Comments on: Opinion: It Has Risks, But Howard Deal Is Fair

By: Manny

Manny — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:50:03 +0000

Dear Ryan Howard: now that you’re a 18M/year player, you are NOT allowed to have shitty Aprils (like you did past season). I know expect the 2006 version… so the pressure is on. You wanted this…now it’s time to perform.

By: Richie Allen

Richie Allen — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:59:39 +0000

Let the fun begin…….Lets Go Phils….Cant Wait!

By: Don M

Don M — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:50:14 +0000

I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that MOST of the team reports by this weekend, a few days ahead of schedule..

By: Richie Allen

Richie Allen — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:26:03 +0000

The thing I’m really psyched out about is this:On comcast this morning ,Amaro said that Howard has been not only working out for at least a month ,but he’s been working with someone on his defense also,down in Fla.
I think our prospects are good boys.

By: Chuck P

Chuck P — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:36:29 +0000

LONGEST POST EVER>>> MY APOLOGIES

By: Chuck P

Chuck P — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:35:34 +0000

I would consider the Red Sox the best team but the Phillies have certainly made their mark as the best NL team of this decade… the only team in the NL that has won 85 games or better over the past 6 seasons.

This deal represents a tipping point for this organization. Amaro was on 610 this morning and I took a lot away from what he was saying. First, the budget is highly linked to the fans in the stadium… the extra revenue that the fans have generated over the past few seasons has allowed Amaro to do what he has done. Unlike NY and BOS that have phenomenal outside revenue streams (NYY Network and Red Sox nation), the Phillies strongly rely on ticket sales and the ballpark revenue; that means, they need to put a good product on the field and as long as things continue to trend in the right direction, the ownership is willing to open the checkbook. The new ballpark was the catalyst for what we see today; the new ballpark and the experience that comes with spending a day at the bank.

With all of that being said, Amaro was quick to point out that this team is not all about Howard. He made it pretty clear that he is not putting his future solely on Howard’s shoulders. This three year deal buys out arbitration but he’ll leave all of his options open… there is a $1 million payout that would be due if Howard was traded before November 2010 but I don’t think that would eliminate the possibility of a trade (especially beyond 2010). To me, this deal and that clause proves that Howard does want to be here. He would love to stay in Philadelphia and win more championships. The incentives are there for him to make some extra coin, win some championships and I think that he’ll be on a mission (an early arrival at spring training should say something to all of us). One other thing that I thought was interesting… Seth Everett said that the key to getting this deal done was Amaro’s experience as an assistant GM. The Asst. GM’s are like the good cops… the guys who get to smooth talk the players and befriend them… Gillick had to be the tough cop and whatever he did really turned off Howard. Amaro was able to use that in his favor to tailor the negotiations in a way that would make Howard feel comfortable. I don’t think the money was any different but the presentation certainly was.

On a separate note… Utley reported to spring training this weekend. He’s progressing well and Amaro did not rule out the possibility of opening day. He said that Chase is basically working 24 hours a day to get back on the field and sometimes they have to tell him to slow down. Gotta love Utley…

By: From Section 113

From Section 113 — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:29:35 +0000

Brook-
No matter what happens this season, the team of the decade has been the Red Sox. They transformed form a franchise that was linked to Bunky Dent and the team never capable to win a championship and into a world class organization with 2 championships and 2 of the greatest combacks in post season series’ history.

By: estrada

estrada — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:34:53 +0000

brooks…keep dreaming

By: Brooks

Brooks — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:09:55 +0000

All aboard!
Saddle up and movem’ out! Phils are on their way to appearing in consecutive WS – something that has not been done since the Yanks 1998-2001.
By the way jumping quite a bit ahead, no team in this millenium has repeated as WS champ.
If (dreaming now!) the Phils could pull this off again this year and repeat as WS champions, would that automatically qualify them as “The Team of the Decade”?
How freakin sweet does that sound!!
Yanks have been in the WS 3 times, winning once (vs the Muts). Boston has won twice, 04 and 07. No consecutive wins – history in the making and we are there?
Sigh, its late and I dream pleasant dreams…

By: Kev

Kev — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:57:52 +0000

Why so negative?

By: David

David — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:51:34 +0000

It is certainly nice, from a fans perspective, to have Howard locked up. But why did they need to give him that much money? They only bought out his arb years and did not get a discount. 15 mill this year instead of maybe 18. So thats maybe a savings of 3 mill. Next year, 19 mill. Does anyone actually think that Howard would get more than that in this economy. Maybe if he had a stud year and got his BA up over .275. But if he had an MVP year next year and got 22 mill in arb, that would mean that the phils only saved 2 mill by signing him to 19 mill (plus 1 mill bonus for having an mvp season). Does anyone really think his arb number goes beyond 22 mill in the third year? If it stays at 22, then the phils save 2 mill by doing this deal, unless of course hes mvp, then its 1. Now on the flip side, if Howard gets hurt or just has a bad year, then your stuck with that contract. All Im saying is that now Howard has no financial motivation to push him, his hitting has gotten worse the last three seasons, his fielding is pretty lousy, and hes striking out at an alarming rate. Yes, he hits homeruns. So did Cecil Fielder, and I wouldnt have given him that contract either. Im sure you will all disagree bc you cant see past your blinding love for Howard, but think about how this really benefits the Phils.

By: Bonezy

Bonezy — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:15:54 +0000

I really don’t believe teh way this offseason is shaking out. This is incredible. O guess the creativity that Ruben showed so far in his rookie GM year, is that so far it is a great choice for the Phils!

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:53:11 +0000

This makes one the the best 3-4 hitter combo in the league for years to come.

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:41:40 +0000

This signing here made my day knowing that we have the best young core players in baseball and will be in contention for atleast the next 3 years and lets home that we can parade down broad street year in year out

By: ryan

ryan — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:33:38 +0000

the bigman deserves every single penny and more of that contract. he is by far and away easily the best run producing power hitter in the game today.

By: Kev

Kev — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:04:48 +0000

First off, awesome article Tim.
Second of all, Love the deal, i agree with everyone else on the obviously reasons why its good to have him locked up and the future of the team.
But does anyone else find it funny that the day the Philadelphia Phillies signed Ryan Howard to a 3 year 54 Million dollar deal, that Geoff has become a ghost on this site? lol hahaha

By: Whisky Priest

Whisky Priest — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:06:12 +0000

I’m assuming that the owners have the final say on budget issues, but does anyone have a more specific breakdown of how that process goes (I know any question involving the ownership of the Phillies is incredibly enigmatic). For example, is there something in the team bylaws that assures Amaro that a fixed percentage of various revenue streams (ie ticket sales, apparel sales, broadcast fees, etc.) is available to him for signings each year? And possibly that there is a guarantee projected out from previous years? After all, I find it hard to believe that a board meeting of the Phillies’ ownership is called every time we pick up a new player.

By: The Dipsy

The Dipsy — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:33:50 +0000

There are other things I really love about this deal and the Hamels deal and the rest of the signings other than the obvious fact that we get to keep the players. For one, I think all of these deals are both team and player friendly. Rarely do you see this. Is also shows me that the Phils are serious about being winners for the next few years as well as making it obvious this is a players wanna play. Other free agents will want to come here because players get treated right. Lastly, and most importantly, it gives the Phillies cost certainty over the next three years in a poor economic climate. This may not mean a lot to the average fan but it will allow the team to understand how much they can spend well in advance of when other teams know and thus allowing for more prudent free agent signings and trades. Its REALLY nice to have cost certainty.

The Dispsy

By: the lopez!

the lopez! — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:09:26 +0000

lose payroll weight now! ask me how!!

get rid of eaton or at least make him do some work around citizen bank park.

hey adam! shovel the snow off the field!

By: hoey

hoey — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:05:30 +0000

i pray to allah a lot that the phillies beat mets.
i declare a jihad on the mets nine from queens!!
may their goats give them the syphillis