<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 100 Greatest Phillies: 39 &#8211; Mike Lieberthal</title> <atom:link href="http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/</link> <description>Your source for Phillies news, events, trade rumors, tickets, bars and other fun stuff.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Melvina Devot</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-186733</link> <dc:creator>Melvina Devot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:51:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-186733</guid> <description>It appears that you&#039;ve put a lot of effort into your site and I need even more of those online right now. I truly got a kick from the post. I don&#039;t ever have much to communicate responding, I merely desired to remark to your remarkable work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that you&#8217;ve put a lot of effort into your site and I need even more of those online right now. I truly got a kick from the post. I don&#8217;t ever have much to communicate responding, I merely desired to remark to your remarkable work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kenny</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72799</link> <dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:00:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72799</guid> <description>Lieby is definatly better then Dutch... It should be the other way around on this one.  Lieby was always one of my favorites.  The man could play!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieby is definatly better then Dutch&#8230; It should be the other way around on this one.  Lieby was always one of my favorites.  The man could play!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason B.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72526</link> <dc:creator>Jason B.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:23:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72526</guid> <description>Mike Lieberthal deserves this spot on this list. Lieby was not what was wrong with the Phillies from 94- 06. In the glow of the W.S., we forget that for almost 2 decades(except for 93), our team was run by inept people. The ownership group refused to spend money and for 8 of those years we had an arrogant bastard taking the reign s at GM. Travis Lee, Marlon Byrd, Jason Michaels, FERNANDO VALENZUELA, Jose Mesa. That was the problem with this franchise. Lieby just happened to be a great catcher on a bad, bad ball club. Find me 7 catchers during Lieby&#039;s tenure with better numbers during that time period.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lieberthal deserves this spot on this list. Lieby was not what was wrong with the Phillies from 94- 06. In the glow of the W.S., we forget that for almost 2 decades(except for 93), our team was run by inept people. The ownership group refused to spend money and for 8 of those years we had an arrogant bastard taking the reign s at GM. Travis Lee, Marlon Byrd, Jason Michaels, FERNANDO VALENZUELA, Jose Mesa. That was the problem with this franchise. Lieby just happened to be a great catcher on a bad, bad ball club. Find me 7 catchers during Lieby&#8217;s tenure with better numbers during that time period.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason B.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72525</link> <dc:creator>Jason B.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:17:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72525</guid> <description>Tim, its an awesome list, and your point was well made. To quote another post from that thread, He lost points for the Burgandy Pajamas he was wearing in the picture.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, its an awesome list, and your point was well made. To quote another post from that thread, He lost points for the Burgandy Pajamas he was wearing in the picture.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72514</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:39:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72514</guid> <description>Dude I&#039;m chill. I had to give my case, however, cause some people just assume I throw darts on the wall and not actually do research when I do these things.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude I&#8217;m chill. I had to give my case, however, cause some people just assume I throw darts on the wall and not actually do research when I do these things.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg V.</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72512</link> <dc:creator>Greg V.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72512</guid> <description>Tim, calm down man!  You made a list, you should expect people to comment on it!  It just seemed weird that Pete Rose was as low as he was!  But it&#039;s your opinion which what makes the list fun to debate.  Nobody is trashing you for your opinion.   It gives us fans something to debate!  If Sal Fasano ends up being your number 1 favorite Phillie (just kidding), so be it!  I&#039;m sure you would read my list and disagree with a lot!  But don&#039;t get all bent out of shape.  You write of other players in team history, many don&#039;t know about which makes this a lot of fun and very informative.  Chill!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, calm down man!  You made a list, you should expect people to comment on it!  It just seemed weird that Pete Rose was as low as he was!  But it&#8217;s your opinion which what makes the list fun to debate.  Nobody is trashing you for your opinion.   It gives us fans something to debate!  If Sal Fasano ends up being your number 1 favorite Phillie (just kidding), so be it!  I&#8217;m sure you would read my list and disagree with a lot!  But don&#8217;t get all bent out of shape.  You write of other players in team history, many don&#8217;t know about which makes this a lot of fun and very informative.  Chill!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: willie the phillie</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72511</link> <dc:creator>willie the phillie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:14:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72511</guid> <description>Rose is #54? I must have missed that. I was thinking he would be in the top 5...Just kidding, Tim. 54 is a fine slot for his Phillie years. And Lieby was a good choice here. He was an all star when the Phils were starving for highlights on ESPN. We suffered some lean times after &#039;93, the steroid boys. (don&#039;t kid yourself)  I believe Lieby was using in &#039;99 too. I heard that from a reliable source, the Internet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose is #54? I must have missed that. I was thinking he would be in the top 5&#8230;</p><p>Just kidding, Tim. 54 is a fine slot for his Phillie years. And Lieby was a good choice here. He was an all star when the Phils were starving for highlights on ESPN. We suffered some lean times after &#8217;93, the steroid boys. (don&#8217;t kid yourself)  I believe Lieby was using in &#8217;99 too. I heard that from a reliable source, the Internet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don M</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72498</link> <dc:creator>Don M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:50:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72498</guid> <description>Did I get banned earlier for my shenanigans??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I get banned earlier for my shenanigans??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don M</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72497</link> <dc:creator>Don M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72497</guid> <description>people just like to bitch and complain...its definitely cool to look back and see what numbers people put together while they were in a Phillies uniform</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people just like to bitch and complain&#8230;</p><p>its definitely cool to look back and see what numbers people put together while they were in a Phillies uniform</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Rich</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72495</link> <dc:creator>Tim Rich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72495</guid> <description>My god people, get off your high-horses and enjoy this list for what it is - a labor of love from a fan. This list took tons of time to comprise and tons of effort. Those of you complaining about the list should appreciate the effort instead of trying to tear it down.I don&#039;t care where Tim places players on this list, I&#039;m just enjoying the everyday read about great Phillies from the past during a time of year when I can&#039;t watch the Phillies play each and every day.Thanks Tim</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My god people, get off your high-horses and enjoy this list for what it is &#8211; a labor of love from a fan. This list took tons of time to comprise and tons of effort. Those of you complaining about the list should appreciate the effort instead of trying to tear it down.</p><p>I don&#8217;t care where Tim places players on this list, I&#8217;m just enjoying the everyday read about great Phillies from the past during a time of year when I can&#8217;t watch the Phillies play each and every day.</p><p>Thanks Tim</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72489</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72489</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry I went on like that, but this Rose talk has been going on ever since I revealed him. I needed to state my case. Let&#039;s continue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry I went on like that, but this Rose talk has been going on ever since I revealed him. I needed to state my case. Let&#8217;s continue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72488</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:48:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72488</guid> <description>Ugh.First, strike off Pete Rose&#039;s All-Star berths. Ricky Bones made an All-Star team. By that time Rose was earning them off his name.Second, Rose was not a great offensive player with the Phillies. Good? OK. His lifetime Phillies OPS+ is right around 100, which actually makes him average. He had two very good seasons (1979, 1981), two slightly below-average seasons (1980, 1982) and one poor season (1983). He had good OBP numbers, but they weren&#039;t consistent over the course of his Phillies career.Third, leadership has a small factor in my list. Yes, it&#039;s great Rose came in and helped lead the Phils to the title. Does that make him any more important than, say, Jamie Moyer? Whose leadership also helped the Phils win a title? Heck, Moyer had one great year, one poor year and one mediocre year. Should he be in the top 40?(By the way, if those 1980 Phillies, with Schmidt, Carlton, Luzinski, Maddox, Trillo, McBride, Boone, Bowa, McGraw, Reed, Noles and Christenson ALL IN THEIR PRIME couldn&#039;t even make the playoffs, then they should&#039;ve been taken out to the woodshed. Ridiculous that they needed Rose to win.)Lieberthal, meanwhile, was an above-average hitting catcher for his Phillies career. His OPS+ numbers indicate he had four average (or very very close to average) seasons offensively. He also had four above-average seasons. Two others were poor - one because he was hurt almost the entire season. Factor in that he&#039;s a catcher and not a first baseman like Rose and Lieby was a better offensive player than Rose for his Phillie career.Lieby also was a fine defensive player. And he made it to two All-Star teams (not by name, mind you), so if you want to consider AS teams, consider that.And Lieby was something of a leader. And sure, Rose came in and helped to win a title, but really, would you have expected the 1999 Phillies, with a pitching staff that included Paul Byrd, Chad Ogea, Carlton Loewer, a rookie Randy Wolf, Robert Person, Wayne Gomes, Jim Poole, Amaury Telemaco and Yorkis Perez, to actually win something? I mean, Gomes was the closer!I stand behind all my picks here. And definitely the Rose pick at No. 54.From the Rose thread:&quot;In defense of Tim, I think a lot of us see the name Pete Rose and think of his whole career. This is only as a phillie for this countdown though. If you look at his numbers as a phillie, they are not amazing because he didnt play here that long. Take away the name Pete Rose and only look at his numbers and you’ll see where Tim is coming from. For instance, someone like Bobby Abreu isnt anywhere close to Rose as a player but had better numbers as a phillie so will be higher on this list.&quot;Agreed. Also read a comment by Phil in that post. He lists about 40 or so players who deserve to be higher than Rose. As you&#039;ll see, most of those players haven&#039;t yet been revealed.Pete Rose was great. Absolutely. One of the top 20 baseball players ever. But for his five years with the Phillies he was NOT that great. He was good, yes. He was very good, yes. But great? Greater than the man who caught the most games as a Phillie and leads Phillie catchers in all major offensive stats? NO.If you want to cry about Pete Rose further, do it in the Pete Rose thread. But that&#039;s my stance. And I&#039;ll shut up about it from now on./end anger</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.</p><p>First, strike off Pete Rose&#8217;s All-Star berths. Ricky Bones made an All-Star team. By that time Rose was earning them off his name.</p><p>Second, Rose was not a great offensive player with the Phillies. Good? OK. His lifetime Phillies OPS+ is right around 100, which actually makes him average. He had two very good seasons (1979, 1981), two slightly below-average seasons (1980, 1982) and one poor season (1983). He had good OBP numbers, but they weren&#8217;t consistent over the course of his Phillies career.</p><p>Third, leadership has a small factor in my list. Yes, it&#8217;s great Rose came in and helped lead the Phils to the title. Does that make him any more important than, say, Jamie Moyer? Whose leadership also helped the Phils win a title? Heck, Moyer had one great year, one poor year and one mediocre year. Should he be in the top 40?</p><p>(By the way, if those 1980 Phillies, with Schmidt, Carlton, Luzinski, Maddox, Trillo, McBride, Boone, Bowa, McGraw, Reed, Noles and Christenson ALL IN THEIR PRIME couldn&#8217;t even make the playoffs, then they should&#8217;ve been taken out to the woodshed. Ridiculous that they needed Rose to win.)</p><p>Lieberthal, meanwhile, was an above-average hitting catcher for his Phillies career. His OPS+ numbers indicate he had four average (or very very close to average) seasons offensively. He also had four above-average seasons. Two others were poor &#8211; one because he was hurt almost the entire season. Factor in that he&#8217;s a catcher and not a first baseman like Rose and Lieby was a better offensive player than Rose for his Phillie career.</p><p>Lieby also was a fine defensive player. And he made it to two All-Star teams (not by name, mind you), so if you want to consider AS teams, consider that.</p><p>And Lieby was something of a leader. And sure, Rose came in and helped to win a title, but really, would you have expected the 1999 Phillies, with a pitching staff that included Paul Byrd, Chad Ogea, Carlton Loewer, a rookie Randy Wolf, Robert Person, Wayne Gomes, Jim Poole, Amaury Telemaco and Yorkis Perez, to actually win something? I mean, Gomes was the closer!</p><p>I stand behind all my picks here. And definitely the Rose pick at No. 54.</p><p>From the Rose thread:</p><p>&#8220;In defense of Tim, I think a lot of us see the name Pete Rose and think of his whole career. This is only as a phillie for this countdown though. If you look at his numbers as a phillie, they are not amazing because he didnt play here that long. Take away the name Pete Rose and only look at his numbers and you’ll see where Tim is coming from. For instance, someone like Bobby Abreu isnt anywhere close to Rose as a player but had better numbers as a phillie so will be higher on this list.&#8221;</p><p>Agreed. Also read a comment by Phil in that post. He lists about 40 or so players who deserve to be higher than Rose. As you&#8217;ll see, most of those players haven&#8217;t yet been revealed.</p><p>Pete Rose was great. Absolutely. One of the top 20 baseball players ever. But for his five years with the Phillies he was NOT that great. He was good, yes. He was very good, yes. But great? Greater than the man who caught the most games as a Phillie and leads Phillie catchers in all major offensive stats? NO.</p><p>If you want to cry about Pete Rose further, do it in the Pete Rose thread. But that&#8217;s my stance. And I&#8217;ll shut up about it from now on.</p><p>/end anger</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: metsblow4show</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72486</link> <dc:creator>metsblow4show</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72486</guid> <description>You guys are debating over who was the Phils best catcher of all time, Dutch or Lieby, well you are both wrong.......Bob Boone !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are debating over who was the Phils best catcher of all time, Dutch or Lieby, well you are both wrong&#8230;&#8230;.Bob Boone !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tyler</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72470</link> <dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:22:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72470</guid> <description>greg v., while i see your point, i do think tenure and lieby&#039;s pretty good stats for his position do make him a better candidate. Yes, hamels led us to the WS and won it for us, but it&#039;s one season. Besides this past season, he has been injured frequently, so therefore isn&#039;t always reliable. And as others have stated, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greg v., while i see your point, i do think tenure and lieby&#8217;s pretty good stats for his position do make him a better candidate. Yes, hamels led us to the WS and won it for us, but it&#8217;s one season. Besides this past season, he has been injured frequently, so therefore isn&#8217;t always reliable. And as others have stated, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Woodman</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72463</link> <dc:creator>Woodman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:10:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72463</guid> <description>Pete was with the Phillies FIVE seasons (1979-1983), not four. I also agree he would be lower than #54 on my list. Certainly he contributed more than  Liberthal, but as you said, this is Tim&#039;s list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete was with the Phillies FIVE seasons (1979-1983), not four. I also agree he would be lower than #54 on my list. Certainly he contributed more than  Liberthal, but as you said, this is Tim&#8217;s list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Malcolm</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72421</link> <dc:creator>Tim Malcolm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:23:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72421</guid> <description>John: I originally wrote &quot;We younger fans,&quot; then added &quot;Most of,&quot; which changed the sentence. I&#039;ll edit that now. Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I originally wrote &#8220;We younger fans,&#8221; then added &#8220;Most of,&#8221; which changed the sentence. I&#8217;ll edit that now. Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72419</link> <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72419</guid> <description>I may have missed Tim&#039;s criteria for his choices in his &quot;greatest Phillies&quot; list. Is it a combination of team tenure, stats, intangibles, awards, his era? It&#039;s mind boggling to see that Lieberthal and 52 other players are in Tim&#039;s opinion have made greater contributions than Pete Rose! How many players on Tim&#039;s list have helped the Phillies get to the World Series twice (1980, 1983)? How many players have been named an &quot;All Star&quot; every single year with the team (four)? How many players on the list can be singled out for inspired leadership in the clubhouse and on the field?Oh well, as they say, everyone is entitled to their opinion including yours truly. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have missed Tim&#8217;s criteria for his choices in his &#8220;greatest Phillies&#8221; list. Is it a combination of team tenure, stats, intangibles, awards, his era? It&#8217;s mind boggling to see that Lieberthal and 52 other players are in Tim&#8217;s opinion have made greater contributions than Pete Rose! How many players on Tim&#8217;s list have helped the Phillies get to the World Series twice (1980, 1983)? How many players have been named an &#8220;All Star&#8221; every single year with the team (four)? How many players on the list can be singled out for inspired leadership in the clubhouse and on the field?</p><p>Oh well, as they say, everyone is entitled to their opinion including yours truly. :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Musselboro</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72414</link> <dc:creator>John Musselboro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:51:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72414</guid> <description>&quot;Most of we&quot; ?!!?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most of we&#8221; ?!!?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brooks</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72411</link> <dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72411</guid> <description>Joel, I do not remember all of Tim&#039;s selection criteria but I would imagine the intagibles that the player added to their teams has to rank high, along with the stats.
Dutch was an integral part of that gang in 93&#039;.  Admirable stats and a scary-ness about him that made him a loveable leader - a tough guy, a ladies man who turned out to be cooky after all!
Daulton had the priveledge of playing on 2 WS, the last being the improbable 97 Marlins as they met and defeated the favored Cleveland Indians.  That team had Ramirez, Thome &amp; Matt Williams (all with over 100 rbi), Visquel,  and Sandy Alomar jr who had his best year.  This team could hit the ball.   They also had unfortunately, Jose Table who blew the save for the Tribe in the bottom of the 9th.  Dutch called quits after that one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, I do not remember all of Tim&#8217;s selection criteria but I would imagine the intagibles that the player added to their teams has to rank high, along with the stats.<br
/> Dutch was an integral part of that gang in 93&#8242;.  Admirable stats and a scary-ness about him that made him a loveable leader &#8211; a tough guy, a ladies man who turned out to be cooky after all!<br
/> Daulton had the priveledge of playing on 2 WS, the last being the improbable 97 Marlins as they met and defeated the favored Cleveland Indians.  That team had Ramirez, Thome &amp; Matt Williams (all with over 100 rbi), Visquel,  and Sandy Alomar jr who had his best year.  This team could hit the ball.   They also had unfortunately, Jose Table who blew the save for the Tribe in the bottom of the 9th.  Dutch called quits after that one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Justin</title><link>http://philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/comment-page-1/#comment-72405</link> <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesnation.com/archives/2009/02/100-greatest-phillies-39-mike-lieberthal/#comment-72405</guid> <description>Dutch: .245 BA, 137 HRs, 588 RBIs, 50 SBs, .357 OBP, .427 Slugging %
Lieby:  .274 BA, 150 HRs, 610 RBIs, 8 SBs, .337 OBP, 446 Slugging %Joel you are very correct my friend, Lieby was definitely better, and very much agree that Dutch was a overrated but then again you can&#039;t outweigh the aspect that he can talk to lizards AND TIMETRAVELS!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dutch: .245 BA, 137 HRs, 588 RBIs, 50 SBs, .357 OBP, .427 Slugging %<br
/> Lieby:  .274 BA, 150 HRs, 610 RBIs, 8 SBs, .337 OBP, 446 Slugging %</p><p>Joel you are very correct my friend, Lieby was definitely better, and very much agree that Dutch was a overrated but then again you can&#8217;t outweigh the aspect that he can talk to lizards AND TIMETRAVELS!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: philliesnation.com @ 2012-05-25 14:56:54 -->
