Offense, Bullpen Clutch In 4-3 Victory
Posted by Tim Malcolm, Tue, May 19, 2009 10:16 PM | Comments: 55
2009 Recaps, Posts
With one out in the ninth and two runners on base, Brad Lidge uncorked a 3-2 slider. It was picture perfect — Willy Taveras had to swing. He did, and he missed, and after a Jerry Hairston Jr. fly out a few pitches later, the Phillies had won a game they have not won all season.
The Phillies beat the Reds, 4-3. Pitching was good, hitting was clutch, relief was huge. At least for a night, the 2008 Phils came to visit, and boy did it look good.
Cole Hamels labored with 117 pitches through six innings, despite the pretty strong numbers (5 H, 3 ER, 7 K, 2 BB). He allowed two home runs, which isn’t recommended, but he battled through and was solid enough. Backing him up, clutching that one-run lead, were Clay Condrey, Ryan Madson and Lidge, whose save came after a hit and a walk. Tense moments, indeed, but huge moments.
Jimmy Rollins provided the big offensive moment with an RBI double. Chase Utley and Raul Ibanez singled and sacrificed, respectively, to add runs in the fifth inning. Ryan Howard homered in the second off Johnny Cueto.


















Posts: 0 The Little Guy
Yate
Posted: 10:18 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Jim
another error for the muts!
Posted: 10:24 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Keith
haha yes :D
Posted: 10:29 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Al in Seattle
Happy days. Raul is on FIRE. GO RAUL! Glad Lidge got the save and Hamels pitched a beauty. We’re coming around folks…
Posted: 10:31 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Phillies Phan SC
Mutts are threatening to score now
Posted: 10:42 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Baseballfan
Why are the Mets being mentioned? You guys get annoyed for coming on here ,but they are not even here and your bringing them up. Its to early to scoreboard watch. The Phillies need to think about the Phillies. They also need to remember they were World Champions ,but everytime they play good We dont need to here about how they were the 2008 team. This is 2009 and that thinking is part of the problem with the start for the Phillies.
Posted: 10:54 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Jim
just because its may doesnt mean i dont root for the other team to lose, weather it be the fish, or the braves or the nats. if the braves are in a frist play tie with us i root for whoever they are playing that day, be it may or september.
we gotta take first place at some point, may as well be now.
Posted: 10:58 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Baseballfan
Great ,but that wasnt the main point of my post. To be happy if they loose is cool ,but to post when they have an error, or when they didnt even score just are “threatening” is dumb.
Posted: 11:02 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Louis
holy spelling errors.
Posted: 11:55 PM on May 19, 2009
Posts: 0 Bruce
Closely fought win for the Phillies. Hamels is not always going to be dominant but gave us a quality start tonight. Admittedly was nervous watching Lidge again allow runners on base in the 9th but survived by making good pitches when he had to. I’m beginning to think of Lidge as a Mitch “Wild Thing” Williams incarnate. (chuckles)
One note aside and off topic; After coming off the DL, the colorful Dontrelle Willis pitched 6.1 innings of shutout ball for Detroit over Texas. This is his first win in nearly 20 months (his last with Florida in 2007). Amazing comeback after all his problems. A great story for all baseball fans (and maybe a movie?). Welcome back Dontrelle.
Posted: 12:01 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 christopher
this game had the feel of that series against the cardinals last season where the phils also played very strong all around team baseball. great to see the team firing on all cylinders. also five wins in a row isn’t too shabby. here’s hoping that moyer is able to turn the corner tomorrow and help the phils take this series.
Posted: 12:09 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
I’m neither a Mets or Phillies fan, but looking at this neutrally, it’s pretty obvious neither one of these team’s are very good. In fact, the division is very weak and the fact the Braves are within close striking distance just shows that. A few wins, even against the Nats, could mislead Phillies fans, just like the Mets seven game win streak did. One week it’s the Mets who are hot, the next week it’s the Phillies. The Phillies did what they were supposed to in this game. They could have scored more runs and Cole could have pitched better, but Lidge did his job, even if Willie Taveras proved to be an over anxious guy who doesn’t know that a lead-off hitter should be taking a strike. If he didn’t swing at one pitch, he would have been on first and the next ball would have been a sac fly. The save was big for Lidge, but it didn’t come easy. His workloads are always heavy in these types of situations. When you look at these two teams though, the holes are obvious. The Mets lost Delgado, but, beyond that, even though their pitching has been very good, especially the bullpen, the defense and basic functioning of the team has been horrible. Meanwhile, the Phillies defense has been incredible, yet three of their starter pitcher’s have been totally unreliable. Phillies fans are hyping themselves up for J.A. Happ, meanwhile he’s just replacing the 5 starter and will be thrown at a red hot Yankees team. The only reliable pitcher is Cole, who’s still not fully where he could be at and his health is always in question. Brett’s alright, but not a 2. And Jamie and Blanton are horrendous. The Phillies have also had shoddy bullpen work, both from Lidge and the middle relieving core. You can go only as far as your pitching will take you. This is why I say no World Champion is coming out of this division, as it’s one of the weakest in baseball and probably the weakest in the NL. The Dodgers look strong, even without Manny and will only get better with him back and some new pieces. The NL Central is loaded with a bunch of decent teams that could probably blockade two NL East teams from getting into the postseason, with like 85 wins too. Either way, there’s a reason why there hasn’t been a back-to-back NL World Champion since 1975-76, or even a back-to-back pennant winner since 95-96, from the Braves, who were in a class of their own. There hasn’t even been one NL team who’s made it past the NLDS more than three years straight, nor one team that’s appeared in three consecutive postseasons. So, the competition is pretty leveled. It’s a long season, but the Phillies and Mets appear to both be weak 84-86 win type teams. The Red Sox, or some powerful team is going to take it this year.
Posted: 01:52 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Rube
@Tim
What you say is true to a certain extent but the Phillies had similar problems last year. So where does the logic come in? The starting pitching is worse this year but they had pretty much the same rotation last year- they just got more out of them. I do think winning the World Series did mask that the starting rotation was not that good in terms of pure talent, but somehow, by luck or effort, it worked. And while I agree that it is improbable to repeat, it’s just very difficult to do in baseball, this team has plenty of strengths along with it’s weaknesses. The NL is not that strong (what teams do you think are so much better than the Phillies? ) and even the AL teams you named all have weaknesses.
I don’t think you can just look at records either when comparing teams. I would say that the Mets and Phillies are both good teams, capable of beating anybody on paper, but despite their almost identical records at this point, the Phillies appear to be better. I base this on the fact that the Phillies have won despite horrendous pitching (which cannot get much worse) with numerous late inning comebacks. The Mets have managed to blow games that they should have won with errors and missteps, such as the baserunning error the other night. It’ s a long season, but if you are the Phillies right now you think “ok, our pitching did it last year they can better-plus we are never out of any game” and if you are the mets you think “geez, we are so talented- I hope we don’t blow this one.”
I’m not saying the Phillies are a great team, or that they will improbably repeat, but they are definitely a good team- they have a great lineup- and if you say that they don’t- you are definitely not impartial. And if the starting pitching can get it together then this team is a very good team. They didn’t have amazing stating pitching, just serviceable pitching last year, and a good bullpen. I will give you that Lidge has concerned me, but I won’t write him off yet. The fact that they are above .500 right now with how bad the pitching has been is a testament to how good their offense and defense is.
Posted: 03:02 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim Rich
Tim, you’re analysis is good but you are ignoring a few points. By no means do I think my analysis is the be-all-end-all of baseball knowledge, but still I think a few things I see are worth mentioning.
At this exact same point last year the Phillies had the exact same 21-16 record yet finished with a 92-70 record. Also, after 35 games last year their longest winning streak was 3 games, this year they have two streaks of 5 games.
While the bullpen has been a little off, after 35 games last year they had lost 5 games. So far this year they have also lost 5 games. No difference there.
After 35 games last year, Hamels was 4-3. This year he is 2-2 but he missed a couple of starts. Not much difference there.
After 35 games last year, the starters had a record of 10-11. This year they have a record of 11-11. Not much difference there.
After 35 games last year, the Phillies had scored 180 runs and given up 163 – a difference of +17. This year the totals stand at 211 and 198 – a difference of +13. Not much difference there.
After 35 games last year, Lidge had 9 saves (albeit with an ERA of 0.00). This year he has 8. I know he’s been a different guy, but that might be turning around now. Nobody stays perfect forever.
On May 9, 2008 (after the Phillies had played 35 games), the standings were:
Florida 21 14 .600 -
Philadelphia 21 16 .568 1.0
New York 17 15 .531 2.5
Atlanta 18 16 .529 2.5
Washington 15 21 .417 6.5
On May 19, 2009, the standings are:
Philadelphia 21 16 .568 -
New York 21 18 .538 1.0
Atlanta 19 19 .500 2.5
Florida 18 21 .462 4.0
Washington 11 27 .289 10.5
The Phillies are in better shape today than they were after 35 games last year.
I think we all know there are problems this year, but there were problems last year as well. Last year Howard wasn’t hitting, Eaton was in the rotation, Kendrick was in the rotation, and Myers wasn’t doing too well. This year Rollins isn’t hitting, Park is (was) in the rotation, Romero is suspended, Moyer is up and down, and Myers is up and down. Things will hopefully work themselves out, but it is waaaaay too premature to write this team off as an 84-86 win team.
Do I think the Phillies will win the Series this year? No, but I didn’t think so last year at this point either – hell, I didn’t think so until they won game 4 against the Dodgers. A lot will happen between now and then. By the end of the year I expect a slightly different bench, a Rollins that is hitting (he’s already started that climb back up), a rotation of Hamels, Myers, Moyer (who will win 10-12 games), Happ, and either a resurgent Blanton or another arm via trade or promotion from the minors. I expect winning the division will be difficult since the Mets bullpen is better, but I also expect Rodriguez to miss some time due to overuse – and I expect that will be the deciding factor in winning the division.
Posted: 03:04 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
Rube – It’s true that there were flaws in the Phillies last season, but at no point during the season did their rotation look as horrible as it have. If it were for a couple weeks, that’d be one thing, but it’s nearly June already and they’ve received terrible pitching from three of their starters, and average starts from their top two. People forget, but last season, the Phillies did have problems. During the summer, the 8th inning was a big problem. Lots of saves were blown in that inning. No matter what team it is, as long as they’re talented, they could win a World Series, if they turn it up at the right time. If you look back at the ’07 Rockies, they probably would have beat the equally inexperienced Indians in the World Series, the same way how the Phillies took care of the Rays in the World Series last year. Had the Red Sox been in the World Series, even if the Phillies would have won, it would have been tougher, but the ’07 difference to the Indians would have been starkly different with Manny Ramirez.
The starting pitching is worse, and the fact that the rotation is nearly identical to last season is what makes it so mysterious. Honestly, I believe age has caught up to Moyer, and the fact he’s signed to a multi-year deal and knows he probably won’t get another contract, nor will he want one, may lack a motivation he may have had last season. With Blanton, I’m not sure what’s happened there. Perhaps once NL hitters got used to seeing him more, they did better, but he’s hard to explain. With Myers, expecting him to pitch an entire season, the way how he was at the end of last season would have been unrealistic. The Phillies could expect the same from him as the Mets could from Pelfrey or a healthy Maine.
The real problem that could amount on the Phillies though is Cole Hamels. He expanded his IP total 72 innings combined with the postseason last year. I know people don’t like Verducci’s study, but it’s proving to be somewhat true, again. In between ’06 & ’08, only one pitcher, out of 24 (Ubaldo Jimenez), under the age of 25, expanded more than 30 IP and had a lower ERA in the next year. 16 of those pitcher’s ended up on the DL and all of them combined averaged to give one more earned run for the season. Cole’s been on the DL every year of his career, except last season. Between having elbow problems in Spring, and being unlucky enough to get a line drive hit off his shoulder and nearly twist his ankle fielding a bunt, it’s hard to predict this guy’s reliability. Clearly, if the Mets do win the NL East, it’ll be because of the edge they have with Santana, who’s been amazing and started this season the way he normally ends.
Right now, the Dodgers appear to be the best team in the National League. It’s still very early, but they’ve gotten out to a great start and have continued to play well without Manny. Even if they don’t keep playing at this level, it’s reasonable to believe they’ll still be very good and Manny could be the boost for the second half, once again. Besides the Dodgers, I believe the Cubs will eventually get it together. They’re not as good as they were last season, but they still are a good team in an improved division with features the Cardinals and Brewers too. The strengths the Phillies have put together is a well improved defense and Ibanez over Burrell. They’ve also gotten better hitting with RISP. However, a regressing Jimmy Rollins has countered that. Besides that, it looks as if the world series lag is getting the best of them right now. I don’t think Amaro did enough to complement this roster to be ready for this season. It probably would have been more smart using the most they invested on Moyer and Park for Lowe, but ownership may have been too cheap to allow that, especially with the anticipated releasing of Jenkins and Eaton. Like the Phillies though, the Mets have improved and regressed. In between July 5th and September 10th last season, the Mets were 40-19, and during that recent 13 game stretch, it looked as if they had some of that again. The reason why is nearly every day, they were getting a quality start. Their bullpen has been much more reliable though. Putz hasn’t gotten off to a great start, possibly because of being overworked or an injury, but K-Rod’s been lights out.
I don’t know if the Phillies are currently a better team than the Mets. Naturally, it’s easy to believe they are, since they’ve won the division the past two years, but they look like a pretty equal team on paper, which is why it shouldn’t shock anyone they’re only a game apart. Chances are, the division lead will keep going back and forth, just like it did last season. The only difference is it’ll probably take a lesser win total than the previous three years. With the Mets, they’ve come from behind in more games recently, such as in a couple of the games in SF this weekend. They do lay over too commonly though. From the 8th inning on though, the team has only blown two saves, I believe, which is much less than the twenty-something total from last season. Containing leads late in games won’t be hard. Their problem has been grinding out close games. Another problem is that so many of their games are close. I believe out of their first 40 games, 21 have been decided by 2 or less runs. They’re 10-11 in those games.
Honestly, what the Mets should do, eventually, is fire Jerry Manuel, because he’s made idiotic moves, using Sean Green in tied games, with a horrible ERA, meanwhile he’s had Stokes available, with only 1 ER in 17+ IP. Other moves like using Santos to pinch hit with Castro with the bases loaded, playing Reed at 1B, with Murphy in LF and leaving Feliciano in with the bases loaded to Diaz will leave him under scrutiny too. They should get a better from outside the organization, who can help instill a new type of attitude, in their clubhouse. Ironically, I think it could be the same guy they fired earlier in the decade, Bobby Valentine, who helped get them to an NLCS and a pennant, after an embarrassing ”semi-collapse” in ’98. I doubt Omar Minaya actually does this though. I don’t think the Mets attitude would be will we blow this one, because the problem has been just getting out to leads. Most games which they lead, they actually win. And while the Phillies starting pitching may improve, that may only be from horrendous to mediocrity. That could be enough to win a division, in a rather weak one, but probably not enough to win another pennant or World Series. The Phillies definitely do have great hitting, arguably the best line-up in the NL and maybe all of baseball, which has helped keep them at .500, but their starting pitching and closer have been opposite. Ideally, if you’re the Mets, having the talent and having it show individually is probably a better position to be in, if you can put it altogether, but the Phillies do have more of an ”edge” Omar Minaya criticized his team for not having, before they went on a 12-3 stretch. All I know is, from the looks of it, the Cardinals or Brewers could be putting up a better fight for that Wild Card, than the unlucky one out of the Mets and Phillies, but it’s way too early to tell. I think we’ll know much more by the All-Star break. If Blanton, Moyer and Park are all unproductive to that point though, is it possible to replace three guys in a rotation? And a closer if Lidge’s knee problems get worst? This all combined with the fact they’re ownership has notoriously been cheap (ex. trading away Abreu while having a shot at the Wild Card in ’06).
Posted: 04:02 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”At this exact same point last year the Phillies had the exact same 21-16 record yet finished with a 92-70 record. Also, after 35 games last year their longest winning streak was 3 games, this year they have two streaks of 5 games.”
Timrich – Yes, but Cole Hamels and Brad Lidge, the anchors of respective parts of the roster, have looked like two totally different pitcher’s. Recently, Jerry Manuel’s made a comment that I think could be similarly applied to both of them. He said he’s not into being in first place in May, but is more concerned with having a good feel about going into every game. Similarly, even if the Phillies are 21-16 to this point, it’s hard to say they feel good about most of their rotation, their weak bench, Jimmy Rollins or much of their bullpen. The line-up has been incredible, but to expect them to produce at this level is just going to end. As you saw last week when Victorino, Rollins and Utley, and other’s were in a rut, when they couldn’t hit, they were exposed to the Braves and Dodgers. There was a lack of consistency, because during many of those games, the starting pitching actually improved.
”While the bullpen has been a little off, after 35 games last year they had lost 5 games. So far this year they have also lost 5 games. No difference there.”
The ninth inning was more secured than though. It’s not necessarily losses from the bullpen that’ll always show how productive a bullpen is. If the starter is in line for a loss and guy’s like Scott Eyre, Jack Taschner and Chad Durbin are giving up runs in the sixth, seventh and eighth innings, if the Phillies aren’t able to come back and win the game, that’s not going to show in that statistical category.
”After 35 games last year, Hamels was 4-3. This year he is 2-2 but he missed a couple of starts. Not much difference there.”
The ERA is what’s to be more worried about. The win-loss category is highly overrated. If Santana had a good bullpen last season, he probably ends up with 20-21 wins, which give a different vibe than winning the same amount of games as Jamie Moyer, who was good, but not anywhere near the Cy Young running. It’s all about if a pitcher, like Cole, or who ever it is, can keep his team in the game. Recently, Hamels has improved there.
”After 35 games last year, the Phillies had scored 180 runs and given up 163 – a difference of +17. This year the totals stand at 211 and 198 – a difference of +13. Not much difference there.”
That’s true, but that right there is probably the most blatant statistical observation that shows you how much the Phillies offense has improved (even with Rollins slump) and how much the pitching has regressed. Unfortunately though, what’s unusually up is much more likely to come down, than what’s down to dramatically go up. In other words, I doubt most people would have anticipated this offensive production from the Phillies, but most expect it to go down. It’ll still be one of the most productive in baseball though. When you’re in a deep hole though, it’s harder to dig yourself out of it. The fact the Phillies are in a hitter’s park will make it even harder for the their staff to work out of this. Right now, the Phillies are like a better version of teams the Texas Rangers have put out there throughout the decade. They can field. They can hit the crap out of the ball. They have a few good relievers. They got a good ace and alright starter in Myers, but 1/4 through the way in the season, the rest is a crap shoot. The Rangers couldn’t field at this level, nor did they have an anchor, or at least a few quality relievers, throughout the decade, which is why they always finished below. The Rockies used to try to play similar ball. It just doesn’t work. I do think some the Phillies will get better though, like Brad, but it’s just amount of how long it’ll take.
”After 35 games last year, Lidge had 9 saves (albeit with an ERA of 0.00). This year he has 8. I know he’s been a different guy, but that might be turning around now. Nobody stays perfect forever.”
Yeah, but most don’t go to that either. The problem is, winning a world series relied on him being dominative. Even if he can be an alright closer, is that really good enough to win another NL East title and World Series? Besides the production though, I think health could be the real issue there, but that kind of works hand in hand.
”I think we all know there are problems this year, but there were problems last year as well. Last year Howard wasn’t hitting, Eaton was in the rotation, Kendrick was in the rotation, and Myers wasn’t doing too well. This year Rollins isn’t hitting, Park is (was) in the rotation, Romero is suspended, Moyer is up and down, and Myers is up and down. Things will hopefully work themselves out, but it is waaaaay too premature to write this team off as an 84-86 win team.”
Myers has been a lot more up than Moyer has. He’s still averaged 6 1/3 IP and a 4.50 ERA in his first 8 starts of the season. It’s pretty mediocre. On the other hand, Moyer’s getting lit up in nearly every start and has to be in real danger of losing his spot in the rotation, or should be at least, with an 8.15 ERA. Similarly, Blanton’s 6.86 ERA has been ugly too. Both Blanton and Moyer actually look decent for a couple innings, whether it’s to start or end, but there’s usually that one or two innings where they lose all of it. A big reason why the Phillies won the WS last season though was Moyer’s production. Moyer made the same amount of starts in ’07 and ’08, and only threw 3 more IP in ’08, and only won 2 more games, but averaged 1.30 less run per game last season. He helped keep the Phillies in a lot more ball games. Besides Lidge, he’s probably been the next most ”about face” guy on the roster. It’s probably too early to make any season ending predictions for any team with a similar record to the Phillies yet, but this is just a hunch, based on a mix of what we’ve seen to this point and anticipation of health statuses, particularly in Lidge and Cole.
”Do I think the Phillies will win the Series this year? No, but I didn’t think so last year at this point either – hell, I didn’t think so until they won game 4 against the Dodgers. A lot will happen between now and then. By the end of the year I expect a slightly different bench, a Rollins that is hitting (he’s already started that climb back up), a rotation of Hamels, Myers, Moyer (who will win 10-12 games), Happ, and either a resurgent Blanton or another arm via trade or promotion from the minors. I expect winning the division will be difficult since the Mets bullpen is better, but I also expect Rodriguez to miss some time due to overuse – and I expect that will be the deciding factor in winning the division.”
Another thing, while Jimmy is improving, it’s very easy for him to revert back. I think he’ll improve, but he’ll probably never get anywhere near where he was at in ’07. As hard as it may be for some to accept, it’s possible, and only natural to suspect, that he may have used steroids, during that one uncharacteristically statistical season. It’s probably reasonable to think he could get back to where he was at last season, or slightly less though. I respect your honesty though, because if I were a Phillies fan, I would have been pleasantly surprised too. In a way, it had to have been more refreshing, not expecting it. A lot of teams will give that extra effort against the Phillies though, just like any defending World Champion. I’m not sure if Moyer can win 10-12 games, without a large amount of run support or a big turn around. They’ll stay more committed to him, than Blanton, because of his contract, but it’s hard to imagine him being more than a back-end of the rotation guy, at best. With Happ, it’s hard to know what they’ll get. The guy’s more seasoned now, but he might struggle and who knows if they’ll have the patience to keep sending him out there. Right now, the Mets got 3 good reliable starters, Santana, Pelfrey and Maine. Perez is out in his own world. Livan and Redding appear to be slightly below average back-end of the rotation guy’s, but they may eventually try upgrading that. They’re innings eater’s who’s ERA’s will be in the 5′s. With the Phillies, they only got two reliable pitcher’s, Cole and Brett, who’ve pitched similarly to Pelfrey and Maine, which is why they got the same numbers. Maybe Cole will take it up a notch, but Santana really is the extra thing the Mets have. Throughout his career, Blanton’s really always been a slightly better version of the current Livan Hernandez or last season’s Tim Redding, so I don’t think they’re much different.
I don’t think the Mets will overuse K-Rod to the point he’ll have to miss time. They’ve done a better job finding days off for him than they have for Putz, Parnell and Feliciano. I think Putz could be the issue there though. A big factor in this division will be the head-to-head play. Since the Phillies really beat the crap out of the Mets in ’07, the Mets have had the Phillies number and play intense every game, in both New York and Philly. If Jerry Manuel weren’t stupid enough to put Green in that game, or take him out, the Mets may be 4-0 right now against them In my opinion though, what’ll decide this difference most are the player’s these two teams acquire between now and the trade deadline. The Mets have more payroll to use, being in a larger market, generating a comparable, if not larger revenue, with the new stadium, in comparison to the world series merchandise. Both team’s have similar prospects. I don’t think the Mets will part with Fernando Martinez, nor will the Phillies in Carrasco, but the Mets might be pressed to move Jon Niese. With the public scrutiny that’s starting to build there, they may be more pressed to making trades. They’ll probably start out with a guy like Nick Johnson, maybe even by next week, who the Nats probably just want to dump a salary of. He’s a very good defensive 1B, and a good patient hitter, who could replace Delgado, for the time being. They might go for Aubrey Huff too. Right now, if the Mets don’t got Delgado longer than late August and don’t make an upgrade, the Phillies do appear stronger. The Mets may try to be creative in how they replace Delgado’s production though. Being that it’s a pitcher’s park, it may make more sense trading for a front-line pitcher, like Erik Bedard, Cliff Lee or Roy Oswalt.
Posted: 04:55 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
I meant to say late July with Delgado. It may take longer for him, considering his age though, so Minaya may be busy looking for trades.
Posted: 05:05 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Dan
AHHHH! WALLS OF TEXT! *FLEE*
Posted: 05:56 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
Tim to me if the phillies add a top pitcher like Peavy, then it changes, we go into a series with mets , hamel against santana, maine against peavy, happ or myers against pfefey. I would like our chances. our defense and hitting is real good ,lidge is a key for the bullpen. The east right now isn’t real strong like you said, Dodgers getting Orlando Hudson was big, he is really underated player. Amaro has to make some moves, everyone on here talks about prospects, can’t be moved we need younger players, and so on this team needs to get the missing pieces to go back to the series. and that is a top starter[ no blaton types] lidge get back to form ,and replace tschner with romano. helps. and right hand bat off the bench[ mayberry].prospect are just that, how many make it ?. Right now people are talking about outman who is pitching real good,but remember you need to go through the league. more than once, did people see floyd so far this year.
Posted: 06:45 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
I was flipping around on the televion and they show highlights from marlins game. The whole outfield was empty, when the phillies played the senators the same, I really think they have water down the talent by expansion. I would love to see them elimate some teams. like them marlins who can’t draw , washington, pittsburg, don’t see much american league but how does kc draw? They need to elimated at least two teams .
Posted: 07:17 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Philles Phan SC
Baseball fan,
Respectfully, that was a conversation that was taking place when it was happening. This is also a BLOG, (more than a blog too) and we discuss stuff as it happens. Because your post was late, you were not n on that (A and B coversation).
Secondly, it is not too early to scoreboard watch. I also do not appreciate being called dumb. I post on here a lot, and am a regular. We talk a lot about things when they happen, again A and B coversation and C your way out.
Posted: 07:28 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 beta sigma shag
Man Tim I think you need to find something to do, I usually leave long posts but not ones that go on for a week. Some of your points are valid, but the one thing you are missing is not many teams that win the world series are exactly the same in September as they are in May.
You can talk about starting pitching, last year 2 of our 5 starters where Kendrick and Eaton if i remember correctly. Then Myers was sent down came back and pitched great, what is to say he can have a similar second half, and Blanton, who was 10-0 was acquired really late last year. Hammels era is slightly high because of he’s first two games, gave up 7 runs in 5 innings I think in the first start, and 5 in 5 in the second I think. And he was not ready to pitch. Matt Stairs was not on our bench, so this team has shown that it can fill spots it needs throughout the year.
A point about last night, I finally watched it on my DVR, and I am sorry but those first two pitches to guy Lidge walk after the error on JRoll(official score was a hit, but that is play he makes 90% of the time, got a glove on in it was an error) where strikes, so I think Lidges performance was better then the numbers show. And he got the save which is big for his pysci(spelled wrong)
Other than Lidge I don’t think you can call our bull pen shaky, in spots maybed but overall the overworked mid relief guys have been pitching well
Posted: 08:49 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 sawaob12
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a comment blast where each response is longer than the next.
Posted: 09:11 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Doug D.
I’m not one to usually make comments about the other contributors, but Tim (not our illustrious blogger, Tim Malcolm), you need to get a life. It’s 4AM and you’re babbling and rambling on and on and on…oh, and on. It is better to keep your mouth shut and leave them wondering about your intelligence than to open it and remove all doubt.
Posted: 09:21 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
That wasn’t our tim. What a air head I am. thanks for telling me, And where is Doctor Terry our famous rectrum physician?
Posted: 09:33 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
If the above “posters” would please keep there posts to under 13,000 words next time, that would be great. Thanks!!
I didn’t even think about reading any of that.. maybe it was good too.. its a shame
Posted: 09:42 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
That might actually be the record holder there. Thats the longest post ever.
Posted: 09:57 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Georgie
Wow, I used to stay up all night and talk a mile a minute, but usually with some pharmaceutical help. Before I got bored reading, It seemed like Tim had some good points, though.
Posted: 10:17 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 King
Tim posted around 4000 words in 3 post….my god.
I wonder if he knows you can get a point across without rambling on.
Posted: 10:53 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Bruce
I wonder about those few who criticize the length of posts by Tim, Rube and Tim Rich on this thread. Is it their attention span, lack of time or plain impatience? I can see if the text of those lenghty posts had little relevance, uninformed or incoherent. However, I took the time to read the posts and found many interesting and valid points in their debates. And while their posts could use some editing to eliminate excessive belaboring of points made, it nevertheless was good reading.
Posted: 10:56 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Georgie
Maybe Tim is shy about talking while the rest of us are here. If that’s the case, it’s ok Tim, we don’t bite (only speaking for myself there), but we are a little ADD-ish, so try to keep those comments under maybe 1000 words…..
Posted: 11:00 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
I cant read when people never use punctuation, or never make any breaks in a sentence/paragraph.
It doesn’t even need to be correct punctuation, but Im not going to read a 4000 word sentence..
If one post is longer than the length of my computer screen, I usually skip it
Posted: 11:06 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Philles Phan SC
Bruce,
In my case it is time management. Sorry, I am working on a post graduate degree and I teach college and have enough to read without coming on one of my favorite sites to read more than my students’ papers.
I agree with you that they should not be condemned. For the same reason I came down on Baseball fan, I agree with you: Every one of us has the right to post what we want. If “Tim” [not out Tim] wants to post, so be it.
Posted: 11:30 AM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Kieren
Re comment way above about it being too early to scoreboard watch and root against our rivals — gotta disagree. Mets losses in May count the same as in September. Where’s my Mr. Met voodoo doll?
Posted: 12:13 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 King
It’s not the fact that I’m impatient, I read most of what he said skimming through it.
It’s just the fact that he doesn’t seperate anything at all, or use punctuation, so it’s a strain on the eyes.
And 90% of the stuff he posted could have been said in a much much shorter post.
Posted: 01:18 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Baseballfan
phillies fan pf.i dont catre if you were posting on here in a convorsation, because you posted it on a blog A$$hole. Where anyone can come one and comment,so get over that. And as far as your dumb, You can post everyday on here and still be a retard.
Posted: 02:00 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Baseballfan
And you using statements like “a and b conversation” dont really radiate intelligence.
Posted: 02:04 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Philles Phan SC
Why do you have to be like that? Not nice to use terms like “retard”
Posted: 02:37 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Miles
I came over to this blog because so many others I have gone to were filled with this. I would hate to see this one do the same.
We should be A) talking about the Phillies or something related (like the Mets, Braves, etc.) and B) responding to others posts in a relevant and appropriate manner.
I don’t care about post length or grammar (although i appreciate it). I just want to talk about the WFCs.
Posted: 03:04 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
The point I was trying to make is when somebody writes a books-worth of their opinion at one time.. not many people are going to read it.
Somebody said that the one guy’s posts were 4,000 words..
People are aloud to whatever, but I think a bunch of us at the same time thought 4,000 words or whatever was too long, and has little chance of getting any response, since it has little chance of getting read
Posted: 03:12 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”Tim to me if the phillies add a top pitcher like Peavy, then it changes, we go into a series with mets , hamel against santana, maine against peavy, happ or myers against pfefey. I would like our chances. our defense and hitting is real good ,lidge is a key for the bullpen.”
Mikemike – The Mets and Phillies both don’t have enough to get Peavy. Even if they did though, Peavy’s paid such a high salary, nearly averaging 16 million through 2013. It’s not that Peavy’s not worth that price, but that Phillies ownership may not be willing to add that payroll to the roster. If the Phillies don’t win another World Series or pennant this year, or even the division or a wild card, their revenue will drop dramatically, especially being in a recession, so I doubt they’d want Peavy’s salary on the payroll. Plus, it’d take all their best prospects, if that would even do it. Not just that though, but there’s a lot of competition with the Cubs and Brewers. Plus, Peavy has no-trade rights and may void a trade to either New York or Philadelphia. The same can probably be said to Roy Halladay, who probably won’t go anywhere, with the way the Blue Jays are playing. Cliff Lee’s price tag could also be overly bloated, coming off winning the Cy Young award. I believe Oswalt also has no trade rights. But, there are still other front-lines that could be available, like Bedard. Also, they probably won’t put Mayberry on the bench, until September, because if he’s not regularly playing, he won’t develop.
Posted: 04:42 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
betasigmashag – If you don’t like what I have to say, you don’t have to read it. Perhaps if I spoke in a more optimistically about the Phillies, you wouldn’t come off that way. Unfortunately, I’m not someone who can be overwhelmed by one recent 5 game win streak, 4 against the Nats, to justify that a team is making a turn around and has a very good chance at another title. A chance? Yes. But, I don’t know if I’d call it a good chance for anyone in this division. What’s to say Myers can’t have a similar second half? It’s not impossible, but I’m basing it off of probability. He doesn’t have as much to prove, or an unstable spot in the rotation either. I highly doubt Blanton will get back to that 10-0 type form. He was great at the end of last season. When the whole team is grooving, it lingers on and did on Joe. However, the other pitchers struggles has on him this year. You’re probably right that Cole shouldn’t have pitched, and it was irresponsible to throw him out there, but Cole’s a more long term concern. By August or September, who knows what his elbow will look like. I wouldn’t deny that he’ll probably improve from where he’s at though.
The problem with Lidge, is walks. I’m not discrediting Willie Taveras, but he helped him get through it. A lead-off hitter is supposed to take pitches. I watched the game too. After taking ball one, he swung at strikes two and three. A lead-off hitter’s job is to take strike. It should be anyone’s after he just walked a batter and has struggled lately. The play with Rollins was not an error. He may have not thrown him out. But, if he fielded it cleanly, he would have had a decent shot to get him. The middle reliever’s haven’t been horrible, but could be better. Condrey’s been very good, but Durbin has. He gave up those two runs to LA last week. His 4+ ERA, up over a run from last season, speaks for itself. Taschner’s been alright, but when Romero replaces him, that’ll help. Taking J.A. Happ out of the pen won’t help there, but putting Chan Ho Park there may be a lot worse. Although he’s been better lately, Eyre’s struggled too and typically does when he’s used too frequently. Basically, their middle reliever’s, Condrey aside, have been mediocre, which is a big downgrade from last season.
Posted: 04:57 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 shag beta sigma delta
I am sorry but Durbin has done a good job, when you only pitch one two innings one bad outing can send you era through the roof, he was over used and had a bad outing in LA so his ERA rose. And I do not care who they played, JRoll and Uttley were getting better swings when they were at the plate, even the outs IMO were hit harder, and you can say the Washington pitchers suck, but it is the mental part of the game that matters, good swings good contact, pulls guys out of slumps. My point was this is not the team you are going to see in August/September/October, they proved last year they can get guys they need. You can say the guy swung at balls but I can say the ump called two strikes balls on the guy before him.
If he fielded it cleanly he could have thrown him out, I am saying it is an error cause he did not field it cleanly and usually does, to me that is an error the official scorekeepers are way to liberal with hits, if it hits your glove you should field it cleanly, it wasn’t like he was diving for it, he got there and muffed it. I am not saying this to bash JRoll I love the guy, and he will make that play 90-95% of the time. that is why I consider it an error. If he fields it and throws and he is safe it is a hit.
And who says Park will not be an good addition to the pen, or that JB and or Myers can not have a better second half, JB was bad beginning of last year with the A’s that is why he was traded. How can you say he has no shot of turning it around, and if he dosn’t find someone who can
Posted: 05:17 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”I don’t think I’ve ever seen a comment blast where each response is longer than the next.”
Sawaob12 – So that’s what you get up at 9 in the morning to talk about?
”I’m not one to usually make comments about the other contributors, but Tim (not our illustrious blogger, Tim Malcolm), you need to get a life. ”
Dougd – I could see why you’re not one to usually make those comments. Who exactly are you ? Like I said to the other guy, if I were making some typical pampering simpleton comment, you’d probably like it a lot more. It’s okay though. I’m sorry I couldn’t please the ”illustrious” population of random bloggers in the morning.
”It is better to keep your mouth shut and leave them wondering about your intelligence than to open it and remove all doubt.”
Dougd – You know what’s funny about your post? Unlike the other guys, who took a shot, they actually talked about baseball. Could you tell me anything about your post that involves the game, the Phillies or even a sport period? Was the purpose of your entire post to attempt to insult someone you’ve never seen before? It must suck, because you couldn’t even do that successfully. You posted at 9:21 AM. Shouldn’t you be working on a Wednesday morning? If you’re not going to work or do something useful, get more sleep, so you don’t wake up a cranky malcontent the next time.
Posted: 05:25 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”I wonder about those few who criticize the length of posts by Tim, Rube and Tim Rich on this thread. Is it their attention span, lack of time or plain impatience?”
Bruce – I don’t get it either. It’s probably a mix of a lack of patience and their attention span bugging out. It can’t be a lack of time, otherwise they wouldn’t have been on this blog to make such comments period. But, the fact they choose to criticize me, rather than Rube or Tim Rich, who made long posts, shows that their a bunch of cowards who wouldn’t want to ”insult” people who regularly right on here. I guess it’s easier to act against those you don’t know, especially if you’re hearing what you don’t like. It’s typical herd mentality. I do appreciate Rube and Tim Rich’s responses though, as they made many valid points about the Phillies and the division too, especially in providing detailed analysis.
”Maybe Tim is shy about talking while the rest of us are here.”
Georgie – I’m sorry you don’t have common sense. You and your ”blogger” buddies criticize the time I choose to write my post, yet you don’t have enough common sense to know I’d be sleeping at 11 AM? I commend your wittiness (sarcasm, sorry I had to say it, because I didn’t know if you’d get it).
”I cant read when people never use punctuation, or never make any breaks in a sentence/paragraph.”
Actually, I did use punctuation. Unlike some of the other writers too, I’ve used proper capitalization. Also, while I could have broken it into more paragraphs, I did break off some parts. If I broke it into too many paragraphs though, it would have given the babies an extreme reason to complain about the length.
Posted: 05:26 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”In my case it is time management. Sorry, I am working on a post graduate degree and I teach college and have enough to read without coming on one of my favorite sites to read more than my students’ papers.”
Phils Phan SC – I could understand that. It’s a shame most of the other’s can’t take off your respectful response.
”It’s just the fact that he doesn’t separate anything at all, or use punctuation, so it’s a strain on the eyes.”
King – If I write on here again, I’ll do a better job. I did use punctuation though. I admit I wasn’t perfect. It’s not a college term paper. You can’t honestly tell me other’s on here have exactly written with great punctuation either though.
”phillies fan pf.i dont catre if you were posting on here in a convorsation, because you posted it on a blog A$$hole. Where anyone can come one and comment,so get over that. And as far as your dumb, You can post everyday on here and still be a retard.”
King – Read baseballfan’s quote. This is the pretty much what I just summarized. Has like twenty people taken exception to an unintelligent vulgar post that lacks even the simplest grammatical skills? No. You know why? Because people don’t respect that post. You know there’s nothing worth reading about, there’s nothing worth responding about it. It’s sad that people get more critical about the guy who actually talks about baseball and the Phillies, rather than a clueless moron who takes jabs at others.
Posted: 05:27 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”We should be A) talking about the Phillies or something related (like the Mets, Braves, etc.) and B) responding to others posts in a relevant and appropriate manner.”
Mike – I agree. That’s the whole purpose of this type of blog. Even if I didn’t use much brevity, I was relevant and not disrespectful. I’ll trim down posts I make in the future though. When I posted than, I didn’t anticipate responding to other’s, although some were up that late. So, I said all of what I needed to say than.
Posted: 05:27 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Georgie
Wow, Tim, you are taking our comments about your comments much too seriously, lighten up! If we all promise to be nice to you will you forgive us? You’ve got to develop a thicker skin to post on here, really, I didn’t think any of the comments were that bad, not compared to some I’ve seen.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone respond to each comment individually though, nice touch.
Posted: 05:42 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Chill dude.. you don’t need to personally respond to every single person that mentions something you typed
Everyone (most people) on here like reading good thoughts, but in this wireless, blog, whatever-age.. we’re looking for some quick points.. and then you kinda go from there..
I opened this page earlier, saw crazy-long posts from you and just skipped over them..
Posted: 05:42 PM on May 20, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
”My point was this is not the team you are going to see in August/September/October, they proved last year they can get guys they need.”
Shag – Well, you’re assuming they’ll be a deep October there, which may getting ahead of yourself. One thing Phillies fans shouldn’t take for granted is winning. Too many people are forgetting the lose losing history. They act as if this has a team that’s won for a while. I’m not saying they aren’t capable of improving and getting back there, but it’s not going to be easy. I don’t think the question is whether the fight is there or not. The question is, mainly with the pitching, is the talent there? Over the next couple months, they’ll learn more about the reliability of Happ, Moyer, Blanton and Lidge. Also, while the Phillies will likely improve from a mediocre start, the Mets may very well too. The two team’s will continue to butt heads all year long and the Wild Card as a consolation is not a given to neither.
Posted: 05:47 PM on May 20, 2009