DH half his career, you even said it yourself. If we aint signing either Manny or Holliday, the Phils are going to be forced to resign Pat…Bottom line
Posted: 05:01 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 J-Man
Or what about bringing up Jason Donald and try him in the OF?He had a good year in the minors and looked good in the Arizona Fall League…We should call him up soon and see what he’s got.
Posted: 05:14 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
“I’m sorry to say this but Bradley is nothing but a broke down Jenkins.”
“All I’m saying is Jenkins would fit the #5 hole better than Bradley. He puts up better numbers in that category.”
These are exact quotes from your posts Chris and these are what I’ve been trying to address. There is absolutely nothing to show that we would be better off with Jenkins in the 5 hole than Bradley. In fact, everything goes in the favor of Bradley over Jenkins, which is pretty obvious.
As far as the comparison between Burrell and Bradley, I’m not exactly sure which player we’d be better off with. You said we’d be losing “a lot” of production going with Bradley over Burrell and I’m just not so sure about that. Bradley put up better overall numbers than Burrell last year.
Posted: 05:17 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
By the way…Thats exactly my point! I agree Jenkins stunk it up last year. No way in hell am I defending him. I’m just stating that Bradley would be another Jenkins, meaning…Had good numbers in the past, but will fall to pieces when it comes down to crunch time.
Posted: 05:18 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
No Chris,huge difference – when Jenkins came over from MIL he was already declining, you said it yourself it was one of his worst seasons in a long time. Bradley is coming off his best, leading the AL in OBP and OPS, 3rd in BA and an All-Star appearance. There’s just no comparing our acquisition of Jenkins last offseason and the possibility of signing Bradley this offseason.
Posted: 05:26 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
About the #5 hole thing..What I’m trying to say is I wouldn’t want neither Bradley or Jenkins filling that spot. If it’s not Burrell, it has to be someone with better numbers than Burrell, or almost close, and I don’t think Bradley is the man to do it. Put it this way…I wouldn’t cry if they signed Bradley, I’d just be disapointed. We have the chance to be the new Yankees and Redsox of baseball if we really wanted to.
Posted: 05:26 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Manny
But I don’t want to be the new Yankees or Redsox!!
Posted: 05:37 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 timb
we’re the phillies. home-grown players… team players…
let’s keep it that way, Ruben!
Donald in the outfield is intruiging.
Posted: 05:40 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
So your saying you’d rather win a world series, or make the playoff’s every 15 years?
Posted: 06:26 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 mikemike
How can anyone want jenkins behind Howard, plus its three lefthanders who don’t hit lefthanders very well .Then victorino followed by felix a 230 and ruiz 220 and pitcher what a lineup. If you know anything about this game you better put someone behind howard who has power and drives in runs. Did you notice when burrell slumped how howard also was not getting anything to hit, there run produciton went down, they had to move victorino down, Remember they needed to go to the 161 game to win the division. And that’s with Lidge not blowing one save what’s the odds of that happening again.
Posted: 08:08 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 mikemike
One thing I Think we are forgeting is right now it’s free agent’s. But who knows who will become available in trades. Holiday is a really great player but with boras and only one year on his contract, It’s a bad situation plus what they want in trade is crazy.
Posted: 08:12 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Phillies Phan SC
Say No to Manny.
Maybe I am too simplistic. We just won a world championship, I am into re-signing as many as we can. If we cannot, I really believe in Arbuckle’s work and using the talent we have. Perhaps a three-man left field platoon. Whatever works. Just my worthless opinion.
Posted: 02:14 AM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 harry
bradley is a asshole. who is self-centered. i have no respect for him after his deal last year when the padres came to town and he flipped of the crowd when he hit that homerun. then a month later he torn his acl trying to go after a umpire. the guy is probably a bigger headcase then manny. look what he did in texas this year when he went after that commentator who said something bad about him. seriously do you really think that would work in philly, the first slump he had it would be a meltdown.
Posted: 01:25 PM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 harry
bradley is a self-centered asshole. i have no respect for him after his deal last year when the padres came to town and he flipped of the crowd when he hit that homerun. then a month later he torn his acl trying to go after a umpire about a call. the guy is probably a bigger headcase then manny. look what he did in texas this year when he went after that commentator who said something bad about him. seriously do you really think that would work in philly, the first slump he had it would be a meltdown.
Posted: 01:27 PM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 JohnnySlowpoke
Hi Everyone. I’ve been following this site for a while now but this is my first post.
If we can’t resign Burrell, then I think we should give Dobbs a chance to be the everyday left-fielder. He has put up some real decent numbers considering the amount of at-bats he’s had. The same with Werth. I would bat Werth fifth and Dobbs sixth. Let these two guys have the chance to produce on an everyday basis instead of getting a big-name, big-dollar, injury-prone headache.
Posted: 04:44 PM on November 5, 2008