Quantcast


The Dip: Roll Call

Posted by The Dipsy, Mon, March 15, 2010 07:13 AM | Comments: 87
Posts, The Dip

#11 Jimmy Rollins Takes off for second

Dave Bancroft, Travis Jackson, Bobby Wallace, and John Ward. No, this is not a list of NASCAR drivers. It is a list of men who have played shortstop in the major leagues and have been elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Suffice it to say, these guys don’t evoke the grandeur and prestige (tongue firmly in cheek) of that hallowed institution. This is one important reason why Jimmy Rollins, if he continues at pace for another 3-5 years, will go into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Not only that, but he has a chance at being considered one of the greatest shortstops of all time.

Sure, maybe I’m not giving the above-mentioned individuals enough credit, but if they were really that great, I would have at least heard of them before I actually looked at the list of actual Hall of Fame shortstops. I am one of those guys that really don’t take baseball before Babe Ruth that seriously. Further, I don’t really consider the truly “modern era” of baseball to have begun until Jackie Robinson broke in. Even so, as it pertains to this discussion, I cannot dispute that Honus Wagner was just incredible and stands head-and-shoulders above the rest. With the way he hit, he could have been a butcher in the field and it wouldn’t have mattered.

The shortstops in the Hall can be sorted into groups.

  1. The guys that played when dinosaurs roamed the earth: Bancroft, Jackson, Wallace, Ward, Hughie Jennings, Rabbit Maranville, and Joe Tinker (check his stats when you get a chance).
  2. Guys who got in mostly through their association with great teams: Pee Wee Reese, Phil Rizzuto, Loe Boudreau
  3. The truly deserving: Joe Cronin, Arky Vaughn, Luke Appling, Robin Yount
  4. The truly great: Wagner, Luis Aparicio, Cal Ripken, Jr., Ernie Banks, and Ozzie Smith

Now you have some context. Jimmy Rollins, during is first ten seasons in the league, has led the league in AB’s and triples four times, won three Gold Gloves (the beginning of a string I suspect), won one MVP and one World Series. He has averaged out of the lead-off spot, 660 AB’s (wow), 105 runs (wow again), and 36 stolen bases while hitting .274. There is no better defensive shortstop in the game. If this caliber of play continues it would take him right over the “truly deserving” category and into the “truly great”.

Of the shortstops currently in the Hall I would take three – and only three – before Jimmy: Honus Wagner, Ozzie Smith, and Luis Aparicio. Aparicio, was a World Series winner, 10 time all-star, 9 time Gold Glove winner, and led the AL in steals 9 straight years (bet you didn’t know that). He was the first state of the art modern day shortstop and an incredible fielder. Ernie Banks only played half his career at shortstop, and if not for that, he would be there with the other three. If you compare Ripken and Jimmy, I’ll take Jimmy’s total offensive game over Ripken’s power. In the field, Cal would catch any ball he could get his hands on, and so can Jimmy. The difference is that Jimmy gets his hands on more balls.

Yes, the roster of Hall of Fame shortstops is not reflective of superior offensive prowess, with shortstop being a defense-first position. Jimmy has more years left to play and hopefully another World Series or two to win. He is a phenomenal two way player who’s biggest sin is not walking more. While Phillies fans tend to be more agog these days over Chase Utley and Ryan Howard, let this little write up serve as a reminder of how good we’ve got it at shortstop. We may actually be in the presence of greatness. Jimmy Rollins is that good.

 
Get cool Phillies t-shirts at Cheesesteak Tees
 
  • Posts: 0 derekcarstairs

    Because Rollins became a starting SS at age 22, he has a chance to run up some impressive career totals. Rollins will play at ages 31 to 35 over the next five seasons (2010-2014), and he still could be putting up good numbers during that time. By age 35, JRoll could have 2,500 career hits, 1,500 runs, 1,000 RBIs, close to 500 stolen bases, more than 500 doubles, 135 triples, and 250 homers. Those are good numbers for a SS who also plays solid defense. Those numbers could put JRoll in the HOF. If he still has something left in his tank through his late 30s, Rollins could be a cinch HOFer.

     
  • Posts: 0 bfo_33

    One of the great all around players – if he keeps it up another few years, adds another ring, a lock for the HOF. Underrated only because the Phils insist on keeping him at leadoff, where he is only ok.

    Imagine the runs scored if we got a 350+ obp from leadoff vs Jimmy’s avg of 328 (or his 298 from last year). Especially now that we have a real #2 hitter.
    Vic
    PP
    Utley
    Howard
    Werth
    Rollins
    Ibanez
    Ruiz

    I know Vic has struggled at lead-off in a very limited sample, but don’t see why he wouldn’t eventually get to his career avg obp (350) in the role. Utley, Howard, and Werth could all get 100 RBIs, Rollins would probably still score 80+runs, knock in 90. Ibanez would also knock in 80+. That line-up could score 1000 runs.

    I know, runs aren’t a problem, egos could be.

     
  • Posts: 0 George

    It always surprises me when people place Rollins in the “also-ran” category. I suppose that some of that is because of his slow start last year and some is because of his low OBP.

    If they read his career stats, though, maybe they’d think more highly of him. He’s easily as valuable as the Phils’ glamor players like Utley and Howard. Those two certainly can’t always drive themselves in; they need someone ahead of them who can single, then steal to get in scoring position, or double or triple–all things that Rollins is good at. Who needs high walk totals when you can do the things Rollins can?

    To me, he’s already in the “truly deserving category.” The standards are changing for SS, though, and Hanley Ramirez may have some influence on whether HOF voters think Rollins truly “great.”

     
  • Posts: 0 bfo_33

    Hanley should be a corner outfield or 3rd base – he’s poor defensively at best, and doesn’t appear to be getting any better. I think the HOF takes defense into account for SS and 2nd base more so than other positions.
    Again, I do think Rollins is underrated, but lead-off means getting on base, which is not Rollins’ strong point. He could be a legitimate RBI guy in the 5 or 6 hole (fits better at 6 on this team – could be a hybrid rbi, 2nd lead-off guy, woudl still steal 20+/yr, score almost as many runs in front of Ibanez).

     
  • Posts: 0 Phan in ATL

    Possible 4 HOFs on current roster: Rollins, Howard, Utley (1st ballot), and Halladay (He’d go in as a Blue Jay but he’ll spend the rest of his career in Philly). Once again, great time to be a Phillies fan.

     
  • Posts: 0 Ben

    phan, its very early to tell, but cole could easily shape up to be a HOFer too. i agree i wouldn’t put him in the catagory of those 4, as he has a lot of work to do to get there. but he’s got the stuff to get there if he can stay healthy and keep his head on straight.

     
  • Posts: 0 Heather

    Interesting article, I’d never thought of Rollins as a future HOF just because of what I perceived as his poor offense….but putting it in perspective it is interesting how those numbers don’t stack up too badly.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Rollins is my favorite player on the Phillies . . . . but he’s not a Hall of Famer

    he’s not even a lock for the All-Star Game every year.. and Troy Tulowitzki is probably ahead of Rollins in the minds of every baseball-person around

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    I don’t think J-roll is a Hall of Famer either… unless he has an ’07-type season at least two more times.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    I love Rollins.

    But to even mention him in the same breath as Wagner, Banks, Aparicio, Cal and Ozzie…..is just wrong.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Don and Chuck – the usuals – if he has another three to five years like he’s already had, then he’s in, and he’s better than Reese, Rizzuto, and Boudreau. And not by a little bit. I conceded that Wagner, Ozzie, and Aparicio were better. By the way, take a look at Cal’s offensive numbers and then take a look at Jimmy’s. Jimmy’s are better. Ernie is by far the best modern day player out of all of them buy he just didn’t plat shortstop very long. Neither did Yount.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Phylan

    Though I love the man, I would readily take Hanley or Tulo ahead of him, unless it’s a swagger-off we’re talking about.

     
  • Posts: 0 bfo_33

    Right now, he’s Barry Larkin – hall of very good, but not hall of fame. If last year was just a blip and he can have 5 more years like 2007 (or even 2004 or 5), + do something in the playoffs (realistic chance of at least 2 more postseason trips, hopefully he’ll do somethign more than bat 0.230), then he’s in the argument. I agree he isn’t Wagner or Banks, but he’s better offensively than Aparicio (although he played in the Pitcher’s era) or Ozzie, and he’s better defensively than Cal, with comparable offensive strengths. If 2009 was the start of a trend, then he’s just the best ss the Phils ever had.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Does it matter to anyone that, barring injury, Jimmy will more likely that not, get to 3,000 hits?

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Cal’s offensive numbers:

    11551 ABs
    1647 Runs
    3184 Hits (1078 were XBH, and of those 431 HR)
    1695 RBI
    .276 BA
    .447 SLG

    J-Roll’s offensive numbers:

    5941 ABs
    945 Runs
    1629 Hits (591 XBH, and of those 146 HRs)
    621 RBI
    .274 BA
    .439 SLG

    Not really sure how you can say that “Jimmy’s are better”

    (Maybe if you were to just multiply Jimmy’s by 2 to just about equal the playing time….then some of the stats are SLIGHTLY better…..but to say he can keep up that pace for 9 or 10 more years is a stretch)

    And….Cal was MVP TWICE…Rookie of the year (which Rollins wasn’t) And Cal played in like 20 STRAIGHT ALL-Star Games???

    So “The Streak” aside….Cal is better.

     
  • Posts: 0 mikemike

    Love jimmy, but ozzie was the best I ever saw in my 55 years of watching baseball. more range,than jimmy , cal ripken defense was a joke ,he had no range.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    As one of “the usuals” . . . considering I spent many a day of the past two seasons defending Rollins against almost everyone on this site

    He’s awesome, best Phillies SS ever, and again, my favorite player on the team

    But Hall-of-Fame is reserved for the guys that are THE GREATEST in baseball

    Rollins’ MVO season was cool.. he would have to have about 5 seasons like that to get in the HOF.. and I just dont see it happening (i’d love to be wrong about that, but I’m pretty sure im right)


    Cal and Jimmy don’t really compare, because they are different types of hitters

    They have about the same batting average, (Ripken actually has a higher On-Base-Percentage..

    And if Rollins plays 10 more years, and you doubled his stat totals

    HRs: Ripken 431 vs. Rollins 292*
    RBIs: Ripken 1695 vs. Rollins 1242*
    Runs: Ripken 1647 vs. Rollins 1890*
    Hits: Ripken 3184 vs. Rollins 3258*

    I mentioned like two weeks ago, that Rollins shift to 3rd in a few years might prolong his career.. he definitely has the arm strength to play there, as he’ll begin to lose some range.. But I def don’t think Rollins plays for another 10 years.. so the comparison between those two players doesn’t really work at all

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Ripken actually had quite a bit of range. And when he moved to 3B, he did very well. Saw him play MANY times. To say his “defense was a joke” is certainly typical of your negative comments.

    Ozzie was the best I saw at SS.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    There is NO DOUBT that Cal moving to third base prolonged his career. Will Jimmy agree to do that?? I guess if he knows that he can play a few more years….then why not???

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Yes. They are two different types of players. If I had to pick one of the two to plat SS for me, I would pick Jimmy. I realize that reasonable minds can differ. And Don, if you read the list of SS’s in the Hall, I guarantee you’ll be completely underwhelmed. I agree the Hall should be reserved for the greatest. Too bad the Hall doesn’t feel that way. If I were running the Hall, I would take at least 10 of them out. But seeing as we do have a standard to go by, Jimmy belongs if he plays another five years to par.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    If Rollins starts getting 200 hits per season (which he’s only done once, 212 Hits, in 2007)

    It would take him almost 7 full seasons to reach 3,000 hits..

    If I had to bet my life on it, I would say that Rollins doesn’t join the 3,000 hit club of Major League Baseball

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Dipsy, he needs MORE than another five years.

     
  • Posts: 0 Badfinger

    I love Jimmy, I think he’s great. People that know me might not think that because of the way I bash him, but that’s mostly because I want him to take some walks and not pop up so much. With that said, he’s not even in the same galaxy as Cal Ripken, let alone the same planet.

    Jimmy is a very good defensive shortstop that has actually improved in the last few years, and is now the best defensive shortstop in the NL kind of by default because some guys got old, some guys couldn’t hit at ALL and got moved out, no one knows about Troy Tulowitski, and Jose Reyes was hurt.

    Jimmy as an offensive shortstop is decidedly average. He was right in the middle of qualified shortstops for OPS last year. He was right in the middle the year before. Hanley was so much better in his MVP year it’s nearly a crime, and he was middle of the road in ’06 as well. And average is ok! With the best 2nd baseman in baseball and a man that can’t hit a curveball but still gets 45 home runs a year getting average production from Jimmy is great. It’s fantastic he’s developed some power in the last few years, that reads really well into his decline years. I wish Charlie would grow some brains and drop him to 6th in the order where he should be where those doubles and home runs would do more good and put someone who can get on base more than 30% of the time in the leadoff spot.

    And now to Ripken- Jimmy Rollins’ MVP season would be the 5th highest pure OPS of Ripken’s career. If you go by OPS+ ( udging him against a stat adjusted for the offense of the league at the time) it’d be Ripken’s 9th best.

    See? It sounds like I hate Jimmy Rollins, but I love the guy. He’s that guy-the carryover from when the teams were awful, to when they were building but couldn’t get it done, to champions. It’s just that when people say things like he might be a Hall of Famer when Barry Larkin can’t even get in I get itchy.

     
  • Posts: 0 Georgie

    Dips, thanks for giving Jimmy his due, I don’t think the fans in Philly (not PN, because most on here realize what we have) give him enough credit, it’s all about Chase, Ryan, and now Roy. I honestly don’t think the team would be where they are now without Jimmy, he is the catalyst, the spark that drives the engine.

    mikemike, we are about the same age, and I agree that Ozzie was the best, so awesome to watch him play. I saw a documentary on him, and when he was little he used a paper bag as a glove because his mom couldn’t afford to buy a real one. When he did get his first glove, his mom said it never left his hand, he slept with it, took it to school, it became a part of him.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Barry Larkin will get in. In order for this article to make sense to anyone, the reader must be willing to extrapolate Jimmy’s stats over say (OK, give) five years. I think that it is completely realistic to see Jimmy play SS until he is 37. He is in good health and has remained relatively injury free. What some are not factoring in to my assertion, and maybe I didn’t make it clear enough in the article, is that Jimmy…like Reese and Rizzuto…has the luxury of being a vital cog on one of the great teams of a generation. That gives guts extra juice. That goes for a lot when guys vote. So take his stats at the end and add it to how great his team was and his role on it = HOF.

    IMO

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    “guys”, not “guts”

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Steve Jeltz

    Barry Larkin and Derek Jeter will both enter before Jimmy Rollins. Remember too that this same current voter class snubbed Alan Trammell, who statistically is Barry Larkin without the PR. Omar Vizquel also has a darn good shot – half by the Ozzie argument (superlative defensive), and half with an outside chance at 3000 hits. So Jimmy might have to wait.

     
  • Posts: 0 Steve Jeltz

    Edgar Renteria is also on pace for 3000 hits as a primary shortstop. He has 2185 through age 32. It helps that he’s been an MLB regular since he was 19 years old on those ’96 Marlins.

     
  • Posts: 0 Steve Jeltz

    Jimmy needs 8 more years as a regular (170 hits a year) to hit 3000. We’ll see. He has 1629 through his first 9.1 years and age 30.

     
  • Posts: 0 BurrGundy

    I really like Rollins. If he could improve his on-base-percentage, then I would agree that he would probably make the HOF. He is exciting, an excellent fielder and a leader. Those playing ss has changed and there are some outstanding competitors for Rollins in the HOF. Here are some names that likely will compete for a placque in the HOF:

    *Omar Visques (2700 hits, 10 gold gloves and still playing)
    *Derek Jeter ( a shoe-in)
    *Nomar Garciaparra ( great player before shoulder injuries)
    *Alan Trammell (outstanding lifetime numbers)
    *Miguel Tajada (Great player, MVP)
    *Raphael Furcal (Still playing strong and outstanding ss)
    *Edgar Renteria (Don’t laugh, he has won gold gloves, hits well and has
    won a world championship)
    *Troy Tulowitzki ( Young player with power who will likely change
    positions)
    *Jose Reyes (Still very young and already has some impressive stats.)
    *Hanley Ramiriz (Young, powerful and talented with many more years
    to compile big numbers.)

    This is steep competition for J-Roll. I personally hope he makes it in and the next five years will tell the story.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Omar Vizquel is a LOCK

     
  • Posts: 0 Bob in Bucks

    Nice article.

    I think Dipsy put it right, IF JRoll can keep it up for another 5 years he is a good candidate for HOF. I don’t think he is in the top category but he is a very good SS and can swing the bat (maybe too often, but he can hit).

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    If Andre Dawson’s a HOFer Jimmy is but he isn’t… Will go down as a very good player once its all said and done but not hall worthy.

    Of that group only Jeter and Vizquel are hall worthy no question, but when you consider all of the guys from this generation who’ll be going on the the ballot who are question marks the rest of those guys are third tier at best. Garciaparra vs Vlad, Reyes vs Adam Dunn…

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    ^Rollins is 128th on the steal list which is his real ‘sexy’ attribute…

    Looking at it he’s going to be nowhere near the passing grade on any of the main categories. Love the guy but he’s not near being on pace for the hall right now (unless anyone can see anything in his numbers to suggest otherwise)

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    To get in the HOF . . . you generally have to be THE BEST for like a decade

    He’s not there

    Utley needs to have 5 great seasons still before he would get in

    and same for Howard..

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    This article reminds me of an argument that was made on here some months ago about Chase Utley being a future HOFer.

    Can we please just wait a few years before we start the induction process on some of these guys that are WAAAAYYYY to young for discussion.?? In Jimmy’s case, he may have only played HALF of his total time…..that’s too early to start suggesting HOF credentials.

     
  • Posts: 0 shag beta sigma delta

    For once I totally agree with you Dipsy, five more years of good stats and he would have to be considered. Especially if the Phillies get to three straight WS or if he wins another one or two in the next five years, that stuff matters. Like it or not Jimmy was the cornerstone of this team, and played very hard when they were bad, and is the face of this team, I love Utley and Howard but the came up after him, so you can say they built around Jimmy. And way too much has been said obp, he gets on enough to score 100+ runs a year so he has to get on base some time. You also have to take these guys in the generation they played, tilio, rayes, and rameriz are not really his peers per say, you are looking at Jeter, Renteria, Tajada and Nomar. All of which except for Jeter, I would put behind Jimmy. Nomar didn’t stay healthy, Tajada linked to roids, Renteria, too much of a jouneymen for me.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Chase is right up there with the very best to ever play 2nd base offensively. I personally project forward think Chase will have a better case than Ryan as there will be so many 500HR guys but appreciate the counter-argument.

    Jimmy is a great offensive shortstop but nowhere near the top all-time when you project him out, he’s not climbing up the lists as he’s barely on them and he’s had his bit outage years. Greatest Phillies shortstop but his numbers offensively don’t stand out, he’ll be nowhere near even the grey area with hits, steals, doubles.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Again….for all three of these guys….Howard, Utley, and Rollins….I just think that you need to wait AT LEAST five years….before even having this discussion.

    They are all awesome players in their own right…..and, yeah….if they continue to play like crazy….then they might/should/could/maybe will be considered.

    But they aren’t close to being there yet….and so much can happen between now and then. Career-ending injury. Steroids (although, I doubt it with these guys). Just hitting a wall and playing below potential for several years. Etc. Etc. Etc.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    Renteria, Tejada, aren’t close… Nomar is likely to be on the Scotty Rolen, Jeff Bagwell, Don Mattingley list of what ifs.

    I love Jimmy, pisses me off sometimes with the nonchalant over-confidence sometimes but he is one of the great Phillies, problem is he’s not even going to be touching the top 75 in 5 years in his top offensive categories even with MVP caliber years, he’d need to be somewhere near the top in at least a couple with the awesome glove numbers. There are just gonna be too many unsexy guys with a hall worthy number somewhere like Biggio’s and Helton’s pass over for a Rollins.

     
  • Posts: 0 mikemike

    The hall of fame issue to me at this point is senseless ,not enough time to judge him for hall of fame. Cal defense at short was a joke. saw a lot of him he had no range but if you want to say he did go ahead, he was a offense shortstop just like ramirez for florida is, ramirez is a error machine ,but his offense numbers if he keeps up will get him in. but the hall should be for all around play but thats another story.

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    I saw a lot of him as well…..and I DO “want to say he did” (have range)

    Thanks for the permsission, mikemike….now crawl back into your dark, dingy hole.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    Carlton Fisk. One of the greatest offensive players? No. But he’s a catcher. Ryne Sandberg. One of the greatest offensive players? No. But he’s a second baseman. C, SS, 2B are not held to the same offensive threshold as other positions. That said, to say that Jimmy will not be in the top 50 or 75 of anything does not necessarily mean as much. If Fisk and Sandberg played the OF, they wouldn’t have gotten in. When Jimmy ends up with 2,800 hits and has been to the Series four times, winning twice, been MVP once, has 7 GG’s, just keep him out. And all those achievements are realistic.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    Series 4 times and winning twice….WRONG!!!

    That should be winning THREE times….

    …..just wanted to clarify.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Original Chuck P

     
  • Posts: 0 Chuck

    That sucks.

     
  • Posts: 0 NJ

    For a C, SS, 2nd basemen to be hall worthy offensively they have to excel in an area like Craig Biggio with hits and doubles and he’s considered to be a borderline at best, Jimmy’s going to have to go a long way to reach even that level and he doesn’t have many good offensive years left in him, he isn’t Jeter offensively.

    He’s like Bernie Williams, great player of his generation to watch, hell of a team leader but even for an SS he doesn’t look to have the numbers.

     
  • Posts: 0 The Dipsy

    NJ – He doesn’t need Biggio numbers if he has won an MVP and two WS. Thats big time stuff. How many SS have won the MVP? The strength of his stats and a push from the currents of an alltime great club will carry him in. Houston sucked. Thats why Biggio is not in. He plays for the a WS winner and wins an MVP, he walks in. Vizquel has no shot. Bernie never won an MVP played OF/DH. Guys like him are a dime a dozen. I can name you ten guys better than him that aren’t in.

    The Dipsy

     
  • Posts: 0 bfo_33

    The guys (or the fan bases) who fight the most for HoF credentials are usually those who don’t have a ring (Jim Rice, Whitey, Dawson). My guess is that at the end of his career, Jimmy will be much happier with his 3 or 4 rings.
    Also, don’t consider Cal joke at short, played hard, caught everything he could get, but he didn’t move to his right very well. Similar to Jeter with more power, less contact, only average defensively.

     
  • Posts: 0 Manny

    Oh no Polanco!! Straining your right knee doesn’t sound too good…

    CRAP.
    Vic back to the 2nd hole?

     
 
Leave a Comment

>> Create a new Phillies Nation account.
>> Already registered with Phillies Nation? Log in here.
>> Comment without logging in:






Please ensure your comments comply with our Comment Policy.