Quantcast


Odds and Ends: Halladay a Hell of a Day

Posted by Pat Gallen, Sun, July 19, 2009 09:13 PM | Comments: 157
Analysis, News, Posts

Halladay shuts down Red Sox:
Toronto Blue Jays pitcher Roy Halladay tips his cap following a complete game 3-1 victory over the Boston Red Sox during AL baseball action in Toronto on Sunday, July 19, 2009. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Darren Calabrese)
Roy Halladay may have just gotten even more expensive.  On Sunday, Halladay bedazzled the prolific Red Sox offense by throwing a complete game.  Doc allowed one run over six hits and did not walk a batter. He struck out seven and threw just 105 pitches, including 78 strikes.  His ridiculous season continues to get better as he dropped his ERA to 2.73 and pushed his record to 11-3.

Halladay’s name is still the most popular amongst those floating through the rumor mill.  ESPN.com’s Buster Olney believes the Blue Jays need to trade Halladay in the next two weeks, or they will regret it.  He likens this possible trade to the Twins dealing Johan Santana to the Mets a few years ago.  The Twins got a shoddy deal because of the position they were in at the time, and the same could happen to J.P. Ricciardi and the Blue Jays if they wait any longer.

On top of the constant linking between the Phillies and Blue Jays, J.A. Happ upped his value on the market with his splendid dismantling of the Marlins.  His latest seven-inning performance has his name buzzing through the tradeosphere. The better Happ pitches, the higher his value becomes, but is it even an option for the Phillies to trade him now?

Mets continue to fade:

Meet the new Mets.  They have little pitching, a struggling offense, and lack a certain je ne sais quoi.

This weekend was a complete letdown for a team that began the second half six-and-a-half out of first.  The Mets lost three of four to division rival Atlanta at a time when they really needed a turnaround.  On Thursday, the Braves won the opener 5-3 behind a quality start from Derek Lowe.  Friday was even more of the same as New York was trounced 11-0.  A 5-1 victory on Saturday salvaged the series to an extent, but Sunday, the Braves made it yet another headache for the Mets.

A 7-1 Braves blowout puts New York nine games out of first place in the NL East.  Is that a surmountable number for a team decimated by injuries and lacking a true staff?  Fernando Nieve, the young hurler for New York, left the game with an injury.

The Mets as a team seem beaten down to the point of losing all will to compete.  Their manager may go, their GM could go as well, plus, their star shortstop Jose Reyes is still not ready.  It’s the turning point for the Mets right now as they approach a double-digit deficit in the division.

Atlanta sits six-and-a-half behind the Phillies, with Florida seven out.

Marlins getting a new stadium, name:

Over the weekend, the newly swept Florida Marlins finally broke ground on a new stadium on the site of the old Orange Bowl.  The 37,000-seat ballpark will include a pool, and most importantly, a retractable roof.

As the Phillies learned the hard way this weekend after a rainout and a lengthy delay, South Florida can’t keep a baseball team if they don’t build a roof.  The sweltering heat of Miami has pushed the fans away in droves, but finally there is help on the way.

In addition to that news, when Florida moves into its new digs, they will officially change their name to the Miami Marlins.  A new stadium for the Marlins is a dangerous possibility for the rest of the NL East.  A cooler home and new found money brought in from the ballpark could make a good, young team even better.

 
 
  • Posts: 0 Evan

    Watching Happ pitch is fun, he’s been having a great run. Still if trading him can get 1.5 years of Halladay I’m all for it. He’s pitched well and shows a lot of poise, but Halladay is the ace that could be a big part of another championship.

     
  • Posts: 0 jacob

    erm, no. what will it take to make philly phans understand that Happ is at worst a great number two in the rotation? 7-0 this year? done. fantastic. consideration for rookie of the year for the nl? down to the voters, but his name is at least on their minds and poised on their lips. admin would do a disservice to this team to trade him. sell the farm for doc, whole-heartedly. but a young, left-handed, and now proven young pitcher? hell no. he’s not trade-bait. you keep him, let him rack up the w’s and ride him as a 3 or 4 while he develops and grows into his place as the number 2 in the rotation.
    He is still learning the game at the major league level. and i must say, he is doing so quite wonderfully this year. if he had been put into the rotation earlier he might be leading the league in wins. happ’s a winner. like it, love it, win with it phils.

     
  • Posts: 0 NateB

    happ’s great, but he’s still new and hasn’t been truly tested. how bad will be his sophomore slump after teams analyze his weaknesses? will he ever be the ace that halladay is? doubtful. he reminds me of kendrick in 2007, but i believe he will do better than kendrick. i’d go for halladay and win the world series the next 2 years.

     
  • Posts: 0 Rick

    I think you keep Happ. *If* he’s the real deal, and the organization think it’s realistic that he could be in the Phillies rotation for 5 years or more, then don’t trade him for 1.5 years of Halladay. I mean, people, we won the World Series. I want another too, but this club does not have to take out second mortgages anymore i.e. overpay and deplete the system. Now instead they can restock and rebuild while remaining highly competitive. Think down the road: besides Hamels, who will be in the rotation 2 years from now? Not Moyer. You’re thinking Brett Myers? They need some fresh arms. Now, if they can sign Halladay to a longer-term deal, I’m all ears.

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    Happ hasn’t been truly tested??? Are you kidding me?? The guy’s pitched PLENTY of games already, are you not watching the games?!

    (Ummm according to that logic, Halladay is unproven too cause he’s never pitched in the postseason!)

     
  • Posts: 0 mikeB

    I see no similarity between Happ and Kendricks. Happ is a better quality pitcher by far.

     
  • Posts: 0 NateB

    i agree with rick that we need to think of the future and happ might be the right guy. as for manny… it’s true happ hasn’t been fully tested yet. remember kendrick? he started 20 games in ’07 (happ’s only started 15 in his entire career) kendrick’s rookie ERA and innings pitched are almost identical to happ’s. tell me… where is kendrick now? was he fully tested after his rookie year? i’ve been watching all of happ’s games. he’s great, but he’s a ROOKIE. how long have you been following baseball? rookies are not truly tested veterans. it’s just a fact, that’s all.

     
  • Posts: 0 Steven

    The Phillies also only have to pay Happ a rookie’s salary, which is about two orders of magnitude smaller the Roy Halladay’s. If they sign Halladay to a long term deal, it will drain a lot more money out of the Phil’s bankroll than keeping J.A. Happ over the same term. Now, if they could acquire Halladay on his current contract while keeping Happ, I’d say go for it.

     
  • Posts: 0 Brian of CO

    Rick hit the nail on the head honestly. Also just because Kendrick crashed and burned after his rookie year doesnt mean every Rookie we every bring up will. If we think like that, we may as well trade Happ, Donald and Drabeck for Halladay just because Kendrick crashed and burned. Thats insane.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chris.I

    I don’t agree with the Phils emptying out the piggy bank on just one player for a year & 1/2, unless we can lock him up long term early, and still be able to keep Happ in Red stripes. Haven’t we learned anything from the Garcia deal? Gonzalez, and Floyd? Come on now Amaro! We are ”EIGHT” games ahead in the NL East…Nothing needs attention right now. Were good enough already to win another W.S back to back to back to back…Go Phils!

     
  • Posts: 0 Brian of CO

    Chris I, I agree the Phils are a very good team, but they are ALL firing on all cylinders right now. I dont think we want to get too far ahead of ourselves and forget the first half of the current season and forget the fact that our starting pitchers are in the bottom 5 in MLB for almost every major category including ERA and homers.

     
  • Posts: 0 Andrew

    Happ just got more expensive too. In no way can he be in a deal now.

     
  • Posts: 0 Mazinman

    The Phillies are looking really good right now. They are heads and shoulders better than any other team in their division. The problem comes when one compares then to the other teams in the NL. If one puts them against The Cardinals, Dodgers, or Giants then things get tougher. Halladay to me would still be a great move (as long as we do not give up Happ) for two reasons:

    1) If we get Halladay we can bring in Martinez into the rotation and give Hamels some time off. Maybe be skipping a couple starts they can figure out what he has had so many problems. Having Halladay in the rotation allows for this luxury.

    2) Halladay has been Mr. Stability which is good in a rotation that has been very unstable this year.

     
  • Posts: 0 Nationals#1

    “Miami Marlins” just sounds awful. they’re going to have to change their logo now too

     
  • Posts: 0 Brian of CO

    Being Compared to the Cards and especially the Giants are the least of our problems. Didnt we sweep the Cards? The trick to the Cardinals is Albert Pujols. IF (yes thats a big IF) you contain him you contain the Cardinals, the Giants are not as good as the Dodgers or the Cards, and I would even say the Brewers and the Cubs have more potential than the Giants honestly. I am not saying that the Giants are not a good team, but just because they have a record close to ours (50-41 to the Phils 51-38) Doesnt automatically make them a comparable team. As I recall BOTH the Rockies and Giants had losing records in the last week of June, then went on a horrendously good streak. Lets not forget the Giants also play ALOT of games against the Diamondbacks and the Padres. Even the Mets are better than the Padres and Diamonbacks. The only team in the league that are worse than those two teams are the Nationals. Now sadly, the Dodgers are the scary ones. Do we have what it takes to beat them? Without a doubt we do. Will we for the rest of this season? Not so sure.

     
  • Posts: 0 Nationals#1

    we’re 7 games ahead, not 8. but that’s not really that important at all because right now the nl east is a very lousy division. the marlins are scrappy but they don’t have what it takes yet. the mets are a shell of a team, the braves are mediocre, and the nationals are the worst team in baseball history. you can’t base our chances of making it deep into the playoffs from our division lead in the middle of july, and the bottom line is that we need an ace right now if we want another world series, period.

     
  • Posts: 0 sweets

    Halladay’s name is still the most popular amongst those floating through the rumor mill. A great fun for Halladay.

     
  • Posts: 0 Tim Rich

    He meant the Phils are 8 ahead in the loss column.

     
  • Posts: 0 Mark B.

    Happ not tested?? Were you watching that sixth inning, or for that matter the entire Sunday game? Tested again and again. And how can anyone mention Kendrick in the same breath?? Kendrick was NEVER this consistent and was never undefeated. In fact, I am not sure that we need Halladay to win in 2009. And he’s gonna cost the Phils BIG TIME on the back-end 1 1/2 years from now. Check out my blog for my comments on Halladay. If you’re going to go for him, you CAN’T TOUCH Happ. To do so would be a huge blunder.

     
  • Posts: 0 Havoc

    From listening to all the analysts, you’d think the Phils are in the worst bargaining position ever in regards to Halladay, but in reality the Jays position is deceptively weak. Frankly the decision to put Halladay up on the trade block is a desperation move, especially from a team that was in the race for most of the first half in the toughest division in baseball.

    I’m not sure if they’re desperate because they can’t win their division or more likely that they can’t meet their payroll with two monstrous and untradeable contracts Rios & Wells. Either way when your opponent in a deal is desperate you don’t make a deal in their favor. Do the Phils want to have Halladay on the team, of course, but do they NEED to have him on the team. Honestly the answer there is no. He certainly improves the odds of going back to the world series, but it’s not impossible for the Phils to do that without him. The Jays don’t just want to unload Halladay by the deadline they need to. If they wait until the offseason his value will continue to drop and they’ll continue to spend more and more money. So far every other team that is supposed to be in the Halladay sweepstakes has been eliminated because they don’t have the prospects, can’t handle the salary, or are in the same division as the Jays. It honestly seems like the Phils are the only team in this thing.

    This is the point where you have to play hardball with the Jays. Make a feeler offer and then closer to the deadline come to them with a 5 or 6 for 1.

    1. Brown
    2. Knapp
    3. Taylor
    4. Donald
    5. Marson

    A solid offer of cheap young talent with two prospects in the top 50. Unless other teams get involved there is no reason to believe that this isn’t the best offer. With a 7 game lead in the division the Phils don’t have to panic and give up Drabek & Happ as some people are suggesting. The lack of competition in the division has given us the entire second half to try and work out our rotation problems. If you can’t get Halladay done for the offer above, you make trade offers for Doug Davis, Aaron Harang or the slew of other pitchers who are going to become available in the last few days of the month. Who knows maybe Pedro will even summon up some more magic. The bottom line is in this trade the Jays need the Phillies not the other way around.

     
  • Baseballbriefs.com tracking back Odds and Ends: Halladay a Hell of a Day…

    Baseballbriefs.com tracking back Odds and Ends: Halladay a Hell of a Day…

     
  • Posts: 0 karen

    Yes, Happ is young and a relatively new major league pitcher but he also has some degree of team loyalty. He fits in with the club and is able to improve upon his pitching each start. That may not win us a championship each and every year we have him but we can feel comfortable in him being the 2, 3 or 4 starter. It is when the club starts to seek out championships year after year that they have problems…..The Yankees and the Mets and the Red Sox have all been focused on winning that world series again and they haven’t. Santana was not the magic key for the mets to win it all. Anyway, who has the best record/average on the phillies? do you really want to gamble on losing the most consistent pitcher for 1.5 years with halladay and his huge salary….I am a JA Happ fan so I guess I am biased but he is something special that I dont want to lose right now

     
  • Posts: 0 Keith E

    In honor of Pat Gillick I say “stand pat”! The NL East is the Phils to lose at this point. They have the rare opportunity to ready themselves for the playoffs at this early stage. Is a Halladay win worth more in the standings than a JA Happ win? Not from where I sit! The Phils have some young talent that will be ready when this current 3 year cycle runs it’s course and will need these players. Milwaukee won the CC Sweepstakes and what did it get them? … the Mets with Santana? There is a certain amount of pride when I look at our line up and see true MLB stars that this organization has drafted and developed. They are truly “Our Phils”!
    So the question is; how many more wins will Halladay give us over Happ? I say at this point in time it’s apples for apples. Keep Happ.
    btw; I’m the idiot that suggested Amaro go to Houston with a bag of cash and come home with Oswalt.
    GO PHILLIES!!!!

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Havoc – I agree with your strategy, but honestly, right now I wouldn’t offer the Blue Jays that much. In addition, if there is one thing the Jays have, its outfielders. Out the Wazoo. They’te gonna want a picther. At this point, who do you wanna keep more, Happ or Drabek?

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Keith, if I were to take a guess at that number, over the course of a season, my answer would be: at least 7.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Havoc

    True The Dipsy, but the Jays would love to lose the two outfielders they have. If you include both it gives them the option. They’d have to eat a ton of those contracts but they’d have cheap replacements to save them a little money. Even though it’s quite a few players I don’t think 5 or 6 to 1 is too much for Halladay. The key is just what 5 or 6 do we offer.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    H – Have you looked at those contracts? If you pull them up on ESPNand look at them I guarantee you that you will laugh so hard that you will pee on your computer and short it out. Those contracts are going anywhere. Think Sam Dalembert x 10.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    I can oly think of a few examples of guys like this coming to Philly. Dr. J and Moses coming to the Sixers. Pete Rose going to the Phils, And Eric Lindros going to the Flyers. Now, I don’t follow hockey but I understand that last one didn’t work out too well. It is so infrequent that a guy is out there that can be said to “put you over the top”. I think Halladay may be the guy.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Stuart

    Chris I, I do not agree with you at all. Just because we are 8 ahead in the loss column in arguably the worst division in baseball right now does not mean we are good enough to win the WS yet. Our division is weak and we have to realize that. We play the mets, and the nationals a lot. maybe two of the worst teams in the league. In no way do I feel we could win the WS right now with this pitching staff. I would not mind trading Happ. Hamels had a great amazing year last year and he isnt nearly as good. I do not want to trade him but im saying that Happ is not guaranteed to have a good year next year. Halladay has proved he can pitch great year after year.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Happ or Drabek?

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Papa Thompson

    Kendrick pitched several starts while undefeated, and got off to a record in the neighborhood of 4-0. He looked like the second coming of Marty Bystrom, and has ended up with about as much success.

    I think Happ is way better than Kendrick was as a rookie. But it’s definitely too early to tell what Happ’s going to do, and it’s entirely possible he’ll nosedive and begin to do so very soon.

    I like Happ’s chances of maintaining because he doesn’t rely on gimmick pitches and seems to when by pitching to location and keeping the ball down. He’s been great. But I’d trade him for 1.5 years Halladay any day, especially since his value is swelling and it would probably cost us fewer prospects.

    On the Marlins’ new stadium, it’s worth checking out the renderings at the team site:

    http://florida.marlins.mlb.com/fla/ballpark/new_ballpark.jsp

    Ther’s not much field detail yet, but the design is way cool. I’m defintiely looking at a 2012 road trip.

     
  • Posts: 0 randy

    As to the mets falling quickly…what about a trade to pick up Shef for a right handed bat of the bench? Prolly wouldnt take much to get him

     
  • Posts: 0 Ben

    if we can include happ and not include drabek (or vice versa) based on happ’s recent success i say we jump on the opportunity.

    winning the nl east is nothing. we have to have a team that can win a 5 game series and two 7 game series. right now we match up well with any ace with hamels, and frankly after that we are at a disadvantage. we need another front end starter who can pitch in those series.

     
  • Posts: 0 Georgie

    They were talking about Halladay’s contract the other day on DNL, said there is a clause included that gives him the right to be traded after this season if he doesn’t like it where he is. So that would mean giving up who knows what for a half year rental. That would be INSANE! I don’t know if anyone can verify this, but if it is in fact part of his contract and he can demand to be traded after this season, Rub and Co. need to think long and hard before giving up Happ or Drabek.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Keep Happ. Trade Drabek and GET THIS DEAL DONE!!

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Halladay’s most likely gonna end up with either Dodgers, Angels, Red Sox or Yankees if the Phillies don’t get him. At some point in the postseason the Phillies are gonna have to face the guy….a couple of times. And, odds are, the team that he’s on is most likely going to advance. Sure, we can compare him to C.C. all we want and the fact that the big guy choked last year with the Brewers in the playoffs. But Halladay is better than C.C. (look at C.C. numbers this year……not bad but not even close to Halladay’s). I agree with Dipsy when he says, “I think Halladay may be the guy.”

    All being said…there are no guarantees….but I think it’s close to the time when RAJ needs to pull the trigger. They want Drabek, apparently, so trade the guy. Maybe he’s the next Cy Young or Walter Johnson or Pedro when he was a Red Sox……or……maybe he’s the next Adam Eaton (probably not…but you get the point). I think we have to take the chance here. An opportunity like this may not come along again for a long time.

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    I saw that too Georgie… I doubt Halladay would use that clause to get out of a contending team like the Phils, but you never know…

     
  • Posts: 0 Frank

    If you think about this whole trade and the prospects that we would be giving up, you have to look to our past prospects. The key parts to our team that won it all last year, Utley, Victo, Hoaward, Hamels, Burrell, Rollins etc, came up through the minor leagues. The question is: is taking the chance of Drabek, who can potentially be a Hamels or better, when Hamels was ptiching well, worth giving up for Hallday. Look at Gavin Flloyd or Randy Wolf who came up and we traded and how they turned out to be decent pitchers. However, I think at this point our farm system is so deep, it is worth it to trade one of the best prospects, Drabek OR Taylor. Not both. Taylor will be the next coming of Howard if you compare there stats. In order to contend again this year we need a top of the line pitcher, like Halladay. We need to close this deal.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    For those that our saying we should give 5 or 6 of our best prospects to Toronto, look at the rumour-mill and compare what every other team is supposedly offering. Riccardi is just sitting there hoping the Phillies get jumpy enough to make that kind of offer because no-one else is, rumour has them offering 1 or 2 top prospects maximum.

     
  • Posts: 0 psujoe

    I’m willing to part with Dravek, butnot Dravek and Taylor. I’m not giving up two top prospects for a rental.

    I’d go Dravek, Marson, Donald and a pitcher not named Knapp.

     
  • Posts: 0 psujoe

    Actually, i would probably add Knapp if it’s just those 4.

     
  • Posts: 0 Doug D.

    Happ is much different than Kendrick. In 2007, Kendrick was able to work out of a lot of jams, while using basically one pitch. In 2008, the word was out and Kendrick is now back in the Minors trying to develop some consistency and confidence with secondary pitches. At this point, I am still not counting out Kendrick making it back to the Show, although it may not be in a Phils uniform. Happ, on the other hand, knows how to “pitch” and already has the ability to use his secondary pitches. Happ doesn’t get into many jams, although yesterday’s 6th inning was a beautiful one to wriggle out of with no damage. Call Me Jay is left-handed, is not afraid to throw inside to righties (unlike Kendrick with lefties), and is deceptively fast, which is a big plus. Pitchers are tabbed as being “deceptively fast” for a reason. It’s usually something in either their delivery and/or their physical stature that causes the deception. It’s not something that hitters EVER “catch up to” as so many think will happen to Happ. He is a keeper. Including him in a trade for Halladay doesn’t make sense, as it will hurt the Phils almost as much as Halladay will help.

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    Who plays for our Single A team? The Jays scouted our players there.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Frank, it looks like the Jays want both Taylor and Drabek. I say go. Let’s do it. At first, when I thought about it, I was not in favor of dealing both. But I think it’s time to get this done…..NOW. Taylor’s numbers ARE impressive and he certainly has that potential. But power hitting outfielders can always be had either via trade or free agency and, while it would hurt losing him, I think you have to take that chance in order to get a pitcher like Halladay. Drabek could be great as well but, again, he’s not at all proven at this level and there are no guarantees that he’ll succeed.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    NJ…not 5 or six….four. Taylor, Drabek, Donald and Carrasco. It’s rich but not system-gutting.

    Doug D… I absolutely agree with your reasoning on Happ.

     
  • Posts: 0 psujoe

    Chuck, dravek, taylor and what else would you be willing to give up?

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Donald and Carrasco. Both easily replaceable in my opinion.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Honestly why is there a Kendrick vs Happ comparison being made, their two totally different pitchers. Kendrick was a young, underdeveloped under-seasoned prospect with very little ‘stuff’ to speak of who came up contributed incredibly well and then couldn’t build on that. Happ is a totally different pitcher, he is a big guy with stuff and command who has as much minor league seasoning as anyone. He’s not going to be a front of the rotation guy by design but he can anchor the middle of the Phillies rotation for a half decade plus.

    The Jays want Drabek, they want Brown and Knapp, Riccardi wants to be spoilt with ‘top prospects’ so he wont want a deal built around Happ.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Good point NJ…but do you think that Riccardi would change his mind after Happ’s performance yesterday? I mean, at what point does the light bulb go off in someone’s head? That’s what makes me nervous. IF Ricarrdi starts demanding Happ, does Ruben go along with it to get his man? At that point, I think it’s time to take a step back and consider other options.

     
  • Posts: 0 psujoe

    So, Dravek, Taylor, Donald and Carrasco. If I thought I’d get him for more than 1.33 years I’d probably do it, but reluctantly.

    I guess the question is do we stand a better chance at winning a WS over the next 5 years with Halladay in 2009, 2010 or Dravek, Taylor and another starter(someone else we trade for this year) and an extra 15 million to get other players in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. if the answer is yes, make the deal.

     
 
Leave a Comment

>> Create a new Phillies Nation account.
>> Already registered with Phillies Nation? Log in here.
>> Comment without logging in:






Please ensure your comments comply with our Comment Policy.