Arbitration Fallout: A Slap In The Face
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, December 02, 2008 10:01 AM | Comments: 75
Posts
In declining to offer arbitration to Jamie Moyer and Pat Burrell, the Phillies sent a message that they don’t want to pay too much for either party. They feared that if Moyer or Burrell would’ve accepted the one-year deal, they would be shelling out more than they wanted.
We’ve gone over the prospects for left field and starting pitcher. What I’ve seen is there really aren’t better options than Burrell for one or two years, and while Moyer is 46, he remains a viable back-end rotation guy. These are players you’d want back on your team.
One line of thinking that I agree with somewhat is that the Phillies shouldn’t be scared about spending money this offseason. Coming off their world championship, they should be sending a message that they’re prepared to defend their crown. By offering arbitration to Burrell and Moyer, they’re saying they could commit about $25M to these two. Instead, they’re saying they need to be cheap with them, and with others. They won’t be spending a lot of money this offseason.
Clearly dropping more cash to Cole Hamels, Ryan Madson, Ryan Howard and the other young arbitration cases is a bigger concern. Yes, the Phils are hampered somewhat by their young core. But by offering arbitration to Burrell and Moyer, what do you lose?
First, Burrell seems to want more than a one-year contract anyway. Why sign on for one year, have to prove yourself again for a big deal, put yourself in limbo once more? I’m almost positive if the Phils offered Burrell arbitration, he’d decline.
Moreover, giving Moyer arbitration is exactly the right idea. He earned $5.5M in 2008 and should get a raise for his stellar play. What’s one year at $7M? Wasn’t that the expected price, anyway? And aren’t you trying to bring him back, anyway?
And finally, just to throw it out there: Major league clubs won’t feel the pinch of the recession until probably next year. So why not spend some money on one-year possibilities now? Obviously the goal is not to trap yourself into bad multi-year deals, so what’s the problem?
What is lost
Now, what do you lose by not offering arbitration? First, you again lose the fans to frugality. That’s most important. Now fans are expecting a left-handed platoon in left field. Second, you lose a little good nature from Moyer and Burrell. I’m sure Moyer doesn’t mind too much, but the idea of arbitration signals in some minute way that the team wants you back. It has to mean something here.
Of course, you also lose the chance to steal a couple first round draft picks. The Phils at most could’ve had four of them if they lost Moyer and Burrell. Instead they’ll get nothing. This is the type of thinking that put the Phillies farm system below the average for so many years. This is the type of thinking that leads to high-risk first rounders, since you only have one shot to get it right. This is the type of thinking that leads to the Reggie Taylors of the world.
But back to the major loss: the fans. The simple fan sees this arbitration mess as cut and dry: Either the team is showing respect for Burrell and Moyer, or it’s slighting them. To the fan, this is a slap in the face to two men who contributed greatly to a world championship.
While I’m not big on acting sentimental, as Amaro put it, I’m all for making smart decisions. Do I want Burrell back for three or four years? Maybe not. Do I want Moyer back for a ridiculous amount? Probably not. But do I want to maximize the ability to win while minimizing long-term risk? Heck yes.
Silly move, Ruben. Silly move.

















Posts: 0 NJ
Amen, economics or not those draft picks far outweighed the risk.
Posted: 10:19 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 maxhole
all a-greed.
Posted: 10:20 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Manny
BAD, BAD move. I could care less about the sentimental part of it, though. I’m more concerned with the four draft picks we’ll lose.
Why not offer arbitration to Burrell??? He was NOT going to accept, I’m 99% sure. It has always been pretty clear that he wants three.
And one year for Jamie is exactly what we should aim for. If he accepts arbitration, great… if not, keep negotiating.
What a terrible move. They blew it BIG TIME. Amaro better have a Lowe in store for us or something.
Posted: 10:22 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Civil Negligence
They won’t be spending a lot of money this off-season? Then why are they going after Lowe and Burnett, Tim? And that’s just starting pitching–aaaaand that’s just an initial list that will only grow with more expensive names after some of the big fish move out of the free agency market.
While it appears Pat is a lost cause, Moyer can still be signed with the team after some negotiations. Moyer’s risk of an automatic several million dollars more is not worth a re-negotiation that can give the Phillies more cash to go after an outfielder.
Let’s take a deep breath now!
Posted: 10:31 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Megary
The major loss is the simple fan? I don’t understand that line of thinking at all. If Amaro tries GM’ing simply to appease the “simple fan”, then he’s destined to fail. I hope Amaro isn’t trying to win any popularity contests, and with this move, it’s obvious he’s not. ;)
None of us know the real reasons as to why they declined arbitration, but we can all be sure that Amaro knew he was potentially losing out on four top picks. (Imo, there’s no point in drafting 6 players in the first two rounds anyway…the Phillies, and almost every other team, would never, ever spend that kind of money signing what essentially comes down to 6 rolls of the dice).
The winter needs to play out before anyone can make a fair judgement as to the logic behind this move. Might it end up being silly? Sure. But then again, maybe not.
Posted: 10:41 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Plain and simple it’s playing it safe, it’s not about bringing out the cash so much as being aggressive. If Burrell and Moyer accepted then we have 2 minor spots to fill on the roster. Instead of trying to set the trend going forward were falling back into line to see what everyone else does. It’s just a safe move and it wreaks of the reach and hope you don’t get burned mentality thats left us with Freddy Garica, Adam Eaton, Geoff Jenkins and no notabile impact prospects since Cole.
Are we going to win this year? The odds are against repeating but where’s the shrewd aggressiveness you want to see from the FO. This was a matter of just sucking it up and covering the bases and they balked.
Posted: 10:43 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 maxhole
the simple fan won’t even hear of this talk. burrell wouldnt take 1 yr arb, would possibly ruin his chance at a decent contract in years to come if he stinks this yr. moyer is old, and we all agree he has maybe 2 yrs left. arb wouldn’t be a bad idea. until he signs a big name, i will cringe at any decision amaro makes, and then i won’t give him credit for doing it. hes a rat
Posted: 10:47 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
I’d be very surprised if the Phils go much further on Burnett and Lowe, who are both commanding multi-year deals at close to $16M per.
Posted: 10:48 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Chuck P
While I agree with everything that you’re saying, I think that the “fan loss” impact will be far less of an impact than you have indicated and the Phillies know that. They’ll sellout regardless… whether Burrell is playing left field or (dare I say it) Geoff Jenkins, the fans will come out to see the defending World Series champs in droves. We have a huge upper hand heading into this season. While every other team must worry about how they’re going to sell tickets and merchandise in a tough economic environment all we have to do is slap a World Series patch on anything and you can rest assured that it will sell. The draft picks aspect is huge, in my opinion. Moyer’s market value is not going to shock anyone; at his age and with his years of service, he’s an easy commodity to value. If you’re going to bring him back for one year (which everyone says is pretty much a given) then why not offer arbitration? If something happens at the table (he shocks them by saying he wants a second year) then you are kind of stuck… if you offered arbitration, this locks him in for one year and one year only. And how much are you really going to save by going this route? Very little, if anything because he is what he is… nobody believes that Burrell is looking for a one year deal. The chances that he would accept arbitration are minimal and if he accepts, no one would be upset with him coming back for one more year. If we had offered arbitration and both of those guys decided to accept, we would be stepping onto the field with, essentially, the same team that we had last year (and the same team that won the World Series)… I can live with that. Now, the worst case scenario is that we can’t find replacements and we don’t have compensatory draftpicks. That worst case scenario is not acceptable.
Posted: 10:49 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 William
I agree with the Phillies move…I’m not happy with not getting draft picks but its still a good move.
Moyer is 46…why not give JA Happ the ball for the next 5 or 6 years. He certainly pitched well in the time he was up. And you can’t forget the teams that saw Moyer all season, Brewers and LA, POUNDED Moyer!
As for Pat, why pay a guy who can play a full game and strikeouts out so much 14 Million! Put Mayberry, 24, or go out and get a younger OF in his place. Yes Pat did hit a great hit in the last game of WS but nothing before that and he was replaced on defense!
I think it was the right move at the time!
Posted: 10:53 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 William
I meant can’t* (can’t play a full game) on the Burrell comment
Posted: 10:54 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Megary: I’m not saying Amaro should make decisions based on the fans. Not at all. But knowing that Burrell probably won’t accept, why not offer the deal? At least you’re showing a little love. Instead you get nothing at all.
Posted: 10:55 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Civil Negligence
I don’t think GM’s care about ‘showing a little love,’ Tim with a chance–although, yes, minuscule–that he would accept arbitration and cost the Phillies millions more via an arbitrator’s decision. Let’s remember that, afterall, baseball is a business.
Posted: 10:58 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 nate
i could’ve sworn the team site said yesterday that they were going to offer arbitration… when did that change?
Posted: 11:03 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 maxhole
will, burrell and rollins broke open game 4 against brews with homers. He did nothing before his double in WS, but did hit game breakers all season long. and its been said before, burrell was better than his replacements in the late innings. how many times did taguchi ef up, and golson cost us a game against marlins late in season when he kicked the ball at victorine against the wall. burrell knows he cant run so he plays deep, keeps balls in front of him. there’s not another OF with legs on the trade block besides dye, and hes not coming here. mayberry has no major league experience, replacing a guy with 29+ homers past four seasons w/ guy lacking his first major league hit is a huge risk, also cheap.
Posted: 11:10 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
I actually think they did the right thing. 25mm for those two is not great value. Now, they could go and sign some clunkers and ill be pissed but not now.
also…theyre NOT going to sign aj burnett, nor would i want them to. they probably wont sign derek lowe either. burnetts agent wants 5 years 80mm…nobodys going to touch that so the yankkes will give him 4 yeras 75mm. lowe…4 years 55mm to the yankees. sabathia will go to the angels because he wouldve accepted by now if he wanted to be a yankee.
the trick is going to be finding someone with 20+ hr and 80 rbi power for cheap on the trade market or free agent market. tahts the real test of amaro. burrell was overpriced and he knew it. now how good is he and getting both quality and value. gillick proved to be fairly astute at that in the end.
besides, if the phillies are going to overpay for something, which i think they will, then you overpay for pitching.
Posted: 11:11 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Matt Kwasiborski
I definitely don’t think this is a slap on the face to the fans. These days fans are more educated on the business side of sports then say they were 10+ years ago. And I also think it is a sign of respect to Burrell and Moyer. By not offering them arbitration we are giving them the right to explore any deal they wish on their terms and time. If we did offer them arbitration, they would have to decide soon on whether to accept it or not and ultimately make this break from the team (in Burrell’s case) come sooner rather than later. And if Burrell winds up being the best option for us, we can puruse a multi-year deal.
In Moyer’s case, again, it allows him to take his time. Plus, he is either coming back here, going back to Seattle, or retiring. I really don’t see him in any other place considering how close he is to retiring and we know he doesn’t want to uproot his family yet again.
The business side of this is rooted in the market price too. None of the big FAs have yet to sign and therefore the market hasn’t been set. Why offer Burrell arbitration when he will probably get offers below his current salary and not the standard market price which would raise his salary? Smart move business wise.
And this Phillies management has to avoid falling into the Dykstra/Daulton trap of 1993-1994. We need to cherish this championship in our memories forever, but the 2008 season and team is done. Time to make sure we don’t get caught up in sentimentality and remain focused on improving this team as best we can. We have to make up for our weaknesses and remember, this year, players will have a genuine interest in playing here, rather then using us for leverage (see Bobby Bonilla).
Posted: 11:12 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 maxhole
haha bobby bonilla, barry bonds sidekick
Posted: 11:16 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Justin
It made sense not to offer Burrell arbitration, look at Adam Dunn, basically a slightly younger version of Burrell and the D’Backs, who are rebuilding, didn’t offer him arbitration to allow them to grab draft picks for him. So obviously theres something in the air that GMs see that puts Dunn and Burrell overpriced or want too many years in a new contract for any team to want to offer. I doubt even a Giants team (making the Aaron Rowand argument not stating anyones going there) offers either a 4 or 5 yr deal.
Posted: 11:16 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Justin
I also believe that Moyer’s either close to resigning or like it’s been stated already they want to give Carrasco, Happ, and Kendrick a shot at the rotation.
Posted: 11:17 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
I see the argument that Burrell is overpriced for what would be his arb salary, but Burell wasn’t going for a one-year deal. He just wasn’t. He’ll take multiple years.
Moyer, on the other hand: I can see more why they didn’t offer him arb. Try to catch him for less money. Sure. But the Burrell situation? The D-Backs are in a much different position than the Phils, who aren’t rebuilding and can afford the one year futher of Burrell, if he actually accepted.
Posted: 11:21 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 mike
Tim isn’t amazing how people will say it’s a smart move not to offer arbitration. They don’t get it.C what are they watching four top choices, its gives you a chance to get a top talent. maybe a hamels or howard and control him for 6 years at a reasonable price. Instead of overpaying for the jenkins and eatons of the world. It gives you more of a chance to have better prospect for trades and replacment for injury or free agents. Could you just picture if they came up with a little more they would have saunders. as a starter. Or Gibson coming out of missour a stud there losing moyer would mean nothing. also does anyone really think they will overpaid for lowe and burnett. that is a joke.All that revenue from this year will go to them a little for arb cases but they raise tickets, sold a ton merchandise. well I will be dead before they ever win again. Civil negligence doesn’t get it if he accepted arb we would have bought another year of thirty homruns and hundred rbi while our farm see if taylor or brown can play, instead they will pay some second tier guy 5 or 6 million for three years. and hope he can be magical.
Posted: 11:21 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Groty
Curious – Thome and Helms still on the books for 2009?
Posted: 11:23 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Bill
This arbitration debacle reminded me of the Ed Wade years. I fear Amaro learned more from Wade than he did Pat Gillick. I can not stand how cheap they are. If Mayberry is there plan for 2010 (a long shot in my opinion), why not spend the extra money if Burrell accepts arbitration and use him as a stop gap to your future.
There is no excuse for Moyer other than poor management by an inexperienced general manager.
http://www.phightinphils.com
Posted: 11:23 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 mike
Tim one thing about the d back. There owner borrowed from mlb 100 million when they won the championship, there owner borrowed money for Johnson and Schilling, they spent and bought there fans a championship. do you think the phillies would overspend to win. ha ha not a chance. John middleton the only owner who would and express it before last year can’t do anything. The way cheap skate Giles put this group together all have to agree to make moves.
Posted: 11:32 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Justin
Helms and Thome I thought are officially off the books, because I think he had a team option and the White Sox picked it up, meaning the Phils were off the hook, I may be wrong but I’m fairly certain they’re both off the books, in fact the Phils didn’t get a prospect in the trade for Helms so i believe the Marlins just picked up his full contract.
Posted: 11:33 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Megary
Tim: To directly answer your question, I think the possibility of Burrell accepting arbitration must have been greater than you believe, at least in Amaro’s eyes. Really, let’s think about this for a second…is he really a hot commodity and where exactly is he going to go? The AL? But where exactly? And is he going to get what he and his agent would like to get?
But maybe I misunderstood what you were initially trying to say, so indirectly…
It appears to me now that you are more concerned with the respect the Phillies show Burrell or Moyer (the players) and not necessarily how this comes across to the fans. Meh…
Should it not be a two way street? Why shouldn’t Burrell accept arbitration or resign after the contract he was previously given? Show some respect or love to the team. Moyer as well. He was (nearly) scrap heap material and now he’s in line for a big contract…as big as any 46 year old could ever dream of. Cut the Phillies a little slack, and let them take some of their extra dollars and throw some “respect” at the player, Hamels, who most deserves it (especially after the way he was treated last year).
I’m not too worried about love and respect to the players. Maybe I should be. But until a whole bunch of them decide to not sign wherever the most dumptrucks full of money are backed up waiting to unload, then I can’t fault the owners or GM’s for trying to protect some of that cash.
The biggest potential loss to the Phillies as I see it now is if they can’t get anything done over the winter. Saving this money and having to sit on it would really piss off the fans, and the players.
Posted: 11:34 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 maxhole
megary, angels like him. abreau is a free agent, and the one outfielder keeps ruining his arm, yanks need a bat and fielder at first and OF. there are plenty of AL teams that would pay burrell
Posted: 11:44 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Your last graph there is the crux of my argument, but I may have skated around it a bit. People would be pissed if the Phils have a light offseason. Obviously we can’t tell until October 2009 what to make of it all, but right now the initial message is one of confusion and repetition.
And when I say at least you’re showing a little love, I mean you’re extending some sort of branch to just show, “OK, we’re still interested in either bringing back guys from 2008, or maybe upgrading.” I’ve made the point before here that Moyer isn’t the right guy at the wrong price, and Burrell absolutely isn’t the right guy at the wrong price. But there really isn’t much harm in one-year deals this season that may put them slightly over the budgeted payroll.
Posted: 11:46 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Gavin
I think it hurts the players signability if they have been offered arb. In essence, they just made Burrell a richer man.
I don’t understand what you have to lose by offering them, unless you have better options. If we were going to sign Manny….then ok, don’t offer Burrell, but otherwise it’s a wasted chance to get draft picks. As you stated Tim, worst case scenerio is that Burrell accepts and he plays on another contract year, and I really don’t see him getting that much more $ than he did this year. he’s been overpaid for a while now.
I still think they re-sign Moyer, but now we have to worry about it. If they offered him arb, at least we’d be 95% sure he’d be back….now….60/40?
I guess it’s going to be Jenkins/Unknown RH in LF next year. Thats a big hole to fill.
I don’t understand the frugality at this point. No one is asking them to go sign Manny/CC/KRod/etc. We just want them to spend it wisely.
How awesome would next year’s draft had been if we had 5 picks in the first 40 or so. Plaus, since we won the WS, we’ll have the last pick in each round. That doesnt help either. I dont get it.
Posted: 11:47 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Megary
To the next person who says something like: “They could have had four top draft picks”…
The Phillies have (I believe) a first and second round pick already. Let’s add to that, speculatively, another first rounder, another second rounder and two sandwich picks between rounds 1 and 2 as compensation for Moyer and Burrell. (Could be a little different based on the signing team’s final record, I believe).
That’s 6 picks in the first two rounds.
OK everyone, what’s that gonna cost? And please explain how that signing money spent is better than spending money on a player already in the major leagues (assuming the Phils spend the money saved by not resigning Burrell or Moyer).
Posted: 11:49 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
what it falls down to is Burrell likely woulnd’t have accepted arbitration but with the ‘uncertain economy’ there was a risk he would have. nevertheless offering him limited his options due to the compensation had he not accepted it but at the very least late in the day someone would have picked him up. Now someone will on their terms without having to give up draft compensation.
It was a do nothing move by the Phils, there’s too much of a do nothing attitude and hope the talent will get you by attitude floating around. This isn’t the 1900′s, the game has changed and you have to be aggressive in compiling draft picks or being clever with your resources or you better dismantle after a championship.
Posted: 11:51 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
megary- because the teams that spend money on free agents and are agressive in the trade market with older players rarely suceed in todays baseball. You want a blueprint for success now you look to the Red Sox, you spend on talent and stockpile it and use your money wisely on veterans.
Posted: 11:54 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
sorry ^ this isn’t the 1990′s for that previous post
Posted: 11:56 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Put it this way: The move last night is a tell-tale sign of what the Phillies are looking to do this offseason: Not overspend.
Posted: 11:58 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 William
Tim, you said something about a lite offseason. Well except for the Lidge deal nothing happened until I believe January with Feliz. Which no one really saw the value in Feliz. I hoped they would have signed him early when I saw he was a FA but they were patient and waited and got there man at a bargain.
I think the Phillies are taking the same approach this year. Let the market settle and get the bargains. Instead of going after the Adam Eatons right away.
Posted: 11:59 AM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Megary
Tim: Amaro could be extending the olive branch to Burrell and Moyer in actual contract discussions as we speak. And I’m sure these players know the Phillies level of interest in resigning them already.
Arbitration isn’t the right tool to be used as an olive branch.
If they could sign Moyer or Burrell for two years at a reasonable figure, would that be better than for one year at an inflated price?
maxhole: You could be right and Burrell may end up somewhere with a huge contract, way above what the Phillies would be willing to offer. But the Phillies hardly knew (though they could have guessed) what other players (I’m thinking Abreu here) would and would not be offered arbitration. And as someone else pointed out, the market has yet to set itself. So who knows, Burrell may indeed resign with the Phillies.
Posted: 12:02 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
I think thats a charitable way of saying it Tim, I think the theme of the off-sesaon is fall back into the pack and hope things shake out like they have before. This is trying to be too clever with Burrell instead of making the right move, a little risky but not a great risk unless we’ve been living past our means.
Posted: 12:10 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 MP
I think at least Burrell should have been offered arbitration. The dumbest person in baseball knows Burrell doesn’t want just one year. There was nothing to lose with arbitration to Burrell. And I think Moyer should have been offered it because the guy has earned a little extra money, and I think we should deal with Moyer on a year to year basis. I think Moyer has at least two good years, maybe three left, but with the age I would keep him at year to year. This, was a huge mistake by Amaro. If we’re serious about repeating, we have to be ready to spend, and this if this is any indication on how money is going to be spent the rest of the offseason, I am not getting my hopes up.
Posted: 12:22 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 William
Reason not to offer it stated right on their website:
While protecting Draft picks is incentive for teams to offer arbitration, the danger of a player accepting can make it not worth the risk. In recent years, the Phillies have been burned in this manner by Kevin Millwood and Placido Polanco.
Posted: 12:24 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 TheDipsy
Get a grip! If Burrell would have accepted arbitration we’d have been screwed. 15m worth of screwed. Let me run a list of names past you that you wouldn’t pay 15m to. Gorman Thomas, Rob Deer, Adam Dunn. Forget it. This what 15m WILL get you. Someone LIKE Raul Ibanez AND Kerry Wood AND Russ Springer. How would you like to spend your money? Ther Phillies are a self imposed “capped” team. Thats the way it is. By the way, Brad Penny is looking kinda good right now.
The Dipsy
Chairman of the Derek Lowe in Pinstripes Foundation
Posted: 12:24 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Burrell One Step Closer To A New Team
[...] Phillies Nation thinks it’s a slap in the face to the players. Beerleaguer wonders if the Yankees wouldn’t be a destination for Moyer. The Good Phight says it’s the economy, stupid. [...]
Posted: 12:33 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Gavin
We’ll start to see some real movement after Dec. 12th when players are non-tendered. This is where Gillick made his hay. Until then we’ll just have to wait and see.
Realistically I see the Phillies signing a fringe OF like Jenkins last year and a Brocail/Spring type for the pen.
My top free agent choice that we COULD ACTUALLY SIGN….Nick Punto.
Prediction……Burrell signs with a team for alot less $ than we thought a few weeks before ST, and we’ll all go crazy because we could have gotten him back for so little $.
Posted: 12:34 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
First of all, Burrell is gone. By not offering him arbitration, teams are now willing to pay a little more for him, knowing that it will not cost them draft picks. The Phillies had an advantage over other teams in negotations (because of the loss of draft picks) but now that advantage is gone. He’ll get a three year deal from an American league team.
Secondly, this now prevents the Phillies from signing any Type A free agents. If the Philles had the compensatory picks for Burrell but signed an Ibanez or Cruz, they would still have a first round pick. Now, if they signed one of those guys, they don’t have a first rounder. If they offered Burrell arbitration and he accepted, then you’re set for one year. If he declined, they you have a green light to sign a Type A free agent knowing that you’ll still have a first round pick.
Anyone who thinks the Phillies are going to go out and sign a Lowe, Burnett or Sheets (who were all offered arbitration!) is kidding themselves. This team will have to improve by trading away it’s already thin minor league system. This is all about money.
Posted: 12:36 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 KM
I am surprised they didnt offer arbitration to Moyer, but not surprised about Burrell. I think that Burrell would have accepted arbitration, and I think we need some new blood from the position. Forget Burrell’s power numbers, they can be made up throughout the order, I will take speed at contact at that position.
Posted: 01:05 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Davegas
I think this team is Victorino’d. When they lost Rowand, Shane stepped up his game and we weren’t questioning why Rowand wasn’t here any more. I think they think someone else will do the same next year. Foolish asumption and hurt the fans looking for a repeat at the same time.
Posted: 01:08 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 KM
I understand that not offering Burrell arbitration pretty much forbids the Phillies from signing another type A free agent because of draft pick considerations, but I think that we can improve the lineup by subtracting Burrell, and i didn’t want to take the chance that he accept arbitration.
Now Moyer on the other hand . . . either the Phillies don’t want him back, or they are trying to sign him outside of arbitration for a more Phillie-friendly price.
Posted: 01:09 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Dave
This makes no sense whatsoever. I’d rather risk having to shell out on a 1-yr contract against getting a boatload of first round picks.
Did we get the wrong guy for the job?
Posted: 01:19 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Megary
Griffin: I agree with you that it’s highly unlikely the Phllies will wind up with any Type A FA’s who were offered arbitration. That doesn’t mean there are no FA’s worth signing however.
Here’s a great link to all FA’s and their current status:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/12/2009-mlb-free-a.html
There are still pitchers and corner OF’s that can be had without losing a pick. Yes, some are worthless, but others may be a good fit. Only Type A FA’s result in a loss of a pick when signed.
Posted: 01:20 PM on December 2, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Actually, Andy Pettite wouldnt cost a pick…
Posted: 01:25 PM on December 2, 2008