Keep A Veiled Eye On Sheets
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, February 03, 2009 08:33 AM | Comments: 113
Posts, Raising Questions, Rumors
Could it be that teams are rapidly dropping out of the Ben Sheets race?
Just today the Mets reached an agreement with Oliver Perez, possibly restricting them of adding another starting pitcher. Meanwhile, the Rangers — who were rumored to be hottest on the Sheets trail — are “slowing” in their pursuit. Supposedly the Rangers wanted to give Sheets just one year with an option, but Sheets wants two guaranteed years.
This isn’t to say the Phillies are definitely in the running for Sheets; in fact, it’s more likely they’re not at all looking at him. However, one cannot rule out the chance that the Phils would sign Sheets to a two-year, $14M deal (or something like that), opening up Brett Myers or Joe Blanton as trade bait for relief pitching. Just something to think about.

















Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
Just a note: The Mets were crazy to give Perez four years and $44M. Just a bad, bad deal. He’ll be good for two of those years, probably.
Posted: 09:35 PM on February 2, 2009
Posts: 0 Bonezy
If all he wants is 2 years I can’t see why we don’t test the waters here. I mean its not uncharted territory giving pitchers bad deals for us (ie Adam Eaton). Worse case senario is that he sucks as bad as Eaton, but I really don’t think that is possible.
Posted: 08:48 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Jason B.
Tim, I agree… The Mets once again over paid for less than mediocre talent. I think he’ll have one good year out of the four that they signed him to. Also, 2 years 14 mil for Sheets is a bargain when you consider that Eaton is making 8 mil a year. If the Phils picked up Sheets, we would have one hell of a rotation. Hamels, Sheets, Myers, Blanton, Moyer. That, my friend, is a SOLID starting 5. The only question with Sheets is how long can he hold up before he ends up on the DL. Perhaps that’s why he’s only looking at 7 mil/yr. Also, per my starting 5, put them in any order you’d like, it’s not overwhelming, but, any one of those 5 can give you a chance to win each time they start.
Posted: 08:52 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Jason B.
My thought exactly Bonezy. That is the worst case scenario. Also, there was a report that the Phillies order for season tickets went up by 20% over last year. Apparently they have 24000 tickets locked up for season tickets each game. With that info in mind, Ibelieve they have the money to take a chance.
Posted: 08:55 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 nick
Why do I feel like if that 8m for Eaton was not on our payroll we’d have Sheets?
Posted: 08:59 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 happy feet
Eaton could get a buyout from the phillies or he can choose to play at AAA because he has no shot at ever playing for the real phillies again. Sheets at 2/14m is a good deal until he hits the wall in august and september and is a bad deal then. I say we get the deal more like 2/8m with incentives to bring it up to 11-13m. That way we arent stuck in another eaton contract. The Mets again proved to us that they are not smart at all. They threw the bank at a guy who gets rattled after a walk to the first batter of the game and they appertly dont have the money to sign big ticket players.
Posted: 09:05 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
heck…id rather pay sheets 2/14 than give another dime to that GREEDY SELFISH SCUMBAG Ryan Howard.
Posted: 09:06 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
The Oliver Perez contract is HORRIBLE too. thats a carlos silva type deal unless this guy finds himself. Id take him at like 3/21 or something like that but 3/36 is CRAZY. and ryan howard will ONLY make 14M if he “loses” arbitration….HAHAHA. this is so screwed up. this sport needs a salary cap BADLY. this has gotten out of control. this is a depression and apparently some teams didnt get the memo..
Posted: 09:10 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 KB
The Mets signed Perez to a 3-year, 36 million dollar deal (not 4), without guaranteeing a fourth year or even including a vesting option. It’s basically #2 spot money for a 27-year old left hander. And on many teams, he’d be a #2.
Posted: 09:18 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
Sheets would be great in any rotation. This guy was the starter for the NL team in the last All-Star game. Also, he still pitched 198 innings in 2008. I don’t know why teams are so scared of him.
2 guaranteed years could get this done in a heartbeat. But we would have to trade Myers or Blanton at some point. I bet many teams would like a guy with Blanton, especially after his good run with the Phillies. He’s good, but he is no Ben Sheets.
Posted: 09:21 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
GREEDY SELFISH SCUMBAG, HORRIBLE, CRAZY, HAHAHA, BADLY…
speaking of screwed up, and depression, Geoff why don’t you sit the next couple of plays out, maybe stop talking for a while..?
Posted: 09:21 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
I must have put some extra sugar in the starbucks this morning…because im fired up today.
Posted: 09:27 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Jason B.
HAHAHA nice back and forth between don and geoff. they could package Myers of Blanton for relief help. Color me ignorant, but if we DIDN’T trade Myers or Blanton AND signed Sheets, couldn’t we throw Chan Ho into the pen? Until Romero returns I wouldn’t be opposed to Park in the 7 th and the Madson and Lidge for the 8th and 9th. Plus, if Sheets were to get injured, we could throw Park or Happ into the 5th spot in the rotation. May be a crazy idea, but I’m just trying to bounce a couple of ideas off my Phillie Phollowing Commrades.
Posted: 09:34 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Tough to see how Sheets doesn’t land with the Rangers after all the song and dance but would love to see him in Philly pinstripes, Happ does deserve a shot but you can’t turn down Sheets at costs.
As for Eaton, the likely scenario for him is taking the expected buyout and signing a minor league deal in the NL central or West, it’s unlikely a team does a Helms and guarantees him a roster spot and if the Dodgers didn’t want Andruw Jones in AAA, the Phils sure as hell don’t want Eaton there.
Geoff has someone put a brick through your window yet? Looks like your going to need to accept the DFA to win back the faithful…
Posted: 09:37 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Phil
on many teams he’d be a #2?
which teams are those again? The 5 worst… maybe? absolutely non of the teams that came close to the playoffs?
Posted: 09:38 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Myers isn’t going anywhere with his salary number otherwise Lowe would be in Philly. I thought Gillick made a bad deal for Blanton giving up the wrong prospects but we saw how it played off and this is a guy you can flip for something useful like the White Sox did with Garland.
Hamels/Sheets/Myers/Blanton/Moyer (or minus Blanton with Happ’s) as good as a rotation as any.
Posted: 09:41 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
I look at Sheets as really a High-Risk, High-Reward guy… and although he reached X-amount of innings last year, I feel like he only did that BECAUSE he was a Free Agent, and that it was actually a selfish thing to do. If you are a starting pitcher, and your arm won’t give you 5-6 innings, it hurts the team to start the game, and have to come out in the 2nd or 3rd innings with your team in a deep hole.. and Sheets did that to them down the stretch.
He would look GREAT slotted in behind Hamels, giving us a legit, lethal 1-2 punch, but I think that the risks behind his arm are such that this is a very unneccesary move, and two months ago we were all loving the fact that we had a set rotation, and sure things in there… the question mark was Myers, but he generally stays healthy, and when he’s on, he’s awesome…
I wouldn’t be mad if the got Sheets, but I don’t think he’s that much of a difference maker if you’re losing Myers or Blanton because of it.. all of those guys are 15 game winners with this offense, but I like the guys who will eat the innings and keep the team in the game… hold the opponent to 3 runs and you did your job, holding them to 1 or 2 is great, but not neccessary
Posted: 09:43 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Ive gotta think that Sheets is in worse condition that has been publicized otherwise someone wouldve bitten by now…
Posted: 09:44 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
As much as I love making a fool out of Geoff and his senseless anti-Howard remarks, I’m really not in the mood. So Geoff, you win. Howard is the worst. He’s garbage. He can take 40+HR and 145 RBI somewhere else because we just don’t need him. Trade him for a bucket of balls and a tube of Roger Clemens’ testicle liniment for all I care!
If Sheets is looking for 2 years and he’s willing to take 2/8 (with a bunch of built-in incentives), that is a good deal. This guy can pitch… the question is, “Can he pitch in this park for an entire season?” I think he can but he’s not as good as his 3.72 career ERA would indicate and that’s why a lot of teams have backed off. I would still take a shot at 2/8. We can do what the Cubs did with Rich Harden last year; limit his pitch counts, give him off regular off days and be very careful with him early on. We could even go with a 6 man rotation at times. If you can get through the early part of the season and keep him healthy for the stretch run, he could be very valuable. If he’s going to give us 3 good months and flame out, then I would rather go with what we have. I want guys that are going to produce in September…
Posted: 09:45 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Perez signed a $36 M/ 3 year deal from what I read… so $12 each for 3 years is still just as bad as $11 each for 4 years.
He’s a STRIKEOUT pitcher, who was 4 in baseball in WALKS per 9 innings..
Career 4.39 ERA, and allows almost 1.5 baserunners per innings (1.42 WHIP)… and his career record is 55 wins – 60 loses.
Another good singing by Omar Minaya… the worst GM in baseball.
Posted: 09:48 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Sheets is best served doing an Abreu and lowering his demands to cherrypick a one year deal. If he has faith in his health it’s not going to make a difference and a 3rd year club option+ deal for him is bad.
It’s a risk but this is a gamebreaker.
Posted: 09:49 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Greg V.
You have got to be kidding me! Sheets gets injured every other day! I would much rather have Myers and Blanton than Sheets. OK, the guy is great when he’s on, but towards the end of the season, that was hardly ever! The Phils have screwed themselves on deals like this before. Sheets is this year’s Freddy Garcia.
Posted: 09:52 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Minaya would fall flat on his face with a team like the Twins and probably still would with a team like the Mariners or Astros who’ll spend. He’s meant to be a very nice guy and he’s not an aweful GM but I’ve barely seen a good deal out of him, even the Putz trade was one he gave up a lot.
Posted: 09:52 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Well I dunno the Clemens thing. But what about Wilfredo Ledezerema – whatever his name is – (that horrible pitcher, HORRIBLE, that washington signed to a minor league deal) and a bucket of balls and maybe another HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE prospect who will never even make it to Lehigh Valley let alone the big leagues. Thats the key do the deal there..I agree about Sheets. Id do it if you can work around him and accomodate his sensitive condition. otherwise itd be a huge pain in teh neck if theyre not ready to make that adjustment.
Posted: 09:55 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
Agreed, Don… Ollie Perez is a talented kid but he’s not worth anything near that kind of money. He’s a total head case and is very inconsistent. When he gets rattled, he loses all control. He’ll go three innings of no-hit baseball, give up a hit in the fourth and then completely lose it in the fifth… walk two batters, sac fly, walk the bases loaded, single… the wheels completely fall off. One of my close friends just happens to be a Mets fan and he hates Ollie Perez. He has a ton of talent but he can’t keep it together for an entire game… the Phillies know that.
Posted: 09:56 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 From Section 113
Adding that Ty Wigginton just signed and if the Mets get O.Hudson we almost have to get SHeets to strengthen our rotation.
Posted: 09:57 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
I was at Pitt when Oliver Perez was their ace…hes THE most inconsistnet pitcher with good talent and good stuff ive seen in YEARS. he could be awesome but hes such a mess upstairs that he cant put it all together…
Posted: 10:02 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
I don’t think they can afford Hudson cause they’re still paying Luis Castillo like $6 M a year for two more seasons
Posted: 10:04 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Brett
Sheets would be a great Phil. I think and incentive laden 2 years would get it done.
Posted: 10:06 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I don’t think that O. Hudson necessitates anything… he might be a minor upgrade over Luis Castillo but he wasn’t a great defender last year and he broke his wrist in August so I don’t know how effective he’ll be this year. Plus, the Mets would have to give up a draft pick to get him so I say, let them have him.
Now, if the Mets sign Manny Ramirez… then we might want to start thinking about adding another bona fide starter.
Posted: 10:06 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Anthony
As a Mets fan, I would have rather taken a 1 or 2 year flyer on Sheets instead of Perez, but you can’t ignore the facts. Chuck P, Ollie had a 0.35 ERA in 4 starts vs. the Phillies last season, with a 0.00 ERA in CBP, so how do the Phillies know he can’t handle a full game, huh?. He comes up big in big games. And once Peterson was fired and Warthen allowed Ollie to change up his delivery motion, his ERA dropped a half point and his walks per nine went down significantly. Now, I’m not saying that we’re going to get the same production from Tatis/Murphy/Delgado in 2009, but I’m sure you are well aware of the facts from 2008 about the Mets bullpen. Even if they blow half of the 26 games they blew in 2008, the Mets run away with the division. But it didn’t go down like that, and the Phillies won the series.
Posted: 10:12 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
LETS GO METS!!!!! NOW BATTING NUMBER 99 : MANNY RAMIREZ!!!
Posted: 10:12 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
not quite mate, good try though.
Posted: 10:13 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
hey chuck i got news for you..you might want to add another bona fide starter either way…because the mets are hunting heads…haha
Posted: 10:14 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
Guess what? The Mets sign Manny and they choke again. It just keeps getting better.
Posted: 10:16 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
wow grumpyminer do you want to chime in with something worthy while your fellow Mets fan talks out of his ass.
Posted: 10:17 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
ahhhhh but you see…just like a post above me….we have a pretty good bullpen now…im pretty sure that even with our offense as is now..can beat phillies up…which they will…because even with the phillies winning the world series…they still went on about the mets….we are in their heads…and mets sign manny…cole hamels better bring another pair of underwear with him cause he will be pissing all over himself
Posted: 10:19 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
honestly guys…im just kidding….we will most likely not get manny…our offense still sucks…you guys are world champions and we have collapsed the past two years…which is maddening and sickening all in one…i have been saying the phillies are the better team..because obviously they havent choked and until mets dont..phillies will still be the better team..lol….i just wanted to see how everyone reacts…much better than over at metsblog…lol…
Posted: 10:21 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Joel
“Ive gotta think that Sheets is in worse condition that has been publicized otherwise someone wouldve bitten by now…”
I agree with Geoff on this one. From reading baseball website online the past few years Sheets has always had good stuff and could be a top of the rotation guy, but injuries have always derailed him.
I just would think that if Sheets was that good, the brewers would try harder to keep him, especially with C.C. gone.
I think this has the potential to be a Freddy Garcia type of situation for anybody that tries to sign him, which is why I think the interest in him has cooled down.
Posted: 10:28 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 1650 Tim Malcolm
I must’ve had an earlier report when I said 4/44. It is 3/36. Still too much. If I’m Minaya, I take a gamble on Sheets at 2/20 and should’ve gambled with Penny, too.
Posted: 10:30 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
In their last 30 games of 2008, the Phillies went 24-6 including the World Series, the Mets went 16-14 ….
Why are Mets fans talking smack again?? Ohhh yeaaa.. because they just resigned OLIVER PEREZ…. ?
Posted: 10:30 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
hey man..i agree…im not a big fan of his….does he have the stuff to be dominant? absolutely….will he be dominant? from watching him the past two seasons…no….and omar wants to go into the season with this crap lineup….cant get hits with RISP w/ 2 outs….its awful…thats why they need a big bat…im a huuuuuge mets fan…i will be the first to say….until mets prove themselves..given the past two years…phillies are better than the mets….ON PAPER though mets are better…however they dont play on paper…
Posted: 10:33 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
i wanted sheets before perez too
Posted: 10:34 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
We know that the Mets are good… but even ON PAPER, what makes you think they are better?
They are better at 3b, and CF….and somepeople argue SS (so i’ll give you that for the sake of this arguement)…
Santana is still better than Hamels, but for how much longer?…
Lidge was better than F-raud; Madson was great down the stretch last year, while Putz has been injured lately… the rest of the Mets bullpen sucks..
Just want to know where you are getting this.. oh yea, and our bench is probably the deepest in baseball too
Posted: 10:39 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 From Section 113
Anthony- I think, if you are a Mets fan, it would be very unfair to blame Peterson on Olie because EVERYONE was giving Peterson credit for Maine and Olie when they were in the playoffs in ’06. And he changed him around from being a never was into something viable and useful.
Chuck P – I think if the Mets sign O. Hudson over Castillo they are making such a HUGE statement that that alone could be enough to lift the Mets up. I mean no one has any faith in Castillo and no one thinks the Mets will get Hudson, if they do that would change eveyones perception and give alot of faith to the team and fan base. Plus Hudson, even injured, is much better than Catillo.
**** Citi group announced today they might/thinking about backing out of Mets deal ****
Posted: 10:41 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
church is better than werth…being a mets fan i have to say jose is better than rollins…close but i think jose is better….although i think hanley is better than those 2….or at least will be…santana is going to be better than hamels for a very long time…santana does not get hurt…lets see hamels pitch another year like he did last year…he is hurt a lot..wasnt last year his first full season?….you cant possibly say that lidge is going to have the same exact year like last year…ill give that to you…he was great…but you cant compare him to krod when krod wasnt even in the bullpen for the mets…he had 62 saves last year in the AL…our rotation is better than the phillies….the phillies last year reminds me of the 06 mets….everything went right for them at the right time…not taking anything away from them…but..i mean its a new year so we have to see…who knows how this will all play out…and IF IF we somehow manage to bring manny into queens….there is no doubt mets would be favorites…no doubt…and even you have to admit that it would be a little difficult pitching to wright beltran delgado manny and church…
Posted: 10:46 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Bob
I would love the Mets to be favored again. And you can not compare the 06 Mets to the 08 Phillies for one reason: the 08 Phillies won the World Series while the Mets started their choking habits by losing to a 83 win Cardinals team in the NLDS, with game 7 in Queens. Have the Mets gotten better? Sure. We shall see if they can shake their choking label. The Mets, not the Phils, have a lot to prove this season.
And “on paper” the 09 version of the Phillies might just be better than the 08 version. They know what it takes to win, the Mets do not. So once again, which team will be relaxed down the stretch and which team will tighten up?
Posted: 10:53 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 Bob
Correction: NLCS
Posted: 10:54 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 From Section 113
Phillyhater- Church and Werth are even in my book. You cannot possibly take one over the other coming into the year. One has been injured most of ’08 while one broke out and hit much better against righties than he previously has done. Werth may regress and might not be the everyday answer in right. Church may indeed hate NY and also is not a top RF to begin with. I think both are nice players who have a chance to have fantastic years in ’09.
Rollins and Jose is a tough argument. WHile Jose might have a better career than Rollins, he’ll never match JRolls leadership or MVP year. So while I believe Jose may/will have a better career than JRoll, JRoll played beyond the capabillities of Jose.
Posted: 10:54 AM on February 3, 2009
Posts: 0 phillyhater
thats what i have been saying….i see where you are coming from….again..and you are right thats when the choking began…that still burns…lol..thanks for bringing that up…i agree…mets get down to one or two games left…i dont have any faith in this team to get it done…its awful…
Posted: 10:56 AM on February 3, 2009