Grading The Offseason To Date
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Wed, December 17, 2008 09:47 AM | Comments: 82
Posts
Let’s count the offseason progress:
Additions
Ronny Paulino (C)
Raul Ibanez (LF)
John Mayberry Jr. (OF)
Jamie Moyer (SP)
Chan Ho Park (SP/RP)
Scott Mathieson (SP/RP)
Subtractions
Jason Jaramillo (C)
Pat Burrell (LF)
Tadahito Iguchi (2B)
So Taguchi (OF)
Greg Golson (OF)
Rudy Seanez (RP)
Tom Gordon (RP)
Yes, the Phils have basically filled holes this offseason. Burrell out, Ibanez in. Seanez out, Park in. Golson out, Mayberry in. Jaramillo out, Paulino in.
Are the Phillies finished with their offseason shopping? Reports say Ruben Amaro has looked at more than 20 non-tendered players, meaning he’s still fishing the lake for minor catches. It’s possible the Phillies will add another bench bat (especially right-handed) and a reliever (would love some veteran experience near the back).
But, for posterity sake, let’s say Amaro has finished his offseason shopping. Are you satisfied?
Grade the offseason (on the A to F scale) so far. At this moment, I’d give Amaro a C-plus. The plus is the Chan Ho Park addition. While everything else seemed to be lateral, Park could turn to be a coup if used correctly.
What’s your grade?
















Posts: 0 Tom G
The Flexibility with the Park move is a significant bene for the team…long relief and spot starter at minimum…good add.
the Moyer move was an over priced fill for a guy who could not command in the league what he is seen value -wise in Philly…over paid for him by 2M per year…
Ibanze is a good pick up…will do well in this line-up…line drive hitter who will produce…but the money placed on his back and the years given do not make it as good of a move going forward. Love the player, not the timing!
I give them a B-…improved bullpen at the least, which was already solid…kept rotation in take with a potential upgrade in overall production in LF…OBP will be higher in the middle of the line-up as a result which will improve our team dynamic…traded a character guy in Left with a Character guy in left…
Would still like the Phillies to go get LOWE…or Ben Sheets (they can now afford to risk some dolllars on Sheets with Park and Moyer on the books)
the YANKS, ANGELS, BSOX, BRAVES, CUBS and METS have all significantly upgraded…Phils have not kept pace…so it is put up or shut up time
Posted: 10:10 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Matthew
My grade is a big fat juicy turd. I just wish for once we would have made the big move and signed the big player to put a real emphasis on our team statement that we make to everyone in our division and MLB. The statement that says, “Yes we won the world series, yes the best just got better, and yes we will be taking our title back again this year…” Maybe I am just jelous of the big deals that the Yankees, Mets, and Dodgers can do. But then again, maybe I am not… because we proved you can still choke even when the roster and payroll says you can’t.
Posted: 10:25 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Mark
How can you grade a test when it’s not completed?
You can’t give him a grade until you see how effective his moves actually were during the season.
Posted: 10:26 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Robbi P
I have to agree with Mark, I see this more as a mid term for the winter offseason, only halfway done.
Wouldn’t the grade change if they signed Derek Lowe or Ben Sheets?
And I don’t think we needed to make the big moves, I think we are saying, we kept our core players, we upgraded our weak spots, you have to play better than us!
Posted: 10:32 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Evrybuddy Hits woohoo
Remember, signing big names does not equal a better team. Ask the Mets.
Overall grade is upgrade thus far. In the B+ range because we didn’t lose anything that we couldn’t replace. If we add a number 2 or 3 pitcher, I’d grade A+
Lose minor leaguer Jason Jaramillo for a legitimate backup catcher Ronny Paulino. (Upgrade)
Lose fan favorite and streaky Pat Burrell for steady Raul Ibanez. (Slight upgrade)
Lose Tadahito Iguchi and So Taguchi and gain nothing (Upgrade)
Lose Gordan and Rudy Seanez and gain Chan Ho Park (Upgrade)
Keep Moyer. (Better than losing him)
Lose minor leaguer Golson and gain minor leaguer John Mayberry Jr. (Push)
Posted: 10:37 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Ed
It’s a pretest?
Posted: 10:47 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Groty
I’m still boggled by the Paulino trade. I can understand trading away Jaramillo, but for another Catcher?
Posted: 10:49 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Justin
Here’s my thing..
I think that Amaro is doing a good job with the money he has to work with, but I am still baffled by this team’s ownership..
They must have made tons of money last year, having the fourth highest attendance (I think), plus the extra playoff games.
Also, their merchandise from the playoffs must have made them millions.
This season, I would be shocked if 95 percent of the games were not sold out at CBP..
So why, I ask you, why, are we still being thrifty with our money?
I understand the owners not spending money in the late 90′s when no one came to the Vet, and no one really cared, but why not now?
Yeah it’s a tough economic climate, but the Phillies organization is making ridiculous amounts of money from this championship.
The Phillies have surpassed the Eagles for the moment, so don’t they want it to continue?
It smells like greed to me… Anybody have any thoughts? Tim?
Posted: 10:50 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Kyle
Moyer = Old
I think they should have spent their $7 mil per year on a better investment or atleast spent it chasing Derek Lowe.
Posted: 10:54 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Ed
There is no doubt about it, the Owners have money to spend but don’t want to spend it. I agree that adding big name guys does not always make you a better team or guarentee anything but I think that is only true to a point. I think adding big bats doesn’t do as much for you but adding a top flight ace or a solid two makes all the difference in the world. I know people say, well a pitcher only effects maybe 30 games a year based on 30 starts but that is totally untrue. If a guy pitches a gem, like 8 innings and you need just one inning from your pen then your bullpen is in good shape for the next day, or next two days. If your starter gets hammered and goes 2 innings now your pen has to come in for 7 innings and you are totally mauled for the next day or two, so now, you haven’t just effected one game, you have effected two or three.
One quality starter can make all the difference. Look at what Sabathia did for the Brewers or what Tim Lincecum did for the Giants. San Fran is terrible but he kept them in the game every single time he went out there.
Posted: 10:57 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Tyler
I give this offseason like a D+… in the Ibanez Burrell exchange was pretty much a wash, we got rid of some power and a massive threat to breakaway with one swing and added a little less power but a higher average, BUT another fricken lefty… i like moyer as a mentor for the younger pitchers and don’t see him making a huge decline from last yr, the only thing that may hurt him is other teams figuring him out but a potential 20mil over 2 yrs is absurd… the chan ho park signing only added to the best pen in the majors so nothing really all that amazing bout that… i would have rather seen this money go towards lowe or even sheets since weve got so many good prospects to back him up should he get hurt… amaro could up this grade to like a B/B- if he signed lowe or a good right handed hitter (depending on who it is), if sheets then it becomes a C+ as of the signing, but his play would obv affect the grade
Posted: 10:57 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Chutley
where’s number 100?
Posted: 11:01 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NEPA
Mark, hindsight is always 20/20, so of course it’ll be much clearer at the end of next season how well all these moves worked out. But, any move a GM makes can either become great or disastrous, especially with the potential of injury. So, we can only evaluate Amaro’s moves by deciding whether he’s filled the teams couple of holes and put us in a good position to repeat. At this point, I would put him somewhere in the C+, B- area.
Posted: 11:09 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Thats basically right..C+/B-. Park will rep[lace Rudy Seanez, thats an upgrade if Park performs well..So add a third of a letter grade there. I prefer Ibanez over Burrell because Ibanez is the type of hitter they needed, so add a third letter grade there..If a C is staying neutral, then they get a C+/B- basically….
I would prefer them to have traded for a starting pticher, but the trade market for pitching simply has not developed so they got antsy and resigned Moyer..the free agent pitchers, though way overpriced, ridiculously so, are taking WAY too long to sign because theyre all waiting for Derek Lowe. A trade market for starting pitching, maybe even offers for Brett Myers, wont start coming until Lowe signs and maybe a few others sign. Boras, again, with the Lowe fiasco, has screwed up the entire flow of the offseason. Once the top 2 pitchers signed the market is supposed to fall into place within a few days from there…but lowe is taking forever to sign somewhere…
I would still expect Amaro to explore the trade market for starting pitching…he has pieces to move because I doubt theyre going to resign brett myers because that money is reserved for cole hamels and maybe werth and victorino. maybe even madson. So if they wont resign him then I doubt that Amaro will keep him past the trade deadline and risk not getting type A status compensation for him. I think they will reach out to blanton and resign him if he pitches well at a reasonable price during the season…i dotn think itll be too hard to keep him if they want to.
the issue is theres no money for myers if you analyze what theyre doing…so why not try and see what they can get? theyd have to demand a rotation-ready starter in return though, which teams kind of dont have to spare yet..
Posted: 11:11 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Greg V.
Well the goal was to get a left fielder and pitchers and they did just that. So I would say this is a more successful off season than most. I’m giving him an A. And this is not from a huge Amaro fan either. But he stated his goals when he took over and he accomplished them. He didn’t talk about right handed batters and what not. He talked about signing a left fielder (Ibanez) and pitchers (Moyer and Park). I think Moyer and Ibanez were two of the best options out there. Park is a good insurance policy. I’m satisfied with what he has done.
Posted: 11:36 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 GM-Carson
I give him a C, because I don’t think he’s improved nor worsened the team. If he is able to get rid of Eaton without eating the entire contract that will get him bonus points. Also, I bet he trades Stairs and gets a righthanded bat, at least I hope he does, and that will also give him bonus points.
Posted: 11:43 AM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
I think that unless they can find a legitimate cheap upgrade, then Mayberry and Jenkins will be your bench outfielders…stairs will just get moved for nothing or DFA
Posted: 12:01 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 OZ
I’m giving the owners a grade of “Under my desk, swinging on the d*ck trouble”.
Posted: 12:02 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Mike N
I say, B/B-. Pitching moves are conservative but solid. Unlike some others, I think Ibanez is actually a good signing, though not an “A” signing because of the money/years. I think Amaro should get some bonus points for keeping the farm intact, though we won’t know what that’s worth for a year or two anyway.
Posted: 12:04 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Theyd better as hell not be done though….the minimum I expect is another arm for the bullpen…I dont have any problem with the things they did…but now is the time to move some pieces around the board and try tp upgrade the rotation. they committed to a back end of Blanton – Moyer – Happ, now they need to decide if theyre going to keep brett myers…if they arent resigning him then move him for some good younger, cheaper players. if one of them isnt rotation ready then you move for a stable option via trade or free agency (garland). no, not derek lowe. they vlearly backed out of lowe because nothing abotu lowe has been linked to the phillies in like a week.
Posted: 12:12 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 psujoe
I give an I-incomplete. there’s some 2010 work that still needs to be done. Myers is gone after next year. We need another pitcher unless we want to be shopping in FA for a #2 next year. I have no idea whose available next year. Madson is gone as well after next year. We have to lock him up or go shopping next year when the market for relievers may be thinner. We despararetly need a right handed hitter off the bench. I-Incomplete.
Posted: 12:15 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Matt Kwasiborski
Groty- here is the reason for the Paulino trade. It immediately impacts the present and future. Coste wore down last year and is probably done here. They need a MLB ready backup catcher who can endure the season longer than Coste did last year. And it also allows Marson to start a full season at Triple A so he doesn’t sit on our bench and retard his progress. I think this is a shrewd move.
I really like the Ibanez move: http://www.philly.com/dailynews/columnists/bill_conlin/20081217_Bill_Conlin__Ibanez_may_fit_perfectly_for_Phillies_in_leftfield.html
Conlin does a solid job writing about even though the Phils lineup is top heavy with LH, Ibanez has a great track record against LHP and there is a lack of depth of All-star caliber LH starters outside of Hamels, Santana, Moyer and Wolf (based on 2007 win totals).
I would love to see Lowe sign here. But I also understand the financial prudence of not overpaying for him. While you guys want the Phils to make a “big” splash, huge FA pitchers have notoriously been huge disappointments in the past decade. And I love the fact that we have three solid almost ready/are ready prospects and here is why. Pitchers like Lowe, CC, Sheets, et al have numerous scouting reports on them and how to beat them. But there is less information on our rookies and they can be brought up for half a season or a spot start or two. I call it the Dontrell Willis effect. Instead of trading prospects for an established and expensive pitcher, the Marlins simply brought him up and he pitched them into the WS.
The Phils did this with Happ in September. They needed one start out of him. Kendrick’s confidence was in the dumpster because teams had a scouting report on him since he came up in 2007. The Phils can afford to keep the status quo because of the minor leaguers who can be effective in the #5 role. Lowe would be nice but we don’t lose anything from last year’s rotation if we don’t sign him. And we all know we won a WS with that rotation!
Posted: 12:18 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Chuck P
B… we don’t need to shake the boat too much… we finished the season #1 and as long as the names on the backs of our infielders read Howard, Utley and Rollins, we will be in contention. Of course, we need to keep looking ahead. Our immediate concerns this offseason were LF and SP. Ibanez was a nice pickup and Moyer’s deal is a good one for us… I mean, he gets to hang around until he’s AARP eligible but the best case scenario is that we’re paying him $7.5 for two years and he’s winning games… worst case, he doesn’t pan out and we’re paying him $6 million to be our bench coach and a long reliever. It doesn’t cripple us either way. Next year, with Myers and Madson gone, we’ll need a RP, a #2 starter, a RF and possibly a 3B (Feliz 2010 club option). We’ll also need to start thinking about what we’re going to do beyond 2010 because that’s when things will get interesting. Rollins club option in 2011, Howard FA 2012, Vic FA 2012… the window has not closed on this run but we need to remain flexible and/or be willing to maximize the value of the players that we have in order to remain at the top in the future. That might mean trading some guys that might not be here in two years (Werth, Vic, Howard, Myers, Madson… dare I say it, Rollins). If it were up to me, I wouldn’t care if we held onto these guys as long as we can; I think that they have earned it but economics tells you to buy low and sell high.
Posted: 12:19 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
This off-season will be truely graded in several months time once we’ve seen the effects of this off-season. The success o the season relies on a return to form from Ryan Howard, the impact Jimmy Rollins, Brett Myers to be an effective frontline starter, Ryan Madson to be the elite set-up guy he finished the year as. The moves made this off-season were underwhelming but with confidence in the guys already on this roster sustaining or reclaiming their top level of performance.
It would have been nice to add a Lowe or a Holliday but there is more than enough talent on this roster and in the system to win, we’ve added character guys an secondary pieces with upside and I’ll give a C, that said I’m throw out the phrase sometimes inactivity in the off-season is the best move. When looking at the Mets and Yankees remember they lost a lot of players this off-season, the Phillies roster is completely in tact.
Posted: 12:20 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
I don’t know that you can give a grade yet, because they added another catcher, with the talks being that Coste could be moved, and that the Marlins were interested in him..
Kendrick has no real spot. .or if he does, then Happ is the odd man out..
I wouldn’t be too surprised to see Kendrick packaged with Stairs (Jenkins makes too much money, and can at least play defense too) and maybe they try to move those guys for an additional RH bat, and a pitching prospect?
Because some moves setup future moves, you can’t really give them a grade right now because we dont know what else they have lined up
Posted: 12:24 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 JohnKruksLoveChild
I give them an F for not signing CC, K-Rod and Manny !!
Burrell needed to move on, hopefully he can find an AL team to join and be their DH, same path as Thome. His fielding is subpar but his bat still has some heat, and if he can keep dinging homeruns, maybe he’ll have a shot at 500 and the Hall before he retires. Ibanez’s numbers seem fine, and I look forward to having more of a line drive hitter in the lineup, too many of our guys swing for the fence when they should just be trying to get on base (JRoll, I’m looking at you).
Park is a bit of a gamble, but it’s not an overly expensive one, and if his production gives us another Durbin type RP, that would be great. The Phils overused Chad last season and he was out of gas by the time the playoffs rolled around. If Park’s usage can balance out the load, that would make him more then worth it.
There’s only so many choices out in the market, and regardless of their increased budget, there are several large payouts looming. I’m much more concerned about locking down Hamels with a long term deal then inking another big name to the roster.
I’ll give em a B- so far for the offseason. Nothing at this point has been overtly bad, and Ibanez and Park have potential but with some performance risk.
Posted: 12:25 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Maverick
Wow peeps are writing books today. my ADD only lets me read the first sentence.
Anyway.. I don’t think you can label Moyer as an “Addition” since he was part of last years team.
My grade is this = We were 3 games better than the Mets last year. The Mets got better. We didn’t so far. C-
It could be worse we could be in the dodgers situation. Everyone leaving for FA.
Posted: 12:25 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
Its more of a halftime offseason grade kind of…ill wait until spring training to give a final stamp on amaros first endeavor into player personnel moves, but so far its like neutral or slightly improved if you factor in all players. paulino could find himself again though and make it very tough for lou marson to get called up, i mean he used to be able to hit….
kendrick is gone, probably before spring training, and the same with coste. travis darnaud is rising to the 4th spot in the organization, now occupied by coste…kendrick/stairs (gone)/coste are the odd guys out here, theyll all be traded or DFA, but two of them could and should be packages (good idea) for some sort of young relief pitching…only myers can get you young starting pithching i think, and even then youd need to send him to a team that has too much pitching or can afford to sign more (thats liek 5 teams)…so you can move him, probably without a lot of trouble, but the options are limited…
Posted: 12:32 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Evrybuddy Hits woohoo
Re the “Phils are cheap” comment:
I would love to see the actual figures but here are my estimates:
3.4 million fans at $27 average ticket price $92 million.
1 million cars parked at $20 per car $20 million.
$20 per person on concessions per game $68 million
TV rights – A complete guess of $10 million
Total revenues of $190 million.
Players’ salaries are at about $110 million. Consider the costs of ushers, security, maintenence, parking authority, food costs, taxes to the city and state, etc, they don’t have much left. They are almost certainly walking away with a profit but by no means are they taking us for all we are worth similar to teams in other cities.
So if the Phils were to spend $20 million more per year on a pitcher and another $20 million on a position player, it would come out of the owners’ pockets.
It is easy to say they can afford it because it isn’t our money. Would you be willing to pay twice the ticket price for higher priced talent?
Posted: 12:33 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
^to chime in on the Paulino move it was a very solid one by Amaro. Paulino is virtually the same age as Jaramillo who looked to have reached his ceiling as a defensive catcher with a below average bat at the major league level whereas Paulino has untapped talent at the plate.
Ruiz is the starter and Marson the heir apparent, Coste is still the back-up and Paulino adds a guy who can compete for that job and at the very least add a back-stop with major league experience to the AAA team. Paulino was a no risk addition with a lot of upside and I would like to see Amaro address the AAA more aggressively which was allowed to regress. We need to try and add a higher level of guys with major league experience onto the AAA and make it a productive stop for the prospects so they don’t have to make the jump straight from AA.
Posted: 12:33 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Geoff
yeah they do need to work on AAA…sign some old relievers to help you the younger people on the pitching staff there…
Posted: 12:39 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
The problem with the AAA team has been is an increase in career minor leaguers and a lack of prospects coming up young at a time many teams around the league are very agressive with minor-league deals for guys with major league experience and consider AAA a productive environment for high celing prospects. The Phillies haven’t had that since a couple of years before the AAA team left Wilkes-Barre.
Posted: 12:43 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
The difference between AAA and AA is that AAA is usually older players who may have reached their ceilings… and AA is usually filled with more up-and-coming prospects
Posted: 12:49 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I think that Coste hit a bit of a wall last year… actually, for a guy that has made a name for himself being a clutch hitter, his September/October splits are not very good. His numbers have been declining over the past three seasons. We all like Coste but Paulino is an upgrade. I thought that there was more to it but maybe we’re just insuring ourselves against injury (not ready to throw Marson in everyday). In any case, something has got to give… we’re not gonna keep three catchers on the team, are we? By the way… Paulino kills lefties. In 1/3 as many at bats against lefties, he has almost as many HR (as he does against righties) and batted .355.
Posted: 12:54 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Agree with that Don, AA has more talent but is much rawer though the level of talent in AAA last year was higher than previous years which has been a growing trend that the Phils got left behind on.
An interesting name for a minor-league deal (with a tie to the Phillies but looks like we’re too late) Derek Turnbow…
Posted: 12:58 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 psujoe
Chuck, why were Paulino’s numbers so down last year? Was he hurt? He had a few decent years under his belt. I didn’t realize he batted .300 before.
Posted: 01:00 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 NJ
Paulino was struggling at the plate last year and in the revolving door that is the Pittsburgh Pirates they sent him down. Outside of Xavier Nady there doesn’t seem to be a player that hasn’t slumpt on that team and because he’s not a great backstop they sent Paulino down. Paulino’s regression was more of a reflection on Pittsburgh’s inability to develop their talent than it is Paulino’s talent.
Posted: 01:04 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
I’ll give them a D so far.
Ibanez is a slight step down from Burrell
Moyer is not going to be as good as he was last year
Although I like the Chan Ho Park signing, he’s going to have a hard time matching Seanez’s numbers from last year.
It’s hard to believe that the Phillies have spent around $47 million this offseason without getting better.
Posted: 01:04 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
oh, I forgot to add that the Mayberry/Golson and Paulino/Jaramillo trades make sense from a Phillies perspective.
Posted: 01:05 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Matt Kwasiborski
How is Ibanez a slight step down from Burrell outside of HRs?
And the Phils will not keep three catchers on the ML roster. Marson will be the full time C at AAA so he can keep developing. His development stops if he is sitting on our bench. Sure he can learn by watching but he isn’t a backup QB. He needs to play everyday so we can assess his worth.
Posted: 01:09 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 scot
It all comes down to Lowe. Lowe would make this team better. The moves we have made so far this season have been made to plug holes or keep the team where it is. The Mets, Braves, and Cubs are focused on making the team better.
If the Mets sign Lowe, Amaro gets an F. If the Phils sign Lowe Amaro gets an A. If a team outside of the NL East signs Lowe Amaro gets a C-.
Posted: 01:09 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
Burrell gets on base more and hits for more power than Ibanez. Burrell hits lefties much, much better and is a better fit for this lineup. They are both awful defensive players and Ibanez is very slow (although not as slow as Pat). Ibanez is also 5 years older and can be expected to decline quickly.
That’s why Ibanez is a slight step down from Burrell.
Posted: 01:15 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Chuck P
The manager didn’t like Paulino and he lost the job… Doumit had a great year by all standards and Paulino wasn’t “managing the staff” very well so he was sent to the minors. He should really improve that aspect of his game on our team. Paulino is probably a backup for the forseeable future (defensively, Ruiz is much better) but he batted .310 in 2006 in 130 games so there is potential. And he kills lefties… http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=pauliro01
Posted: 01:16 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 psujoe
Thanks on Paulino guys.
Nice righty bat on the bench with decent power against lefties. This is the type of little deal that really helps build a winning club.
Posted: 01:30 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
Ibanez has improved over the past few seasons, whereas Burrell’s numbers have declined since 2005.
Burrell does not get on base more than Ibanez… he gets on base at a higer percentage than Ibanez, but Raul was on base more times… that number may be a wash if Burrell played the full 9 innings, and I realize that its not his fault that he didn’t… but if your manager feels the need to replace you late in games, it should speak volumes.
Burrell hits for more power than Ibanez… 5 more HRs, but 20 less RBIs doesn’t impress me at all
Over the past three years, Ibanez has averaged .037 higher batting average than Burrell (.291 to .254),
5 less HRs, (26 to 31),
20 more RBIs (113 to 93),
and 12 more Runs Scored (89 to 77) …
somebody PLEASE tell me how Burrell is better
Its the same people saying that Ibanez is too old, that want to also sign Derek Lowe for 19 years, $850,945,000..
Posted: 01:32 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 MA Phanatic
give them a B- for now, but I think that grade will prove higher once the season starts. Amaro’s moves have been very similar to Gillick’s moves. Are the big names coming to Philly? No, but Amaro hasn’t spent a ton of dough and has filled our holes nicely. Would have loved to see Lowe on his way, but I’ll hold out hope for Park instead
Posted: 01:38 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
If Derek Lowe was signed for 19 years, he’d retire at about the same time as my man Jamie Moyer!
Burrell’s last 4 years:
.281 BA .389 OBP .504 SLG
.258/.388/.502
.256/.400/.502
.250/.367/.507
Ibanez’s last 4 years:
.280/.355/.406
.289/.353./.516
.291/.351/.480
.293/.358/.479
So as you can see, Burrell gets on base more and has more power and Ibanez gets more singles. What’s amazing when I look at Burrell’s stats is how consistent he was. His end of year numbers are so close every single year.
Posted: 01:44 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Don M
So when they are both standing on the base paths… Ibanez is more likely to have hit a single that drove in a run… Burrell is more likely to have gotten walked
which is good..
Doesn’t it bother you that Burrell hits only .255 over the past 3 years and gets paid $14 M… if we know they wont increase the payroll past whatever dollar amount, don’t you want to see them spend it more wisely, or more productive players?
Burrell gets paid to drive in runs, instead, he walks…and then they replace him with Bruntlett … how does that performance help the team?
Posted: 01:52 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 Griffin
Don, don’t forget that Burrell is more likely to get an extra base hit as well. Since when is walking and getting replaced by Bruntlett a bad thing? Walking with men on base moves everyone up a base, is that a bad thing? If Burrell walked with men on base last year and Victorino came up, it that such a bad thing? Did Burrell fail in that situation?
Posted: 01:59 PM on December 17, 2008
Posts: 0 psujoe
Walks are good for a 1 or 2 hitter not a 5 hitter. I always hated the fact that Bobby Abreau would look for a walk in the 9th inning with a runner on second. 3-4-5 need to hit the ball. What will be interesting to me is just how many dingers Ibanez will hit in CBP. Despite the DH Safco was much harder to hit a homer than CBP. Ibanez should easily hit 25 here. At 4 million less per I’d take Ibanez over Pat.
Posted: 02:03 PM on December 17, 2008