Phils, Pedro in talks?
Posted by Pat Gallen, Mon, July 13, 2009 09:06 AM | Comments: 120
News, Posts, Rumors
According to Jayson Stark of ESPN.com, Pedro Martinez will be in Philadelphia today as the two sides come closer to a contract agreement. Stark says that Martinez will take a physical on Tuesday, and if he passes, he will sign a one-year prorated offer.
Phillies scouts watched Martinez throw in his native Dominican Republic last week and apparently liked what they saw. On Thursday, Martinez told the Associated Press, “I feel the best I have for some time.”
Related Stories:
















Posts: 0 Kate
Ugh. Way to throw money away, Phils.
Posted: 09:27 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Phil
This will be a good pick up if they also get Halladay. If not then it’s pointless.
Posted: 09:34 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
God help us.
Posted: 09:38 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
interesting move… i guess we will see how it plays out…
Posted: 09:41 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
if Phils land Halladay we will have a pretty ok rotation to compliment our bats…
Halladay
Hamels
Happ (if not part of the Halladay trade)
Blanton
Moyer
Pedro
Posted: 09:46 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 jim d
pedro go away
i want halladay
Posted: 09:52 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Reports suggest Pedro looks more like he did 2-3 years ago. a non-Phillies scout said “looked very good in recent workouts, with his fastball anywhere from 89-94 mph”. If he has enough life on his fastball to set up his off-speed pitches I’ll take Pedro to be as good as a Randy Johnson has been.
As for Halladay have said before I don’t see him being traded and found this quote- “I think he’s staying right where he is,” an American League official agreed. “I think [Blue Jays general manager J.P. Ricciardi] is just laying the groundwork to make a deal this winter or next year.”
We all want Halladay sure but I’m looking at Drabek, Happ, Taylor, Brown and a couple of others as guys who gives us just as good if not a better chance to win in 5 years time. If all-stars bought championships then things might be different but time and time again the post-season has been proved to be a crap-shoot. Right now I’ll take Hamels to be better after the break, Happ and Blanton as two very good arms and two incredibly experienced veterans to get the job done.
Halladay would give us as close to a chance to win 1 out of 5 nights but this teams either capable of winning with near what it has now, or won’t do much damage at all. It’s a team game.
Posted: 10:05 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
I would start thinking about people other than Halladay. This is a distraction. If the Blue Jays will trade him without demanding Michael Taylor, Knapp, Drabek or Happ (since the GENERAL MANAGER has said that those players will not be traded, period, end of discussion) then MAYBE a deal can be reached. Otherwise I dont see anyone getting him. I kind of think unless some team gets desperate and does something extreme that its either the Phillies or nobody. Boston and NY either dont need him (BOS), or dont have the prospects (NY). St Louis doesnt have the money. Texas doesnt have the money. Milwaukee probably doesnt have the money. The Mets dont have the prospects. The White Sox dont have the prospects because Gordon Beckham is not going to be traded.
I mean who else is a legitimate candidate to match? (crickets….)
So the Jays are backed into a corner. It would be smarter of them to hang onto him and try to trade other guys.
Posted: 10:10 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
NJ get out of here with your negativity…..and your unnamed “american league officials”
Posted: 10:10 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Kate
Pedro pitched for the Phillies in SIMULATED GAMES. Heck, even I could pitch well in a simulated game.
Posted: 10:15 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Why would you give up ALL your best prospect (or two of three) for SOMEONE THAT WILL BE HERE FOR A YEAR AND A HALF! If you think the Phillies will sign him to a long-term extension youre smoking crack. They havbe an inflated payroll already. You have to put 2 + 2 together. Theyd be looking for rings out of him until his contract ends then collect on the draft picks. But to do that youre not going to trade away cornerstones of future winning Phillies teams (your best prospects) for a short-term solution. Hallday is great. But you have to exercise restraint, and cool-headed stretegy.
Posted: 10:20 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
NJ and Geoff…you have hit the nail on the head with your points on this. As for Happ….I REALLY don’t want him to be traded right now. He has looked too good as of late and I can’t help but think he is poised for a HUGE second half. Right now, he and Blanton are our two most reliable starters (yes….Moyer has done ok….but I still hold my breath every time he takes the mound)
Pedro?????…….well, I guess he’s worth a shot IF his fastball does indeed hit 94 or so. Could be VERY interesting!!
Posted: 10:20 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 rob5000
Hey how about we all just shut up and see what happens. Baseball is a business and I’m sure they aren’t just signing Pedro for the hell of it. Considering the Phils decent luck with their more recent signings I see no reason to doubt them at this point.
Posted: 10:25 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Maverick…..how is it that NJ is projecting negativity?
Posted: 10:26 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
You want the source here it is http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/story/11948558
Negativity? What have I said that is so grossly offends you? Beats me why so many people here seem to endlessly criticise anyone that writes anything more than a moronic one line statement.
Posted: 10:26 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
If you map it out there is an odd man out here:
Hamels (locked up to 3 year deal)
# 2 starter yet to be traded for
JA Happ (young, cheap, under team control for yrs, not going anywhere)
Joe Blanton (under team control for two more years with arbitration, FA after 2010 I think, will be staying here until his contract is up)
Jamie Moyer (old, some good days some bad days, expensive contract ending after 2010)
Pedro Martinez (one year prorated contract)
Then behind them, assuming they arent traded (drabek, carrasco, savery, bastardo, lopez, etc)
Who is the odd man out? I am thinking that at least one of those guys in the minors will be in the rotation next year (Drabek). One will probably be traded for a starter.
I think Moyer is the odd man out. They could DFA him, trade him, cut him, exile him to the pen, whatever. I dont know that he will be in the playoff rotation.
Posted: 10:32 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
Im not criticising your ignorance towards those with ADD by writing novels on the message board. Write as much as you want..
i’m criticising you for spreading Anti-Halladay propoganda in here.
Clearlly we all know landing him is a loooooong shot and 95% unlikely to happen but we can still dream and talk about the idea…
Posted: 10:35 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 1376 Pat Gallen
Taken from ESPN.com during the futures game:
“Philadelphia might be the most motivated suitor, but unlike some other teams mentioned in speculation, the Phillies lack a young major league “sure thing” to serve as the centerpiece of a Halladay deal. Although the Phillies have high regard for pitcher J.A. Happ, he doesn’t fit that description.
“He’s pretty good,” said an NL scout. “But from the way everybody in Philly talks, you’d think he was the second coming of Steve Carlton.”
I’d take the second coming of Carlton!
Posted: 10:37 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
btw Geoff…are we assuming at this point that Meyers will not be back next year?
Posted: 10:39 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 rob5000
I guess a 1.000 winning percentage is just pretty good.
Posted: 10:42 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
I gues we are…he could be resigned for a cheaper base salary with incentives (which would be a shrewd, smart move), but that means someone else would be out of the loop unless the starter they trade for is an impending free agent.
Thats even more consideration that Moyer is a potential odd man out – and sooner than you think.
Posted: 10:46 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Here’s the thing with Pedro…..he HAS to be a better option for us than a healthy Bastardo or Lopez (although Lopez DID look pretty good in his two starts). IF his fastball is what the scouts are saying it is then it makes sense to bring him here. For a one year 3 mil or so deal, it’s worth the gamble….especially if the ability to trade for another pitcher becomes too difficult.
Geoff…I like your breakdown of the odd man out…..the only thing I would like to add is that Moyer’s fate in the scenario you paint probably depends on how he starts the second half. If he absolutely impresses for his first five starts of the second half and goes into the playoff push absolutely on fire, then I think you have to rethink your analysis. And Moyer’s a smart guy who’s been around a long time….he probably is one step ahead of you and that alone may motivate him.
Posted: 10:46 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Anti Halladay propaganda… That’s just bollocks. Maverick your just being assholic for the sake of it which I assume is because you don’t like anyone not being like a little puppy rubbing up against your leg.
I’d love the guy as much as you, am just adding my thoughts added to what I’ve read by sources far more informed than you or I will ever be to open the discussion up. There’s far more to the Halladay and Pedro situations than a one line Beavis and Buttheadesque post, get used to it.
Posted: 10:47 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 christopher
“Pedro pitched for the Phillies in SIMULATED GAMES. Heck, even I could pitch well in a simulated game.”
no you couldn’t.
i have no problem with adding pedro. i like what lopez has done, i still have high hopes for bastardo, and i’m still very excited about carrasco… but i have no problem with adding pedro.
Posted: 10:52 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
It gives the Phillies more options, which is what I like about the move for Pedro. I am worried about him and Moyer in teh same rotation because it will wear down your bullpen. Thats why I think Moyer is the odd man out once they dio make a trade. You cant have two guys in your rotation who are only 5-6 inning pitchers.
Posted: 10:54 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im tired of reading all these reports acting like JA Happ is going to get traded…enough already. They did the same thing with the Flyers and JVR.
Posted: 11:00 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
wow…. Halladay is getting the Main headline on Philly.com
Looks like the local media is making its voice heard.
Posted: 11:07 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Steve-o
I don’t mind the Pedro signing. He’s going to cost roughly $2 Mil, and he will allow us to put Bastardo back in the minors and continue to develop, while also allowing us to keep Carrasco down there. My only concern with Pedro is how deep he can go into games. Earlier this year we saw our bullpen get overworked from starters not being able to go far enough into the games. With Moyer AND Pedro in our rotation, I’d be nervous about that potentially happening again.
Posted: 11:09 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Gavin
I know signing Pedro doesnt preclude the Phils from getting Halladay in a trade, but why sign him if there is a strong chance that you can get Doc?!?!?
RAJ knows his chances, and the fact that they are going to sign Pedro shows that he believes there is no chance to get Doc (Unless he’s planning on sending Happ to TOR).
I have gone back and forth on what I think should happen that I’m not sure what I believe anymore, but the window to win world championships is not a big one, and if he signs Pedro, we’re going to have to be comfortable with him until Sept. b/c he aint going anywhere.
I wonder how much input RAJ is getting from Gillick. I trust Gillicks instincts on these older guys.
Posted: 11:12 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Rich
Guys, you can never have enough starters. Signing Pedro is smart, as long as you scouted him out well first, which we did. With the exception of Blanton and Happ, we have problems right now. Signing Pedro means we can probably upgrade on #5. Now, if we can get Halladay for any kind of reasonable price (By reasonable here, I’m willing to give a Michael Taylor with a Carrasco and one or two more prospects of the ilk of a Flande and Donald level), now we have bumped everyone down a spot, and Jamie is bound to be a spot starter the rest of the way. Such is life in baseball, and while we all love Jamie Moyer, we knew this day was coming. Odds are we will still have to deal with an injury of some kind anyway, and this will all work itself out.
Posted: 11:29 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
I really can’t see Happ being traded. And why would you want to anyway? To get Halladay up when you probably only have him (Halladay) through next year and to give other stud prospects along with him?? I don’t think so. I just doesn’t make sense at this point.
Posted: 11:33 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Jeff
Here is the BOTTOM line. If the Phillies do trade for Halliday then Happ will be in the deal. The Bluejays are going to get alot. Happ might mean Drabek stays and Taylor goes. I make the deal. This is a once in a lifetime trade. This player does not come along everyday. No national league team has won back to back since the 70s. Drabek if in the deal is a prospect. This is for the best pitcher in baseball. Makes us favorites. I also say yes to Pedro. Better then Bastardo and Lopez. If his fastball is moving, he is edgy and could give us a jolt. Who cares about the money, its not mine. They make plenty from us going to the games, Jerseys, Hot Dogs, beers, etc. They make plenty and can afford a low risk move. Hamels, Halliday, Blanton, Moyer, Pedro. I would take that in a heartbeat. Our fifth is a hall a famer and our second.
Posted: 11:35 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 The Dipsy
I think the Phils signing Pedro is a great idea. I don’t think it has anything to do with a Halladay deal. If I were Reuben, I would say “If the Blue Jays are interested in trading for some of our young talent, then of course I’ll listen.” If Ricciardi calls on the 31st he does. If he doesn’t he wasn’t that serious in the first place. RE: Pedro. Three million dollars to give Pedro a tryout is no gamble. The Phils are making money hand over fist. Seriously, in the world of MLB, who really cares about three mill? If he doesn’t pan out as a starter you can put him the pen or cut him. Personally, I think he might be good in the pen because I don’t think he can go 7 anymore. AND, I have no empirical data whatsoever to back up that opinion. Wow, Happ sure does look good.
The Dipsy
Posted: 11:42 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Rich….there’s NO WAY the Jays give up Halladay for Taylor, Carrasco, Flande and Donald. It’s just not enough incentive for them. Great deal for us, but it won’t happen. Happ OR Drabek will have to be in the deal and I just don’t see it happening.
Posted: 11:45 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
btw…..the more i look at the state of the Phillies rotation… grabbing Pedro is a smart move.
BeyondHamels, Blanton, Happ we got nothing….
MOYER is currently the WORST starter in baseball accroding to ESPN.
He ranks 92 out of 92. Dead last in ERA for pitchers with x amt of innings.
Posted: 11:50 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
My point is who cares if this is a once in a lifetime trade. So was the Eric Lindros trade. The Lindros trade destroyed the Flyers franchise allowing the Nordiques/Avalache to win 2 Stanley Cups and be a perennial contender during their run. The Flyers had Lindros, who was enough to get them to the finals once, but he didnt have the pieces around him to win because of that trade.
I really think its a horrible idea to give up ALL of that for one guy. I think a move like that is PRIME to backfire if you give up guys liek Happ or Drabek or Taylor. Say you give up all of that and Hallladay gets injured and misses the season. Then youre SCREWED. Then you pissed away your future for an injured guy whos over 30 and makes 15M a year. Maybe he doesnt become Type A because of that injury.
You have to think about those things. Giving up prospects WILL happen for a starter. Maybe even some good ones. But giving up a young pitcher under team control for YEARS along with your BEST prospects is COMPLETELY retarded. Any GM that does that should be fired.
Lets get this clear. The Phillies DO NOT NEED Roy Halladay. It would be nice to have him. They need another starting pitcher who logs innings. That DOESNT meant it has to be him. There are other people who can do that at a lower price if the price for him is too high. Now, this is exactly the kind of stupid trade a Philadelphia team would make in years past.
But this isnt years past. This is a championship team. If the price is too high, they wont cave in. They wont make this trade. They are NOT desperate. This is not a desperate team, not a desperate organization, not a desperate fan base by in large. So STOP acting desperate. The Blue Jays are desperate. THEY have to drump salary, not the Phillies. The Blue Jays are in salary dump mode, which means they cant get away with asking for too much in a trade because EVERY team knows they are trying to do that. Thats why I cant see him being moved for the price they are demanding. They will have to break down and lower expectations or else he wont be traded.
Posted: 11:50 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 psujoe
I can’t see the Phils signing Halladay to a big time extension. The payroll does go down about 5 million, but that’s not counting arbitration increases or new contracts to replace Eyres, Park, etc. I can’t imagine the Phils takign their payroll in to the 130′s for an extended period of time.
Posted: 11:53 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
I saw Happ in Spring Training and I said then that putting him in the pen and making Chan Ho Park the 5th starter was a mistake. He looked GREAT in Florida. Oh well, I guess it worked itself out for both of them and now Happ’s no 5th starter…..he’s more like a #3 at this point. That’s why if I can’t see him being part of this trade. He’s really starting to establish himself, he’s young, and the Phils have control of him longer than they would with Halladay (unless they sign him to a 4yr/100 mil contract…which is NUTS!!)
Posted: 11:53 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Thats why Pedro is replacing Moyer in my eyes. Moyer is out when they make their big trade.
Again, if youre demanding all that for ONE GUY. YOu know what? seya! Forget about it, move on, well find another team who is going to be realistic. Ruben is NOT desperate. Dont count him out yet.
Posted: 11:54 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Maverick
Halladay = higher likelyhood of repeating as WFC’s this year and next.
Your Lindros comparison is flawed b/c Phils have the pieces around Halladay. Its not like we are trading Howard or Utley to get him.
Posted: 11:54 AM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Because they ahvent done that in this regime. Its not their style. They will not do that if it means sacrificing too much in the future. It really doesnt make sense to meet Torontos price because they have noone to trade with. Toronto has NO leverage at all. They should just hold onto him.
Posted: 12:07 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Adding Halladay hardly guarantees a championship this year or next, if it did the Yankees and Mets would have taken the majority of titles this decade. By all means deal Carrasco, Donald, Marson to try and get the guy but Toronto seems to be laying the groundwork to deal him in the off-season or next deadline not now.
The players in the system should guarantee the Phils chance to win every year for the next decade unless we have that little faith in our system, coaching infrastructure and organisation as a whole.
If Halladay meant another title the Phils would have made the deal last week but unfortunately it doesn’t. Smart management wins championships.
Posted: 12:08 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 mick
Pedro feels the best he has felt in a long time because he has not had to pitch–on paper i see a disaster here–after 20 innings he goes on the DL and the Phils are out 4 million—However, if he gives them 8-10 quality starts the front office looks brilliant–nothing ventured nothing gained–what is 4 million
Posted: 12:09 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
There’s NO WAY the Phils sign Halladay to what would be about $100 mil over 4 years. And you know what??……….I would hope that they wouldn’t. It makes absolutely NO SENSE to the future overall success of this team. It would mean less money for other players like Howard, Utley, etc….players that play every day, not 1 in 5.
Posted: 12:09 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 The Dipsy
NJ – Good point. If I’m not mistaken havent the Jay targeted 2B and C as need positions? If so, than wouldn’t it necessarily make Marson or Ruiz and Donald parts of a Halladay deal? And then I guess a couple of pitchers. Personally, I wouldn’t offer them anymore than Carrasco, Donald, Marson. Geoff is right that the Jays have no leverage. But query: If we were to take back Wells in the deal, and thats a huge “IF”, and I know we’d be swallowing a lot of money, would the Jays make us actually give up less? Its just a question.
The Dipsy
Posted: 12:14 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
The more I think about it , signing Pedro make a whole lot of sense. Let’s face it….
1)Roy Halladay is NOT coming here.
2)Cole Hamels is NOT the same pitcher he was last year.
3)Brett Myers is done.
4) Jamie Moyer is on the serious downside of his career (Geoff seems to think he’s done before the season’s over….not sure I want to rush to that judgement but the point is it’s almost over for him).
5)Bastado and Lopez probably aren’t the answer.
So that leaves us with two very good starters right now….Happ and Blanton. Taking a 3 million dollar chance on Pedro Martinez is a smart gamble.
Posted: 12:22 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Kris
Don’t trade Happ, we would not be in 1st if not for him. He’s the only starter that doesn’t have a loss. Too valuable to lose especially when Hamels seems to forgotten how to pitch well.
Posted: 12:27 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 psujoe
Chuck, A Pedro signing would be great. It’s going to cost the Phils next to nothing. If it doesn’t work out the Phils will lose less than a million. Much more upsiethan trading prospects for a guy like Meche who would eat up 11 million.
Posted: 12:31 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Dipsy…good question……I would think that IF we agreed to take Wells then giving up less would be the answer. But…where do you put Wells? Seriously…..do you even mess with this outfield right now?
Posted: 12:33 PM on July 13, 2009
Posts: 0 The Dipsy
Honestly Chuck, I would just put him on the bench or try to lay him off on another team and eat part of his salary. Sounds so easy doesn’t it? He’s got a funky salary which calls for about 20m a year in 2011, 12, 13…I THINK. But for this year and next he is pretty cheap. You just know the Jays wanna dump that. Its a real pipe dream that any team would ever do that. Including us. But whaddaya do when Ricciardi calls you and says “Roy and Wells for Marson, Donald, and Flande?” :)
The Dipsy
Posted: 12:50 PM on July 13, 2009