Quantcast


Blanton’s 2011: A Year to Forget

Posted by Pat Gallen, Mon, November 14, 2011 03:35 PM | Comments: 23
2011 Player Review, Analysis, News, Opinion, Posts

Hey, I'm still here.... (PHOTO: AP)

We continue our 2011 Player Reviews with starting pitcher Joe Blanton.

If you’re making eight figures and post a 4.85 ERA over the last two seasons, plus have spent a long stretch on the disabled list with arm trouble, people get a little ticked off. That’s where things stand with Joe Blanton after an ugly 2010 season and an even worse 2011.

It was a doomed year basically from the get-go. In his first start of the year against the New York Mets, Blanton allowed seven earned runs in 4 1/3 innings, and it was basically chalked up to one of those days early in a long season. His next start against the Nationals was better, although most any start would be. Blanton got through six innings, giving up five earned runs.

Not long after, the elbow troubles began. In late April, he hit the disabled list with nerve damage, taking with him a 5.92 ERA through just four starts. He’d come back on May 9, make two starts that lasted just five innings each, and then return to the DL on May 23, staying there until he would return in a bullpen role on September 5.

Blanton did not start again for the remainder of the year, but did throw a few innings out of the pen in some meaningless games. He also pitched in the Florida Instructional League in mid-October, reportedly hitting 90 on the gun consistently. At that time, the big righty said he would rest his arm in the offseason, opting to go without surgery.

Surgery or not, 2012 MUST be a better season for Blanton because his 2011 was an expensive wash. Luckily enough for the team, Vance Worley and Kyle Kendrick stepped in and were outstanding as starters (taking into account Oswalt’s DL stints, as well). If they hadn’t gotten such production from them, Blanton’s disappointing campaign would have been even more apparent. Injuries do happen, but his 2011 did nothing to provide the naysayers much positive reinforcement.

In 2012, Blanton will again make over $10 million. They pay him that to be an innings eater – not to be a Cy Young candidate, but more or less to keep the bullpen as fresh as a back-of-the-rotation pitcher can. Moving forward, he’ll need to go past 180 innings and post an ERA of around four to be close to worth what he’s getting paid. As for this past season, it was certainly one to forget on many levels.

GRADE: 0/10 – Blanton barely pitched and when he did as a starter, it wasn’t pretty. He at least showed the elbow was OK late in the year, but for all that money, the Phillies got squat in ’11. We truly hope for a bounce back in 2012 from Big Joe.

 
 
  • Posts: 0 EricL

    Too generous!

     
  • Posts: 0 Andrew from Waldorf

    Interesting

    I didnt see fat Joe contribute at all to the loss to the Cardinals and their digraceful bull pen.
    But you all want those guys to come back. All of them.
    Heck give them raises long term deals.

    If fat joe is a 0 whats the big contract?

    A minus 1 million? Thats not justice. Try 1 billion?
    Not enough.
    LOL
    Moyer and Blanton caused this.
    Not a moron hitting 4th with a 342 sluggin pct who swings at 0-3 pitches

    Carry on

    Moyer and Blanton bad

    Big contract he goto hall of fame.
    Ask Donny
    Extend them all
    Forever

     
  • Posts: 0 BART SHART

    A generous contract cooked up by Amaro that bites us in the butt. But Amaro was young and inexperienced then. I hope he has become smarter and shrewder. We need a smart and shrewd GM.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Extend them all
    Forever

    Big contract he goto hall of fame

    Carry on

    Moyer and Blanton caused this.

     
    • Posts: 0 Andrew from Waldorf

      LOL

      you think hes elite.

      Or you play to the mortards?

      Either way its amusing.
      Until he does his thing in the playoffs.

       
  • Posts: 0 Andrew from Waldorf

    Fat Joe swung at a 0-3 pitch in the 7th down a run as the pitcher tried to walk the leadoff man.

    Fat joe makes
    20,000,000.00$ this year
    20,000,000.00$ in 2013
    25,000,000.00$ in 2014
    25,000,000.00$ in 2015
    25,000,000.00$ in 2016
    25,000,000.00$ in 2017

    It just makes me laugh. You guys lash out at cheese burger joe and Moyer or whatever turd they sign.

    But you want Utley and Rollins and the first baseman and Lee signed till they are 50 at 20 plus million per.

    the probelm is at First second SS and 3rd

    Seriously if fatso is a 0? Whats the waste of space who hits 4th with a .317 slugging who strikes out on 3 pitches to Arthur Rhodes?

    There is no numer to go that low. So I am giving fat Joe a 4.

     
    • Posts: 566 Brian Sr. of CO

      0-3 Pitch? no balls – 3 strikes? You sure about that one?

       
  • Posts: 0 Andrew from Waldorf

    Donny could read
    http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/Philadelphia-Phillies-Cole-Hamels-Jonathan-Papelbon-free-agency-111211

    Maybe comprehend?

    Or Donny say bestest team lost again.
    Best team score more runs.

    Donny say they best.
    Donny say sign long term.
    Donny bring in Soriano and Ramirez.
    Donny say throw in Zambrano

    Then Donny cry about 6th starter and utility infielder.

    Donny say best team lose.
    year after year
    Donny say crap shoot
    Me ask Donny
    If crap shoot why sign good players?
    Just roll dice

    Me take chance with new players.
    Donny stuck in 2008

    But still best and scored more runs again
    cause best
    Donny play to the stupid who think first baseman is elite and feared.
    Donny say so.

     
    • Posts: 2118 Lefty

      Hey Jethro, I posted that link here yesterday. Better get back to the cement pond with Ellie and Granny or you’ll miss the vittles. :)

      Seriously, read that link folks, Rosenthal can be a hack sometimes, but he’s spot on prescient with this one.

       
    • Posts: 566 Brian Sr. of CO

      Was that English?

       
  • Posts: 1637 Chuck A.

    It must be nice to have all the time in world to make up and post nonsensical sh*t online like AFW does.

     
  • Posts: 0 BART SHART

    AFW — try to make sense. I don’t want to feel like I’m wasting my time trying to decipher your written twaddle. When you “make sense” you have something to say. Your recent posts make you out to be pathetically mentally ill. Smarten up. You are better than that. Or…….maybe I’m wrong.

     
  • Posts: 0 bacardipr05

    Yeah Blanton has been pretty much a waste of Roster spot and payroll for that matter. Another player that we are stuck with till he rides the contract out.

     
  • Posts: 0 bacardipr05

    Blanton=Chupacabra

     
  • Posts: 0 Psujoe

    Blanton helped the Phils win a WS. He’s a very important piece this year. I’m of the belief a stud 1-2-3 and a serviceable 4-5 is the way to go although not at $10.5 mil.

    What would it cost to sign Jerry Hairston as a super utility guy?

     
  • Posts: 1353 Brooks

    I browse through most of AFW’s posts, in there (sometimes) is an interesting read perhaps from a therapeutical perspective…

    Back to the gist of this post. Please people, don’t forget how pumped a lot of you were before the season began to have Cheeseburger as our 5th starter. Regardless of past campaigns, he was deemed the final piece to the pitching puzzle. Here is what he did in 2010, started the season out with an ERA of over 7, until late May or early June he was awful. He did finish up the season with an ERA of just under 5 (4.82) which indicates that the second half of his season was near palatable. Consistently we’d arrive at game he was pitching in the hole 0-3 after the first inning.

    His trade value was at its zenith before this past season started. Once it started and he tanked, Blahnton showed his colors. I say if some team wants him as part of a package for what the Phils need, throw him in, PLEASE!

     
  • Posts: 793 Manny

    Remember that post about “what to do with Blanton” before the 2011 started? And almost everyone wanted to keep him… yup.

     
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    you had no idea that Worley would be effective at this level (still dont know if he’ll be effective after the league has seen him for a year … JA HAPP anyone?)…

    Kendrick was Kendrick .. then had a nice year this season .. …and to get rid of Blanton, they wouldn’t have gotten anything in return, and would’ve had to eat almost his entire salary anyway … they MIGHT have had a team take $1-2 M of his salary … but to save $1-2 Million … they thought it was more worthwhile to have a 5th starter. Can’t say I disagree with that logic one bit

     
    • Posts: 793 Manny

      Pre-2011 you definitely could’ve had a team willing to take on more than $1-2 million of his salary. Much more. At that time, trading Blanton would’ve been a salary dump (no decent prospects in return) but at least it would’ve freed up the remaining part of his contract –money that could be used today to extend Hamels, sign J-roll, etc.

      The Worley argument is weak because it doesn’t really matter who your fifth starter is. Had Worley been mediocre, we still would’ve won the division –and by a substantial margin. Come playoff time, a guy like Worley becomes irrelevant.

      Kendrick would’ve been a very good alternative and many times on here I advocated that he’d be fine in that role (if we traded Blanton). But for whatever reason we stuck with Blanton when he was clearly unnecessary and taking up substantial salary space. Mismanagement of resources 101.

      Now for 2012, Blanton did not undergo surgery and decided to rest it instead. That makes me skeptical about his health status. He was screwed early-mid 2011… why not go for surgery then… or at least now in the offseason when he would have ample time to recuperate? Sadly, no one will want him now and our best bet is to hope for the best and keep him around and get at least 150 innings out of him.

       
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    I seriously think you are fogetting that there was no market for Blanton ….. and how does it not matter who your 5th starter is ?? That’s 30-35 starts …. and hopefully 200+ innings of your season

    I remember reading on here how we should trade Blanton-for- Michael Young .. “because the Rangers need pitching” ….

    only teams with deep pockets can afford to pay $8-10 M on average to above average pitching …… often, its that solid pitching depth that gives teams good seasons and puts them into playoff contention .. but its a team full of $10 M per year players that limits the “puzzle pieces” that you can add like Pat Gillick used to do

     
    • Posts: 793 Manny

      Name me 5th starters at the beginning of the season who actually made 30-35 starts and/or 200+ innings.. probably not that many…. maybe even none.

       
  • Posts: 0 Don M

    Name me 5th starters …period…

    . I dont know half of the 5th starters in baseball, because they are generally crappy AAAA players, etc … and thus was the thought that the Phillies have either the advantage, or a hell of a chance in every single game last year regardless of who the other team had on the mound.

     
 
Leave a Comment

>> Create a new Phillies Nation account.
>> Already registered with Phillies Nation? Log in here.
>> Comment without logging in:






Please ensure your comments comply with our Comment Policy.