The Debate: Beltre vs. Feliz
Posted by Pat Gallen, Sun, November 29, 2009 04:14 PM | Comments: 95
Analysis, News, Opinion, Posts
You’ve digested the turkey, the cranberry sauce, the sweet potatoes. You’ve reflected on what it means to be thankful over this long weekend. Now, its time to get back to what’s important; and that’s the free agent market the Phillies have in front of them.
Last week, Sam Donnellon of the Philadelphia Daily News talked about how wonderful it would be to have Chone Figgins at the top of the order. A few things make that relatively unlikely.
First, he is hoping to secure a deal in the $10-12 million per year range, which takes the Phils out of it from a financial standpoint. Figgins will be 32-years old at the start of the 2010 season, meaning a four-or-five-year contract will take him into an age bracket that normally means a downhill slide in production. On top of that, whether or not you believe that Jimmy Rollins is a leadoff man means very little. Because Charlie Manuel does, it’s unlikely he would take J-Roll out of that position for Figgins. That makes a slap-hitting, seventh hitter pretty expensive at those figures.
All of those variables put Figgins deep on the backburner, unless for some unknown reason he changes his price tag.
The hotly debated name out there besides Figgins continues to be Adrian Beltre. If we are tossing Figgins to the side, Beltre’s name, to me, stands out more than Placido Polanco (not a third baseman by trade), Mark Derosa (super-utility man, but can he play 3B everyday?), or Miguel Tejada (aging, not a 3B, but would switch positions here).
Many are wondering if he is an upgrade at all over Pedro Feliz – and I say yes. Defensively, Feliz was one of the top third basemen at his position, until you delve deeper into the numbers. Using John Dewan’s Fielding Bible, you’ll notice that Feliz was a plus-5 this season. If you’re unfamiliar with the Plus/Minus stat, it represents the number of plays the player made above/below the number that an average fielder would make, according to the video scouts at Baseball Info Solutions.
Feliz’s plus-5 puts him just above average, however, two of the top three defenders at the hot corner are Figgins, with a ridiculous plus-40 – best in the majors – and Beltre, with a plus-27, ranking him third in baseball. Feliz saved just five runs at his position, while 30 were saved by Figgins, and 21 by Beltre. With the glove, it turns out Feliz is not nearly on par with the others. There’s no denying his defense is solid, but he’s getting up there in age and was clearly aided by having Jimmy Rollins to his left. But again, lets take Figgins out of the equation since he seems to be a long shot.
Offensively, many point to Pedro Feliz and his 82 RBI, his .336 average with runners in scoring position and his clutch hits throughout the season. Beltre, on the other hand, was serviceable in those statistics as well. The Mariners third baseman hit .284 with RISP, and did knock in 44 runs in just 111 games as he dealt with injuries.
Feliz’s stats must be looked at in the context of the lineup he was a part of. The Phillies managed 820 runs in the regular season in 2009, while the Mariners plated just 640, the worst in the American League. Feliz was the benefactor of hitting behind Ryan Howard, Jayson Werth, and Raul Ibanez in the most feared lineup in the NL. Beltre was surrounded by the likes of an elderly Ken Griffey Jr., Russell Branyan, Jose Lopez, and Yuniesky Betancourt. Not exactly murderers row.
Because Beltre was the focal point of the Seattle offense, he very rarely was given anything good to hit with those names around him. Plug him into the Phillies offense in the seven spot, and you have yourself a very solid piece at the bottom of the order.
Looking at Beltre’s peripheral stats, he does strikeout a bit too much compared to Feliz, fanning 74 times in 449 at-bats. Pedro whiffed 68 times in 131 more AB’s.
Contractually, there might be some reason for the Phillies to pause. The infamous Scott Boras represents Beltre and will undoubtedly attempt to suck the most cash he can out of any team willing to dole it out. The free agent market has yet to play out in the early going, so there is no gauge as to what Beltre will seek. If it’s a three-year deal in the $6 million range per season, it seems worth the chance on an excellent defensive corner infielder that is only 31. Ruben Amaro appears to be calmly sitting back, allowing the market to breathe in it’s early stages.
The debate will continue throughout the winter with so many people having differing opinions on who should be the new starting third baseman in Philadelphia. Adrian Beltre is my favorite to be the man, but who are you hoping for to take over for Pedro Feliz?
Pat Gallen can be reached via email at Pat@Philliesnation.com


















Posts: 0 Jeff Dowder
Hasn’t Feliz already made it known that he’s upset enough not to entertain any offers to come back? I think one of the beat writers reported that. And you know as well as I do that Manuel doesn’t think Rollins should be batting leadoff. It’s just not the sort of thing he can really say publicly.
Posted: 04:39 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Tim
bring rolen back for a few years!
Posted: 04:45 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 rusty stab
Since Beltre is represented by Boros, he might be priced too high. Am I crazy to think the Phils could afford Mike Lowell (since it has been said that the Red Sox would pay half his salary) AND Juan Uribe, who could get considerable playing time since Lowell will play about 125 games at third? Rollins and Utley could get some time off with Uribe substituting occasionally. Plus Utley could occasionally play first, giving Howard a day off with Uribe playing second. More versatility, better bench. Or am I nuts?
Posted: 04:57 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 kreiderr
We need the best right handed threat at third base that we can find. I do believe that is Beltre. DeRosa would be a great pick-up as a utility player. With Beltre, we lose nothing defensively, and if he stays healthy you add a consistent 25 HR guy. After that, everything else is too expensive, or the player is too old. Against lefties: Rollins, Victorino, Utley, Howard, Beltre, Ibanez, Worth, Ruiz, pitcher That is a tough, tough line-up.
Posted: 05:13 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
Mike Lowell is an idea, but not sure it’s a great one. He’s owed a lot of money ($12 mil) and is coming off numerous injuries, plus is 35 years old. So even if Boston pays half, that leaves the Phils on the hook for $6 mil.
If I’m taking him I’m making Boston pay more than that for a guy who is about to fall apart and hasnt played a full year since 2007.
Dont mind Uribe as an option, but if your going to pay $6 mil, wouldnt you rather have a great defensive player in Beltre for about the same amount with decent offense or a liability like Lowell?
Posted: 05:17 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Brian Quinn
I was really excited for the third base market leading up to free agency starting. But quite frankly, I am now looking at who is there and am not really excited about anyone. Figgins would be the best fit if they put him in the leadoff spot, but like you said, that is not going to happen. Nobody else really excites me. I think if they can sign someone to a 2 year deal and then see what else is out there in a couple of years, that would be the best route.
Posted: 05:55 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Ryk
@kreiderr… Seriously put Werth at #7? The dude put up 36 HR, 99 RBI, and 20 SB. That’s not the guy you hit seventh.
That said, and I have been given flack here for saying this here before, but I think Beltre is the best option for third for his defense alone. Check out the free agent pitchers with the best ground-ball ratios and you will see a guy named Joel Piniero. He’s coming off a great season, so his price would be a tad inflated compared to his norm, but he’s worth a look. Imagine a ground ball pitcher with a potential 3B gold glover in Beltre, the defending SS gold glover in J-Roll, the true 2B gold-glover in Chase Utley, and, well, let’s say an improving Ryan Howard. Pretty scary.
Posted: 06:04 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 George
I agree with Jeff Dowder on his thoughts about Rollins leading off. Manuel is not the oaf people think he is, and if the Phils had a better option at the top, Rollins wouldn’t be there.
I honestly hope Feliz isn’t as disgusted as has been indicated. I think of Moye, who wasn’t pleased with management abruptly sending him to the bullpen, but then changed his tune. The unfortunate thing with Feliz was that the contract timeline for picking up his option was too short for any consideration, and I think he might eventually realize that.
It still may be possible to re-sign him, and unless the front office is prepared to go all out for Figgins, there are just no real “upgrades” worth the extra cost. Figgins will be overpriced, but in my opinion, Beltre is just another 7 million dollar strikeout waiting to happen when Ibanez is in scoring position. With Boras as his agent, he might even be an 8 million dollar strikeout.
Posted: 06:38 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 George
The Red Sox have indicated that they’d pick up half of Lowell’s salary, but the article I read said his contract was for sixteen million, not twelve. There’s not a GM in his right mind that would pay eight million for 120 games (if they’re lucky) from a man who looks like he’s already died. The Sox would have to cough up at least three quarters of his salary before anyone will relieve them of Lowell.
Posted: 06:47 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
Just because it’s Boras representing him doesn’t mean that he’s gonna be too expensive. He’s the agent, not the player. Remember a year ago when people here were saying “forget about signing Madson to an extension because he’s with Boras…”?
Posted: 06:47 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
Mike Lowell is not an option for this team. Hes a stiff out there and hes injured all the time. Id be ok with Polanco or DeRosa if it means spending more money on better Starting and Relief Pitching.
Posted: 06:54 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
I just dont see Derosa as being able to play 150 games at 3B. Hes not that strong defensively and thats a very important position. Polanco is unproven too, although he is game for anything and Im sure would do quite well there.
Posted: 07:59 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 rusty stab
Lowell may be well over the hill and he will be 36 at the start of the 2010 season. He is a former gold glover and hit .290 with 17 homers last year. When he plays he is productive. I agree that he may cost too much , but he “has been” one of the game’s better third basemen both with a glove and bat. The question is: Is he a “has-been?” Also, I would want to get Juan Uribe to complement Lowell and act as the major infield utility player. He made only $1 million last year and is a free agent with pop in the bat and versatility in the field.
Posted: 08:05 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Ed R.
DeRosa has never played than 140 some games in a season.
Posted: 08:22 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
Pat, exactly what you said:
“If we are tossing Figgins to the side, Beltre’s name, to me, stands out more than Placido Polanco (not a third baseman by trade), Mark Derosa (super-utility man, but can he play 3B everyday?), or Miguel Tejada (aging, not a 3B, but would switch positions here).”
That’s the big issue here. All of those guys (except Beltre) have giant question marks hanging over their heads. They are not “regular” third basemen and it’s scary to think what could happen (defensively) with any of them (Polanco, Tejada, DeRosa) playing the hot corner.
Posted: 08:40 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Sarah
Has anyone else but me thought that they could sign DeRosa and then have him split time with Dobbs? That would give Dobbs some extra at-bats, which could help him be a better pinch hitter.
Posted: 08:45 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Els
Ed, that is not because of injuries though. He just was a super utility guy his whole career. Now, he is going to get his starting job.
Posted: 08:59 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I’ve thought about that possibility, Sarah… but I don’t see how having a platoon is an overall upgrade over Feliz….
Posted: 09:13 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Love The Misery
Just thought I’d take a belated moment to say that, for Thanksgiving this year, I was grateful for rhe Phillies sucking goat ass in the World Series this year.
Posted: 09:26 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Dylan
@ Ryk
“potential 3B gold glover in Beltre”
Beltre won 2 consecutive GG in the American League. So he’s not really a potential gold glover.
@ kreiderr
It’s Werth, not Worth, come on man. Jayson Werth (I actually gave that as a bonus question to a spelling test in my class) It drives me nuts when “Phillies Fans” can’t spell their players names correctly (ie Cole Hammel or Jason Worth) sorry, I don’t mean to be rude.
Posted: 09:28 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 jrollpatrol08
pat i generally agree with your beltre decision and rationale.
this is kinda how i see it…
we can all probably see why beltre/figgins lead the pack of available FA 3rd basemen. these are the two guys with the greatest chance to play more regularly during the course of the season. both of these guys are young, will land multiyear contracts, and will be everyday players at 3rd base…the same cannot necessarily be said for the older derosa, polanco, tejada. if one of these guys were brought in to play third, then there would be another platoon player at 3rd who would get alot of playing time. i am not really a fan of the ’3rd base by committee’ strategy. get one of beltre/figgins to be your guy, 140-150 games per season, for the next couple years.
although i think figgins is an all around better player right now, i would be hesitant to get him into a longterm deal. has one overarching strength–speed. this is great for now, and it has led to his success in high obp, but in 2 years when he is 34 his speed will be severely decreased. he will be an average player, 2 years into a 4-5 year deal makin 10mil per season. i dont really want that on my team.
on the other hand, a guy like beltre can still be pounding in rbi’s for the next 3 years. even if beltre produces same numbers he did in seattle he would still be an offensive upgrade over feliz. his power attributes are more worthy of a multiyear investment than are figgins’ speed skills
Posted: 09:34 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Ryk
@Dylan. Yup, you’re right, but I meant potential NL gold-glover. He’s never won one of them in the senior circuit yet. Sorry for not being clearer. :)
Posted: 10:45 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Dylan
If he comes to the Phillies he will win the GG. Afterall, Zimmerman and Wright are no match for Beltre defensively. Although, LaRoche is extremely underrated along with Kuzmanoff.
Posted: 10:49 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Brooks
We’ll all be surprised and happy when Ruben picks up Atkins from the Rox.
Looks like the Rox are going with the younger Stewart at 3rd base so Atkins will be available.
He’s a 6’3″, 215 lb rh hitter who averaged 25 hrs and over 100 rbi from 06 to 08, his batting average over .300, only 1 of those seasons did he have 100 strike outs and his OBP was OK – from a high of .409 in 06 to .328 in 08.
Last year was an odd one, I have not been able to figure out what happened, if it was injuries or just a terrible year but his average was way down, power down and his atbats were a the lowest since he became a regular. Perhaps sharing time with Stewart took its tole?
Regardless, he should not be nearly as expensive as Figgins or Beltre and would be a much smarter choice than DeRosa, Polanco or Tejada (neither of which are true 3rd basemen).
Strong, younger right handed hitter with pop. Perfect for the #7 spot in the lineup.
Ruben will surprise us, that I know.
Posted: 10:52 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Dylan
Brooks,
I would be happy if that happened. Utley has been quoted many times saying that they push each other to become better players. They are best friends and Chase has been wanting to reunite with his best man since they got out of college. I would, however, not be suprised if this happens by the Dec. 5th. Heck, for the right amount, he’s def. worth a shot.
Posted: 10:55 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Brooks
Lets take Betancourt too – Rox did not resign this right hand reliever. His ERA between 2 teams was 2.73 and he is 34. Decent Scott Eyre type of pitcher who definitely could pitch more than one inning if needed. A few great upsides:
1) he is a righty
2) he can pitch to more than 3 batters –
3) he can be obtained for probably under $3 mil
Posted: 11:18 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 Geoff
They said they want an as good or better defensive player to replace Feliz. So that disqualifies Tejada and Atkins, who has TERRIBLE defense. Youre essentially down to Beltre, DeRosa, Polanco.
Posted: 11:51 PM on November 29, 2009
Posts: 0 GWFightinsFan
I think we have to look at it one of two ways, do we want to keep the same type of lineup we had last year? If so, then we add Beltre, who is as good as Feliz with the glove and hopefully an upgrade at the plate. In other words, hitting behind Ibanez will be a righthander with power potential, who sometimes lacks discipline, but still holds his own in the field and may be an upgrade over Feliz. OR, do we want to add a contact hitter, who can move runners over, not strike out, draw a walk now, be more of a pure HITTER and then but might not be nearly as good in the field as Feliz then we go with Polanco. If we add Polanco, it gives us more options in the lineup in that we can go with him at the #2 spot and move either Rollins or Victorino down there (my preference is Rollins, but anyhow) or we can put him in the #7 slot, which gives us a guy who may not hit as many homers or even drive in as many runs, but we won’t be the guy who kills a rally by swinging at a bad pitch or grounds into a double play. He’ll help to turn the lineup over so we can give more at bats to the big boys. What do you all think?
Posted: 03:06 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
I agree that Ruben will surprise us. As for Atkins, he would be decent in a platoon role too. Is there a team out there that will give him a starting position after the year he had? Maybe the Phils lock him to a one year deal where he can come in, get some time at 3B, 2B, and 1B occasionally and give some righty pop off the bench. All the while, he gets to play with his best friend Utley. I could see that as a scenario.
Posted: 08:47 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Dylan
Atkins will start somewhere. As for Betancourt, I’d much rather lock up Lyon for a 2-3 year deal. An offseason of Beltre/Atkins, Kennedy, Lyon, and Duscherer would be a great one for the Phillies.
Posted: 08:50 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 George
Based on statements made by Charlie Manuel about the Phil’s lineup not always producing, I would think they are looking for a different type of hitter than Feliz. If Beltre were a better situational hitter, I think there’d be no question that he’d be the right fit. But he isn’t, and that is why management is also looking at candidates like Polanco. It’s really impossible to know what management will consider an upgrade at third. It’s hard to improve on Feliz’s defense, and that might not be the ultimate goal. The Phils don’t have a lot of ground ball pitchers, anyway, and with a Gold Glove SS, they may be okay with just adequate defense at third. Offense would seem to be the issue, but that raises the question of “what kind of offense?”
Management may be willing to settle for the kind of lineup they already have. They might not. The final determination here may be based on money and contract length. With the big Moyer question, the Phils need at least one more reliable starter and more bullpen arms. Due to the costs there, they might have to sign someone at third none of us are even considering.
Posted: 08:55 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Ben
george, exactly what i was thinking. polanco you have to think can provide serviceable defense, if not good defense. offensively he is exactly what we need, a .300 hitter who will knock guys on second base in hitting deep in the line up.
Posted: 09:20 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Fielding Bible – schmeilding bible …. Pedro Feliz can play the sh!t out of thirdbase!!!
He lost some range.. but he’s got sure-hands, and one of the most accurate arms I’ve ever seen from 3b .
BUT.. I would gladly welcome Beltre or Tejada too
Posted: 09:35 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
I would say that Tejada is the best OFFENSIVE candidate of all the 3b Free Agents..
with his move to 3b.. after playing SS how bad can he be? The throw is longer, but you have more time to set yourself
I think Tejada would be better defensively than Polanco, who would have to move from 2b to 3b
Posted: 09:40 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 George
The throw from deep in the hole at SS is actually the longest in the infield. Third is a longer throw than second, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be made by a second baseman. Polanco has played third, so I don’t think that’s as much an issue as Tejada’s age. Tejada is being considered for third only because he’s lost range at short. Given his age and the fact he’s never really played third, his defense is far more untested than Polanco’s.
From a power point of view Tejada might be an offensive upgrade, but again he may be too similar in style to what the Phils had in Feliz, but with questionable defensive skills. He’s also not going to be cheap.
Posted: 10:10 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Georgie
hahaha@ George- “a man who looks like he already died’. I know that sounds mean but I think the same thing when I see Mike Lowell, he does look a bit zombie-ish.
You guys almost have me sold on Beltre, please don’t suggest anyone who will be a defensive downgrade though, why would they even think of doing that? It’s just lovely that Atkins and Chase are bff’s, but if the dude can’t field his position, I don’t want him.
Posted: 10:30 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Georgie
I’m curious about that “Fielding Bible”. Wouldn’t it have to be rather subjective in its interpretation of fielding abilities?
Posted: 10:41 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Tejada hits for power, average, and never strikes out .. that isn’t similar to Feliz at all
Polanco hasn’t played 3b in like 5 years.. so whatever experience he had at that point should be a wash
I said before that whoever the Front Office gets.. is fine with me, they have proven that they know what guys fit our team
Posted: 11:06 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
Summary by John Dewan who wrote the Fielding Bible:
“My book, The Fielding Bible, goes into great length (ad nauseum to some) describing the new fielding system we developed at Baseball Info Solutions, the Plus/Minus System. Video Scouts at BIS review video of every play of every major league game and record detailed information on each play, such as the location of each batted ball, the speed, the type of hit, etc. Using this in-depth data, we’re able to figure out how each player compares to his peers at his position. How often does Derek Jeter field that softly batted ball located 20 feet to the right of the normal shortstop position, for example, compared to all other major league shortstops?
A player gets credit (a “plus” number) if he makes a play that at least one other player at his position missed during the season, and he loses credit (a “minus” number) if he misses a play that at least one player made. The size of the credit is directly related to how often players make the play. Each play is looked at individually, and a score is given for each play. Sum up all the plays for each player at his position and you get his total plus/minus for the season. A total plus/minus score near zero means the player is average. A score above zero is above average and a negative score is below average. Adam Everett turned in the highest score we’ve had in four years of using the system with a +43 at shortstop in 2006. That means he made 43 more plays than the average MLB shortstop would make. “
Posted: 11:08 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
That said, I trust a system and a group of people that do JUST defense.
Feliz according to this system is a +5. Thats basically an average defensive 3B. He makes the plays he should make, but rarely goes out of his way to make a play that another third baseman would not.
Beltre is a +27, meaning he goes out of his way to make stops at 3B. Feliz is solid, but he’s not anywhere near Beltre.
Offensively, the numbers may prove to be a wash, but Beltre has shown 3 of the last 4 years he can go yard 25 times, and thats in a big yard at Safeco. Imagine here with a short left field. He should be able to duplicate that, plus give you steady D.
Posted: 11:12 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
As I’ve said before….my only real concern with Tejada is his “attitude”…..he’s been known as somewhat of a complainer when things don’t go his way…..but that was primarily in Baltimore….the O’s signed him to a nice contract…with the premise being that he was the cornerstone of a winning rebuilding effort…didn’t exactly work out that way..
Maybe a change to a WINNING team and culture will take care of all that…
Posted: 11:30 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Manny
I’m pretty much sold on Beltre by now.
Posted: 11:48 AM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
Here is my problem with the FIELDING BIBLE vs. what Pat is calling “BASICALLY AVERAGE”
The Fielding Bible ranks all 3b.. 1: Ryan Zimmerman, 2: Adrain Beltre, 3: Chone Figgins, 4: Evan Longoria, 5: Scott Rolen, 6: Brandon Inge, 7: PEDRO FELIZ, 8: Jack Hannahan??, 9: Joe Crede
http://www.fieldingbible.com/
So if you’re the 7th best in baseball.. I would hardly call that “AVERAGE”
…
Guys that had lower Fielding Percentage from that same list above:
Ryan Zimmerman, Brandon Inge, Adrian Beltre
I understand that Feliz is the rangiest, web-game, superstar to ever play the Hot Corner … and he’s not going to get any better defensively as he ages .. but all these different +/- , Range Factor, etc.. you can manipulate lists any way you want using statistics .. PEDRO FELIZ is one of the best 3b in baseball, regardless of what random stats people use to say otherwise
Posted: 12:33 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
***isn’t the ragiest, web-gem*, superstar…. *
Posted: 12:37 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 kreiderr
Hey Dylan…
It drives me nuts when “Phillies Fans” can’t spell their players names correctly (ie Cole Hammel or Jason Worth)
That would be players’ and it would be more appropriate to use e.g. in this case meaning “for example” rather than ie, which should be i.e. if you were educated at all. You must be a very popular teacher. I can tell that grammar is your specialty. By the way, correcting spelling on a blog is rude. We’re talking about baseball not writing a thesis. I also resent you putting “Phillies Fans” in quotes. So, in order to be a Phillies fan you have to be able to spell all their names correctly? That makes a “true” fan? Talk about delusions of grandeur. I bow to your superiority oh master speller…you’re right my opinion means nothing. You’re so much smater than the rest of us (e.g. anyone else who has a grammatical error on this sight) Merry Christmas!
Posted: 12:41 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Chuck
Yeah…I would hardly call Feliz AVERAGE…..seems to me that he’s the “scapegoat” or “odd-man out” this offseason…..because the Phillies didn’t win it all and….you know,….changes just HAVE to be made…..for the sake of making a change….
Posted: 12:58 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 1431 Pat Gallen
I’m not making Feliz a scapegoat by any means. I gave him his props, he’s solid at the position. But he’s losing a step, his skills are declining and his bat is slowing down too. Get some younger blood in there, is all I’m saying.
If Ruben goes with Polanco instead, I have no problem with that either as long as they have a serviceable backup. It’s just that Beltre to me makes the most sense.
Posted: 01:02 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Bob in Bucks
Short of a major change to the structure of the lineup (read major trade) I think Beltre is definitely the best pick. No reason to put a contact hitter before the catcher and the pitcher. You need someone to pick up the RBIs from the walks of the guys in front of him.
It has been so long since the Phillies had a good 3B that Feliz is a fielding god in fans eyes. He is good but not great. Beltre is in fact better.
As to money, I leave it to the GM.
Posted: 01:05 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Don M
for what its worth, I would imagine that playing 3b must be easier in the AL … no bunt attempts for hits, no sac bunts, and Defensive-wheel plays, etc..
AL, you basically play straight up, except for double-play or guarding the line.
whatever happened to Abraham Nunez ???
Posted: 01:19 PM on November 30, 2009
Posts: 0 Jesus
It seems like people are really over valuing Figgins and really under valuing Beltre. I keep reading that Beltre strikes out too much and isn’t a good situational hitter. His stats really tell otherwise. Obviously Figgins does get on base much more than Beltre but he also strikes out at an almost identical rate that Beltre does without Beltre’s power. Figgins’ career K% is 17.1% and Beltre’s is 17.2% but last year it was 18.5%. I can handle the occasional strike out if there is some power tied to it but not from a “slap” hitter. I don’t want that high of a k rate from a lead off hitter. For reference JRoll has a career number of 12.9% and 10.4% last year. Obviously this is just one stat but it’s to dispel some of the things that are being said about Beltre when compared to Figgins. I just don’t see or understand why people want him on this team. Whatever your feeling is about JRoll he is our leadoff hitter and the team’s sparkplug. Figgins has had one season better than JRoll, last year and people want to bring Figgins in as our leadoff hitter? He is going to command 10mill/yr for 4yrs. I think Figgins is a good player but people are putting too much weight on his 09 season, a walk year, and over looking some things that just don’t make him worth 10mill/yr. He strikes out way too much for his power(never has had over 44 xbh, and highest slg %.432), has been 1st or 2nd in the AL every year since 04 at caught stealing, and will be 32 at the beginning of this contract. As has been stated before Figgins is primarily a pure speed player who probably will see gradual decrease in that area from yr 1 of his contract to yr 4. I would much rather have Beltre for 3yrs and use the extra 2-3million on a relief pitcher.
Posted: 01:28 PM on November 30, 2009