Lopez Leaves With Injury
Posted by Amanda Orr, Thu, July 09, 2009 01:45 AM | Comments: 88
News, Posts
Rodrigo Lopez was removed after five innings due to inflammation in his right shoulder. Lopez started feeling tightness in the fifth, and the velocity of his fastball dropped down to 82 mph.
“Like when the muscles are really, really tired, where it starts to bother you — that’s the way I felt,” he said.
Feeling “uncomfortable” Lopez wanted to play it safe and avoid a long term injury. After the game, Lopez said he felt better and no tests have been scheduled at this time.

















Posts: 0 peasant
i knew he was injured, why else would he leave after 5 IP and 2 ER? lets hope its nothing serious but i have my doubts he is ok
Posted: 02:19 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 j reed
With Beltran out it should go to Victorino as he is a center fielder. I think what happened last year with Fukidomi who owes his all star appearance to the japanese more than the cubbies faithful might happen again this year but with Sandoval who in addition to Giants fans will collect votes from all of Venezuela (probably under fear of late night visitations by Chavez’s secret police). Eventhough Sandoval deserves the nod, Shane’s #1 ZR rating makes him the more complete player. Remember the All-Star game we lost in the late innings with Chubby Caberara defending 3rd while Scott Rolen, arguably one of the best fielding 3rd basemen of his day sat on the bench watching a ground ball he would have kept in he infield.
Posted: 02:23 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 j reed
Sorry about this post… i put it under the wrong section….has this web site has been having alot of problems because i swear i was posting under the case for shane article?
Posted: 02:26 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 phils_ftw
Reed, this was an article about Shane but was changed about 20 minutes after it was put up.
Posted: 02:30 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 558 Brian Michael
Yes, it is scheduled for later this morning. Sorry about that.
The server problems from yesterday and today have been fixed. It should be smooth sailing from here on out.
Posted: 02:56 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 » Phillies Edge Reds on Victorino’s Walk-off Single | Blogging-Baseball.com
[...] Nation’s Amanda Orr provides more info on Lopez’s discomfort and early exit: “Like when the muscles are really, really tired, where it starts to bother you — that’s [...]
Posted: 05:32 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
Another pitcher with health issues.
Here’s how I see it all going down: Happ AND another pitching prospect (maybe Carrasco but not Drabek), Donald AND a position player (maybe Marson, but probably someone who projects higher — and maybe even three total position players, i.e. Donald, Marson, mid-level guy) for Halladay.
This still leaves a hole in the rotation, which means we sign (gulp) Pedro.
Halladay
Hamels
Blanton
Moyer
Pedro
I’d prefer if the final name were Happ, but it’s pretty obvious Toronto wants him, so we’d have to part with him. Overall, I’m OK with the above scenario. If Pedro tanks, you can continue to plug from within (KK, Carpenter, maybe Lopez is fine after a day or two of rest, etc.).
Posted: 08:15 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Morris Buttermaker
I think the injury to Lopez causes the Phillies to want to hold onto Happ. And I agree. As of right now, the Phillies do not have a number 5 starter. Lopez has looked good in two starts. But so did Bastardo. But I do not see much sense in trading one starter for another starter while you are still short a starter. I am not saying that Happ is as good as Halladay, but I don’t see the point in adding an ace while putting a AAA pitcher in your lineup.
The only two people I consider untouchable are Drabek and Happ. Other than that, make it happen. We are so accustomed to losing and having bad things happen to us that we don’t realize that the Philadelphia Phillies have the chance to repeat as World Series champions and be able to make a run for 2 or 3 more years if this trade happens. Don’t want to make the same mistake of not trading for Randy Johnson because you want to hold onto Tyler Green.
Posted: 09:05 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Ed R.
The difference Morris is that Lopez has more than one pitch, Bastardo does not. 98% of what he threw when he was in the majors was a fastball. Lopez can mix and match a bit. He also has the benefit of MLB experience and has twice won 15 games for a bad Baltimore Orioles team. Honestly, I’d rather trust Lopez over Bastardo and Carpenter.
Posted: 09:13 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 nk
from what i’ve seen i like lopez pitching. and although bastardo did look good at first, the main problem was that he only threw fastballs and became too predictable. lopez mixes his pitches plus has experience which is also another postive. hopefully, his injury isn’t too serious because he seems like he can pitch pretty well.
Posted: 09:51 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Lewisauce
We are not keeping Happ if we get Halladay, period. If Doc comes, JA goes. I’m OK with this. Yous?
Posted: 09:52 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Griffin
I think Bastardo’s future is in the bullpen where he can get away with throwing a fastball the majority of the time.
To get Halladay, I think it will cost Drabek, either Brown or Taylor, Donald and another prospect (Marson?). I’d pull the trigger on that deal and go for it before Howard, hamels and co. leave via free agency.
Posted: 09:53 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Ed R.
Griff – I am not sure Bastardo is even suited for the bullpen. Even a solid reliever needs two pitches. Madson didn’t become the dominate 8th inning guy he is now until he was able to really develop that amazing change up of his. Madson has the fastball and change up, Lidge the fastball and slider, Trevor Hoffman, fastball and slider etc. Really the only great reliever out there to work exclusively with one pitch is Mariano Rivera because he has possibly the best cut fastball of all time. But that pitch itself is somewhat unpredictable and does different things depending on what side of the plate the batter is on. Bastardo can only throw a fastball right now, and not even a good one. Doesn’t have much movement, just gas.
Posted: 09:58 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Havoc
Well since the Jays want a SS and a catcher you can assume that Donald and Marson are going in this deal. I want Halladay but if we give up Happ we’ve patched a hole by making a new one. The Jays aren’t exactyly hurting for pitching prospects to bring up I think you can get this deal done without Happ, and if it costs Happ I’d take a run at Doug Davis who we can get for a lot less.
My offer for Halladay would be
1. Brown
2. Donald
3. Marson
4. Savery or Carrassco
5. one of Kendrick/Bastardo/Carpenter
If it takes sending Savery & Carrassco instead of the kendrick/bastardo/carpenter deal I’d do that too. Hell for Halladay i’d make Knapp available. Happ though is way too important to our rotation.
Posted: 10:01 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
the Jays already cut BJ Ryan… reports now have them looking to move Scott Rolen (I see him Red Sox-bound.. they were looking at Garret Atkins.. but Rolen plays better defense, and can still play pepper off the Green Monster)
they are also looking to move Alex Rios (him and Vernon Wells make a ton of money).. which is why I said they would probably be interested in taking one of, if not both, of our OF prosepcts in Taylor and Brown, in any Halladay trade
Posted: 10:28 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Untouchable Phillies: Kyle Drabek, Dominic Brown, Jason Knapp
meaing that available guys are..
Carrasco, Donald, Taylor, Marson, Bastardo, Savery.. and maybe even Happ
if we could make the Halladay deal, keeping one of our OF guys and both Happ and Drabek.. I would do that in a heartbeat
Posted: 10:30 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Untouchable: Happ (proven MLB commodity – too valuable), Drabek (future ace, too valuable), Taylor (raw power too valuable). Knapp is too far away from tjhe majors to really slap that label on him. Apparently the Phillies wont trade him though.
Posted: 10:38 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
If we’re slapping all these untouchable labels on guys, then I can’t really see this deal materializing for us. Period.
Posted: 10:41 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Art
How about throwing Brett Myers into the deal instead of JA Happ? I realize that Myers is out for most of the season, but Toronto is looking ahead to next year.
Posted: 10:51 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
If it doesnt happen then its doesnt mean our season is over. Im TOTALLY fine with not gettting Halladay if theyre asking for too much. Maybe you can get Haren for a little less and that works, maybe someone else.
But teh mistake the Flyers make and the mistake that the Phillies used to make was you cant trade away guys you identify as your future core for veteran players now. The Flyers needed Pronger but this is a tad different.
In baseball there are seeveral times more prospects. But you HAVE to pickl 3,4,5 guys and say NO, these guys arent going anywhere. Theyre part of our future no matter what or for what player.
Posted: 10:52 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
Go for it… if you can get it done, do it… we’ve been able to plug Rodrigo Lopez and Antonio Bastardo into the 5 spot in the rotation since Myers went down. We can fill that 5 spot… hopefully, you can keep Happ/Drabek. If it comes down to Happ or Drabek, that’s a tough call. Remember, Drabek has already had TJ surgery…
One thing to keep in mind, folks… if Halladay comes here, I’m almost certain that we won’t sign him beyond 2010 before the middle of next season so forget about the extension, for now… let him pitch under contract. Let’s say that we decide to let him walk in 2010… he’ll almost assuredly be a Type A free agent, so we’ll get a slew of draft picks if/when he walks. We would also have the ability to put him back on the market for a midseason rental in 2010 (getting sure-thing prospects in return). This deal makes a lot of sense for us.
My list of 5 is more like 3 or 4 at this point…
Texas doesn’t have the money… the players are making noise but the owners are trying to sell the team.
The Yankees aren’t interested…
Phils, Chi-Sox, BoSox (keeping quiet at this point) and Cardinals… the Cardinals have emerged as a player (according to MLBTR). I didn’t identify them as a team with pitching needs (formidable 1-3) but apparently they’re interested. I still think that it’s going to come down to the Phils and Chi-Sox.
Posted: 10:52 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
I think it’s going to be quite straightforward. If the Jays are dismantling then the Jays will really like the key points in the Phils offer and a deal will likely get done and reasonably quickly, or this could be reminiscent of the Santana and Peavy situations where negotiations drag on, labour and inevitably stall.
At this point its impossible to know who’s being discussed though I’d speculate the possible deal won’t be as hard to stomach as we might expect. It’s all going to come down to how available he really is and that’s something we just don’t know right now.
Posted: 10:57 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
Victorino leads the Final Vote candidate!!
Posted: 10:58 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Geoff you’ve made some good points in the Halladay discussions… Where have the pie in sky ideas gone?? Do think your placing Haren’s value on the low side, his contract situation alone on D-Backs in that division alone would make him a harder target than Halladay with one foot out the door.
Posted: 11:01 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
It sounds like the Jays’ representatives think that Amaro is not doing a good job of trying to broker a deal… everything that I read makes it sound like he’s being a bit stubborn with the prospects (no offer will include Happ, Drabek, Taylor, Brown, etc…) and the Jays aren’t having that. Even if you feel like you’re not going to part ways with those guys, don’t be stubborn about it. Let’s start conversations first… you gotta be flexible and open-minded.
Posted: 11:03 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Yeha. But the Phillies have the ammo to get Haren I think. They have the ammo to get Halladay too it just depends on which guys they value more than Toronto does.
Posted: 11:04 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im siding with Amaro. you pick 4 or 5 guys and say NO, theyre not going anywhere.
Posted: 11:14 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike N
Instead of having a no-trade list with five names on it, I think it makes more sense to put the highest upside guys in pairs, and say something like: we’d do Taylor or Brown, but not both. Or we’d do Happ or Drabek, but not both. And if Toronto gets one of the guys from either of these two groups, then that’s it from the top tier. So a deal would be one of Happ/Drabek/Taylor/Brown (or whoever you think the top tier is), plus, say, Carrasco/Bastardo, Marson, Donald. That’s a lot to give up, but that’s what I suspect it will take. And it’s worth it.
Posted: 11:19 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Bastardo cant be traded while hes on the DL.
I just think its stupid and counterproductive to trade JA Happ, who is already solidified in your rotation. Your upgrading one spot, but leaving the other spot in jeopardy.
EVERY TEAM in baseball faxes the teams they want to trade wth a list of guys that are off limits. Thats COMMON practice. The Jays are complaining about that? Well screw them, keep YOUR untouchables and make a deal with a team that will play ball.
Posted: 11:25 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
I think Amaro’s playing it smart here, he’s making sure he isn’t metaphorically walking into the negotiating room with a sign on his back saying ‘screw me’ over a guy who might not be as available as we’d like to think.
Posted: 11:25 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
EXACTLY NJ…if toronto is complaining it means Amaro is doing a good job
Posted: 11:30 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
If the Jays want to make a deal now and not deal him inside the division then the Jays have to lower their expectation to what the Phils, Cards, Brewers will offer because unless they can coax Texas into the bidding war the Phils are in prime position when the bidding gets serious.
Personally I see the Jays backing down off the ledge and not entering into serious trade negotiations until the off-season.
Posted: 11:39 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I agree, Mike… you have to try to protect your farm but we have to remember that this is not an exact science. Last year, Carrasco was off limits. For all intents and purposes, Carrasco is still our top prospect… maybe he’s not off limits and maybe he never should have been or maybe he’ll turn out to be the pitcher that scouts thought he would be when they named him Top Prospect in ’06 and ’07.
Posted: 11:42 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Geoff,I agree….can’t trade Happ. That would just be totally stupid . If we had healthy Brett Myers coming back in August then maybe (and I mean maybe) Happ is a consideration. But he is probably the most consistent starter right now and to get rid of him would be suicidal. Fortunately, Lopez has stepped up and given us 2 pretty good outings (I don’t think the shoulder stiffness is anything to really worry about) and Moyer has righted his ship. And Cole will consistenly get better too. My point is that we don’t have to do anything stupid here just to get Halladay.
Posted: 11:50 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I agree with that, NJ… I don’t think that we need to rush into anything but we don’t need to be hasty, either. At the end of the day, I would bet that the Phillies FO know for sure right now whether they’re actually going to offer what Toronto wants to get Halladay. That is, they either feel like they really want him or they feel like they can do without him (and they’ll see if they can steal him). They want to be in the driver’s seat but as long as new teams keep throwing offers out there, Toronto controls the discussions. There might be one team that will come in and sweep them off their feet… I doubt that will happen in this economy and with the teams that are interested but it could (Gordon Beckham). If we add Halladay and subtract Happ, we’re better… Halladay is a stud.
In 2007, Happ had a 5.07 ERA with AAA Ottowa in 24 games… this is not an exact science and Halladay is the closest thing to a sure thing that you’re gonna get.
Posted: 11:54 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 christopher
we still have not seen bastardo’s changeup used to its full potential while he was in the majors. he has a subpar slider, i’ll agree to that, but the few times bastardo used his changeup it generally looked very good. don’t count him out as a starter yet.
Posted: 11:57 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
Playoff rotations…
Hamels, Halladay, Blanton, Moyer
Hamels, Blanton, Moyer, Happ
Hmmm…. which one is better???
Posted: 11:58 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
One thing to remember guys, if a deal happens it’s not Hamels then Halladay… It’s Halladay then Hamels and it wouldn’t be Hamels starting opening day.
Posted: 12:02 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Can Bastardo be in a “player to be named” scenario.. and once he’s off the DL.. he’s the guy they already agreed to trade?
Chuck P … I agree with what you’re saying about a strong rotation.. but would you rather win the World Series again this year.. and then suck from 2012-to-2017 or so with no chance of making the playoffs..
If we go after Halladay.. we have little chance of being able to keep both he AND Cole Hamels LONG TERM …. Moyer is gone after next year.. and we would be without viable replacements in our farm system..
Happ isn’t Halladay.. and if you need to include him in a deal, then do it.. but you have to be able to keep Drabek if Happ goes.. or keep Happ, trade Drabek .. because you NEED to have legit options for top-to-mid rotation starters in the years to come
Posted: 12:09 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
Buster Olney via MLB Trade Rumors –
Any team with serious plans to acquire Roy Halladay cannot approach the Blue Jays with a list of untouchable players, as ESPN.com’s Buster Olney points out. Here are the details:
* If the Phillies want Halladay, they’ll have to be prepared to discuss players like Michael Taylor, Dominic Brown, Kyle Drabek and Jason Knapp.
Posted: 12:11 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Guys….really….who gives a rat’s a$$ who is 1st and who is 2nd.
Second….Chuck P, granted halladay is better than Happ. BUT…by sutracting Happ just to get Halladay you still have a hole in the rotation that needs to be filled. Happ is a VERY solid starter right now…..not just your 5th started that may be more expendable.
Posted: 12:13 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I’d still let Hamels pitch first in the playoffs, NJ.
—
Chuck: You gotta think two years from now too… and how our rotation will look then. Hamels, an expensive Blanton???, Carrasco???, Drabek???, and some washed up veteran?? Think about it. Giving up Happ today not only opens a big hole in our 2009 rotation, but an even bigger hole in the years to come.
Posted: 12:13 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I was referring to Chuck P, not Chuck (so confusing!) — We agree on this Don.
Posted: 12:17 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
JA Happ, Jason Donald, Dominic Brown, and Jason Knapp..
I’d do that today… we keep Carrasco, Marson, Taylor, and Drabek..
whatever happens we need to have SOMETHING left after this deal.. and if they dont want to do business.. we’ll go after Erik Bedard instead, for less
Posted: 12:20 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
I need to change my name or something!!!
Manny….I agree….trading Happ opens up a huge can of worms unless Drabek can just zoom in and take his spot right now which probably ain’t gonna happen.
Posted: 12:20 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
And I also like how Amaro has repetitively said some of the prospects are untouchables. Boosts our bargaining power. Suddenly, every good prospect on our team becomes more valued and wanted. Now you could get away with just dealing 1 or 2 of the top-top guys, instead of 3 or 4.
And if Halladay doesn’t work, try someone else like Haren or Bedard. Our rotation will be solid either way. No need to punish ourselves to watch poor Phillies baseball in the next few years.
Bottomline, our pitching RIGHT NOW going into the All-star break is really good. There shouldn’t be any rush. We want a solid guy for the playoffs, more than for July and August. Take your time, Ruben.
Posted: 12:31 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
I agree…Ruben’s in the driver’s seat with this.
I’m all for getting Halladay but not at such as huge cost that by 2011 we’re a shadow of our former selves.
Bedard is still an attractive alternative…and cheaper too.
Posted: 12:35 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Just voted something like 200 times…..keep it up guys!!
Vote Bran Torino!!!!
Posted: 12:38 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 psujoe
brown or Taylor, Carassco, Donald and Marson. 2 year $20 million per extension(Halladay won’t take less).
Posted: 12:43 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
If Adam Lind doesn’t make the All-Star team.. its a joke
Halladay shouldn’t take less than $100 M over 4 years.. he’s a horse
If i’m the Blue Jays.. I don’t trade the best pitcher in baseball right now for psujoe’s offer of Carrasco, Donald, Marson, Brown/Taylor
I make sure that I get at least Happ or Drabek to go along with at least one of Brown/Taylor
I don’t see the D’backs trading Haren just because they aren’t winning this season.. I think Bedard is definitely going to be traded though.
Anyone hear anything about Cliff Lee? Im guessing Indians keep him since he’s not too expensive next season
Posted: 12:52 PM on July 9, 2009