Rollins Straightforward in Free Agent Stipulations
Posted by Pat Gallen, Wed, October 12, 2011 08:24 AM | Comments: 15
Analysis, News, Opinion, Posts
Almost a year ago to the day, Jayson Werth sat on the stage in front of the hoard of media in the Phillies press conference room in the bowels of Citizens Bank Park. He gave the answers you thought he would, proclaiming he’d had a wonderful time in Philadelphia and will always love the fans. But there was always a sense that Werth would take the money and run. The Phillies were not willing to overpay for an outfielder, so it was pretty well known he wouldn’t be back.
As Jimmy Rollins took the podium on Tuesday, for what could be the final time as a Phillie, there was much more uncertainty regarding the face of the franchise than there had been with Werth in 2010. Manning shortstop since 2001 on a full-time basis, the Phillies wouldn’t feel like the Phillies without J-Roll. That infectious smile, that rocket arm, that big mouth that ruffled some feathers, but was the catalyst for a playoff berth in 2007; Rollins will have some suitors once free agency begins.
At 32, it’s clear Rollins is no longer the guy he was at 28, the age when he won the National League Most Valuable Player award and led the Phillies to the playoffs for the first time in 14 seasons.
First off, his bat has slowed down. Rollins’ OPS took a leap this year, going from a career-low .694 in 2010 to .734 in ’11. The bad news: this year was the second lowest OPS of his career, although in fairness, numbers were down across baseball again this season.
On Tuesday, Rollins made it painfully obvious that he’ll test the waters in free agency and he won’t come out until he’s got cash the way he wants it.
“Obviously, if I was to go somewhere else, it’d be probably for money, and for years, and to another good team. I’m just not gonna go somewhere just because they’re giving you a lot of money. It has to be the right circumstance.”
During his final interview of the 2011 season, Rollins made no bones about his intentions.
Can you fault him? Rollins has been grossly underpaid by industry standards over the last few seasons.
Just after Rollins inked his long-term pact, Chase Utley signed one for nearly double. Ryan Howard, Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee; the Phillies broke the bank for all of them. Raul Ibanez and Brad Lidge both got more.
Luckily for the hoards of Phillies fans who have been wondering where he’ll go and what his plans are this offseason, J-Roll assured them that Philly is the place he wants to be first and foremost. But heis prepared to move on to an organization that is willing to go five-years on a deal.
“When the offer’s on the table – well first, like I said, from the Phillies, see how that goes. And then if that doesn’t work out exactly how I would like for it to, we’ll weigh all the other options in and see what makes sense.”
If anything, applaud him for bucking the ever-growing trend of star athletes wearing clichés out en masse. Rollins could have said, “we’ll see what happens” or “it’ll play itself out.” He could have taken the high road, but he didn’t. He let everyone know what his true intentions were.
So, if this is it, then it’s been a fun ride through twists and turns of the past decade. If you go Jimmy, we’ll miss you. But we’ll all move on.

















Posts: 0 Jeff
I hate Barkley but agree with what he said. I also hate the new NBA. He said the owners don’t want the MLB in NBA. Where there are 20 horrible teams and all the good players go to the Yankees redsox or phillies. It’s now happening in the NBA.
Posted: 08:33 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1353 Brooks
Who in the F* gives a damn what Charles Barkley has to say about anything? Whatever
It will be a different look for the Phils in 2012 and it really needs to be. This has been a hell of a ride and its time to adjust the surroundings, reset the furniture, retool the forces – it will be OK. Jimmy and a few others are going through what every player, every franchise experiences – a decline in skills, age creeps up.
There are short stops out there for the taking, the Orioles may have found a gem in J.J. Hardy. He hit 30 hrs this year, his fielding percentage was the best of his career (he was never in Rollins category defensively but topped Rollins this year with a .990%, 6 errors in 620 fielding chances – meaningful as this stat may be), his average this year was in the high .260′s (same as Jroll). Yes, his OBP% stinks (.310 this year), yet his slugging % was nearly .500. Never known as a speedster, what does that matter in Cholly’s system anyway?
My point, which should not be taken lightly is this guy made $5.8 mil with incentives I believe he made $7 mil. total. This guy is a free agent 2012 (according to rotoworld).
Vic (cf)
Utley (2)
Mayberry (lf)
Howard (1b)
Pence (rf)
Hardy (2b)
3b ??
Ruiz (c)
Whatever becomes of 3rd base, in this lineup you would still have hitters 2 through 6 capable of hitting between 20 and 40 hrs.
Posted: 09:39 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1353 Brooks
BTW – I forgot to add that Hardy will be 30 in August of 2012 – sounds like a 3 year deal might be an option?
Posted: 09:41 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1374 Pat Gallen
Brooks I like that you’re thinking outside the box, but you can’t just pick up a guy like JJ Hardy. Doesn’t work like that. The Orioles signed him to keep him I would think. (He just signed a 3 year extension that goes into effect this year). Plus, he’s had a really up and down career. I just don’t see that as feasible.
3B is Polanco, whether we like it or not. If they can keep him healthy, Amaro talked about how he wants more people to hit like him. And when he is completely healthy, which might be a pipedream, Polly can be a .300 guy.
Posted: 09:54 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1637 Chuck A.
I like JJ Hardy but who would you trade for him? Who would the O’s want? I agree, too, that while a nice player, I’m not sure that I’d want him for more than one or maybe two years. If Jimmy leaves, the Phillies just need a stopgap til Galvis is ready (maybe in 2013?). I’d say if that’s the case, just bring back Valdez and MiniMart and have them fight over it or share it. It would be for one year and it’s a cheap option. And I’m sure there are other Valdezs and MiniMarts out there as well. I think that the Phillies need to go into this thinking that they will lose Jimmy (which I think is very real) and build around that idea.
So maybe with Polanco a question mark, Ryan out til June/July, Rollins gone, and Chase’s health in the back of everyone’s mind….Don’s idea of Aramis Ramirez…AT THE RIGHT PRICE AND TERMS….isn’t a bad thought…
Posted: 10:09 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 76 branderson925
Man, losing J-Roll would be a real tough pill to swallow.
After gaining my peak interest in the Phils around 2001 (and still maintaining it) J-Roll, Bobby A-Breu, and Dare I say it Rolen were my childhood/early teen heros.
Like the author says, it will be tough to imagine this team without the face of their franchise. Kind of like the Mariners without Griffey.
Yes, I know Rollins’ numbers are down but so are a lot of SS. It is real tough nowaday to get a get a SS who is more than just average at the plate. BUT, if Rollins wants five years, that is completely ridiculous and we can not afford as a franchise to bunker down that much money and commitment to a deal like that. I love the guy, he’s been a hero to Philly but seriously do we want him after he’s 35? Idk. With this trend of injuries over the past couple of season with the Phils it pains me to say we can’t do this. We NEED to get younger.
GO PHILS!
(6 more months baby!)
Posted: 10:14 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 0 Don M
Part of my Aramis Ramirez idea was if rollins wouldn’t be back, and you went with the 1-2 year rental shortstop … Furcal..Wilson, etc… somebody thats a little bit more consistent with the bat than what Freddy Galvis could give you
but we dont even know that Ramirez is leaving Chicago … (I dont think he will)
AND… from Amaro’s quotes they are planning on a healthy, productive Polanco. . . . my thought on this was if Polly would benefit for more rest … or if Howard is going to miss a lot of time .. utley could play 1st (save his legs a little), Polly to 2nd … Mayberry stays in LF… etc..
but its too early for all the what-ifs
Posted: 10:26 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1353 Brooks
My point about Hardy is that there are viable options available, even if short term (until as Chuck said) perhaps Glavis is ready or something something else pops up.
Posted: 10:29 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1353 Brooks
All this chatter about Glavis too, lets not forget he is unproven and will remain so until he gets to the bigs.
Posted: 10:36 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 680 The Original Chuck P
Two articles that you might be interested in…
http://baseballjunkies.blogspot.com/2011/07/free-agents-class-of-2012-jimmy-rollins.html
http://baseballjunkies.blogspot.com/2011/10/nlds-philliescards-recap-part-2.html
Posted: 10:36 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 0 TheDipsy
Galvis has been ready defensively for three years. Gimme 4/45/.240 and I’ll be happy. And all that money you’d be saving would allow you to go out and get a big bat, by trade or FA. Galvis and Valdez at SS is no problem. Move Polanco to second. He’s a better 2B than a 3B. Move Chase to 1B. That means you can find a power bat to put at 3B. Or keep it the way it is and put the power bat at 1B. OR put Mayberry at 1B and put the power bat in LF. Simply put, you could go get the best bat that plays either LF, 1B, or 3B and then move the guys to their positions to accomodate. I’ll take Matt Kemp, thanks.
The Dipsy
Posted: 11:26 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 0 Don M
Interesting artcile about the RedSox collapse …. definitely worth a read to any baseball fan .. and a postive note about possible-Closer candidate, “…and Jonathan Papelbon among the team’s hardest workers… ”
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2011/10/12/red_sox_unity_dedication_dissolved_during_epic_late_season_collapse/?page=full
Posted: 11:28 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1637 Chuck A.
Only one word I can think of to respond to that article….. WOW.
Posted: 12:14 PM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 1637 Chuck A.
So, Dipsy, you’d move Galvis to the major league level right now, right? Not sure I’d do that and I don’t think the Phillies will…but I get your reasoning. I think he needs a full year at AAA before he’s ready. 2013.
Posted: 11:32 AM on October 12, 2011
Posts: 0 bacardipr05
The thing is with all the plans of having Valdez or having Galvis do you think a diminished offense like ours can absorb another weak bat. If we where say the Cardinals then possibly yeah. We need the best possible offensive and defensive person possible. Absorbing a possible .220 hitter will only make the situation that much worse,
Posted: 01:56 PM on October 12, 2011