Will Burrell Stay Or Go?
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, November 04, 2008 12:00 PM | Comments: 43
Posts
That is the question of the offseason already. Burrell devoted the first 11 years of his professional career to the Philadelphia Phillies, and at 32, is looking for a three-year deal so he can settle a bit, maybe start a family.
But the Phils opened discussions with a proposed two-year deal worth $22 million. Not good enough, Burrell said. It’ll probably take a 3Y/$36M contract to haul Burrell back to Philadelphia. Maybe the $32M-$35M range if he really wants to stay. But the three years are a given.
The only way I can see three years working is if the Phils decide to trade Ryan Howard before 2011, Burrell can round out his contract at first base. But that’s a little too far away, and too conditional, to commit to a contract.
That said, I don’t think the Phils should give Burrell three years. I would even hesitate with two years. To me, Burrell is a home run hitter with a slight tendency to walk and single. His on-base percentage was down to .367, though his slugging was at its highest since his 37-homer season. He resembles too much of a right-handed Howard at this point to commit to any longterm deals. And what the Phils really need is a contact-suited hitter who can also hit for power from the right side.
General Manager Ruben Amaro Jr. talked about a possible replacement:
“If Pat Burrell is not with us, we know we’re going to have a void in leftfield,” Amaro said. “We might have to deal with that internally with the Geoff Jenkinses of the world and the Matt Stairses of the world.”
That quote immediately points me to Rocco Baldelli of the Rays, who hit .263 with 4 HR and 13 RBI in 80 AB this season, coming back from a wealth of ailments. He could be had for relatively cheap (a 2Y/$4MM deal seems right), and is a righty who can stroke lefties.
Other options include:
Milton Bradley: He hit .321 with 22 HR and 77 RBI for Texas. The 31-year-old will be looking for a two- to three-year deal worth about $7MM per year.
Juan Rivera: Injury plagued the last two years, Rivera hit just .246 with 12 HR and 45 RBI, but did hit .310 in 2006 with 23 HR and 85 RBI. He’d probably want a two-year deal worth about $2MM per year.
Jason Michaels: The former Phillie fits Amaro’s quote. He hit 8 HR with 53 RBI in 123 games last season. He’s not really a bonafide contact hitter, but he could platoon in any field. He would also be a cheap $2M-$3M per year.
Casey Blake: He could play the outfield. He hit .274 with 21 HR and 81 RBI between the Indians and Dodgers. I see him wanting at least two years, and at least $5MM per year. The Indians may have an inside track on him.
From the left side, the Phils could look at Raul Ibanez, Mark Kotsay, Garret Anderson, Brad Wilkerson or Bobby Abreu.
I know Ibanez is being discussed, but I really don’t see the Phillies adding another left-handed bat. Why do so when they already have Jenkins and, possibly, Stairs? That aside, Ibanez wouldn’t be a bad two-year deal, but for his asking price of about $6MM, I’d rather go for Bradley.
And that’s my top choice: Milton Bradley. Yes he’s a nuisance, but with a winner things could change. I see him as a nice, under-the-radar fit for the offense. I’m not keen on going cheap with a Baldelli or Michaels, but who knows — either could work in a platoon situation with Jenkins.
Now, if it’s Burrell or Bradley for two years? I’d maybe go with the latter.

















Posts: 0 Phil
Bradley and Utley are friends too.
Posted: 11:10 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike T.
the phillies will dig through the garbage and find some trash that no one else wants. it will happen. don’t anyone worry.
Posted: 11:19 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Phil
Well, Bradley would fall under that garbage. He had a career year…a very good career year. I do not think that he will repeat the year he had this year or stay healthy for a full season.
Posted: 11:22 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jamie
Baldelli is too much of a risk. The guy can’t stay healthy and has to take a gallon bucket full of pills each day just so he can hope to take the field. He’s a feel good story, but he can’t be relied upon. Juan Rivera is not the answer, and we’ve already seen Jason Michaels…no way. The same could be said for Abreu…plus he’s another lefty.
Casey Blake can play both the infield and outfield, which is attractive to giving someone a day off here and there, but his power numbers are much less than Burrell, and their lifetime averages are nearly identical.
So, for me, it really comes down to Milton Bradley and Pat Burrell too. While Bradley would be cheaper, his power numbers are lower than Burrell too. While his average was considerably higher last year, we have the “attitude” angle to look at. If I was faced with a choice between Burrell and Bradley, I’d lean towards Pat yet again. He will not be a clubhouse cancer, distraction, or looking to punch the next fan that mouths off to him. Pat’s steady and is a clubhouse leader. That’s got to be worth a little scratch I’d think.
Posted: 11:27 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
At this point it’s hard to see how were going to put a genuine threat behind Burrell, from all I’ve heard I don’t see anyway Bradley signs cheeply without making a hell of a fuss though if he were to be the guy his ailments would open the door for Stairs and Jenkins to get some more starts.
I still like the idea of 3 years and Burrell and I’m resigned to the fact we won’t be able to keep Ryan Howard here long-term short of pulling a A-Rod to Texas like move that would really hurt other areas of the team. We either sign Ryan up now or start fielding offers this time next year and unless were very confident of re-signing him, he shouldn’ factor into the Burrell decision.
I’m not championing for Burrell’s return but the alternatives look like a slippery slope, look how long it took to just stablize 3rd base after Rolen’s departure.
Posted: 11:47 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
^If we can add Rivera as a bench bat at the very least for $2m that’s a deal you make.
Posted: 11:49 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 gkit
How about Gabe Kapler, he hit .301with a .838 OPS in only 229 ABs, which is important. One mistake Gillick continued to make was getting guys to be bench players(Taguchi and Delluchi) who were only effective when they had a lot of ABs. Baldelli wouldn’t be bad either except he must platoon with his health problems, so if Jenkins doesn’t bounce back he wouldn’t be able to take over as a regular. Kapler at age 33 might not be able to either but he has a better chance. The best scenario would be to get either of these guys and around July hope that Michael Taylor is ready to be promoted after the breakout year he had at Clearwater last year.
Posted: 11:52 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Kapler is a real special case. He had a very, very good two months after retiring and becoming a minor league manager. Honestly, he’s not an answer.
Posted: 11:54 AM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Doug
I agree with your assessment of Milton Bradley as the best option as our ’09 left fielder. This past season, he was 3rd in the AL in BA, 1st in OBP, 1st in OPS, and 4th in slugging. He is a switch-hitter. Plus, he is a very passionate player, which is just the kind of athlete Philly fans love.
Posted: 12:43 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jamie
True, Doug, but Philly fans don’t put up with Prima Donnas who are always pissed off about something, or who are more concerned with themselves than the team. See Owens, Terrell. Bradley is another one of those in my opinion.
Posted: 01:03 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 pb
here are some other possible right handed bat outfield trade options
Jose Guillen– Royals– Like Bradley is a nuisance but maybe if he’s on a winner that will handle itself. Wants out of KC he has 2yrs 24Mill left on his deal and the Royals would probably eat some of that money or take a contract back.
Aaron Rowand– Giants– Not sure if SF is willing to unload him after only 1 year and eat some of the 44Mill over 4yrs but if he does come back, sorry Aaron but you gotta play LF
Eric Byrnes–D’Backs–Are his best days behind him? (proabably) Or can he bounce back from injury. AZ is more than willing to unload him and eat some of the 20Mill over 2yrs he’s owed
Magglio Ordonez– Tigers– Det. is looking to dump salary but are they willing to do a deal like we did when we sent Abreu to NYY for garbage? He is owed 18Mill next yr and 15Mill in 2010 but has 3Mill buyout so 1 year 21Mill sounds steep but not if we can send either Eaton (9Mill) or Jenkins (8Mill) along with prospects as part of the deal
Ryan Spilborghs–Rockies — Doubt that Col. will trade him. Why? He’s cheap and good, oh and if they decide to deal Holiday they’ll need him. I just put him on the list because I like him as a player.
Everyone else I thought of was all ready on Tim’s list
Posted: 01:04 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 John
I saw the other day that the Rockies are looking for takers for Matt Holiday ?
Maybe we could get him and not gut the farm system.
Posted: 01:17 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Todd
I was on the flight out of dallas with the Texas and White Sox All Stars to NYC this past summer, and bradley barely even spoke to his own teammates. Young, Kinsler and Hamilton were all chatting and goofing off, Bradley was off to the side the whole time, and they barely acknowledged each other. On a team like the phils, where everyone seems to be pretty close and won because of it, is that something we want to add?
Posted: 01:20 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Tim Malcolm
john: Holliday is available, but he’s:
A – A one-year rental with a fat contract proceeding him in 2010.
B – Worth Victorino and prospects, and Lou Marson is first on the list.
Posted: 01:31 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
)I have no interest AT ALL in milton bradley or any of that 30 and over trash. Let Burrell walk, hes DH at this point of his career. If Baldelli passes a physical and is really healed (trainers) id have some interest in bringing him in.
Id really concentrate on bringing in a LF replacement via a trade. One of Kyle Kendrick and JA Happ are on the outside looking in, especially with Carlos Carrasco looming and the Phillies going hard after the top japense Prospect Junich Tazawa. The Phillies, fresh off a WS win, have money to spend and they should sign a free agent starting pitcher to add depth to the rotation. Hamels is the man, hes has ABSOLUTELY proven that. so you need someone to slot in between myers and blanton/moyer. Lowe, Oliver Perez, someone like that would fit in well in that slot if you dont have to pay a ridiculous price. That makes happ and kendrick eexpendable in a trade for a LF who is preferable under contract, right-handed, doesnt strike out too much, and isnt old. Im sorry, not really interested in Magglio Ordonez. Maybe Ryan Ludwick? Dejesus is a corner outfielder, he proved that last year by not really being great in CF. I really do think Kendrick is getting moved and maybe even happ if/when moyer returns.
its not going to be easy to find an adequate replacement for burrell, but it also makes almost no sense to resign him. In the NL hell be totally immobile in a year or two. Lets see what Amaro’s got. Hopefully he was paying attention while Gillick pieced together a WS Champion, despite all his flaws.
Posted: 01:42 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
also…i want ABSOLUTELY NO PART OF MATT HOLLIDAY. just wait….his power will disappear once he leaves colorado i GUARANTEE that. He is going to be the next barry zito type contract. I feel that whoever gets him will be making a huge mistake.
Posted: 01:44 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
i mean, is it me or does that guy have total fraud bust written all over him?
Posted: 01:47 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
I don’t think a lot of OF will be available via trade. Moreover, I don’t see Happ and/or Kendrick being attractive pieces for other teams. Happ maybe, but not Kendrick. Certainly neither is the centerpiece of a deal. It would at least require Carrasco and/or Marson.
Posted: 01:51 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Laughin at bringing up Michael Taylor in July, the guy would have to have a monster in Reading and that’s if he even starts the year there.
Wouldn’t agree he has bust written over him Geoff but his price-tags a hell of a lot higher than I’d like to see us go to considering his contracts up and we’ve just won the championship, we don’t need to play in the rental market for 1 big shot at the title. Would disagree with Bradley being a Philly player, he’s not the athlete he was as an up and comer and he’s not the work hard and then you can have a moan Philly guy.
I really wouldn’t rule out a trade for a RHB coming if Burrell’s allowed to walk.
Posted: 01:59 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
^Dellucci type trade not a blockbuster.
Posted: 02:01 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Craig
Providing he can prove his fitness and Pat does not resign then Rocco Baldelli would be worth exploring.
Posted: 02:07 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Jake
A bit off topic but I just want to thank Tim and the rest of the Phillies Nation crew for all of the work they have put into this website. I truly believe this is one of (if not) the best sports blog sites on the net. You continue to provide terrific writing and are my main source for everything Phillies. I appreciate everything you guys have done and please continue to keep up the fantastic work!!
Posted: 02:08 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 timb
milton bradley is coming off one of his best years. i look at him as a passionate player, but very immature… ala brett myers. i think manuel and the coaching staff could cool his jets through their player friendly ways and he could find a nice home here. he gets my vote.
Posted: 02:11 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Am I the only one thinking Baldelli’s headed back to Tampa?
This organisation has wanted him for a long time but he’s not a shade on the player they wanted, he may have made the highlight reel with his two high-profile longballs but he’s barely played and has shown nothing to believe he’s going to be used much more he was down these past two months.
I like Michaels but the possibility wreaks of instability with the corner outfield spots though is Byrnes really a possiblity? His health really in questions with the continual setbacks but he would come relitavely inexpensive… Could that be for real or us just trying to find a name?
Posted: 02:16 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
As much as I would love to have Holliday come to Philly, I’m not sure I’d give up Vic in return. If the Phillies can make the trade without involving Victorino, I’m all for it. How many prospects besides Gavin Floyd have we lost, and regreted it? In the end we still came out ahead and won the World series. Atleast Holliday is a proven winner.
Posted: 02:17 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Manny
Unrelated, but I made this 5 min video that I’d like to share with all of you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3vNz5rETY
Posted: 02:26 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
The goal I believe is for a LF to get two years here, so that in 2011, Michael Taylor could be ready to step in everyday.
Posted: 02:37 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Haven’t we been down this road with Mike Constanzo? Taylor doesn’t seem to have everyone in his corner.
Posted: 02:50 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Well, Taylor has been very promising, but there’s a ways to go.
Posted: 03:24 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 From Section 113
“At least Holliday is a proven winner.”
Lest we forget Holliday has won nothing and was actually out at the plate in game 163 against the Padres in ’07.
Holliday ain’t werth the prospects since he won’t ever sign here, and if he did, we couldn’t afford Holliday/Lidge/Utley/JRoll/Hamels/Vic/ect, and I didn’t he fathom Howard!
Just won’t happen.
I like the idea of Baldelli but wonder if Bradley could mesh well here. Bradley would require more yrs and I would not be for that, where as we could get Baldelli for 2 yrs and an option at the most.
Posted: 04:07 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Chris.I
I was referring to being a winner meaning ”everyday player” compared to someone who has no MLB expierience.
Posted: 04:17 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Why would anyone in their right mind want to go after Holliday if it means giving up a bunch of prospects and possbily someone like Victorino? I think resigning Burrell or going after someone like Bradley for 2 years would be the far and away better option. We have a championship team, the goal should be to add pieces to it, not take away from its heart and soul (players like Victorino/Werth).
Posted: 04:25 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 T Mac
Personally, I don’t care to see Burrell back, no matter what kind of deal we could get for him. Overall, factoring in his lack of speed, poor defense, and high strikeout rate, he’s at best an average player who is way overpaid.
I like the idea of taking a flyer on Baldelli for 2 years at $2 million a year. He showed in the playoffs he can still play and hit lefties, and we can use the combination of Jenkins, Stairs, and Dobbs against righties (we’re paying all three of these guys to play next year, so let’s use them!)
Posted: 06:02 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 Soapy
Personally, I want J-Mike back! I was a dumbass and bought his jersey only to have him traded in the offseason. If he comes back I’ll have that ready for opening day.
Posted: 07:48 PM on November 4, 2008
Posts: 0 pb
MLBTR says the White Sox are looking to dump Nick Swisher, anyone think he can bounce back? (with Manuel & in our lineup?) He’ll only be 28 in 09 and owed 2009: $5.3Mill, 2010: $6.75Mill, 2011: $9Mill, 2012 $10.25Mill club option, $1 million buyout, 2013: FA
For his career he’s a better RH hitter
It wouldn’t be the MLB Hot Stove season with out the annual White Sox Phillies trade
Posted: 01:42 AM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Phillies Phan SC
I may be alone here, but I still say we need to pay the people we have and develop our talent. Trade – maybe, but buy a fee agent – no. I would make an exception for Jason Michaels though, I think he was one that could do the job and not be through the roof.
Posted: 05:29 AM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Swisher may be available and signed cheaply but he won’t come cheap.
Posted: 08:43 AM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Bill
“Mistakes, I’ve made a few, but then again, too few to mention” – Ed Wade
Pat, good riddance. You have no speed. You hit an average number of homers but hit in the smallest ballpark in the state (including Lehigh, Harrisburg, Reading, and Scranton). You led the league three of the last four years in WORST batting average with runners in scoring position. You can’t field your position without help from Rollins and Victorino (media backed statement). You haven’t hit over .260 since your rookie season. And, you are too motivated by the media. You are the worst player this city has had since some guy named Von Hayes.
Posted: 12:06 PM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 Chuck
Bill……seriously? Since Von Hayes? Better go back and check some of the rosters in the past 15 or so years before you make a statement like that. And just to clear up the facts……2002….. .282 avg along with 37 HR and 116 RBI. And 2005….. .281/32/117.
Posted: 01:53 PM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 MetsLose
Bring back the Bat!
Posted: 04:50 PM on November 5, 2008
Posts: 0 jimmyk
Wow, we just won the WS and so many people are bashing Pat. He did well in every round of the play-offs and while he only had one hit in the WS it was huge. He may not be the best defensive LF but he is always among the leaders in outfield assists.
Bradley is a head case who will disrupt the chemistry of the team. Holiday is a one year rental whose power numbers will decline outside of Coors, for that we will deplete the farm or give up key contributors from the team. Don’t give up on Kendrick so fast he will be fine. Sign Pat to a fair deal until someone from the farm is ready.
Posted: 02:10 AM on November 6, 2008
Posts: 0 Федор
Народ в таких вот случаях так говорит – Беда деньгу родит.
Posted: 01:24 AM on August 23, 2009
Posts: 0 jean bardovsky
This article is very first-class. I was reading it with pleasure. sincerely
Posted: 12:58 PM on January 15, 2010