The Pros and Cons of Pedro Martinez
Posted by Brian Michael, Fri, July 10, 2009 08:15 AM | Comments: 148
Posts
This analysis of Pedro-watch is provided by new contributor Pat Gallen.
Yes, he is a future Hall-of-Famer. Yes, he has over 3,000 career strikeouts, over 200 wins, and a winning percentage north .684. Yes, his mantle is decorated with three Cy Young Awards and a World Series Trophy.
No, he is not the same pitcher he once was. No, he does not have the same heat on his fastball. No, he is no longer the ace of a rotation.
Pedro Martinez could be joining the Philadelphia Phillies after scouts liked what they saw from him during a simulated game in the Dominican Republic. He will pitch again today for the suits, wherein a decision will be made. Martinez would ink a one-year deal if the Phils determine he is the right fit.
As one of the most dominating starting pitchers ever, Martinez struggled during his final few seasons in New York, but has been working to get himself back. During his 17-year career, Pedro has amassed 214 wins against only 99 losses, with a cumulative ERA of 2.91. His name is littered among the record books. Martinez has led the league in ERA five times, win percentage three times, strikeouts three times and twelve times he won double-digit games in a season.
But it’s clear he is no longer that guy. The Phillies are not looking for that guy – they are searching for an answer at the back of the rotation. In their quest for a dependable fifth starter, the Phils have used Chan Ho Park, Rodrigo Lopez, Antonio Bastardo, and Andrew Carpenter. Park was bounced from the rotation, Carpenter was a spot starter, and Bastardo and Lopez looked decent until injuries knocked them out.
It’s a signing that has many levels to it. Pedro plugs a hole, but how well can he seal it? Let’s look at the positives, and negatives, of taking on 37-year old Pedro Martinez:
PROS:
- One-year, prorated contract doesn’t cost the Phils much.
- If he is healthy, Martinez is a veteran that clearly knows how to win.
- Think Kris Benson: If he doesn’t work out, it was nice knowing you.
- His baseball IQ is through the roof – his presence can only help the rest of the staff.
- Pedro is a jovial guy. He would fit in well with this loose bunch of characters.
- Was excellent in his short stint for the Dominican in the World Baseball Classic.
CONS:
- He is 37-years old, and well past his prime.
- Over the past few seasons, Pedro has been injury prone.
- Is he better than the likes of Rodrigo Lopez, Carlos Carrasco, and Antonio Bastardo, among others?
- The bullpen will not be safe with Martinez on the mound. It’s unlikely he can go more than six innings.
- Started just 25 games over his final two seasons with the New York Mets.
- He’s an ex-New York Met.
VERDICT:
It’s a win-win for the Phils should they lock him up. While he is on the back nine of an illustrious career, Pedro Martinez could supply them with a solid back-end pitcher. And if he doesn’t, the Phillies can cut him loose and eat the small amount of money he would be owed.

















Posts: 0 I know Sal..
how about this..they sign Pedro, because their going to have to include Happ in a deal for Halladay. Our rotation becomes Hamels, Halladay, Blanton, Moyer, and Pedro (or Carrasco, or Carpenter, or Kendrick or…)?
Posted: 08:32 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Phil
No way! They can’t trade Happ. H cubed!!!
Posted: 08:36 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Miles
Sal, that is everyone’s favorite analysis/rumor of the day, but I think its a pipedream.
Anyway, I just don’t know how you can consider a situation win/win when there are NO OTHER TEAMS INTERESTED. I mean you are telling me that he’s throwing well enough that we are interested, but no one else is this desperate? I just don’t see it. Why didn’t one of the other contenders step up and go check him out as well.
Plus, try convincing a stadium full of Philly fans its a win/win when he gets lit up for a second straight start after being signed with Carpenter and Lopez pitching well at AAA. He also still stinks of New York Met. I’m just not as open to “projects” like this once you hit the All-Star break. April is one thing but I don’t want random burnt out arms being signed just to give it a whirl when we have division rivals coming to town in July-August. Just my take.
Posted: 08:38 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Papa Thompson
The Phils are doing the right thing by working him out again before deciding on a contract. I don’t mind them signing him. They say he looks good. If it turns out he sucks, send him walking. Is he any worse an option than Kendrick? And Lopez would still be a question mark without the shoulder trouble – now he’s a major question mark. They need to do something in preparation of the Halladay move.
Posted: 08:48 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Ed R.
ESPN is reporting that whoever wants Halladay has to take the terrible contract that is Vernon Wells along with it. That could be good for the Phillies but also a deal breaker. If you have to add that big contract then it means the Phillies should not have to part with as many or as high of quality prospects as they would going just after Halladay. I could see the Phillies still doing it but they would probably have to include Victorino or Werth. Unless they want to pay Wells to be a almost 5 million dollar right hander off the bench and spot starter in the OF.
Posted: 08:52 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 I know Sal..
I agree Papa…I just can’t see making this move without it foreshadowing something bigger down the line. As a 5th starter, if Pedro is throwing well I think it is a win-win. He brings experience, knowledge and a great personality to a team that he honestly would probably fit in just right with.
Posted: 08:54 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
I think they want to use him as the 5th guy for the stretch and out of the bullpen in the postseason…
As for The WElls thing…thats called bluffing. NOBODY IN BASEBALL is going to take on that contract. Theyre full of it when they demand that.
Posted: 09:25 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 rivlez
Pedro pitching for the Phillies. Never would of thought it.
Posted: 09:33 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I completely agree with you, Miles. I’m pretty sure that one of the guys from AAA can perform at least as well as Pedro at this point.
$2 million or whatever they pay him is still a good amount of money (he’d be making the same as Hamels during the rest of the season)… can’t we just use that to get a bench bat that’s better than Bruntlett and let one of our AAA guys be our 5th starter? They’ve done a good job, so why change it?
Posted: 09:45 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Phil
Maybe we can get Millar too when we trade for Halladay.
Posted: 09:56 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
Olney says Pedro has agreed to throw a second time (which he previously refused to do) and if the Phils see what they like then he could be in Philly by Monday. I guess we have to believe the Phils are looking at something very specific in Pedro otherwise it is a questionable move.
Posted: 09:56 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Brian
Just listened to John Heyman on WFAN. He said he thinks its 60-40 that Halladay gets traded. The fans in Toronto are protesting on it. He said Phillies are at the top of the list. Also the Angels are there. He said the Giants are another team but need hitting more. He said the Phillies have the talent to give away and the cash to sign.
Posted: 10:00 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
With Millar – is that a guy that will thrive as a pinch hitter? does he need playing time to get good at bats? because the only PT hell get is as a pinch hitter.
Posted: 10:06 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I think that Pedro is better than what they’ve got ready to go on the farm, at this point… he’s going to give them an edge. We don’t really have that nasty pitcher… Pedro could help this team. If he doesn’t pan out, we haven’t wasted a lot of money…
Posted: 10:06 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Tom G
The issue remains the PHILS have not a little but a Serious problem with starting pitching…though Pedro could help the situation, our WINDOW is this YEAR, 2010 and maybe 2011…
A Halladay and Hamels, one two, with Blanton and Happ(if not traded) as the 3/4 and bringing in a rookie for next year solidifies us for next year…
Trading, 3 Farm Studs for the Best pitcher in Baseball, places the PHILS in the driver seat for two seasons…with much money coming off the books after this year…it also would allow us to either resign him, or go after another upcoming star starter for 2011…
Giving up ( pick 3 of the following )CARASCO, HAPP, Savery, Drabek, and Knapp along with Dom Brown would make us unhappy about 2012, but great about the PHILS in 09, 10 and 11!
DO it, and hope for the best…we are on the cusp…waiting any longer reduces his games available for impact…we have one week to deal! (and have max impact)
Posted: 10:09 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
The Giants need a bat.. maybe they would be interested in Wells
Posted: 10:14 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
I’ve said this in other threads and I’ll reiterate my thoughts here. I LOVE this move. The reason? It shows the Phillies will do whatever it takes…but…they will do their best to build for the future at the same time. Who cares about the 2M? The way we fill up our stadium every game it means nothing. There is absolutely no risk at all here. If he comes in and blows up a few games release him and move on…its that simple.
We are in the catbird seat here on all fronts. We lead our division and are capable of winning it going away with what we currently have on the roster. People like to criticize this move by citing that Pedro ‘choked’ with the Mets and caused them to miss the playoffs. Maybe he did but that situation was entirely different. The Phillies are not relying on Pedro…there are other options. The Mets, however, had no one else. He had to keep pitching for them even when it wasn’t going well.
Pedro wants to play for a contender as he has never one a championship, so maybe he hasn’t had interest from other teams because he wants to pitch for the WFC.
Pedro is as much a competitor as anyone who has ever taken the mound and that attitude will fit in with guys like Chase and Ibanez who play the game hard on every play. I look forward to him pitching for the Phillies and I hope we can get him a ring.
Posted: 10:15 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
I like the Pedro signing (if it happens) .. $4 M is what I heard, after originally hearing $2.5 M … so that is expensive, but he’s so much better than Antonio Bastardo, Rodrigo Lopez, etc.. that I would GLADLY take Pedro on my team right now, because it gives us a better chance to win
Posted: 10:17 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
The issue with starting pitching isn’t serious, it’s noticeable but not serious. The majority of the rotation is turning in good performances in most starts. In the majority of losses the bats have gone quiet, failed to drive runners in or the opposition has managed to get some runs off the pen, sure there have been some bad starts that have resulted in losses but right now there aren’t too many. Roy Halladay, Kyle Drabek, Carlos Carrasco hell Dan Haren won’t change that.
You don’t just give up prospects to get a guy or raid free agency thinking you’ll be better, the Yankees became a laughing stock for it, the Mets failed with that principle, even the Braves tried it briefly. I’d love Halladay but again you don’t just get a guy because you think he makes you better, you address your real problems and then se how a guy can help you otherwise your running towards a mess.
Posted: 10:21 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 NJ
The issue with starting pitching isn’t serious, it’s noticeable but not serious. The majority of the rotation is turning in good performances in most starts. In the majority of losses the bats have gone quiet, failed to drive runners in or the opposition has managed to get some runs off the pen, sure there have been some bad starts that have resulted in losses but right now there aren’t too many. Roy Halladay, Kyle Drabek, Carlos Carrasco hell Dan Haren won’t change that.
You don’t just give up prospects to get a guy or raid free agency thinking you’ll be better, the Yankees became a laughing stock for it, the Mets failed with that principle, even the Braves tried it briefly. I’d love Halladay but again you don’t just get a guy because you think he makes you better, you address your real problems and then se how a guy can help you otherwise your running towards a mess.
Posted: 10:21 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Pedro is said to be throwing today at 1pm.. because they want to see how his arm responds before they sign him.
Posted: 10:23 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Its Pro-rated, meaning its abotu half of what is being reported.
Posted: 10:25 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Miles
Don M, how exactly do you know that he is better than Bastardo and Lopez? His ERA last season is almost exactly what Moyer’s is right now and all I’ve heard on this blog is complaining about him all year (some of it justified). The guy has been nothing but unproductive since 2005 and I find it to be very wishful thinking that he would be effective enough to keep a spot in this rotation, especially considering the ballpark.
And since when is 2-4 million not a big deal? You don’t just pay someone that and that drop them after two starts if they are terrible. What happened to my angry Phillies mob that used to worry about dishing out dollars? That WF Championship has made us weak!
Posted: 10:30 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Kevin
“He’s an ex-New York Met.”
I know this is probably just there as a joke, but it’s not like Phillies fans have fallen in love with an ex-Met on the roster before (Lenny Dykstra anyone?)
Posted: 10:31 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Agree NJ…all these people are like “trade drabek, trade all of those top guys, its roy halladay.” i even heard someone call in on the drive home to ESPN radio yesterday and say “trade ryan howard, kyle drabek, michael taylor, and carlos carrasco for roy halladay and kevin millar” and the person was SERIOUS…still stuck in that idea that theyre going to trade howard. THey signed him to an extension because theyre NOT GOING TO TRADE HIM.
what if you give up all those prospects for Halalday and he gets injured again? did you think about that?
You have to hold onto 3 of your top 4 prospects in this deal. Out of Drabek, Knapp, Taylor, and Brown you have to hold onto three of them. Thats what WINNING teams do. You KEEP your best prospects so that you can have a respectable team in 2011.
YOu need a frontline starting pitcher, BUT it doesnt have to be roy halladay if the asking price is too high. would it be great? YES. But if theyre asking you to give up your 3 BA Top 25 prospects then you tell em to take a hike on down the road. YOu offer one of those guys.
And if tahts not enough? SO FREAKING WHAT?> MOVE ON TO SOMEONE ELSE.
Thats the asking price in MOST trades for starting pitchers. One top notch prospect, a few decent prospects (Carasco, Donald) and filler. The Bedard trade was an anomaly and it got their General manager fired.
Sabathia, Haren, Harden: all these deals folliowed the same general format.
Posted: 10:33 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike
I don’t know. . . Halladay would be great but I don’t like the idea of giving up Happ and having only two guys over 35 at the back end of the rotation. I think a safer move is to keep Happ and have something that looks like this:
1) Hamels 2) Doug Davis/Zach Duke/Jarrod Washburn/etc. 3) Blanton 4) Happ 5) Moyer.
Its not as flashy but those are all solid number 2/3 guys and it would give us FOUR reliable pitchers in the rotation.
My fear with Pedro is that it suggest that we’re poised to give up Happ? But what if we don’t get Halladay? Do we really stop there?!? And if we go looking for another, do we keep Happ and have 6 guys in the rotation or do we trade Happ for the likes of Bedard? Signing Pedro thus scares me a bit.
Posted: 10:33 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike
Also, any thoughts on whether we could do a three-way with BoSox for Penny if we can’t get Halladay?
Posted: 10:35 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
Great point, CZ… the expectations are much less than they were in the NY. I actually think that him being an ex-Met is a positive… you know that he’s going to want to come out and dominate that squad.
Tom G – the Phillies don’t NEED to give up three top pitchers and Dominic Brown. Look at what other interested teams have (prospects)… we are one of only 2 teams with 3 top 25 prospects (and the Rays). If other teams are putting out 1 top 25, you would expect that we don’t need to sell the farm to generate a competitive offer. If they really want to move him, we shouldn’t need to blow them away; we need to have a better offer on the table than the other teams involved. The Cardinals only have 1 top 50 prospect (Brett Wallace) and he’s apparently off limits. The Red Sox have 0 in the top 25 and 2 in the top 50. The White Sox have 0 in the top 50 (but they have Gordon Beckham). If the Cardinals try to get this done, it’s probably going to cost them Rasmus AND they might have to take Wells in return. The White Sox might have to give up Beckham… The Rangers probably can’t do it, financially (they’re trying to sell the team so you don’t expect them to have a bunch of money lying around). The Angels don’t have any top 50 prospects.
We are in the driver’s seat…
Posted: 10:35 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
The WFC made us realize we have a great team already, they just are missing a few more pieces and then theyll be back again.
were not as desperate as we used to be. Thats why its odd when you hear someone saying sell the farm for Halladay…because why? They won a championship with THIS same basic core team. They need a frontline starting pitcher, a RH bench bat, and an extra relief arm. But two of those 3 pieces you can get in August in a waiver-trade for cheap (which is the Phillies’ specialty). The starter has to be good and it will cost some good prospects, but you dont go throwing away the future ace of this team (drabek) and a future OPS/Homerun machine (taylor) or even the future leadoff hitter of this team (brown) just blindly and wrecklessly.
thats what those three guys project to be, so you can give up one of them for the Doc, but NOT 2 and NOT all 3.
Posted: 10:37 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Keystone
CZ, Pedro won a world series in 2004 with the Boston Red Sox. He already got a ring.
Posted: 10:40 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Happ is WAY too good a major league pitcher to trade or to even consider trading. There is ZERO chance that he will be traded. There is ZERO chance that Drabek will be traded? why? bc the GM and the Manager came out and said so…ALSO, how many times in sports (and in philly sports) has a team given up their entire farm for one superstar and it hasnt worked out? Look at the Braves with Texeira, actually – that stuff happens EVERY year. Sabathia? yeah they made the playoffs but he choked again.
im PRAYING that the Pronger trade works out for the Flyers…praying hard…
Posted: 10:41 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Miles,
I know that Pedro Martinez is better than Bastardo and Lopez.. because I am better than Bastardo and Lopez.. and Pedro Martinez is better than I am. Therefore, Pedro Martinez is better than them as well..
I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY love how everyone on here is being smart about this Halladay move.. last year people would have been willing to give up everyone but Utley and Hamels to make the move… now we see how expensive free agents are (even .500 pitchers make $10 M per season).. and how important it is to keep homegrown talent..
Before the season our Farm wasn’t ranked all that high.. but we’ve now got 4 players ranked in Baseball America’s TOP 50.. The Rangers, pre-season best farm system has 3 players, I think Yanks and Sox had 2 each..
Posted: 10:42 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I’m sorry… as good as these guys look, we would be LUCKY if one of those names (Drabek, Brown, Taylor, Knapp) actually lived up to the hype.
Sell high, buy low… Rube should be smart and patient but I think that we should go for it. Prospects are prospects… if we don’t get Halladay, we need to go out and get a Davis/Duke/Washburn and we’ll be in a market saturated with buyers. There are only one or two teams that can put together a legitimate package for Halladay… I would rather be fishing in that pond (than the one where I’m standing shoulder-to-shoulder with other GM’s).
My $0.02.
Posted: 10:44 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 beta sigma shag
I think the real problem with pedro, is he is a 5-6 inning pitcher, and we already have Moyer, do not get me wrong I like MOyer and have defended him on this site forever, but he is a 5-6 inning 2-5 run guy, and I am fine with that, especially with this offense. Now you put Pedro out there and you have two back end rotation guys that are going to tax your pen. That is really my only concern with signing Pedro
Posted: 10:49 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Chuck P .. I agree to an extent.. because getting rid of TOP PROSPECTS for Roy Halladay.. isn’t a “BUY LOW” move ..
but I agree with what you’re saying.. if Drabek has half the career that Halladay has so far, we should be happy
Posted: 10:51 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
REALLY? they are TOP 25 Prospects. MOST of the TOP 25 are guys that are close to major league ready and PROJECT as SOLID major league players.
for a top 25, or even top 50 prospect to come to the majors and bust is a HUGE deal. because it really doesnt happen as common as people say it does.
“oh well those guys wont amount to anything lets trade them all,” if you want to be the pirates in 4 years then GO RIGHT AHEAD.
Posted: 10:51 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
Sorry, missed that one Keystone. That’s what I thought but a guy at work told me he had already left that team and I foolishly didn’t check the facts.
Very good point Geoff. The WFC has not made us soft but it has taught us the value of patience and levelheadedness. Sure, we all still get upset at every loss and joyous with every win but I think all of that sky-is-falling crap has moved on a bit. This team has been doing business the same way for years now and they have shown that for the most part they know what they are doing. I will let them handle it the way they see fit and I will keep watching the Philies win.
Posted: 10:53 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Bastardo is a 4 inning pitcher, 6 run guy…
I understand that Pedro isn’t the best move ever.. but signing him doesn’t limit any other moves with prospects and trades.. and if things go well, maybe we have pedro in the bullpen come playoff time when we’re only in a 4 man rotation anyway..
I still think that Bedard is a target.. and would look GREAT as our #2
Posted: 10:55 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 beta sigma shag
I think something is wrong here because I have been agreeing with Geoff way too much lately. Except I think if you have to give up Drabek, Donald, and one of the two outfielders I think they can do that. That is one top tier prospect and two guys that probably will never play in the big league on the PHillies, and even throw in another prospect, Carpenter, or Carasco. But you are right you do not give up your three top prospects, and you do not trade Happ, because he has proven to be a solid pitcher
Posted: 10:56 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 CZ
To be fair the Pirates have no shortage of ‘prospects’. What they have is a shortage of brains. They continuously get fleeced by bigger teams offering their prospects and they always take the crap guys that make you scratch your head. They also have proven to have no ability to consistently groom their young guys into talented players. One thing you can’t argue with the Phillies about is their continued success at turning draft picks into players…and many times we are talking about later round picks. Look at the current 4 guys in the top 50. Only one of them (Drabek) was a first round pick. That is why you can say with some certainty that these guy WILL be good. The Phillies have proven that the guys that reach these levels in their system DO work out.
Posted: 11:00 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I’m with Miles and Geoff on this one. If we can’t get Halliday because they simply want too much, SO WHAT… MOVE ON, and go after another less shiny but still solid pitcher. This Halladay thing has become more an obsession than an objective, cool-headed rationale.
Look where we have holes and fill them. I see a hole in our No.2 spot… go take care of that. Halladay would be terrific, he would give us much more than what we need, but seriously ARE WE THAT DESPERATE?
Posted: 11:00 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Walter
Pedro at WBC: 2G, 6IP, 1H, 0R, 6K – although that doesn’t prove anything because he pitched 3 innings in two games and didn’t start any of the two. Also he pitched against the Netherlands who even though beat the DR they still don’t have MLB caliber hitters.
Pedro and Bedard won’t fit in Philly because of high fly ball ratios which would turn into homers at CBP and Bedard never likes playing in high pressure cities like boston, NY and philly.
Also Werth could join all star team because carlos beltran is injured and the NL needs an outfielder. That would be great because the phillies #2-6 hitters would all be on the all star team.
Posted: 11:01 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck P
I didn’t say trade them all, Geoff… I actually said that we only need to trade ONE to get him. I do, however, feel like we should be selling high because our farm, which was once laughable, is now, arguably, the best in baseball. If there are only one or two teams that can actually piece together a package to get Halladay (and has a team that he’s willing to play for), I would say that’s a buyer’s market, wouldn’t you? Sell our prospects high and buy Halladay low… he’s a great pitcher and everyone knows that but there aren’t many teams that are able to do it…
Posted: 11:06 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike T.
My list of Roy Halladay trade UNTOUCHABLES:
1.
2.
3.
The end.
Posted: 11:07 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Bastardo should be inserted into the pen upon his return. I think he should be able to contribute down the stretch and be groomed to replace Scott Eyre when he retires at the end of the season. With the eventual eye towards replacing Romero when he walks as the second setup man.
Posted: 11:07 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Im ok with one…as long as its not Taylor or Drabek…so Brown.
Posted: 11:08 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike T.
I’d let the Blue Jays pick any 4 minor league players. The word “untouchable” is so ridiculous. I laugh at it every time.
Posted: 11:10 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Mike
Again, why the rashness to grab Pedro/Halladay? What’s wrong with:
1) Hamels 2) Doug Davis (3.13)/Zach Duke(3.23)/Jarrod Washburn (3.08)/ Penny(4.71) 3) Blanton 4) Happ 5) Moyer!!
We can hit the ball. To win the division and the NL, we just need more quality starts. Happ is doing it. Hamels can do it. Blanton eats innings and one of these guys would not cost us either Happ or our farm system.
I know Halladay is the best but we don’t need the best. And Pedro has had heat in the past, but why waste our energy on a project? So what if he’s good in the locker room and has experience? We have guys that are good there and have experience winning. I don’t get why our choices are sell the farm and Happ or sit on our butts with Pedro.
Posted: 11:13 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
right because why would you want good players to develop in your system and play for you under team control cheaply for 6 years? who wants that these days?
Does anyone think they might let Victorino walk? With Taylor developing so quickly theyll have a crowded outfield..Werth has another year after this one…Does Vic have one more arb year next year?
Posted: 11:15 AM on July 10, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Come on man, you need something a little better than that. Penny sucks…those other guys are ok…but it would require the rest of the rotation to step up. They need a beast in there…doesnt have to be Halladay but someone.
Posted: 11:17 AM on July 10, 2009