Phillies Are Early Frontrunners for Halladay
Posted by Amanda Orr, Wed, July 08, 2009 02:39 PM | Comments: 92
News, Posts
The Phillies have been looking for a pitching upgrade for quite some time, and now they could be an early favorite to land Roy Halladay. Halladay would be a perfect option for the Phillies; a ground ball pitcher in a hitter-friendly park. Toronto’s general manager, J.P. Ricciardi, is in no rush to trade Halladay, but made it known that Halladay is on the market.
The Phillies’ deep farm system makes them a popular favorite. They have a stronger farm system than in recent years, and the Phillies are not afraid to part with their prospects. The Blue Jays addressed they would like a shortstop. The Phillies could package Jason Donald in a deal. The Blue Jays had interest in Donald last year.
Also, the Blue Jays are unlikely to trade Halladay to a team within their division. That eliminates the Red Sox and Yankees, opening a door for the Phillies. The Blue Jays would be happy if he was out of the American League all together.
The only problem is that Halladay has a long list of teams he does not want to not play for. Ricciardi did not mention the teams, but there is always a possibility the Phillies are on that list.
















Posts: 0 The Little Guy
Often injured? sportsnut, what the hell are you talking about?
Are you talking about the same Cliff Lee that was in the minors in 2007?
Posted: 05:10 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Walter
pablo sandoval is only 2 percentage points ahead of vic heading into final day. Keep voting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: 05:10 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Nick
most of you guys dont seem to realize that happ and drabek will almost definitely be sent to toronto in a deal for halladay. J.P. Ricciardi is NOT an idiot and will not deal a player of halladays caliber without receiving a pitcher of drabeks talent and a guy like happ to play for the rest of the season in halladays absence. This move will absolutely destroy our farm system but halladay is so good it will most likely be worth it especially if he agrees to an extension with us assuming the trade takes place. And the Indians might suck but they will want a similar price for cliff lee.
Posted: 05:16 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
Amaro on the situation –
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=51504164955&ref=nf
Posted: 05:19 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
read and that and you are either listening to a liar or someone that will NOT be trading our top prospects…
Posted: 05:20 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Jayson Stark.. on ESPN 950 … said that any deal for Halladay would have to start with Kyle Drabek … and that it could take anywhere from 4-6 players.
Drabek, Jason Donald, Dominic Brown, and JA Happ to start..
He also said that there is little to no chance the Phillies would reach an extension on Halladay’s contract, meaning that we would have to give up our best minor league talent.. to take a chance with Halladay for a year and a half..
… tough call, I kinda don’t see it happening (i dont see them trading him to an AL EAST team) .. so in my mind.. Texas and I guess the WhiteSox have the young talent to get him.
Stark also said that the Phillies people liked what the saw from Pedro Martinez.. who at like $2 Million is worth a shot, I think.
Posted: 05:31 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Julian
http://zozone.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/07/amaro_talks_halladay_martinez.html
The Phillies aren’t willing to deplete their farm system. There are untouchables.
Posted: 05:34 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Anyone know why the Phillies website.. is trying to get you to vote for Victorino.. AND Brandon Inge ??? “Bran-Torino” is on the website.. i don’t get it.. maybe thinking that extra Tiger-fan votes will push him over the edge?
Adam Lind from Toronto got my votes for the AL.
Posted: 05:35 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
We made a deal w/ Detroit to promote each other;s player in an effort to double votes…I remember that kind of thing happening last year.
Hell, if we’re doing this we should promise to vote Lind into the All-Star game if the Jays promise to trade us Halladay!
Posted: 05:40 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 AM
imagine Halladay in a career year
Posted: 05:42 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 AM
*meant to say contract year..
might be worth it
Posted: 05:43 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
Well we are the front runners? but if Texas was him or Angels Giants, Boston, Yankees, Cardinals Brewers, Mets all have better prospects according to scouts, I think Drabek and Taylor are monsters plus Donald is a lot to match
Posted: 05:54 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Bruce
You got it Don. I read today’s interview with Amaro, thanks to CZ’s posting of a link to facebook.com.
As Amaro pointed out, there is a limit to Phillies’ payroll of $130 million plus. And that he does have a personal list of “untouchables” in the farm system. There can be NO extension of Halliday’s contract beyond year 2010.
The Phillies front office must give this thought. For the remainder of this season, Halliday is to paid the remaining $7 million and $15.75 million next season. That’s a total of about $23 million for 1.5 years. A very expensive rental pitcher indeed.
As mentioned, the Phillies’ 2009 payroll already has climbed to more than $130 million, and they already have committed $95.5 million to 11 players for 2010.
I don’t think it’s realistic to think the Phillies would be agreeable to give up $23 million AND a “boatload” of top prospects for a 1.5 yr rental pitcher.
It is realistic to think the front office have a contingency plan that may include the likes of Pedro Martinez and Paul Byrd. Much cheaper and NO
mortage of the farm’s future.
Posted: 05:55 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 The Dipsy
If the Phils can’t get Halladay to put his name on an extension then I don’t trade Drabek. Period.
The Dipsy
Posted: 06:00 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 David M.
Halladay would be a great pitcher to have on the Phils, but i’m thinking that the Blue Jays are looking for a ridiculous amount of our talent in exchange for him. I wouldn’t risk giving up some of our best farm talent and more just for this guy. We’d be giving up too much. But if we can make a reasonable trade without getting rid of any of our best players i’d say go for it.
Posted: 06:01 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 BS
Hmm, I don’t remember finishing 2nd in the Sabathia sweepstakes. But that worked out really well for us.
Posted: 06:10 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 shag beta sigma delta
I think Happ should be the only untouchable, Drabek is going to be great according to most of you in here, but if we can re sign Halladay to 3-5 years I would take that and give up Drabek, just not Happ
Posted: 06:22 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 TheBigRedP
23 million for a year and half of Halladay is a bargain. He will command at last 23 million/year when he hits the market.
Posted: 06:23 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Papa Thompson
Should we take offense to being called frontrunners?
Posted: 06:30 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Dave
I’m going to agree with shag. Trading Happ for Halladay would upgrade the rotation, but still leave a big hole there. It doesn’t eliminate the question marks.
Now, a Hamels, Halladay, Blanton, Happ playoff rotation? That’d be sick. Do what you need to to get it done.
Posted: 06:33 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Dave
I would love Halladay in the rotation, my only concern is throwing away the entire farm system for him. I love Happ, Drabek, and Taylor. Those three should be untouchable, but one of them will probably have to go if Halladay were to become a Phillie. Out of those three, Taylor is probably the most expendable because of the amount of outfield talent that we already have. Good starting pitching is hard to come by, and Drabek may be the real deal when he comes up. Remember Jamie Moyer isn’t getting any younger, and we have to think about next season as well. To hear more of my thoughts, check out my blog at http://www.broadstreetheroes.com/.
Posted: 06:37 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Andrew
I am certainnly not excited to get Pedro. But its a one year deal. what if just eats some innings in long relief? what if hes good? I see it as a no lose situation. He isnt a bad attitude guy like Beltran or Reyes or Delgado.
Halladay I would be as excited almost as I was when they won the world series. Id give happ and marson and mayberry and whoever else they want for him.
He is better than Santana.
Posted: 06:46 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Andrew
Happ untouchable lol
He was un owned in fantasy leagues 4 weeks ago.
Get a grip people. I love how hes pitching. He is our ace right now. I hope to keep him and hope he continues to do well. Hes not Cole. Hes not untouchable.
Posted: 06:48 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Papa Thompson
Halladay prefers the Dodgers?
I sure hope they don’t make a move for him while we sit on our hands because Happ’s a good value and we don’t want to dump prospects.
Halladay’ll sit us down in the NLCS, probably beating Happ, and we’ll all be back here calling for RAJ’s head.
If the Dodgers are contenders for Halladay, we need to pull the trigger.
Posted: 06:51 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 jcfriedl
To me, Drabek is untouchable. Taylor is absolutely shredding AA and just tears the cover off the ball harder than Ryan Howard according to some.
Dominic Brown has more tools than Taylor, but just hasn’t put up the numbers yet and is still in A ball. Knapp has a load of potential, but has command issues and is still only 18 years old. I’d like to see him pitch against A+ hitters. The Jays are going to want at least two of these guys plus a Jason Donald and maybe even Happ. That is just too much for the money we’d have to dish out to Halladay on a long term deal. And I highly doubt we’d deal away too many players just for a year and a half rental. This team is a Jason Marquis type pitcher away from being just fine this year.
Posted: 07:09 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Andrew
We may be favored to win series this year and next with halladay?
Is a dynysty worth it?
Id almost expect to repeat if we get Roy.
Posted: 07:46 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 william
happ untouchable all prospects are fair game do not let this guy go to the dodgers or the mets
Posted: 07:56 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Brian of CO
Pedro? LOL. Heres a great idea, let sign an older pitcher who FAILED for the Mets. One of the main reason the Mets choked. Real smart Rueben. I would LOVE to see Halladay in red pinstripes, but I dont have the faith in Rueben to NOT sign Pedro, and sign Halladay.
Posted: 08:12 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Gavin
I dont see the Phillies trading more than 4 upper prospects for Doc, maybe a 5th low level guy, but anything more than that would be historical. It would be on the level of the Vikings trading all those picks for Herchel. No one including the Phillies should have to trade their top 5 prospects for anyone…. anytime.
A package of Donald – Marson – Knapp/Carrasco – Brown/Taylor – 5th low level guy is more than fair. We’re not talking KK- Condrey – Mayberry – etc. here. All of those guys are highly regarded.
If the deal “has to” begin with Drabek, then thats fine, they only get one more guy out of those listed, but if they want volume then Drabek is untouchable.
Posted: 08:26 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
I am now hearing that we are going to have Halliday by Friday
Posted: 08:28 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Andrew
signing pedro costs nothing. its win win
damn people be logical. its not your 3 million
he wont be back unless by some miracle he did well with us
pedro sucks but you lose nothing signing him.
Posted: 08:42 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 Havoc
I’m all about Halladay, but I wouldn’t deal if the price is Happ and/or Drabek. If it comes down to that let’s make a run at Doug Davis he’s not as good but we can get him for a whole lot less. Halladay would help us, but losing Happ would weaken the rest of the rotation, and we don’t have anyone i’m confident can take his place.
I’d trade Brown, Donald, Marson, & Savery or Carrassco. If they need a 5th guy to convince them I’d offer one of Bastardo/Carpenter/Kendrick.
If our rotation is Halliday, Hamels, Happ, Blanton, Moyer we’ve got a great shot at another world series. Hell just the triple H’s would give us a good shot at it. Then who knows maybe Carrassco or Drabek have a shot at making the rotation next year.
Posted: 08:46 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 MikeB
I read comments attributed to Halliday earlier today to the effect that all he cares about is going to a club that has a legitimate shot at winning. The Phils clearly fit into that category, and therefore I think it’s highly likely he would wave his no-trade clause and come to Philly. I don’t see the Phils parting with Happ though unless they have a legitimate candidate to fill his slot in the rotation i.e. if they think Pedro can be a quality fifth starter for the remainder of the season.
Posted: 08:52 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
some jerk keeps posting under my name, can you do something ?
Posted: 10:36 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 mikemike
some jerk keeps posting under my name, can you do something ?
Posted: 10:36 PM on July 8, 2009
Posts: 0 OZ
I wouldn’t do whatever the Jays wanted, but i’d be darn close.
Havnig Halliday for 1.5 years on this team is a dream. Versus hoping our prospects work out? C’mon on…
See Tim Moss, Greg Golson, Mike Costanzo, Adam Eaton, Wayne Gomes, etc. etc.
Posted: 10:48 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Sam
I would not give up Drabek for anything and there were talks of possibly trading Happ, frankly we’ve got to give them someone who is somewhat proven. I love Happ and he has a low payroll with lots of talent and would settle in nicely as a #3. We do have lots of young talent coming up as well, so I think we could afford to lose Happ if need be. I’m looking at this trade going something like Happ, Donald (hate to give up this future all-star), and Marson (possibly Mayberry as well). My two untouchables are Drabek and Taylor. Drabek is not going anywhere they are taking their sweet time with this kid grooming him to be their next ace. Taylor has the power of Ryan Howard (their stats at this age are very similar) and he can play the outfield. I know our lineup is already stacked, but when the phils are lookign to replace werth or victorino Taylor will fit in very nicely. I really hope the phils can make some magic happen and land Halladay, how sweet it would be! go phils!
Posted: 10:50 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 kreiderr
I just want to remind people that the Brewers went out and got Sabathia and lost to the Phils in the playoffs. The Yankees went out and broke the bank for Sabathia, where are they in the AL East? The Mets went out and got Santana, what happened last year to them? Just getting a veteran #1 pitcher does not mean it automatically gives us the World Series. As Rollins said at the victory parade, it takes a team, not just one guy. I’m going to take the opposite position on this issue. The Phillies should not trade away the future for one guy who will pitch once every 5 days and who could blow his arm out and never be the same again (see Freddy Garcia). We could get two decent starters for much less than Halladay. Let’s not get carried away.
Posted: 11:28 AM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Philly Texan
I would bet the roadblock to a Halladay trade is Drabek.
I’m sure the Jays want him in return (wouldn’t you?), and the Phils don’t want to give him up. Ricchardi said today he would only trade Halladay now if the offer blows him out of the water. To me, that means Drabek.
We know Donald would be in the deal and maybe another middling pitching prospect.
As a lot of folks have said, the jays have a crowded outfield, so I doubt they would go for Taylor or Brown.
We can day-dream all we want, but we’re not going to steal away the best pitcher in baseball on the cheap.
If we want Halladay this year (and remember the Jays don’t have to trade him this year), I think it’s going to take adding Drabek to the package.
That’s the price.
Is it worth it? Should we win now and sacrifice the future? Glad I’m not the one who has to make that call. Good luck, Rube.
Posted: 12:33 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Jays are overpaying for Vernon Wells… but are looking to move Alex Rios … also, most teams would like to get the best possible prospects into their farm system.. not just the best at a given position.
If the Blue Jays made this deal without getting Taylor or Brown, I’d be shocked
Posted: 12:41 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Memphis
I think Hagen in PDN had a good take on Amaro/Montgomery. That the organization may be happy with just getting into the playoffs and taking their chances, and because the NL East is so bad, we could do that without Halladay. So, even if Halladay makes us the NL favorites to get to the World Series (this year and next year), I would not expect Rube to trade the farm, give in to Toronto, etc. If he goes to StL or LA, we’ll just get into the playoffs and take our chances.
Murph in his High Cheese blog also talks about the rotation in 2011 (Hamels, Happ, Drabek as the foundation), but it’s hard for me to see the Phils spending big $$$ to fill it out. I do think Rube and Charlie implying Drabek is untouchable is more posturing than an absolute. It all depends on what would satisfy Toronto.
I would definitely make a serious run at him, but if Toronto’s asking price truly is crazy, take a pass.
Posted: 02:30 PM on July 9, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike T.
If they’re seriously considering Halladay, here’s my list of UNTOUCHABLES:
1.
2.
3.
There you go.
Posted: 10:50 AM on July 10, 2009