<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 8 Players Can File For Arbitration Today</title> <atom:link href="http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/</link> <description>Your source for Phillies news, events, trade rumors, tickets, bars and other fun stuff.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chuck P</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66447</link> <dc:creator>Chuck P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66447</guid> <description>Hamels wants the ball in his hands in big game situations.  Under pressure, there aren&#039;t many better than Hamels and that means a lot to me (as a pitcher, the highest honor should be winning a WS MVP).  He&#039;s certainly worth more than he was paid and it&#039;s unfortunate that Hamels wasn&#039;t happy BUT the rules of the MLB salary system dictated the situation last year.  Of course we want to pay him what he&#039;s worth but the reality is that there aren&#039; t many (if any) teams in baseball that would have handled his situation any differently.   Hamels was upset with us but he should have been upset with the system... they always compare Hamels with CM Wang because their regular season numbers are similar.  Wang earned less than $500k last year just like Hamels... we didn&#039;t mistreat Hamels.  If you&#039;re a GM, you need to understand the system and what is customary, not just how good a player is and what you think they&#039;re worth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamels wants the ball in his hands in big game situations.  Under pressure, there aren&#8217;t many better than Hamels and that means a lot to me (as a pitcher, the highest honor should be winning a WS MVP).  He&#8217;s certainly worth more than he was paid and it&#8217;s unfortunate that Hamels wasn&#8217;t happy BUT the rules of the MLB salary system dictated the situation last year.  Of course we want to pay him what he&#8217;s worth but the reality is that there aren&#8217; t many (if any) teams in baseball that would have handled his situation any differently.   Hamels was upset with us but he should have been upset with the system&#8230; they always compare Hamels with CM Wang because their regular season numbers are similar.  Wang earned less than $500k last year just like Hamels&#8230; we didn&#8217;t mistreat Hamels.  If you&#8217;re a GM, you need to understand the system and what is customary, not just how good a player is and what you think they&#8217;re worth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66441</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66441</guid> <description>Bret, Manny has hit over .300 11 times in his career, while consistently hitting more than 30 HR per season. Until Howard can demonstrate that ability, which is a couple years from now, then he&#039;s not the same as Manny.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret, Manny has hit over .300 11 times in his career, while consistently hitting more than 30 HR per season. Until Howard can demonstrate that ability, which is a couple years from now, then he&#8217;s not the same as Manny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bret</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66438</link> <dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66438</guid> <description>You are so wrong about Howard....Manny is the same player...cant play defense either...but he won 2 rings with the Sox and carried that awful Dodger team to the NLCS by himself.   He&#039;s a joke in the outfield but his teams win....just like Howard.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so wrong about Howard&#8230;.Manny is the same player&#8230;cant play defense either&#8230;but he won 2 rings with the Sox and carried that awful Dodger team to the NLCS by himself.   He&#8217;s a joke in the outfield but his teams win&#8230;.just like Howard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66437</link> <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66437</guid> <description>Sign them all! If it&#039;s true the front office had some interest in offering a fortune to Lowe, the money they have can best be use for arbitration eligible players that Tim listed. They have a solid rotation in place for the world champions and someone like Lowe is not a neccessity. Also, the idea of trading Myers is pure fantasy. Myers is the idea #2 starter behind Hamels. He was arguably the best pitcher in the second half of the season last year for the Phillies.Multi-year contracts should be a priority for at least the two most
mportant players.. Hamels and Howard. The longer the front office delay the inevitable, the more expensive the contracts. And please don&#039;t use the lame excuse of Howard not having &quot;gold glove&quot; skills in fielding. I have seen worst fielders than him who have received accolades (for hitting) and were considered all stars. Can anyone recite a game last year where Howard made an error that cost a win for the team? And how many such games were lost due to Howard&#039;s fielding?
Get the picture? Talks of his defensive liability is overblown and I have seen some remarkable defensive gems with his glove. &quot;Baseball fantasy&quot; players will offer statistics on fielding to support their argument but will conviently ignore Howard&#039;s impact as a great run producer and the effect on the opposing pitcher&#039;s mindset and approach to the entire lineup.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sign them all! If it&#8217;s true the front office had some interest in offering a fortune to Lowe, the money they have can best be use for arbitration eligible players that Tim listed. They have a solid rotation in place for the world champions and someone like Lowe is not a neccessity. Also, the idea of trading Myers is pure fantasy. Myers is the idea #2 starter behind Hamels. He was arguably the best pitcher in the second half of the season last year for the Phillies.</p><p>Multi-year contracts should be a priority for at least the two most<br
/> mportant players.. Hamels and Howard. The longer the front office delay the inevitable, the more expensive the contracts. And please don&#8217;t use the lame excuse of Howard not having &#8220;gold glove&#8221; skills in fielding. I have seen worst fielders than him who have received accolades (for hitting) and were considered all stars. Can anyone recite a game last year where Howard made an error that cost a win for the team? And how many such games were lost due to Howard&#8217;s fielding?<br
/> Get the picture? Talks of his defensive liability is overblown and I have seen some remarkable defensive gems with his glove. &#8220;Baseball fantasy&#8221; players will offer statistics on fielding to support their argument but will conviently ignore Howard&#8217;s impact as a great run producer and the effect on the opposing pitcher&#8217;s mindset and approach to the entire lineup.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don M</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66434</link> <dc:creator>Don M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:48:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66434</guid> <description>The thing with Werth, is that if you don&#039;t resign him now, you need to do that in-season (which not a lot of teams or players like because its an off-field distraction)..Werth will be VERY desireable to teams because of the reasons above... puts together good at-bats, hits for Power, Great defense, above average baserunner.. etc..  If he plays everyday, he&#039;ll get even better against RHP.. and his HR totals get to be 25+, with RBIs climbing around 85+ if he bats 5th..He&#039;s a $6 M player that we&#039;ve had for $1.7 M... I&#039;d like to see him get $14/ 3 years... if he goes to Free Agency, somebody will pay him more money than the Phillies will.. he&#039;s VERY underrated, lets keep him while we can.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing with Werth, is that if you don&#8217;t resign him now, you need to do that in-season (which not a lot of teams or players like because its an off-field distraction)..</p><p>Werth will be VERY desireable to teams because of the reasons above&#8230; puts together good at-bats, hits for Power, Great defense, above average baserunner.. etc..  If he plays everyday, he&#8217;ll get even better against RHP.. and his HR totals get to be 25+, with RBIs climbing around 85+ if he bats 5th..</p><p>He&#8217;s a $6 M player that we&#8217;ve had for $1.7 M&#8230; I&#8217;d like to see him get $14/ 3 years&#8230; if he goes to Free Agency, somebody will pay him more money than the Phillies will.. he&#8217;s VERY underrated, lets keep him while we can.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MikeD.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66428</link> <dc:creator>MikeD.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66428</guid> <description>For the record, i&#039;m completely in agreement that we need to lock up Hamels for a while. The guy is really classy and whenever he takes the ball I am almost always thinking that the only way we lose the game is if the offense doesn&#039;t show up.That said, I&#039;m wondering if any of you guys have considered the whole &quot;verducci effect&quot; with respect to Cole. I&#039;m sure most of you are familiar with the theory, but if not, the basic gist is that when dealing with young pitchers you need to treat them as if they&#039;re training for a marathon. You need to build stamina incrementally. The unofficial industry standard is that no young pitcher should throw more than 30 more innings than he did the previous season.If we take a look at Cole, he&#039;s was at 190 IP for 2007. In 2008 he hit 262 IP – a whopping 72 inning increase. It&#039;s no secret that Hamels has been injury prone in the past. Granted he stayed healthy during the entirety of 2008, but I still think a 72 inning increase on a 24 yr old with a history of injuries should still make you take this sort of decision very seriously.I think I sort of lost my &quot;point&quot; with this post. I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is that I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the Phils let him go to arbitration this year. On the other hand, I also wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they tried to lock him up. There&#039;s a lot of pros and cons with each decision and I just don&#039;t think that it&#039;s going to be a completely black or white/yes or no decision.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, i&#8217;m completely in agreement that we need to lock up Hamels for a while. The guy is really classy and whenever he takes the ball I am almost always thinking that the only way we lose the game is if the offense doesn&#8217;t show up.</p><p>That said, I&#8217;m wondering if any of you guys have considered the whole &#8220;verducci effect&#8221; with respect to Cole. I&#8217;m sure most of you are familiar with the theory, but if not, the basic gist is that when dealing with young pitchers you need to treat them as if they&#8217;re training for a marathon. You need to build stamina incrementally. The unofficial industry standard is that no young pitcher should throw more than 30 more innings than he did the previous season.</p><p>If we take a look at Cole, he&#8217;s was at 190 IP for 2007. In 2008 he hit 262 IP – a whopping 72 inning increase. It&#8217;s no secret that Hamels has been injury prone in the past. Granted he stayed healthy during the entirety of 2008, but I still think a 72 inning increase on a 24 yr old with a history of injuries should still make you take this sort of decision very seriously.</p><p>I think I sort of lost my &#8220;point&#8221; with this post. I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Phils let him go to arbitration this year. On the other hand, I also wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they tried to lock him up. There&#8217;s a lot of pros and cons with each decision and I just don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s going to be a completely black or white/yes or no decision.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew R.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66427</link> <dc:creator>Andrew R.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66427</guid> <description>I agree with you Don M., but I just hope we dont &quot;offend&quot; him by not giving him big money now. We&#039;ve been pretty cheap for a long time now.  At some point we&#039;re going to have to take a big risk. I think Hamels is the one to do it on. Screw Howard.Victorino, yes. sign him as well. his raw numbers aren&#039;t super, but he brings a lot of fire, leadership, and clutchiness, which is hard to come by. i know that when he leads off the bottom of the ninth with a double and slides in, pumping his fist, 3 hard claps, and starts yelling and pointing towards the dug-out to get the guys rallied, i know i feel it.Werth I&#039;m not quite sure about going long-term, definately need to see him this year and see if he can remain healthy, and duplicate his numbers. He sure plays great D (which seems to be underrated by a lot of people), and he puts together great AB&#039;s, usually productive AB&#039;s. He&#039;s a great athlete and should be signed, but let&#039;s wait and see how 2009 plays out.I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll sign Madson (Scott Boras), but who knows? Fuentes was a pretty good closer and he only got what? $6.5M for a couple years, so maybe Madson could be had for the $3-$4M range.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Don M., but I just hope we dont &#8220;offend&#8221; him by not giving him big money now. We&#8217;ve been pretty cheap for a long time now.  At some point we&#8217;re going to have to take a big risk. I think Hamels is the one to do it on. Screw Howard.</p><p>Victorino, yes. sign him as well. his raw numbers aren&#8217;t super, but he brings a lot of fire, leadership, and clutchiness, which is hard to come by. i know that when he leads off the bottom of the ninth with a double and slides in, pumping his fist, 3 hard claps, and starts yelling and pointing towards the dug-out to get the guys rallied, i know i feel it.</p><p>Werth I&#8217;m not quite sure about going long-term, definately need to see him this year and see if he can remain healthy, and duplicate his numbers. He sure plays great D (which seems to be underrated by a lot of people), and he puts together great AB&#8217;s, usually productive AB&#8217;s. He&#8217;s a great athlete and should be signed, but let&#8217;s wait and see how 2009 plays out.</p><p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll sign Madson (Scott Boras), but who knows? Fuentes was a pretty good closer and he only got what? $6.5M for a couple years, so maybe Madson could be had for the $3-$4M range.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew R.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66426</link> <dc:creator>Andrew R.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:11:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66426</guid> <description>hey Chuck P., like you said hamels is the best pitcher in the NL. I dont necessarily agree with that, but top-5? absolutely. Hamels was already not happy about receiving $400K for this year, so we better try to patch that up with a respectable offer for long-term.We let Curt Schilling get away not once, but twice. First time I can kind of deal with. But when he left the d-backs and expressed interest in coming back, but ed wade was too much of an asshole, i just can&#039;t take that one. So what did we end up with? Kevin Millwood AND Eric Milton. How&#039;d that work out?Hamels needs to be locked up. Who was the last great pitcher to come out of our system? Grover Cleveland Alexander? We got very lucky with Carlton and Schilling. Colbert is an &#039;over the top&#039; pitcher. We should do almost whatever it takes to get it done.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Chuck P., like you said hamels is the best pitcher in the NL. I dont necessarily agree with that, but top-5? absolutely. Hamels was already not happy about receiving $400K for this year, so we better try to patch that up with a respectable offer for long-term.</p><p>We let Curt Schilling get away not once, but twice. First time I can kind of deal with. But when he left the d-backs and expressed interest in coming back, but ed wade was too much of an asshole, i just can&#8217;t take that one. So what did we end up with? Kevin Millwood AND Eric Milton. How&#8217;d that work out?</p><p>Hamels needs to be locked up. Who was the last great pitcher to come out of our system? Grover Cleveland Alexander? We got very lucky with Carlton and Schilling. Colbert is an &#8216;over the top&#8217; pitcher. We should do almost whatever it takes to get it done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don M</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66425</link> <dc:creator>Don M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:07:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66425</guid> <description>The interesting thing to watch will be if the arbitration figures will follow the likely trend of Free Agent contracts...   not YANKEE signings, but the rest of them.. the reason that so many players are still unsigned is because no team is willing to pay AVERAGE or ABOVE AVERAGE players $15 M per seasonNow obviously Howard is amoung the BEST in baseball.. but I can&#039;t see him winning $16 M in arbitration, that would be ridiculous.. The Phillies should offer him like $11 and try to settle with him around $12 MI though Hamels had 3 years before FA, paper today said after the 2012 season..  It only makes sense to sign Hamels through his arbitration years if you plan on including 2-3 years on top of that deal.. that would make it a 7 year contract for Hamels.. leaving him to become a Free Agent for the first time at age 32.. with the chance that he&#039;s going to add Cy Youngs and No Hitters to his resume .. he would still be in line for a GREAT contract at age 32.Considering how much it would take to sign Hamels now (at least $70/ 7 years).. you would be overpaying him now to underpay for him later.. with a chance that his arm could be hurting from all those innings this past season.... I say you offer him arbitration each of the next two seasons, but pay him whatever he asks instead of taking him to the hearing...  In two years, if you want to sign him to a 5 year deal, you can do it.. you&#039;ll have a better gauge on the rest of your young pitchers, and you&#039;ll see if he can stay healthy again..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing to watch will be if the arbitration figures will follow the likely trend of Free Agent contracts&#8230;   not YANKEE signings, but the rest of them.. the reason that so many players are still unsigned is because no team is willing to pay AVERAGE or ABOVE AVERAGE players $15 M per season</p><p>Now obviously Howard is amoung the BEST in baseball.. but I can&#8217;t see him winning $16 M in arbitration, that would be ridiculous.. The Phillies should offer him like $11 and try to settle with him around $12 M</p><p>I though Hamels had 3 years before FA, paper today said after the 2012 season..  It only makes sense to sign Hamels through his arbitration years if you plan on including 2-3 years on top of that deal.. that would make it a 7 year contract for Hamels.. leaving him to become a Free Agent for the first time at age 32.. with the chance that he&#8217;s going to add Cy Youngs and No Hitters to his resume .. he would still be in line for a GREAT contract at age 32.</p><p>Considering how much it would take to sign Hamels now (at least $70/ 7 years).. you would be overpaying him now to underpay for him later.. with a chance that his arm could be hurting from all those innings this past season&#8230;. I say you offer him arbitration each of the next two seasons, but pay him whatever he asks instead of taking him to the hearing&#8230;  In two years, if you want to sign him to a 5 year deal, you can do it.. you&#8217;ll have a better gauge on the rest of your young pitchers, and you&#8217;ll see if he can stay healthy again..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66424</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66424</guid> <description>Edit: Forgot about Ryan Madson. See, when there&#039;s that many, you just lose track.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit: Forgot about Ryan Madson. See, when there&#8217;s that many, you just lose track.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chuck P</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66421</link> <dc:creator>Chuck P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66421</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know guys... if you have him for 4 years under rules of arb, is it necessary to &quot;lock him up?&quot;  He&#039;s not going anywhere for 4 years and that&#039;s an eternity in baseball.  Yes, he deserves a raise and he&#039;ll get it through arb but if you lock him up for 7 and he gets hurt in 2, you are screwed.  Plus, I don&#039;t know if he&#039;ll take anything that we would be willing to offer him to keep him long-term.  To me, a long-term deal for a pitcher is 5 years.  We could go 5 years but all that&#039;s doing is giving us one more year of Hamels and adding significant risk over the next 3.  Is it worth the risk?  I think that Hamels is the best pitcher in the NL and keeping him happy is important but not at the risk of setting this franchise back 5 years.Gotta sign Vic... nothing on the farm to replace him.Howard&#039;s case is a nightmare... terrible fielder, yes.  Inconsistent, yes.  BUT he&#039;s the best run producer in baseball and has all the accolades to back it up... we screwed ourselves by low-balling him last year.  Now the bar has been set pretty high.  If he can continue to produce runs like he has (even considering his fielding woes and record breaking strikeout numbers), he&#039;s worth every penny but I don&#039;t think that he will.  History is certainly not on his side.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know guys&#8230; if you have him for 4 years under rules of arb, is it necessary to &#8220;lock him up?&#8221;  He&#8217;s not going anywhere for 4 years and that&#8217;s an eternity in baseball.  Yes, he deserves a raise and he&#8217;ll get it through arb but if you lock him up for 7 and he gets hurt in 2, you are screwed.  Plus, I don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;ll take anything that we would be willing to offer him to keep him long-term.  To me, a long-term deal for a pitcher is 5 years.  We could go 5 years but all that&#8217;s doing is giving us one more year of Hamels and adding significant risk over the next 3.  Is it worth the risk?  I think that Hamels is the best pitcher in the NL and keeping him happy is important but not at the risk of setting this franchise back 5 years.</p><p>Gotta sign Vic&#8230; nothing on the farm to replace him.</p><p>Howard&#8217;s case is a nightmare&#8230; terrible fielder, yes.  Inconsistent, yes.  BUT he&#8217;s the best run producer in baseball and has all the accolades to back it up&#8230; we screwed ourselves by low-balling him last year.  Now the bar has been set pretty high.  If he can continue to produce runs like he has (even considering his fielding woes and record breaking strikeout numbers), he&#8217;s worth every penny but I don&#8217;t think that he will.  History is certainly not on his side.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew R.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/comment-page-1/#comment-66419</link> <dc:creator>Andrew R.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/01/7-players-can-file-for-arbitration-today/#comment-66419</guid> <description>Hamels needs to be secure. Are we, the fans, the only ones who see this? What do you think? He might get about $6M this year in arbitration, and he&#039;s got what, 4 more years of arbitration? So hopefully a little discount these 4 years (keep it about $7M per...so let&#039;s just say $30M over these 4) and maybe something like $18M, $18M, $18M in 3 more years. That would be a 7-year, $84M deal. Probably won&#039;t get it done, but Hamels has to know he&#039;s injury prone and could really make out like a bandit if he ever bites it.I don&#039;t know. I think we really need to pull the stops on Hamels. He is definately a big-game ace and the more we delay, the more he&#039;ll want to test FA. Think about it from his standpoint. He already has some great numbers, he&#039;s got great post-season hardware, he&#039;s a World Champion. What is he lacking? Maybe a CY and of course, the BIG payday. Wouldnt you be tempted to go out to LA or San Diego for a boat load of money and pitch in those huge ballparks? I know I would. If the guy has a low-3.00 era in CBP, then what would it be in PetCo? Lock up Hamels!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamels needs to be secure. Are we, the fans, the only ones who see this? What do you think? He might get about $6M this year in arbitration, and he&#8217;s got what, 4 more years of arbitration? So hopefully a little discount these 4 years (keep it about $7M per&#8230;so let&#8217;s just say $30M over these 4) and maybe something like $18M, $18M, $18M in 3 more years. That would be a 7-year, $84M deal. Probably won&#8217;t get it done, but Hamels has to know he&#8217;s injury prone and could really make out like a bandit if he ever bites it.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know. I think we really need to pull the stops on Hamels. He is definately a big-game ace and the more we delay, the more he&#8217;ll want to test FA. Think about it from his standpoint. He already has some great numbers, he&#8217;s got great post-season hardware, he&#8217;s a World Champion. What is he lacking? Maybe a CY and of course, the BIG payday. Wouldnt you be tempted to go out to LA or San Diego for a boat load of money and pitch in those huge ballparks? I know I would. If the guy has a low-3.00 era in CBP, then what would it be in PetCo? Lock up Hamels!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: philliesnation.com @ 2012-02-12 05:47:04 -->
