Quantcast


Peavy/DeRosa Trade: Reports Indicate It’s Close

Posted by Tim Malcolm, Wed, December 10, 2008 02:11 PM | Comments: 190
Posts

UPDATE (1:46 p.m.): ESPN-AM 1000 in Chicago reports a deal fthat would send Jake Peavy to Chicago and Mark DeRosa to the Phillies is very close to finished.

From Rotowire:

The main parts of the trade would have Peavy going to the Cubs, while the Northsiders would send Jason Marquis, Kevin Hart and Josh Vitters, one of the Cubs’ top prospects, to the Padres. The Phillies would get Mark DeRosa. There is no clear indication whom the Phillies would part with in this trade. Part of the deal would also include the Cubs paying for part of Marquis’s salary.

***

Before the new round of updates, here’s where we stand:

  • A multi-team deal that would send Jake Peavy to the Cubs and a slew of players to the Padres remains in stalemate. The Phillies have confirmed a deal is in the works, and rumors had them close to acquiring Mark DeRosa for prospects (JA Happ, Kyle Kendrick or Jason Jaramillo). Most recent rumors admit DeRosa may not be the player the Phils want.

Now, according to La Velle Neal, the Twins are asking about DeRosa. The Cubs will give the Twins a list of pitchers they’d want (who would go to the Padres).

 
Shop for Philadelphia Phillies Gear at Shop.MLB.com!
 
  • Posts: 0 Justin

    I’m not a fan of trading 3 prospects/MLB ready players for Mark DeRosa, if we’re getting players there should be something other than a utility player who the Cubs are just trying to get rid of.

     
  • Posts: 0 NEPA

    We wouldn’t be giving up all 3 of those players. Probably just 2 of them.

     
  • Posts: 0 Robbi P

    If the Twins are getting involved then is it possible that we are getting Delmon Young. I know people are down on him but the guy is 23 years old but Marquis and Young would be great with Mayberry waiting in the wings.

    Now that the other New York Team wasted 160 million on their “ACE” is Derek Lowe in Red Pinstripes more likely? I mean, there is no way that the Yankees get all of those pitchers.

    Finally does anyone know why the Phillies aren’t “kicking the tires” as they like to say with Ben Sheets.

     
  • Posts: 0 Justin

    I don’t that any of those 3 is enough to get Delmon Young let alone Young and Marquis. The twins were saying before the only thing that would make that trade happen is a Jason Donald type prospect.

    In my honest opinion the Phillies in the past have spent too much money on injury prone players that Ben Sheets should be the furthest from their mind. (Injury prone players like Mike Jackson, Mark Portugal, Gregg Jeffries, Danny Tartibull, etc.)

     
  • Posts: 0 MP

    I’m not a fan of DeRosa for 2 prospects either. If it were just one (Happ or Kendrick) it might work, but I don’t think all three are worth it for DeRosa.

    On other news, did anyone else listen to WIP this morning around 9ish about Burrell’s situation??? Very interesting. Apparently, according to Seth Everett (that MLB.com guy) no team wants to give Burrell the contract he wants (3 yrs) and I guess Everett heard rumours that if he cannot seek a deal he wants he might settle with whatever Philly would offer. Anyone else hear it?

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    Burrell is finally realizing he is asking for way too much. Thank God.

     
  • Posts: 0 Justin

    All i can do is laugh at him for thinking he’s better than he is, he’s gotta be pissed at his agent for telling him fairytales of better deals out there.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    DeRosa for Happ’s not a bad deal straight up but in the context of this deal it is. The Cubs get Peavy, the Padres get their prospects, whoever the third team is needs to come out with something sustainable especially if it is an NL team. The Cubs aren’t a weaker team for loosing DeRosa who they have cover for so you can’t enter into making the Cubs the hands-down front-runner in the NL without getting significantly better in the deal yourself.

     
  • Posts: 0 Ryan

    why the hell would you trade pitching prospects for an aging utility player? that is so stupid. i’m angry . i hope it doesn’t happen.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    The same goes for Burrell as for Dunn and most of the free agents, the K-Rod deal shows this isn’t the year you want to be a free agent so they need to decide whether they think they play for a bigger deal hoping the market improves next year or they say it’s only going to get worse and take what they can now… Tough call for guys like Burrell.

     
  • Posts: 0 Griffin

    Kendrick and Jaramillo stink. Can we stop calling them “prospects”? Just because they are young doesn’t mean they are good. jaramillo is now our third best minor league catcher (behind Marson and D’arnaud). Happ is a projected 4th or 5th starter at best, but he does have some value.
    But Kendrick and Jaramillo?? Stop overrating these guys, they’re not that good!

     
  • Posts: 0 MP

    If this is the case with Burrell, I say sign him to some 2 year deal and keep Bruntlett for cheap.

     
  • Posts: 0 Justin

    Last I checked Kendrick won at least 10 games each of his 2 years of MLB service, pretty decent for a kid no one heard of before last year.

     
  • Posts: 0 MP

    Yeah I agree about Kendrick. I don’t think the Phillies would have sent him to FL during the playoffs to work on pitches if they didn’t still have hope for him. He was also the first in line to replace a pitcher in the postseason if someone got injured. I think Kendrick still has some good stuff left, he just needs to work on his stuff. I don’t think both he and Happ plus Jarmillo are worth trading for DeRosa.

     
  • Posts: 0 Griffin

    Kyle Kendrick was never a highly rated prospect. He gave up a ton of baserunners in 2007 and somehow managed to not give up a ton of runs (luck). His luck ran out in the playoffs and he was awful in 2008.
    Now, which do you think was a fluke? HIs entire career except for 3 months in 2007 or those 3 months in 2007?

    Let’s be realistic here.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck P

    Kendrick is a 4th starter at best… with our offense, any 4th starter can win 10 games. We gave him all of our run support, otherwise Hamels would have won 18 games.

    No one wants to talk about Pettite…

     
  • Posts: 0 Griffin

    Chuck P, I think Pettitte is interesting. If he can be had on a one or two year deal, then let’s do it. I think we would all agree that we need to sign another starter.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    Now its starting to make more sense…so happ and coste probably arent in the deal..instead, its kendrick and jaramillo, who are going to lose their position battles in the depth chart anyway. so why not trade them? if they move those two, then thats smart from amaro…now, it said that they might not get derosa, but if not him then what outfielder from the cubs is worth that? pie? or there has been talk of the cubs trading zambrano, id chip in some more prospects for the cubs if they want to trade zambrano to the phillies….

     
  • Posts: 0 Griffin

    A quick stat on Kendrick, he has given up 410 hits/walks in 277 innings in his major league career.

    So can we not focus on his wins and focus on his underlying numbers? He’s not someone who should be “off limits” to other teams in a trade.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Pettitte’s not going to happen, he balked at taking a pay-cut to stay with the Yankees, if he doesn’t return there or to Houston he’ll retire. Irreguardless of whether it’s Happ and Coste or Kendrick and Jaramillo, you don’t get into this deal and let the Cubs walk off with Peavy and the Padres with thier choice of prospects and only come out with minor tweaking.

    BTW the Cubs have already dismissed rumors Zambrano will be traded.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck P

    Griff… great stat. He’s not a SO pitcher… he does induce a lot of groundballs and double plays so those numbers will be high but his command has to be perfect. He really gets into trouble when he’s walking guys. In his first season, he did well because he had great control and limited his walks. Is he the KK we saw in 2007 or 2008… I think the latter is more likely (or something closer to that). An ERA in the 4′s good for 8-12 wins… not irreplaceable by any stretch of the imagination.

    Pettite is 36 y/o… proven… certainly had a rough year by his standards (a lot of distractions) but I would take a 2 year chance on Pettite if he’s willing to lower his asking price. It seems like he’s off everyone’s radar. That must really piss off a future potential HOF’er.

     
  • Posts: 0 ped

    who’s Chase’s replacement until he returns?

    is it DeRosa?

    I rather it be Bruntlett

     
  • Posts: 0 Stuart

    To hell with derosa, we need out of that deal. focus on maybe getting burrell back. Add lowe and maybe petite. Thats our world series champions right there except with two more great pitchers.

     
  • Posts: 0 psujoe

    I take it Derosa is an insurance policy on Utley and Feliz, nothing more. 5.5 mil is expensive for an insurance policy. No way I want this guy as our LF. No power against Lefties at all.

     
  • Posts: 0 Justin

    I like the deal if we’re giving up EITHER Happ or Kendrick but not Kendrick and Jaramillo or Happ and Jaramillo unless we’re getting something on top of just DeRosa. I think he’ll be a good platoon in LF while Donald plays 2nd until Utley’s back.

     
  • Posts: 0 OZ

    don’t want Happ in that deal – still has some promise. i’m fine w/ Kendrick & Jaramillo.

    De Rosa for Happ is something you do mid-season to beef-up for the stretch. not a good deal in December GM meetings.

    i make one more strong bid for Lowe, one more outreach to Toronto to see what it would take to get Halliday. Plan B – sign Moyer & Burrell, and be done with it.

    Not interested in Sheets in the least bit.

     
  • Posts: 0 MA Phanatic

    i have an idea this trade never develops and we end up with Raul Ibanez…

     
  • Posts: 0 RK

    I hope we can make it happen with Lowe, or just trade for Peavy and leave the other teams out of it. Braves offered Burnett $80 Mil over 5 Years, and the Muts are trying to add more releivers

     
  • Posts: 0 Gavin

    Derosa is a good deal if it’s Kendrick and Jaramillo. Amaro still has to sign someone…..Moyer, Sheets, Lowe…..I dont mind going into next year with Happ/Carrasco competing for the #5 spot.

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    I really hope Marquis is not involved in this thing.

     
  • Posts: 0 reddeath

    OZ, halladay would take our entire farm and then some….

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Jaramillo doesn’t have anywhere to go in our organization, so we need to move him somewhere… Kendrick is kind of in the same spot.. Did he reach his ceiling already? Sure you could move him to AAA, hope he develops more, and have him available if somebody goes down… but to get a starter for those two is a good move.

    Since Happ is being counted on for the rotation more than Kendrick, I would not part ways with Happ in this deal… But Kendrick and Jaramillo for DeRosa sounds good to me.

    So the Padres get 5 players back for Peavy.. two of which are starters with ERAs around 5 (Marquis, Kendrick), and Catcher with limited upside (Jaramillo).. a STUD prospect in Vitters.. and I dont know anything about Hart.. I feel like you should get more for Jake Peavy

     
  • Posts: 0 MP

    Peavy has a no-trade clause and he will only go to Chicago if traded.

    If this is an insurance policy, DeRosa is too expensive. Bruntlett could fill in if Utley is out at the begining of the season – which is impossible to know at this point. Why did we let Iguichi go again?? Wouldn’t he have been cheap? I would like this deal better if we wern’t giving up Happ, Kendrick, and Jarmillo. It should be one pitcher, and Jarmillo, not all three. Does anyone else feel like we’re getting screwed in this deal?

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    “Derosa is a good deal if it’s Kendrick and Jaramillo.”

    I second that, Gavin. That would take care of LF and (2B/3B the first few weeks) while allowing us to get Lowe and maybe Moyer too. We lose power in our lineup but we would gain a lot of strength in our rotation. Overall, the team would be more balanced.

     
  • Posts: 0 TheDipsy

    Only the Marquis de Sade could bear watching Jason Marquis pitch. He’s horrible. I wanna get back to the Delmon Young thing. Thats a guy I like.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 reddeath

    i think if were trading more then kendrick and jaramillo for one year of derosa, then no deal.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I think it is only ONE of those two pitchers + Jaramillo…. if its Kendrick + Jaramillo we’re making out like bandits

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    The way this deal is shaping up the Cubs get a high-class call girl, the Padres get a hot young one and the Phils get the the kinda cute in her own way but not so great one, not quite the toothless tranny outside port authority but when everyone else is getting theirs you want a little more.

    In otherwords if everyone else is getting a rolex in this deal then why are we settling for the casio?

     
  • Posts: 0 RK

    MP I think Iguchi went back to Japan

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    Kendrick + Jaramillo for DeRosa: YES
    Kendrick + Jaramillo for DeRosa + Marquis: NO
    Happ + Jaramillo for DeRosa: NO
    Happ + Jaramillo for DeRosa + Marquis: NO

    That’s where I stand.

     
  • Posts: 0 Mike B.

    Anyone also consider that the Padres might also be trying to trade for younger, lower-level MLB guys like Bruntlett who will just keep the seats warm, as it were, for any of the Padres prospects who won’t be ready for a few years? They got prospects from the Khalil Greene trade, they probably got prospects from the Maddux trade, they get prospects from this trade…the thing is you can’t just start your MLB season with a bunch of prospects. You gotta start some guys somewhere, even if they suck, to give your minor league players time to develop. Greene is gone, so it would make sense for us to give up Eric Bruntlett to the Padres. Whatever they have won’t be ready, even if the Padres are getting or have already gotten really good pitching prospects, they might need a veteran guy to fill Peavy’s place until those prospects are ready…one year of Adam Eaton won’t hurt because they’re already going to suck and they’ll be fine with taking him if that means their prospects are given more time to develop. Right now the Padres have almost NO ONE with any MLB starting experience besides Chris Young and Peavy…so Kendrick’s probably gone because he’s had almost two years worth of experience. They idea is what will help the Padres, and what will help them most is having a guy with MLB experience to keep the seats warm until their prospects are ready. That’s what the Brewers did in 2004 and 2005.

    Not sure if we give up Eaton, but we’re almost DEFINITELY giving up Bruntlett. The Padres traded Greene and they don’t have anyone to play shortstop. Most likely it’s Bruntlett and Kendrick, but Eaton’s a definite possibility by my logic.

    I’m putting on all the lucky clothes I wore during the Phillies playoff run and praying that we’re somehow trading Adam Eaton and half his salary.

     
  • Posts: 0 Mike B

    Heck, giving up Bruntlett makes even more sense.

    Phils get a utility righthanded batter with more pop in Mark DeRosa.
    Padres get a slew of Cubs prospects plus guys like Kendrick, Marquis, and (maybe) Eaton to fill some current roster holes
    Cubs get Peavy.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Yes Kendrick/Jaramillo for DeRosa is a decent deal but the Cubs make off with Peavy and the Padres with Vitters plus all the other prospects. If we ace the Cubs in a decisive series or in the play-offs their rotation is unstoppable and in the deal we made of with… DeRosa…

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    why would the padres want a utility player like bruntlett in a trade…if yorue trading peavy, you probably arent interested in bench players like that..the padres can go sign someone as good as or better than bruntlett for cheap anyway…

    im perfectly fine with getting derosa for kendrick/jaramillo..thats actually a great deal for the phillies…

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    But, NJ, the priority is to make OUR team better. Getting DeRosa would enable us to fill the LF gap AND use the money to get at least Lowe. That makes the team better.

    Of course, I’m assuming that if we DO make this trade, we would HAVE to upgrade our pitching by bringing in a guy like Lowe. If not, then it’s definitely not worth it.

     
  • Posts: 0 Geoff

    its still worth it…the yankees are getting lowe…you can use the money savd by getting derosa to sign relievers and try and trade for a starting pitcher, since kendrick/jaramillo will probably not be missed in the farm system anyways…

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    This trade doesn’t make us significantly better, DeRosa’s appeal is his versatility in the field which is something the Phils don’t really need like some other teams. It doesn’t guarantee us a frontline pitcher and even less than a guy like Rivera does.

    I like seeing Amaro getting in the mix but everyone else gets off well in this trade and the Phils get slightly better than we would have been anyway for making the Cubs the frontrunner in the NL.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck P

    Bruntlett is not a trade chip…

    I’m there with you NJ… we’re the nice guys in this deal. Everyone else is trying to accomplish a set of goals and we’re just there to help everyone out. The Padres bolster their farm, the Cubs establish themselves as the NL favorites (yes, having six pitchers named Peavy, Zambrano, Harden, Hill, Lilly and Dempster to go along with a very good lineup and a formidable bullpen would make them the clear favorite) and we get a good player… don’t get me wrong, it’s not a bad deal (Jaramillo/Kendrick), I don’t know if it’s worth it when you consider what it does to our chances of repeating.

     
  • Posts: 0 Griffin

    I’m not worried about what makes the Cubs better, I’m worried about what makes the Phillies better. If the Phillies back out of the deal, the Cubs will find another trade partner.
    Derosa for Kendrick and Jaramillo is a no-brainer.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Bottom line is that DeRosa would be of more help.. in the playoffs, or regular season than Kendrick or Jaramillo … so make the trade

     
 
Leave a Comment

>> Create a new Phillies Nation account.
>> Already registered with Phillies Nation? Log in here.
>> Comment without logging in:






Please ensure your comments comply with our Comment Policy.